Changing the subject isn't working
It might fairly be argued that the depth of a person's desperation can be measured by the pettiness of the distractions they employ to divert attention from the problems they cannot solve.
Take, for instance, the current plight of U.S. President Donald Trump, who has been unable to quell the outrage among his MAGA base over his administration's failure and/or refusal to release information related to disgraced financier and accused pedophile/sexual trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, who is alleged to have died by suicide in 2019 while in pretrial custody in New York.
Factions of the MAGA movement have long been obsessed with the so-called 'Epstein files,' particularly the rumoured client list purported to include the names of high-profile individuals who consorted and travelled with Epstein and participated in illicit sexual activities organized by him at various locations.
MAGA agitators have demanded release of the list (assuming one actually exists), claiming it's essential to expose those who were party to Epstein's perversions. Prior to Trump's re-election as president in November 2024, several noteworthy Republicans — including now-FBI director Kash Patel, now-deputy FBI director Dan Bongino, now-Vice-President JD Vance and even Donald Trump Jr. — demanded its release and accused the Biden administration of covering it up to protect pedophiles.
Shortly after Trump's inauguration, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi was asked by a Fox News reporter whether the Justice Department would publish 'the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients.' She responded that it was sitting on her desk for review. When that 'review' resulted in a declaration that there is no new information — list or otherwise — worthy of public release, the MAGA world erupted.
The problem in all of this, of course, is that any close examination of Epstein's circle of associates is necessarily going to include Trump, who is known to have spent a lot of time with the financier, was photographed alongside him on numerous occasions and was referred to by Epstein as one of his closest friends.
And the sudden reluctance to release the Epstein files has caused the first real fracture between the president and his once blindly loyal base. Unable to convince his followers that there's no 'there' there, Trump has pivoted to another strategy that has worked in the past: change the subject, divert the attention, redirect the rage.
Weekday Mornings
A quick glance at the news for the upcoming day.
The release last week by the Rupert Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal of what is purported to be a lewd 50th-birthday greeting/drawing from Trump to Epstein seems to have accelerated the divert/distract effort; in short order, the administration released a trove of documents related to the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., and 'new' information regarding Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server.
While neither of those largely meaningless gestures is likely to dampen the current MAGA unrest, the president added a layer of absurdity by abruptly demanding that two professional sports teams — football's Washington franchise and baseball's Cleveland side — revert back to the names that had been abandoned because of their racist overtones.
Evan Vucci / The associated press files
U.S. President Donald Trump
There's only one reason Trump would attempt to re-ignite debate over the long-settled question of discriminatory sports-team names: because it fuels a dormant corner of the rage that drives the MAGA world's various ongoing grievances and passions.
The problem, however, is this: while this strategic slide into unprecedented pettiness will surely add to his acolytes' anger, there is absolutely no chance compounding the outrage in this tangential manner will make MAGA suddenly let go of an issue it has so determinedly stoked as one of its tentpole conspiracy theories.
Try as he might, Trump cannot make Epstein go away.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
a few seconds ago
- CTV News
Top Trump officials discussed Epstein at White House meeting Wednesday night
From left: U.S. Vice-President JD Vance, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel. (Getty Images via CNN Newsource) A much-anticipated meeting between U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, U.S. Vice-President JD Vance and others was moved from Vance's residence to the White House Wednesday night after intense media coverage, a source familiar with the logistics told CNN. They discussed a number of topics, including the Jeffrey Epstein case and potential next steps, the source said. The meeting was originally planned to take place at Vance's D.C. home and was also supposed to include White House chief of staff Susie Wiles and U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, CNN previously reported. The administration's handling of the Epstein case, as well as the need to craft a unified response, was expected to be a main focus of the dinner. Trump administration officials are weighing whether to publish an audio recording and transcript of Blanche's recent conversation with Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, CNN previously reported. The meeting was also seen as a potential chance for Bondi and Patel — who have clashed over the Epstein case strategy, including in a contentious meeting with Wiles and Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino — to clear the air. Vance had tried to play peacemaker between Bondi, Patel and Bongino previously. Vance and his office denied on Wednesday that a meeting on Epstein was taking place.
Global News
30 minutes ago
- Global News
Man charged with shootings of Minnesota lawmakers pleads not guilty
The man charged with killing a Minnesota lawmaker and her husband and injuring a state senator and his wife pleaded not guilty in federal court on Thursday. Vance Boelter, 58, was indicted on July 15 on six counts of murder, stalking and firearms violations. The murder charges could make him eligible for the federal death penalty, though prosecutors say that decision won't be made for months. One of Boelter's lawyers entered his not guilty plea on his behalf. The accused was present in the courtroom and wore an orange sweatshirt and yellow pants, according to The Associated Press. He spoke only to affirm that he understood the charges and thanked the judge. When Boelter was arraigned on June 16, prosecutors released a letter they say he wrote to FBI Director Kash Patel admitting to the murders. Story continues below advertisement View image in full screen This booking photo provided by the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office shows Vance Boelter in Green Isle, Minn., on June 16, 2025. Hennepin County Sheriff's Office via AP In it, he confessed to the June 14 shootings of Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark. It does not provide a motive as to why he targeted the Hortmans or Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, who both survived after being shot nine and eight times, respectively. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'Dear Kash Patel. My name is Dr. Vance Luther Boelter Ed.D. I am the shooter at large in Minnesota involved in the shoo 2 shootings the morning of Saturday June 15th at approximately 2:30 am and 3:30 am, or around that time. I will probably be dead by the time you read this letter,' Boelter wrote. In it, he made rambling mentions of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and boasted about the number of weapons he had stashed with him during his shooting spree. He concluded the letter by writing, 'I am willing to spill all the beans. I just want my family safe. They had nothing to do with this and are totally innocent. This was a one person job.' Story continues below advertisement On Thursday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Dulce Foster issued a revised schedule with various deadlines without setting a trial date to allow both sides ample time to review mountains of evidence. 'The investigation of this case arose out of the largest manhunt in Minnesota's history,' prosecutors wrote. 'Accordingly, the discovery to be produced by the government will include a substantial amount of investigative material and reports from more than a dozen different law enforcement agencies at the federal, state, and local levels.' They added that the evidence could potentially include thousands of hours of video footage, tens of thousands of pages of responses to dozens of grand jury subpoenas, and data from numerous electronic devices seized during the investigation. Foster on Thursday agreed that the case is complex and excluded it from speedy trial requirements. Story continues below advertisement The motive for the crimes remains unclear. People who know Boelter said he is an evangelical Christian, politically conservative and had been struggling to find work. Authorities said Boelter made long lists of politicians in Minnesota and other states — all or mostly Democrats. In several letters written to the New York Times via his jail's messaging service, Boelter implied his actions were rooted in part in the Christian commandment to love one's neighbour. 'Because I love my neighbors prior to June 14th I conducted a 2-year-long undercover investigation,' he wrote. The acting U.S. attorney for Minnesota, Joe Thompson, told reporters last month that 'there is little evidence showing why he turned to political violence and extremism.' Prosecutors say Boelter was disguised as a police officer and driving a fake squad car in the early hours of June 14 when he went to the Hoffman home in the Minneapolis suburb of Champlin. Boelter later went to the Hortman home, killing them both and gravely injuring their dog, authorities say. Boelter turned himself in to the police the next day. — with files from The Associated Press
Winnipeg Free Press
30 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump orders federal regulators to probe alleged bank discrimination against conservatives
NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order mandating a probe into whether banks have discriminated against conservatives and certain industries like gun manufacturers and cryptocurrency companies, invoking the vast powers to go after entities that the Republican president alleges have discriminated against him and his allies. The executive order deals with an issue known as 'debanking,' which is when banks close accounts of individuals or declines to go into business with certain industries. Trump has accused JPMorgan and Bank of America of debanking him and his companies in the past, something both banks have denied. Trump ordered federal bank regulators to make sure banks do not discriminate against individuals or companies for their political or religious beliefs. He also ordered bank regulators to probe when banks may have allegedly discriminated and refer the cases to the Department of Justice. The move could open banks to potential civil or criminal investigations, fines or punishments. When Trump and his party discuss debanking, they typically refer to banks closing the accounts of a person or company when they no longer want to do business with them. Banks usually say they close accounts or deny loans because the person or business is deemed too risky. The banking industry has long argued that it has a constitutional right to choose whom they go into business with, if it does not violate laws like the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. Th act, which was part of several pieces of legislation signed during the Civil Rights Movement, bans banks from discrimination based on race, ethnicity, religion, sex and other protected statuses. Another type of debanking is when government regulators tell banks to avoid doing business with industries or individuals. Democratic President Barack Obama's Department of Justice told banks to avoid doing business with 'high risk' industries, which included payday lenders and firearms manufacturers. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. This type of government-directed debanking is also known as reputational risk, where the historic reputation of an industry prompts banks to be more careful about banking and lending. Historic examples include entities who did business in high-risk countries, did business largely in cash or were repeatedly flagged by bank regulators. Conservatives have argued that reputational risk has become an umbrella term that allows banks to discriminate. The banking industry insists it does not actively debank and does not target specific industries or individuals. Banks have already been removing any mention of reputational risk from their policies and procedures, particularly since Trump returned to the White House. 'We don't close accounts for political reasons, and we agree with President Trump that regulatory change is desperately needed,' said a spokeswoman for JPMorgan Chase. The Obama administration's government-directed debanking has been a rallying cry for conservatives. It's one reason why the cryptocurrency industry backed Trump in 2024. While the Biden administration did not explicitly force banks to debank the crypto industry, Democratic President Joe Biden's bank regulators did express some public concern about it, a move that was read by banks as a reason to steer away from crypto. That phrasing by the Biden administration was often referred to as 'Operation Choke Point 2.0' by Trump and his allies. Republicans have introduced legislation to cut down on alleged acts of debanking as well. Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, chair of the Senate Banking Committee, has introduced legislation that would require bank regulators to no longer consider reputational risk as a factor in how they measure a bank's health and risk profile.
