
California Uber and Lyft drivers push for settlement in wage theft claims
Ride-share drivers in Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego held demonstrations in front of city hall buildings on Wednesday as California state attorney General Rob Bonta, city attorneys and attorneys representing ride-share drivers continue negotiations next week with Uber and Lyft to settle thousands of claims of wage theft for drivers.
At least 250,000 individual ride-share drivers in California who drove for the apps between 2016 and 2020 are estimated to be eligible for the settlement for wage theft claims of tens of billions of dollars, according to Rideshare Drivers United in California.
In 2020, more than 5,000 drivers filed wage and hour claims with the California Labor Commission office against Uber and Lyft, alleging they were misclassified as independent contractors prior to the passage of Prop 22, a ballot initiative that created an exemption for gig workers to be classified as independent contractors.
Daniel Russell worked full-time as a ride-share driver for Uber and Lyft between 2016 and 2020 in San Bernardino, California, and now works as a teacher and drives part-time. He estimates being owed about $300,000 from both companies in unpaid wages, including unpaid overtime, meal and rest breaks, and mileage reimbursement.
'The more I drove, it seemed, the more I got manipulated,' he said. 'One of the big ways you're losing is the depreciation on your car.'
During that time, Russell said he worked 70- to 80-hour weeks, often chasing bonuses or trying to make up for the unreliable and inconsistent pay, and put 270,000 miles (435,000km) on a single vehicle in just over three years before it broke down, just as he finished paying it off.
'I get very frustrated when I hear ride-share companies claim it's a part-time job, it's not meant to be full time. No. They created a market and business that is relying on full-time labor, so they have to take accountability for that full-time labor,' he added. 'They built this massive company on the back of our labor. They were undercutting cab companies. They took losses for years to make this happen. Hopefully they will be held accountable for the law they weren't following before they wrote their own law, Prop 22. Drivers are entitled to that money.'
Ben Valdez, an Uber driver in Los Angeles since 2015 who was working 20 to 25 hours a week during the four-year period, said he's owed nearly $200,000 from his wage theft claim he filed against the company.
'The companies need to pay the drivers what they what they're owed. They took advantage of a lot of drivers during the period of time,' said Valdez. 'It's not just about the earnings. There should be compensation for time based on the hours you actually work. The state of California needs to know that it's not just about the money owed. It's about changing the way that these companies operate.'
Ibrahim Diallo, a ride-share driver based in San Francisco, claimed his pay has declined over the years during his time working for the apps.
Studies, including those from the University of California, Berkeley, and the National Equity Atlas, have shown that pay for ride-share and delivery apps have remained significantly low, often below hourly minimum wage rates with expenses, taxes, and active working time taken into account, including after Prop 22 was enacted in California. Uber and Lyft have disputed low hourly average wages for drivers.
'I have struggled recently against homelessness while trying to still work as a driver,' Diallo said to Rideshare Drivers United. 'After expenses, many of us are earning less than minimum wage. This is inhumane. We need accountability and for the state to force these companies to make better standards for work.'
A spokesperson for Uber said in an email 'drivers come to Uber precisely because of the unique flexibility that it provides. Prop 22 safeguarded their choice to work independently, while ensuring important new protections. The voters of California have spoken – overwhelmingly – and we look forward to putting these years-old matters behind us.'
Lyft did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Uber's UK driverless taxi trial has Brits all saying the same thing
Futuristic robotaxis could soon be driving on UK roads, as Uber confirms its latest trial. However, the news has sparked debate online - with many brits sharing the same concern Uber has revealed futuristic plans to bring driverless taxis to the UK, but Brits have pointed out one big problem. Fully autonomous robotaxis — self-driving cars with no human safety net — could be deployed on London 's roads in the spring of 2026, the taxi firm has announced. The ambitious project is being conducted in partnership with Wayve, a UK-based artificial intelligence company that has been developing and testing driverless vehicle technology on the capital's streets under human supervision — as current regulations require. CEO and co-founder of Wayve, Alex Kendall, said: "The UK has been Wayve's home since 2017 — building this technology here has been an incredible journey, from testing our first prototype in Cambridge to deploying the world 's first end-to-end AI driver on public roads, starting in London and expanding nationwide. "Accelerating commercial self-driving pilots to 2026 positions the UK as a leading destination for the deployment of L4 self-driving technology. These early pilots will help build public trust and unlock new jobs, services, and markets. For Wayve, this means we can prioritise the UK for early deployment and help deliver safer, cleaner mobility to the UK. We're excited to bring the benefits of L4 autonomous mobility to cities around the UK." Changes in policy regarding driverless vehicles were revealed in the build-up to Uber's announcement — the government initially aimed to introduce autonomous cars onto British roads by 2026. However, this timeline was later pushed back to the latter half of 2027. Despite this, the government put forward an accelerated regulatory framework to allow smaller-scale autonomous commercial services, such as buses and taxis, to operate sooner, with the aim of fostering innovation and positioning Britain as a global leader in autonomous transport technology. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander emphasised the significance of this development, stating: "The future of transport is arriving. "Self-driving cars could bring jobs, investment, and the opportunity for the UK to be among the world leaders in new technology. With road safety at the heart of our pilots and legislation, we continue to take bold steps to create jobs, back British industry, and drive innovation to deliver our Plan for Change." While Uber is yet to confirm whether the robotaxis in the London trial will be available for public use, the company has stated it intends to integrate these vehicles into its UK app as a regular option as soon as legislation permits. The details of the trial, including the number of vehicles and operational specifics, are still being finalised. Uber and Wayve are working closely with regulators to ensure the vehicles meet safety and operational standards before they hit the streets without a human driver. Uber's London trial follows similar initiatives worldwide — Uber launched a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas in March 2025, and claiming its driverless vehicles there could work 20 hours a day, seven days a week — customers have the choice between a regular taxi or robotaxi, if there's one available, with no difference in fare. According to the Department for Transport, the industry could create approximately 38,000 jobs and contribute £42 billion to the UK economy by 2035. However, the introduction of driverless taxis raises social concerns, particularly regarding employment. GMB national secretary Andy Prendergast, emphasised the need to consider the 'significant social implications' of autonomous vehicles, including potential job losses for professional drivers. While members of the Great British public all seem to be saying the same thing about robotaxis on social media. One person wrote: "Not only would I not get in one, I wouldn't want to drive on the same road as one." A second posted: "No. No bloody way. For starters. How will they avoid the potholes? I'm sure London must have some even if it far less than the rest of us." Another agreed: "I wouldn't trust them but also wouldn't use them because it's taking people's jobs away!" While a fourth chimed in: "It's hard enough to trust an ordinary taxi." Although clearly in the minority, at least online, not everyone is so lacking in trust. One commenter said: "Yes, I can't wait to get a driverless car when you don't need a driving licence." While someone else added: "Arrogant human drivers are the biggest danger." Uber's upcoming robotaxi trial in London represents a major step toward integrating autonomous vehicles into everyday urban transport, with the potential to reshape the future of mobility in the UK and beyond — but it remains to see whether Brits will trust the tech enough to use it.


Metro
15 hours ago
- Metro
Moment cab passenger dives out of car to avoid paying fare
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video This is the moment a taxi passenger jumped out of a moving car to allegedly avoid paying the fare. Footage captured the woman dived out of a white Renault travelling at speed on a road in Itapetininga in Sao Paulo state, Brazil. The passenger is seen tumbling out of the rear right door of the car and landing on the road, before managing to pick herself up and limp away. Local media reported that she began to make her escape as soon as the cab driver requested the fare. A passing cyclist is seen appearing to stop to check if she was ok, before she is seen walking off. The taxi driver claimed he was about to drive to the police station after the woman said she didn't have the cash to pay for her journey. She had also given a different name on the way to the town centre to the one the trip was booked under. She was travelling with Ubiz Car, a local Uber-style ride-hailing service in Brazil. As of 2022, the app covered 24 cities in the country and had more than 5,000 drivers on its books. The lady eventually paid the fare, totalling 10.40 Brazilian reals (or £1.38) by bank transfer. In Brazil, cab hailings apps including Uber offer cash as a payment option when calling a ride. More Trending Last month, the Uber trialled accepting cash payments for all journeys in the UK outside London. Drivers can however opt out of accepting physical money if they are don't wish to handle the notes and coins or are concerned about passengers running off without paying – known as bilking. Those that choose to take cash can refund any change due via the app. While the US giant has typically battled Chinese competitor DiDi for the market in South America, several local startup rivals have more recently entered the fray. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: British journalist Charlotte Peet who vanished in Brazil four months ago has been found MORE: Beatboxing Nun shocks viewers with her incredible hip-hop skills MORE: Crypto boss 'chained up and electrocuted tourist before taunting him with chainsaw'


The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
Shocking moment passenger hurls herself out of moving Uber to avoid paying £1.40 fare
THIS is the shocking moment a passenger threw herself out of a moving taxi 'to avoid paying the £1.40 fare'. Baffling CCTV footage shows how the back door was wide open as the Uber travelled down the road. 6 6 6 The customer could be seen trying to ease herself out of the car and hit the ground already running in a bid to avoid falling. But the driver was going too fast for her to land steadily on her feet. She tumbled onto the tarmac, rolled over, and skidded to a stop moments later. She then picked herself up and hobbled off as a passing biker stopped to ask if she was okay. The bizarre scenes unfolded on 3 June in Itapetininga, west of São Paulo, Brazil. The taxi driver told police that the ride had been requested with cash as the selected payment method. On the way to the destination in the city centre, the passenger gave a different name from the one the ride had been booked under. She added that she did not have the cash, prompting the driver to tell her they would have to go to the police to sort the matter out. En route to the police station, the passenger opened the door and jumped out of the moving car. The taxi driver - according to her testimony - stopped, got out, and tried to talk to the passenger. The woman allegedly told her she would pay the fare - £1.38 (10.40 BRL) - via a transfer later on and asked for her account details. A local media source told What's The Jam: 'At the end of the day, she paid the driver.' 6 6 6