Community Revitalization Levy sparks debate into use of public funds for private projects
But concerns have been raised over the use of public funds for private projects, like a proposed event park being built in partnership between the City of Edmonton, the province and OEG Sports and Entertainment.
A CRL is a tool that allows cities to take any tax revenue that would come from new development in a particular area, and then use that revenue to pay for the cost of borrowing for approved CRL projects.
Catalyst projects — those expected to bring more people and businesses to an area — can be funded and approved by the province through a CRL.
There are three CRL plans to fund projects in select areas: the Capital City Downtown CRL, Quarters Downtown and Belvedere.
Council approved a motion 11 to 2 to extend the Capital City Downtown CRL by 10 years to 2044, with Coun. Michael Janz and Coun. Erin Rutherford voting against.
What's proving to be a point of contention is determining which projects should be funded through the CRL, and which should be funded another way.
Why millions of dollars are on the table for Edmonton with the community revitalization levy
11 hours ago
Duration 3:32
The City of Edmonton, the Alberta government and OEG Inc. announced a $250 million dollar event park earlier this month. All three groups will share the costs for the park, with the city uses money from the community revitalization levy. But some city councillors are raising concerns over using public funds for private projects.
The province, the City of Edmonton and the Edmonton Oilers ownership group announced on March 7 that they were nearing an agreement that would pay for an event park beside Rogers Place and about 2,500 new attainable housing units north of Ice District.
According to city administration, attainable housing — within the context of the CRL — would be at or below market value.
City councillors debated this matter during two council meetings on March 18 and 19.
Part of the Capital City Downtown CRL is also supposed to pay for the demolition of the Coliseum, the former home of the Oilers, located on the corner of 118th Avenue and Wayne Gretzky Drive.
Pending ongoing negotiations, including a public hearing, the total cost of all projects is $408 million.
The event park has drawn the most scrutiny in the Capital City Downtown CRL plan.
The park is estimated at $250 million with the funding breakdown as follows: $97 million from the province, $69 million from the City of Edmonton, through an extension of the CRL, and $84 million from the OEG.
"If I had the choice between getting cash or gift cards, I always choose cash, flexibility, and here we are getting a gift card to the OEG store," said Coun. Janz questioning why funding was tied to financial partnership with the OEG.
"I am going to err on the side of leaning into my own values and not over intellectualize this, and say, at the end of the day, there are things that I cannot entertain in that extension, and they're not just even the ones with the OEG," said Coun. Rutherford.
"They're also ones with the subsidies for the attainable housing, because quite frankly, I don't think public dollars should be going toward private subsidies."
The Village at Ice District, which will contain the 2,500 housing units, is expected to cost around $68 million.
The costs for that will also be split and include $31 million from the province, $33 million from the City of Edmonton, through the CRL, and $3 million from the OEG.
Puneeta McBryan, CEO of the Edmonton Downtown Business Association, told CBC there is infrastructure that desperately needs to be funded to have work completed.
"Unfortunately, it's become fairly politicized in Edmonton, this question of extending our CRL, but we have infrastructure that is quite literally crumbling in our downtown," McBryan said.
"Whether you're looking at you know that last stretch of Jasper Avenue, between 102nd Street to 109th Street, or the entrances to our LRT stations, infrastructure that's older than I am that desperately needs renewal."
McBryan said if the CRL extension did not go through then the city would have to borrow for infrastructure improvements.
"And that becomes a tax burden on the entire city, because they have to borrow that through their regular capital budget."
Going to a public hearing
Tim Shipton, OEG's executive vice-president of external affairs, told CBC in a statement that the new event park will be unique and "one-of-a-kind in Canada."
"Public infrastructure site serving investments will fund critical public infrastructure for the Village at Ice District development, adding much-needed housing while encouraging downtown revitalization," Shipton said.
Shipton noted housing will be developed in partnership with multiple organizations and include "numerous housing typologies: purpose-built rentals, student, attainable, affordable, etc."
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Municipal Affairs told CBC in a statement that the investment would will help spark Alberta's and the City of Edmonton's tourism sector, create good-paying jobs and drive economic growth.
The statement said the provincial government is in support of authorizing the CRL extension.
"We anticipate having all necessary approvals to do with this package in place later this year," the statement continued.
Coun. Andrew Knack, who also expressed trepidation about the items tied to the CRL extension, put forward an amendment to the extension motion to independently verify a study by the OEG on the economic and public benefit of the event park and housing, which was passed.
"I feel like I could have voted no right away, but I wanted to make sure that everyone in Edmonton had a chance to have a say about this," Knack said.
Had the motion been voted down, the matter of the CRL could not have gone to a public hearing.
"I think there is fear that if we were to say no to this particular funding for those particular projects, that the province would just remove all of the funding entirely and that it can be used toward something else. I'm not sure that's the case," Knack said.
"I think if Edmontonians were quite clear that they have other more important priorities for that money in the downtown core, that that would hopefully allow the province the opportunity to say, hey, well, we still want to help revitalize downtown."
A public hearing on the CRL is expected to be held in June.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
6 days ago
- CTV News
Alberta government to introduce anti-speeding campaign
The Alberta government will soon be rolling out a new campaign targeting stunt drivers and excessive speeders. There have been 22 deadly crashes in Edmonton so far this year compared to 16 at the same time last year. After the province introduced new rules earlier this year, Edmonton was forced to limit photo radar use to school, playground and construction zones. Edmonton city councillor Michael Janz says advertising doesn't go far enough and more enforcement is needed on the roads. He says the province is playing politics. 'We don't need more posters. We don't need snazzy radio ads. What we need is enforcement,' Janz told media on Tuesday. 'The fact that the minister has taken critical tools away from law enforcement agencies, that they've been playing politics with this issue, is unacceptable.' Transportation Minister Devin Dreeshen says the province is working with law enforcement to identify times and locations where stunt speeding takes place. He says reports from law-abiding drivers will help identify those trouble spots. 'A lot of these racers, speeders or excessive speeders would have license plate covers or spray that they would put on their license plate, which would make photo radar completely ineffective,' Dreeshan told CTV News Edmonton on Tuesday. One political analyst questions whether a campaign will be enough to deter those who already take measures to conceal their identity when they drive dangerously. 'It looked like the government was getting less strict about enforcing things like speeding, and now it wants to get more strict with regards to enforcement,' Lori Williams, a political scientist at Calgary's Mount Royal University, told CTV News Edmonton. 'It would be important, I think, to message more clearly not just that this is dangerous and problematic, but that there's going to be more effective enforcement.' Dreeshen said the province is working on makingto make sure there is physical enforcement on major roadways.. He said the new campaign will run for two to three weeks, after which the province will evaluate its effectiveness.
CTV News
16-07-2025
- CTV News
Edmonton councillor talks infill debate, increasing housing options across the city
Edmonton city coun. Michael Janz speaks with Alberta Primetime host Michael Higgins about the city's infill debate. This interview has been edited for clarity and length Michael Higgins: Why is infill suddenly such a contentious issue? What drove the considerable degree of tension we saw heading into the summer break? Michael Janz: This issue is a big issue in many, many municipalities across Canada when you talk about how we grow and how we rebuild our cities. Our cities are changing. There's more and more people moving here. Premier Smith's Alberta Is Calling campaign has been wildly successful. We've added 150,000 people in the last three years and where they live and what housing choices are provided, these are big questions that not just Edmonton but Calgary, Toronto, Winnipeg, even Fort Saskatchewan and Sherwood Park are trying to wrestle with. MH: Blanket rezoning. Your Calgary counterparts, their decision on that, it is considered by some to be their most contentious of last year. Were there lessons that you took from what Calgary went through on the infill issue? MJ: There's always challenges with how you deal with growth. I think generally, Edmontonians know that we need to build in, not out. That we can't keep doing more and more suburban sprawl. It's financially ruinous. It's environmentally ruinous. Everybody kind of agrees that more density should be concentrated around more LRT stations, but that's challenging when you live on those blocks and there's a building going up next door, that's where we really get the rub. MH: You proposed a policy change that would have cut the number of units from eight to six at the end of your sitting, though council voted six to five against that. Why did that fail? Why did that not go through? MJ: It's funny when we talk about these numbers, because even in Edmonton, a lot is not a lot. Many of our lots are very different, and the point I was trying to make is that there is no universal lot size. We should be talking more about what is the appropriate amount of housing on a lot. That's a conversation we should be having when we say eight units anywhere. That's not actually true. The vast majority of lots, they're not big enough to even fit the requirements for eight units. There's a number of important changes we made. We made the architecture of the infills better. We made them make sure they're facing the street, not facing the neighbours. There's many of them that already exist in our communities. You go to Bonnie Doon or Richie or others, there's many infills that are unrecognizable. They just look like new homes and that's sort of what I'm trying to get towards. So the eight to six was more of a communication saying this is what you could fit anywhere, especially when we constrained the size of the box, we shrank it to half the lot. MH: Surprised it didn't pass though? Six to five was the vote. MJ: I think part of it was a recognition that in some cases where you may be able to do eight closer to an LRT, closer to another location, my colleagues still wanted to preserve that opportunity, knowing that at the end of the day, when you get out your tape measure, in most cases, you may not be able to do more than six. MH: Where do you weigh in on the issue of members of council dropping off the radar before the voting is finished? Before you're done debate on issues as big as this one? MJ: I can tell you, we knew this was a hot one. I had told my colleagues back in the June 3 Urban Planning Committee and before. I've been door knocking a lot and I can tell you, Edmontonians are very sour at a couple of councillors who were not present for the vote, in particular one who's running for mayor. I think I wouldn't be surprised if skipping that vote caused irreparable damage to their campaign. MH: Water under the bridge where council is concerned, or do you see more coming of this? Might this even be something where the province kind of leans into the conversation? MJ: The province, in the past, has said that they want to see more housing. Minister Nixon has said to me that he's very impressed with how Edmonton has been trying to welcome more housing and build more homes, especially around transit. That Edmonton City Council is very focused on affordability, that we want to see more homes with more transit choices and more housing choices where you can live, maybe with one car, maybe not required to have two or three cars. Having options for families that are more affordable and in better locations where people want to live. The province has been very favourable to this. Pierre Poilievre and Prime Minister Mark Carney have both said they want to see more housing across Canada. The two biggest issues in poll after poll, it's not infill, it's housing and affordability. Those are the big issues. We're taking action in that at the city level where we can. Edmonton has been on an infill journey for almost 20 years. We will continue to be. There's always going to be refinements, there's always going to be changes working on it. MH: Where does that leave the conversation then on Edmonton growth? Calgary as well? The need for housing supply, housing affordability, when you know that when you come back, there's an election coming? MJ: I was talking to the other city councillors, and for me, I have 20 neighbourhoods that have infill under construction, but almost seven or eight councillors don't have any infill in their wards. This is a very hot topic for three or four councillors in the city, but citywide and province wide, the main topic is still the housing crisis, where we're going to build homes, how we're going to build a more affordable city and more affordable province. This is what this is about. It's about more affordability and more housing choices for more people and no matter who the mayor is of Calgary, Edmonton, we know that we need to keep building homes, and we need to keep building them in places where people want to live. It's figuring out how to do that better, and that's what we're trying to do.
CTV News
16-07-2025
- CTV News
Mayoral candidate Tim Cartmell apologizes after missing council vote on infill
Edmonton mayoral candidate and current city councillor Tim Cartmell is apologizing after missing a vote on infill. After days of debate on the issue in which councillors heard from hundreds of residents, a motion was passed to delay a decision until 2027 on whether to continue to allow eight units mid-block. The motion passed 6-5 on July 8, with councillors Michael Janz, Ashley Salvador, Andrew Knack, Jennifer Rice and Karen Principe in opposition. Cartmell had pledged to curb infill from eight units to six as part of his mayoral platform. He was absent from the vote on July 8. 'I regret missing the council meeting continuation last Monday. I know many people were counting on me to be there, and I apologize for letting them down,' he said in a statement issued Wednesday. Cartmell said it was necessary to miss the vote to spend time with his family. 'I had made family plans to go to a distant, remote place in eastern Canada. A place deliberately chosen because it had no connectivity and therefore no distractions,' he wrote. 'To spend one final week with my family before the final months of the election campaign and hopefully four years as mayor during which there will likely be no opportunity at all to squeeze in a family vacation.' Coun. Erin Rutherford's seat was also empty on July 8, but she attended the meeting virtually while on vacation in Kelowna. Rutherford voted in favour of Mayor Amarjeet Sohi's motion to leave the decision on infill reduction to a later date after consultations are completed in 2027. Cartmell says he will continue to work to 'get infill right' if elected in October. 'I made a mistake. I intend to learn from it,' he said. Edmontonians will go to the polls on Oct. 20 to elect a new mayor and city council. Sohi is not running for a second term after losing a bid to win a seat in the April federal election.
