Fired FTC Commissioners Call Out Trump's 'Radical' Reading of Constitution
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A representative for the two commissioners of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) dismissed by President Donald Trump in March has criticized the administration's legal arguments as a significant departure from established legal precedent.
"The radical idea that the Constitution gives the president virtually unlimited power to fire independent commissioners at the FTC, the Fed, and other similar agencies has no basis in law," Amit Agarwal, special counsel at the nonprofit advocacy group Protect Democracy, told Newsweek.
"In fact, it ignores nearly a century of settled law that limits the circumstances under which a president can remove commissioners."
Newsweek has reached out to Trump's legal counsel via email for comment.
Why It Matters
Trump's legal representatives have argued that the president's executive authorities grant him largely unrestricted removal power over agencies within the executive branch of government. However, Trump's efforts to oust high-ranking officials and lower-level staff from agencies such as the FTC or the National Labor Relations Board have faced substantial legal opposition, on the grounds that these actions represent an overly expansive interpretation of presidential powers.
Alvaro Bedoya testifies during a House hearing in the Rayburn House office building in Washington on April 2, 2025. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on April...
Alvaro Bedoya testifies during a House hearing in the Rayburn House office building in Washington on April 2, 2025. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on April 23, 2025, in Washington. Rebecca Kelly Slaughter sits before a House committee in the Rayburn House office building in Washington on March 26, 2025. More
Annabelle Gordon / Alex Brandon / Mattie Neretin/Sipa via AP Images / AP Photo / Sipa via AP Images
What To Know
Agarwal is part of the legal team representing Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Martin Bedoya in their ongoing lawsuit against the Trump administration and high-ranking officials at the FTC.
According to their complaint filed late last month with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the two Democratic commissioners received a message from the president on March 18 that read: "Your continued service on the FTC is inconsistent with my Administration's priorities. Accordingly, I am removing you from office pursuant to my authority under Article II of the Constitution."
Slaughter and Bedoya are now arguing for their dismissals to be deemed unlawful and invalid, as they engaged in no "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office," per Title 15 of the U.S. Code, which lays out the rules governing the removal of FTC commissioners. The two are requesting that they be permitted to return to their duties at the federal agency.
In a filing with the Court on Wednesday, Trump's legal counsel argued that removing the two commissioners was well within his executive powers as laid out in the Constitution and established legal precedent, and that this action did not fall under the recognized exceptions to the president's "unrestricted removal power."
They added that any order requiring him to reinstate the officials would amount to "an extraordinary intrusion on the President's exclusive authority to exercise control over the Executive Branch."
Against this, however, Agarwal told Newsweek: "The extraordinary intrusion here is the President's attempt to give himself a power Congress withheld for good reason."
What People Are Saying
FTC Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter in March said that her removal violated "the plain language of a statute and clear Supreme Court precedent," and that President Trump had fired her because he was "afraid of what I will tell the American people."
President Donald Trump's legal counsel wrote: "Neither of the two narrow exceptions the Supreme Court has recognized to the President's otherwise unrestricted removal power—for inferior officers with limited authority and for multimember bodies that exercise functions that are legislative and judicial, rather than executive—applies here. FTC Commissioners must therefore be removable at will to ensure they, like the rest of the Executive Branch, are accountable to the people who elect the President.
"The President cannot be compelled to retain the services of principal officers whom he no longer believes should be entrusted with the exercise of executive power."
Amit Agarwal, special counsel at Protect Democracy and part of the legal team representing Slaughter and Alvaro Martin Bedoya, told Newsweek: "Americans are seeing right now how much damage a president can do by wielding unchecked power over the economy. Congress wisely protected economic regulators like FTC commissioners and Fed members from political firing to prevent any president from using these powerful agencies to punish their enemies and enrich their friends. This isn't about Democrats vs. Republicans or liberals vs. conservatives—it's about a stable economy governed by laws rather than political whims."
What Happens Next
On Wednesday, Trump's legal team filed a motion for the court to deny Slaughter and Bedoya's lawsuit. Their dismissal remains in effect pending the court's ruling.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Newsom: Pentagon lying over LA to justify National Guard deployment
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Monday accused the Defense Department of 'lying to the American people' in justifying deploying National Guard troops to the state to quell Los Angeles protests against federal immigration raids, asserting that the situation intensified only when the Pentagon deployed troops. 'The situation became escalated when THEY deployed troops,' Newsom posted to X, referring to the Pentagon. 'Donald Trump has manufactured a crisis and is inflaming conditions. He clearly can't solve this, so California will.' Newsom was responding to a post from DOD Rapid Response on X, a Pentagon-run account, which claimed that 'Los Angeles is burning, and local leaders are refusing to respond.' President Trump on Saturday deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area amid the ICE protests, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying the decision was made due to 'violent mobs' attacking 'Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations.' While protests have intensified in recent days, devolving at times into violence, the majority of gatherings have been largely peaceful. Still, California National Guard troops began arriving in Los Angeles on Sunday morning, with some 300 deployed on the ground later that day at three locations: Los Angeles proper, Paramount and Compton. White House officials have sought to highlight images of burning vehicles and clashes with law enforcement to make the case that the situation had gotten out of control. 'The people that are causing the problem are professional agitators. They're insurrectionists. They're bad people. They should be in jail,' Trump told reporters on Monday. In addition, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has threatened to deploy approximately 500 U.S. Marines to the city, with U.S. Northern Command on Sunday confirming the service members were 'prepared to deploy.' The use of American troops has rankled California officials, who have said the federal response 'inflammatory' and said the deployment of soldiers 'will erode public trust.' Newsom also has traded insults with Hegseth, calling him 'a joke,' and that the idea of deploying active duty Marines in California was 'deranged behavior.' 'Pete Hegseth's a joke. He's a joke. Everybody knows he's so in over his head. What an embarrassment. That guy's weakness masquerading as strength. . . . It's a serious moment,' Newsom said in an interview with podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen. The tit-for-tat continued when chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell then took to X on Monday to attack Newsom. 'LA is on FIRE right now, but instead of tackling the issue, Gavin Newsom is spending his time attacking Secretary Hegseth,' Parnell wrote. 'Unlike Newsom, [Hegseth] isn't afraid to lead.' Newsom, who has formally demanded the Trump administration pull the National Guard troops off the streets, has declared the deployment 'unlawful' and said California will sue the Trump administration over its actions. 'There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles, and to do so in this unlawful manner and for such a lengthy period is a serious breach of state sovereignty that seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation,' David Sapp, Newsom's legal affairs secretary, wrote in a letter to Hegseth on Sunday. 'Accordingly, we ask that you immediately rescind your order and return the National Guard to its rightful control by the State of California, to be deployed as appropriate when necessary.' In the past 60 years, a U.S. president has only on one occasion mobilized a state's National Guard troops without the consent of its governor to quell unrest or enforce the law. That was in 1965, when former President Lyndon Johnson sent Guard members to Selma, Ala., to protect civil rights protesters there.
San Francisco Chronicle
12 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
AP PHOTOS: Trump's new travel ban takes effect, and some protest
President Donald Trump's ban on travel to the United States took effect Monday. Demonstrators outside Los Angeles International Airport held signs protesting the ban affecting citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries. At Miami International Airport, passengers moved steadily through an area for international arrivals. Tensions are escalating over the Trump administration's campaign of immigration enforcement. The new ban applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ampere Analysis Breaks Down The Threat U.S. Tariffs Would Pose To European Film & TV
Speaking at NEM in Croatia, Ampere Analysis Co-Founder Guy Bisson ran the rule over the so-called plan to save Hollywood from Jon Voight and associates, and assessed the potential impact on the European film and TV biz. 'A 120% tariff on incentives to cancel out global schemes is patently ridiculous and obviously very damaging, potentially, to the European industry,' he said. 'Tax treaties, local tax treaties in the U.S., and incentive schemes, just like we use in Europe, clearly, are the way to go if you want to re-enliven your industries.' More from Deadline Donald Trump's Tariffs Deemed Unlawful & Blocked By Trade Court; White House Appeals Instantly Life After Peak TV: "It's A New World Order... There's A Rethink Required" - Berlin Streamer Content Spend To Top Commercial Broadcasters For First Time In 2025 - Report A draft of Voight's Make Hollywood Great Again plan, obtained by Deadline, included a mixture of production incentives and a 120% tariff on the value of a foreign incentive received. After he presented the plan to Donald Trump, the President public proposed a 100% tariff on all U.S. film imports, including productions that shoot in other countries. The NEM confab and sales market is held annually in Dubrovnik. The latest edition kicked off, Monday, with Bisson's session, which was entitled: 'Content Trends in the Era of Trump: Protectionism, Production and International Markets'. The Ampere executive set the scene by showing how the European content business has benefitted from the U.S. studios widening their production bases and streamers setting up shop in several parts of the continent, resulting in orders for thousands of hours of first-run programming. He also said international markets are key to those same U.S. giants monetizing their series and movies with, for example, 54% of the total box office for U.S. films coming from international markets, according to Ampere. Getting into the weeds on the suggested measures, he said a 120% tariff on any incentive received overseas is 'one of the most concerning aspects of the proposal, effectively closing the door on U.S. producers making use of any overseas incentive.' He went on to break down what might happen if the proposed measure were introduced with a slide that pinpointed the UK and Spain as the two biggest potential losers in Europe, given the volumes of U.S. production in both countries. 'Obviously the big European markets – the UK, France, Italy, Spain, Germany – are on that list, but so is Poland, for example, and Turkey, and the Scandinavian markets. They have been the [among] biggest beneficiaries of that 'runaway' production.' Speaking about the notion of tax treaties with certain countries for films substantially produced in U.S., Bisson said the idea is interesting: 'While you still have to make a majority, or spend a majority of the budget, in the U.S., you can effectively stack or double dip incentive schemes through those treaties.' He also said any re-introduction of rules that prohibit networks (and now, SVODs) fully owning shows 'would remove one of the things that's annoyed producers so much, which is streamers taking all rights in perpetuity.' Trump has said that he would meet with industry officials, and the White House said no final decisions have been made regarding the plan. Voight, Sylvester Stallone and a group that included studios and unions later wrote a letter to Trump emphasizing the need for production incentives While punchy, the NEM presentation was, thusly, analyzing what are currently theoretical scenarios. Bisson said that the best hope for the European biz is that theory never becomes practice. 'None of this is actually happening or being put in place yet, it's just a suggestion,' he said. 'Who can predict what Trump will do next. You may have heard the nickname that Trump has been given: TACO; Trump, Always Chickens Out on tariffs. That's what we can hope will happen again when it comes to our industry and the suggested protectionism being placed on film and TV.' Ted Johnson contributed to this report. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery Tony Awards: Every Best Musical Winner Since 1949 Tony Awards: Every Best Play Winner Since 1947
