logo
Community Revitalization Levy sparks debate into use of public funds for private projects

Community Revitalization Levy sparks debate into use of public funds for private projects

CBC25-03-2025

The Community Revitalization Levy is in the spotlight for the millions of dollars it could provide to infrastructure projects in Edmonton.
But concerns have been raised over the use of public funds for private projects, like a proposed event park being built in partnership between the City of Edmonton, the province and OEG Sports and Entertainment.
A CRL is a tool that allows cities to take any tax revenue that would come from new development in a particular area, and then use that revenue to pay for the cost of borrowing for approved CRL projects.
Catalyst projects — those expected to bring more people and businesses to an area — can be funded and approved by the province through a CRL.
There are three CRL plans to fund projects in select areas: the Capital City Downtown CRL, Quarters Downtown and Belvedere.
Council approved a motion 11 to 2 to extend the Capital City Downtown CRL by 10 years to 2044, with Coun. Michael Janz and Coun. Erin Rutherford voting against.
What's proving to be a point of contention is determining which projects should be funded through the CRL, and which should be funded another way.
Why millions of dollars are on the table for Edmonton with the community revitalization levy
11 hours ago
Duration 3:32
The City of Edmonton, the Alberta government and OEG Inc. announced a $250 million dollar event park earlier this month. All three groups will share the costs for the park, with the city uses money from the community revitalization levy. But some city councillors are raising concerns over using public funds for private projects.
The province, the City of Edmonton and the Edmonton Oilers ownership group announced on March 7 that they were nearing an agreement that would pay for an event park beside Rogers Place and about 2,500 new attainable housing units north of Ice District.
According to city administration, attainable housing — within the context of the CRL — would be at or below market value.
City councillors debated this matter during two council meetings on March 18 and 19.
Part of the Capital City Downtown CRL is also supposed to pay for the demolition of the Coliseum, the former home of the Oilers, located on the corner of 118th Avenue and Wayne Gretzky Drive.
Pending ongoing negotiations, including a public hearing, the total cost of all projects is $408 million.
The event park has drawn the most scrutiny in the Capital City Downtown CRL plan.
The park is estimated at $250 million with the funding breakdown as follows: $97 million from the province, $69 million from the City of Edmonton, through an extension of the CRL, and $84 million from the OEG.
"If I had the choice between getting cash or gift cards, I always choose cash, flexibility, and here we are getting a gift card to the OEG store," said Coun. Janz questioning why funding was tied to financial partnership with the OEG.
"I am going to err on the side of leaning into my own values and not over intellectualize this, and say, at the end of the day, there are things that I cannot entertain in that extension, and they're not just even the ones with the OEG," said Coun. Rutherford.
"They're also ones with the subsidies for the attainable housing, because quite frankly, I don't think public dollars should be going toward private subsidies."
The Village at Ice District, which will contain the 2,500 housing units, is expected to cost around $68 million.
The costs for that will also be split and include $31 million from the province, $33 million from the City of Edmonton, through the CRL, and $3 million from the OEG.
Puneeta McBryan, CEO of the Edmonton Downtown Business Association, told CBC there is infrastructure that desperately needs to be funded to have work completed.
"Unfortunately, it's become fairly politicized in Edmonton, this question of extending our CRL, but we have infrastructure that is quite literally crumbling in our downtown," McBryan said.
"Whether you're looking at you know that last stretch of Jasper Avenue, between 102nd Street to 109th Street, or the entrances to our LRT stations, infrastructure that's older than I am that desperately needs renewal."
McBryan said if the CRL extension did not go through then the city would have to borrow for infrastructure improvements.
"And that becomes a tax burden on the entire city, because they have to borrow that through their regular capital budget."
Going to a public hearing
Tim Shipton, OEG's executive vice-president of external affairs, told CBC in a statement that the new event park will be unique and "one-of-a-kind in Canada."
"Public infrastructure site serving investments will fund critical public infrastructure for the Village at Ice District development, adding much-needed housing while encouraging downtown revitalization," Shipton said.
Shipton noted housing will be developed in partnership with multiple organizations and include "numerous housing typologies: purpose-built rentals, student, attainable, affordable, etc."
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Municipal Affairs told CBC in a statement that the investment would will help spark Alberta's and the City of Edmonton's tourism sector, create good-paying jobs and drive economic growth.
The statement said the provincial government is in support of authorizing the CRL extension.
"We anticipate having all necessary approvals to do with this package in place later this year," the statement continued.
Coun. Andrew Knack, who also expressed trepidation about the items tied to the CRL extension, put forward an amendment to the extension motion to independently verify a study by the OEG on the economic and public benefit of the event park and housing, which was passed.
"I feel like I could have voted no right away, but I wanted to make sure that everyone in Edmonton had a chance to have a say about this," Knack said.
Had the motion been voted down, the matter of the CRL could not have gone to a public hearing.
"I think there is fear that if we were to say no to this particular funding for those particular projects, that the province would just remove all of the funding entirely and that it can be used toward something else. I'm not sure that's the case," Knack said.
"I think if Edmontonians were quite clear that they have other more important priorities for that money in the downtown core, that that would hopefully allow the province the opportunity to say, hey, well, we still want to help revitalize downtown."
A public hearing on the CRL is expected to be held in June.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opinion: Edmonton's downtown plan must put people before developers
Opinion: Edmonton's downtown plan must put people before developers

Edmonton Journal

timea day ago

  • Edmonton Journal

Opinion: Edmonton's downtown plan must put people before developers

Article content A recent Edmonton Journal opinion piece (' Downtown Edmonton needs bold action now, ' May 13) supports a $553-million expansion of the Community Revitalization Levy (CRL), claiming that 'when public goals align with private-sector interests, the result is a downtown that is safer, cleaner, more vibrant, and more economically resilient.' This has been Edmonton's downtown strategy for decades: Subsidize developers, spruce up public spaces, and hope people move in. But the results are hard to ignore. Despite hundreds of millions of dollars in public investment, downtown remains underpopulated, and the revitalization taxpayers were promised has yet to materialize. Before council commits to another half-billion, we need to ask: Is this really the best tool we have?

Edmonton breaks ground on $1.3B Capital Line South LRT expansion
Edmonton breaks ground on $1.3B Capital Line South LRT expansion

Calgary Herald

time29-05-2025

  • Calgary Herald

Edmonton breaks ground on $1.3B Capital Line South LRT expansion

The latest expansion project for Edmonton's sprawling LRT lines broke ground on Thursday, that will, once completed, connect the current Heritage Valley transit centre on Ellerslie Road to Century Park by way of 111 Street. Article content Article content With plans to construct one underpass, two overpasses, and two additional LRT stations, the project is expected to take about five years to build and cost nearly $1.4 billion, barring any overruns on time or budget. The Capital Line South LRT expansion was prioritized in the city's ongoing transit buildout to accommodate what it expects will be 15,000 daily riders once complete because of the area's ballooning population. Article content Article content 'We are growing as a city. We have had over 140,000 people move here in the last three years. We're going to be a city of 1.25 million people projected by the end of this year. We can't stop building transit. We can't stop building ways for people to move,' said Edmonton's deputy mayor and ward papstew Coun. Michael Janz at the groundbreaking ceremony. Article content 'Alberta's provincial government is pleased to have committed $365 million in provincial funding for this project. Now this total includes a recent approval at the city's request to reallocate $41 million in provincial funding from the Metro Line and the Valley Line West LRT projects to support this Phase One of the Capital Line South LRT project,' Dreeshen said. Article content Article content Phase One of the project will add a high-floor LRT connecting the existing Century Park LRT station and spanning 4.5 km to the Heritage Valley Transit Centre, which is currently a park and ride, but will also get an LRT station as part of the expansion. The expansion includes an underpass under 111 Street and 23 Avenue as well as two new bridges over Blackmud Creek and Anthony Henday Drive. Phase one will also add an operations and maintenance facility on the south side of Anthony Henday Drive and a Twin Brooks LRT station. Article content Article content Dreeshen said the province's support for Edmonton's LRT projects ties into the Alberta government's plans to create an 'optimal passenger rail system' for Alberta. Further, he said the province expects to have a passenger rail master plan completed by the summer, which will outline a 15-year plan to create commuter and regional rail services around the province, including connecting Edmonton and Calgary's mass transit systems.

Edmonton city council discusses selling more naming rights for rec centres, rinks and pools
Edmonton city council discusses selling more naming rights for rec centres, rinks and pools

CBC

time21-05-2025

  • CBC

Edmonton city council discusses selling more naming rights for rec centres, rinks and pools

Social Sharing What's in a name and what is it worth? Edmonton city councillors wrestled with those questions on Wednesday. Edmonton city councillors debated the pros and cons of pursuing more sponsorship deals for city facilities on Wednesday, with some saying naming rights sales could generate much-needed revenue for the city — about $21 million over 10 years — and others saying facilities built with taxpayer money shouldn't have corporate names. Administration is proposing that councillors pre-approve the naming concept sale for about two dozen recreation centres, rinks, outdoor pools and storage facilities, allowing officials to initiate negotiations without coming to council to obtain permission first. Councillors Tim Cartmell, Sarah Hamilton, Andrew Knack, Aaron Paquette, Karen Principe, Jennifer Rice, Keren Tang and Jo-Anne Wright voted in favour of streamlining the process while Mayor Amarjeet Sohi and councillors Michael Janz, Erin Rutherford, Ashley Salvador and Anne Stevenson opposed it. "We are in significantly deep financial straits," Cartmell said during the meeting. "We need every partnership, every dollar, every opportunity we can." Any potential name sale deals would still have to receive final approval from city council. Ward Anirniq Coun. Erin Rutherford told CBC News in an interview that even though council has the final say over sponsorship deals, it can be hard for councillors to kibosh them after staff have sunk resources into the negotiations and revenue has been factored into the city budget. "It does feel very much like that end checkpoint is just a rubber stamp approval," she said. Excluding large rec centres Though council voted to give city officials more freedom to explore sponsorship deals, they later decided to reconsider that decision and contemplate excluding some large recreation centres from the list of facilities that could be renamed. Sohi said hundreds of millions of public dollars have been invested in the Clareview, Commonwealth, Kinsmen, Meadows and Coronation rec centres so they should retain their current names. City officials would still be free to negotiate deals for smaller facilities and amenities within buildings, he said during the meeting. City council postponed discussion on the issue Wednesday afternoon and it will be on the agenda for Friday's council meeting. Booster Juice decision The Terwillegar Community Recreation Centre was renamed last year after Booster Juice bought the temporary naming rights for the facility. The rec centre remains municipally run but the company paid for new signs and pays the city a sponsorship fee, which has not been publicly released. City officials told councillors during Wednesday's meeting and a community and public services meeting last week that the change has gone over well, without confusing residents or compromising the city's brand. "We've been rather impressed with the sophistication of our users, that they're very aware of the brand and whose money — theirs — has paid for these facilities," said Jennifer Flaman, the deputy city manager of community services, at last week's committee meeting. Councillors heard on Wednesday that of the thousands of inquiries the city has received from the public about the facility since the name change announcement, only three related to that topic. Public appetite for name sales A city survey in July 2020 found 80 per cent of more than 6,000 respondents were either comfortable or neutral with selling naming rights to offset pandemic-related costs. Another survey, in November of last year, found 65 per cent of more than 4,000 respondents were either comfortable or neutral with selling naming rights to offset operating costs. Coun. Jo-Anne Wright said feedback she received from residents in Ward Sspomitapi while out doorknocking last week reflected the city survey results. Mayor Sohi, however, said he heard criticism from residents who felt the Booster Juice renaming decision diminished community pride — and that the revenue generated by name sales isn't enough to solve the city's fiscal challenges.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store