logo
PM picked ‘wrong Chancellor and wrong priorities', claims Badenoch

PM picked ‘wrong Chancellor and wrong priorities', claims Badenoch

The Conservative Party leader accused Sir Keir Starmer of appearing at the despatch box 'all puffed up and self-righteous', and claimed he has 'the wrong Chancellor and the wrong priorities'.
Sir Keir listed 'three trade deals, record investment, breakfast clubs, social affordable housing, defence review' and the decision to pump £14.2 billion into building Sizewell C nuclear power station in Suffolk as being among his achievements.
At Prime Minister's Questions, Mrs Badenoch told the Commons: 'Last year he said he was taking the winter fuel payment away to balance the books.
'But the books are not balanced, in fact they are worse.
'This year the deficit is forecast to be £10 billion higher since the budget.
'Not since last year's election, since the budget.
'In what way are the books now balanced?'
Chancellor Rachel Reeves last year announced that the Government would strip pensioners of the universal winter fuel payment, unless they claimed certain means-tested benefits.
But the Government has since said pensioners with a gross taxable income of less than £35,000 will be eligible for payments of up to £300 each winter.
Sir Keir replied: 'She's obviously missed the interest rate cuts, the growth figures for earlier this year, the strategic defence review, local transport – £15 billion going in, free school meals, Sizewell, social housing.
'She stands there to lecture us, and I see Liz Truss is obviously back in vogue.
'Advising Reform officially now, haunting the Tories, and I remind her that the shadow home secretary (Chris Philp), I think he was then chief secretary to the Treasury, he gave a Liz Truss budget 9.5 out of 10.
'The Leader of the Opposition said what was wrong with Liz Truss's budget was not necessarily the package, that was alright, it was the way it was sold.
'They've learnt absolutely nothing.'
In a follow-up question, Mrs Badenoch said the Prime Minister mentioned Ms Truss because he 'wants to hide from his own economic record'.
She added: 'He's a coward.
'Every time he stands up there and talks about Liz Truss it's because he is scared about talking about his record and what is happening to the economy out there.
'Let's bring it back to the U-turn which he's running away from.
'A U-turn on the policy his MPs went out defending time and time again.'
Mrs Badenoch continued: 'This is laughable.
'He stands there all puffed up and self-righteous.
'Why can't the Prime Minister just admit that he made a mistake?'
In his response, the Prime Minister said: 'Three weeks ago I said that I wanted more pensioners to be eligible for winter fuel.
'I'm really pleased we've set out the threshold for the certainty that is needed.
'She says I don't want to talk about record.
'What about three trade deals, record investment, breakfast clubs, social affordable housing, defence review, Sizewell, we could go on all morning.'
He added: 'At the weekend she said that she would be getting better in the role.
'She could start with apologising for the Liz Truss budget, that would be better.'
Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle rebuked laughing Labour MPs after Mrs Badenoch said her PMQs performances 'get better every week'.
He told them their behaviour was a 'very bad look'.
In her question, Mrs Badenoch said Ms Reeves said the winter fuel payment 'U-turn won't be funded through higher borrowing'.
She asked: 'So, will the Prime Minister admit that it will be funded by putting everybody's taxes up?'
Sir Keir said: 'At the budget, we put record investment in our NHS and our public services – record investment – but she comes every week to carp on about national insurance, but she doesn't stand there with the courage of her convictions and say she'll actually reverse it, and the reason she won't?
'Because she won't stand up and say she's against the investment in the NHS, she won't stand up and say she's against the investment in our public services, and we'll all listen very carefully in just 20 minutes when the Chancellor lays out more record investment as to whether they welcome it, or whether they'll say they wouldn't support it.'
In her final question, Mrs Badenoch said Ms Reeves had 'made bad choices – bad choices that mean higher inflation, bad choices that have led to lower growth, bad choices that have meant that jobs have been lost every single month since Labour come into office'.
She said 'thousands of families' had 'lost their incomes in Stoke, in Grangemouth, in Luton', before she asked: 'Isn't the truth that we've got the wrong Chancellor and the wrong priorities?'
Sir Keir said: 'A wrong choice they made was making her Leader of the Opposition.'
Turning to the Government's plan to hand the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, where the UK maintains a military presence on Diego Garcia, Mrs Badenoch had earlier claimed 'Mauritius is scrapping income tax' and asked: 'Why on earth should the British taxpayer pay £30 billion for tax cuts in Mauritius?'
The Government risked jeopardising the 'vital intelligence and strategic capability' on Diego Garcia without a deal, the Prime Minister warned.
'Legal uncertainty would compromise it in very short order,' he added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer urges Iran and Israel to ‘step back' after strikes targeting Tehran
Starmer urges Iran and Israel to ‘step back' after strikes targeting Tehran

STV News

time27 minutes ago

  • STV News

Starmer urges Iran and Israel to ‘step back' after strikes targeting Tehran

The Prime Minister has 'urged all parties to step back' after Israeli strikes targeting Iran's nuclear programme. Israel launched strikes on Tehran early on Friday, rekindling fears of a full-scale conflict. Sir Keir Starmer said the Government urged 'all parties to step back and reduce tensions urgently' after the strikes, adding that 'now is the time for restraint, calm and a return to diplomacy'. He said: 'The reports of these strikes are concerning and we urge all parties to step back and reduce tensions urgently. Escalation serves no-one in the region. 'Stability in the Middle East must be the priority and we are engaging partners to de-escalate. Now is the time for restraint, calm and a return to diplomacy.' The attack appeared to be the most significant Iran has faced since its war with Iraq in the 1980s. Sir Keir's sentiments were echoed by Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who said stability in the Middle East was 'vital' for global security. 'Further escalation is a serious threat to peace & stability in the region and in no-one's interest,' he said in a post on X. 'This is a dangerous moment & I urge all parties to show restraint.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Defendants should have right to choose judge-only trial, says Leveson
Defendants should have right to choose judge-only trial, says Leveson

Telegraph

time37 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Defendants should have right to choose judge-only trial, says Leveson

Defendants are to get the right to ask for a judge-only trial without a jury. Under plans for 'once-in-a-generation' reform to reduce court backlogs, an independent review set up by the Government will recommend ministers should follow the example of Canada, Australia and New Zealand and allow defendants in the crown court to opt for a judge-only trial. Sir Brian Leveson, the senior judge heading the review, will recommend the move as a way to speed up trials to tackle the record backlog of more than 75,000 cases which is forcing some victims to wait up to four or five years for justice. He told a conference on modernising justice: 'I can see the advantage in lots of cases. You will get a reasoned judgment [from a judge]. In front of a jury, you don't get a judgment at all, you get guilty or not guilty. 'The case will be undeniably speedier because the judge doesn't have to explain to the jury all the basic premises of the criminal law.' Sir Brian is also expected to recommend that the public should be spared jury service if a case is going to last more than 12 months because of the 'unfairness' of it taking a year out of their lives and livelihoods. Instead, such cases would be heard by a judge without a jury. Other proposals will further scale back people's right to a jury trial for some lower level offences such as assault of a police officer while resisting arrest, racially aggravated criminal damage, dangerous driving and possessing a class B drug like cannabis. These are likely to be tried either by an intermediate court comprising a judge and two magistrates or by extending the powers of magistrates to try cases carrying sentences of up to two years, rather than only those with maximum jail terms of one year, as at present. Sir Brian was appointed by Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, who said that 'once-in-a-generation reform' of the courts was the only way to tackle justice delays for victims. Internal Ministry of Justice forecasts suggested the backlogs could rise to 100,000 without radical action. Sir Brian said there was a 'real risk that the system will collapse' as defendants take advantage of cases being delayed as long as 2029 and 'threw the dice' in the hope their victims or witnesses disengaged and prosecutions were abandoned. He also said it would be up to the Government to decide which types of cases it felt were appropriate for defendants to have the right to spurn a jury but he said the judges would have the discretion to overrule any request if it was in the public interest to do so. 'There are some cases, which I would not consider appropriate for a judge to try alone, and I would give the judge a discretion,' Sir Brian said. 'So a defendant may say, 'I would like to be tried by a judge alone', and the judge would be perfectly entitled to say, 'I think not'.' Public opprobrium He suggested one type of case judge-only trials could be where there was significant 'public opprobrium' over the case such as sexual or sadistic violence and could sway the jury. 'I can see defendants, perhaps charged with cases that attract public opprobrium being concerned about a jury coming in from their daily lives to face that trial,' he said. 'Equally, I can see if it's that much public opprobrium, why a judge may say, 'I'm not sure about that.' So there is a balance to be done, but judges make judicial decisions all the time.' He said it could also apply to factually or legally extremely complex cases where a jury may struggle to fully understand the case. A third type could where there had been alleged confession or identification, where judges tended to be more rigorous in scrutinising its validity than necessarily a jury. Sir Brian said there had been a limited number of cases where judges had heard cases alone such as where a jury had to be discharged due to evidence of jury tampering. He is expected to deliver his report to Ms Mahmood next week with publication expected in early July. It follows a similar review of sentencing by David Gauke, the former Tory justice secretary, which recommended freeing some prisoners as little as a third of the way through sentence to tackle prison overcrowding.

Readers Letters: Believe carbon capture project support when we see it
Readers Letters: Believe carbon capture project support when we see it

Scotsman

time38 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Readers Letters: Believe carbon capture project support when we see it

Chancellor Rachel Reeves says financial backing for the Acorn carbon capture and storage project is coming… but when, asks reader Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... More smoke and mirrors from the Labour Party and the UK Government. From my recollection this is the third time the UK Government has proclaimed financial backing for the Acorn carbon capture and storage project (proposed 20 years ago) but there is still no money on the table. While tens of billions of pounds continue to flow into projects south of the Border, Scotland is supposed to be grateful for the UK Government now declaring financial support for the Edinburgh exascale supercomputer a year after it cancelled funding. Increased public spending commitments have been cynically hailed by Labour Party politicians without reference to projected inflation increases or different spending choices made north and south of the Border. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad To cap it all, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray now hypocritically says that the Scottish Government did not spend last year's Budget increase 'wisely' when much of it was spent on increased public sector wages, while the Scottish Government also continued to mitigate the effects of Westminster-imposed austerity. Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves leaves from 11 Downing Street on Wednesday before heading to Parliament to present her Spending Review (Picture: Henry Nicholls/AFP) Or has the 'Governor' now abandoned the last vestiges of socialist principles he presumably once held and if that is the case why are Scottish trade unions still supporting a Labour Party that in government continues to betray the poor and disadvantaged in Scotland while being complicit in the continuing slaughter and devastation in Gaza? Stan Grodynski, Longniddry, East Lothian Power play It's good that Edinburgh is to be blessed with the UK's most powerful supercomputer, but what about the considerable electricity required to support it? Is there now to be a new power station built? For surely our creaking National Grid system will either need to be upgraded or a dedicated and separately managed power station will have to be built to service it. Elizabeth Marshall, Edinburgh Privacy paramount Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Jane Lax (Letters, 12 June) says the police are recording people's sex wrongly. She writes, 'The law is the law', but her description of the law on this is incorrect. The Supreme Court was clear that its recent judgment on the meaning of trans people's sex applies only to the Equality Act. For other law, it remains the case that a gender recognition certificate changes a trans person's legal sex 'for all purposes' (to directly quote the legislation). The Court also said that discrimination against trans people continues to be unlawful under the Equality Act. For the police to ask victims, witnesses or suspects whether they are trans, as a matter of course, would very likely be unlawful indirect discrimination, undermining trans people's right to privacy. The law allows an exception on a case-by-case basis: when asking is necessary and for a legitimate reason. There will be good reason to record that a suspect or victim of crime is trans in some cases where it is relevant to the nature of the crime, or where an accused person is remanded in custody. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But for the large majority of offences with non-custodial outcomes – theft, vandalism, speeding, and many more – whether anyone involved as victim, witness or suspect is trans will be completely irrelevant to the offence, and should not be asked or recorded. Tim Hopkins, Edinburgh Driving forces Harald Tobermann (Letters, 12 June) wants even 'more buses to ensure balance and harmony on our roads'. Actually we need fewer buses driving around with few passengers in them. Far too much taxpayers' money is spent on public transport and far too little on maintaining and improving public roads. The chaotic Edinburgh tram project cost £1 billion for eight miles and because it was years late and grossly over budget there was a public inquiry into its failings, which cost £13m. Meanwhile, Edinburgh has been turned into an anti-car city with bottlenecks caused by bus lanes, lack of parking, congestion, potholes, and more patches than Windows Vista. While Newcastle has a three-lane city bypass Edinburgh has a two-lane one which is often at a standstill. Sheriffhall roundabout was supposed to be replaced by a flyover with construction beginning this year. What happened to that? The fact is that road users – commercial and private – are being robbed by central government and mostly ignored by local government in favour of subsidised buses and mass travel. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Take, for example, road fund licence, or vehicle tax as the DVLA now styles it. This is £195 for 12 months for a car with a list price under £40,000, but £620 for the first five years if it is over £40,000. A £40,000 car will trouser the government £8,000 in vat. All this largesse doesn't go back into the road system, it goes straight into Rachel Reeves's piggy bank. A new road construction programme would boost economic development, as would reducing taxes on owning and driving cars, vans and lorries. William Loneskie, Oxton, Lauder, Berwickshire Sick society? Who will win a Scotsman Health Hero award ? Despite the nice picture of him on the front of The Scotsman of 11 June, is SNP health minister Neil Gray really in the running? Our NHS is floundering in a sea of crises, the latest being the recent sharp rise in drug deaths. This is even more awful given the SNP's 'clean' drug usage programme at the Thistle in Glasgow which was meant to really help. It is rumoured that John Swinney is considering a cabinet reshuffle. If Mr Gray goes, who can possibly replace him? This is not because Mr Gray is irreplaceable, more to do with the question as to whether anyone in the SNP is able to do the job following a long line of failures, including Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf. Mr Gray ought to have been a certainty for a hero award. The likelihood he is highly unlikely to get one speaks volumes. Gerald Edwards, Glasgow Fly high Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lt Cdr Lester May raises an interesting opinion (Letters, 10 June), but I regret to inform him that he is almost a whole century out of date (and more so in the UK context). Military aviation has become acknowledged worldwide as the primary armed force, without which a modern-day army and navy simply could not function. Postulating that a ship-borne or army-ancilliary alternative to an Air Force could ever work is, frankly, farcical. I could refer him to the many studies from the early 1930s onwards, but I think that the current UK perception as encompassed by the Chiefs of Staff Commitee is sufficient to vindicate a tri-service policy. Iain Masterton, Kirknewton, West Lothian Lines of sadness Former Makar Kathleen Jamie this week, commenting on the unveiling of her words on the Canongate wall at Holyrood, said: 'Poetry is democratic. It's available to anybody – through libraries, through memory.' How right she is. I was reminded of a beautiful poem of hers, 'Lochan', which ends with this line: 'underneath a rowan, a white boat waits'. This poem captures my sadness at the growing evidence of a crisis in democracy in Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Yes, a white boat waits for us all: possibly beside a flamingo or near a needless wind turbine. Let's hope there are some rowans left when our time comes. Mary Howley, Dunoon, Argyll Ferry tale It is somewhat ironic that EU rules put the final voyage of the Hebridean Isles ferry on hold, given the EU funded its construction (your report, 11 June). A grant from the European Regional Development Fund enabled financing of the project and a senior Director-General from the European Commission attended its launch by the Duchess of Kent at Selby on 4 July 1985. Stephen Fox, Edinburgh Lights out In all my years of attending art galleries and museums, I have never encountered such crass irresponsibility as that of Glasgow's Gallery of Modern Art, which clearly think nothing of putting visitors' safety at the height of the tourist season in jeopardy. The ground floor main gallery 'film installation' exhibition for John Akomfrah's Mimesis: African Soldier is in pitch blackness – apart from the small video screens – and near to its only entrance, hidden in perfect darkness, are two large concrete pillars, impossible to see until one literally walks painfully into them, and particularly hazardous to those coming in from the street whose eyes have had no chance to adjust so as to have the remotest chance of spotting the pillars in time. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad When I pointed this out to a staff member, their response was to shrug their shoulders and laugh. There's a twisted irony that this touchy feely, sensitivity training obsessed art gallery eschews basic common sense, never mind basic health and safety training that would never have allowed this dangerous state of affairs to have arisen, unless Glasgow Life (the city council's deniable asset Culture and Sport wing) are determined to bankrupt themselves in a litany of injury claims. Mark Boyle, Johnstone, Renfrewshire Mystery moon On Tuesday night I looked out to the south from my bedroom window and saw the moon, very full and riding high over the Pentlands, but to my amazement, it was bright red! Can anybody tell me, is this a natural phenomenon or is it a celestial forecast of impending doom? Enlightenment please. Sandy Macpherson, Edinburgh Write to The Scotsman

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store