logo
Can Greg Abbott Kick Out Fleeing Democrats? Experts Weigh In

Can Greg Abbott Kick Out Fleeing Democrats? Experts Weigh In

Newsweek8 hours ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott warned on Sunday that Democratic lawmakers who fled the state to break quorum during a special legislative session could be removed from office for abandoning their duties. Abbott cited a 2021 opinion by Attorney General Ken Paxton as justification, asserting that it allows him to declare vacancies and replace absent members.
However, a detailed review of Texas law and the attorney general's opinion indicates the governor lacks unilateral authority to take such action.
Why It Matters
Abbott's threat highlights a broader clash over executive power, legislative independence and due process in Texas politics. While Abbott cites Paxton's 2021 opinion to justify potential removals, the opinion indicates that only courts—not the governor—can determine whether a legislator has abandoned office. If a governor could unilaterally remove legislators for breaking quorum, it would drastically expand executive power and potentially override voters' choices.
Texas House members during a hearing at the state Capitol in Austin on July 10, 2021.
Texas House members during a hearing at the state Capitol in Austin on July 10, 2021.
Tamir Kalifa/Getty
What To Know
Who Is Greg Abbott?
Abbott has served as Texas' governor since January 20, 2015. A former lawyer and Texas Supreme Court Justice (1996-2001), he served as attorney general from 2002 to 2015. A Republican since his state Supreme Court appointment by Governor George W. Bush, Abbott is known for his conservative positions on immigration, gun rights and limiting federal oversight.
Who Is Ken Paxton?
Ken Paxton, a former state legislator, has been Texas' attorney general since 2015. As the state's top legal officer, he issues advisory opinions like his 2021 KP-0382 and represents Texas in court. In 2023, Paxton faced an impeachment attempt in the Texas House over allegations of corruption, abuse of office and bribery tied to his relationship with a political donor. The Texas Senate held a trial in September 2023 and acquitted him on all counts, allowing him to remain in office.
Quorum Breaks Explained
A quorum break occurs when enough lawmakers leave a legislative session to prevent official business. Legislative bodies like the Texas House require a minimum number of members present to pass laws—two-thirds in this case. In Texas, a quorum is the minimum number of legislators required for the House (100 of 150 members) or Senate (21 of 31 members) to conduct business. If enough members leave, they can deny a quorum and halt legislative proceedings. The tactic, which is used by Democrats and Republicans, is legal but controversial.
What the Paxton Opinion Says
Attorney General Opinion KP-0382 was issued during a 2021 quorum standoff. It addressed whether lawmakers could break quorum and whether such actions create a vacancy. The opinion concluded:
A vacancy may occur if an official "abandons" office.
Determining abandonment is a fact-specific question for a court.
A quo warranto action (a legal proceeding used to challenge whether a person has the legal right to hold a public office) must be filed by the attorney general or a district attorney for a court to decide if a legislator forfeited office.
The opinion did not rule breaking quorum unconstitutional, nor did it grant the governor power to declare vacancies unilaterally.
Historical Context
Texas governors have used legal and procedural tools to compel lawmakers back to the chamber but have never removed members for breaking quorum.
1870: Thirteen Texas senators left the Capitol to block a wartime powers bill, denying a quorum. They were arrested, and the bill later passed, establishing quorum-breaking as a tactic in Texas politics.
Thirteen Texas senators left the Capitol to block a wartime powers bill, denying a quorum. They were arrested, and the bill later passed, establishing quorum-breaking as a tactic in Texas politics. 1979: Twelve Democratic state senators nicknamed the "Killer Bees" hid for four and a half days to block a vote on presidential primary election rules.
Twelve Democratic state senators nicknamed the "Killer Bees" hid for four and a half days to block a vote on presidential primary election rules. 2003: More than 50 Democrats fled to Oklahoma to delay a Republican-backed redistricting plan. The plan ultimately passed after lawmakers returned.
More than 50 Democrats fled to Oklahoma to delay a Republican-backed redistricting plan. The plan ultimately passed after lawmakers returned. 2021: More than 50 Democrats went to Washington to protest voting restrictions. Arrests were authorized to compel attendance, and the bill passed after members returned.
What People Are Saying
Chuck DeVore, chief national initiatives officer at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and a former California lawmaker, told Newsweek on Monday: "The governor has threatened to declare a vacancy, which he can do. This does not require any sort of judicial intervention...under Article IV, Section 10 of the Texas Constitution...the governor can declare vacancies.
"I really think that eventually there will be members that come back...there are members that cannot withstand the financial pain...and potentially criminal action, because if it's found out that you took money from somebody in exchange for breaking quorum...that's illegal.
"What happened the last time [2021]...the average Texan simply looks at this and says, you're not doing your job. And what ends up happening is the public begins to turn against them."
Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston, told the Texas Tribune: "It's a messaging move...It's a last resort for Democrats who have run out of options legislatively and even legally."
Mark P. Jones, a political science professor at Rice University: "If we're going to follow our current primary schedule, we do need to have these districts approved by the Legislature before the opening of filing [for the 2026 midterms] in November."
The Texas House Democratic Caucus, in a four-word statement in response to Abbott's threats: "Come and take it."
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, during a press conference on Sunday: "We're going to do everything we can to protect every single one of them."
What Happens Next
Abbott ordered Democratic lawmakers to return when the House reconvenes on August 4. While he has threatened to declare their seats vacant, any attempt would almost certainly lead to a court challenge.
With no precedent for removal in Texas history, the standoff could prolong legislative gridlock, prompt additional special sessions and potentially set new legal precedent on gubernatorial authority (the legal powers and responsibilities granted to a state governor under a state's constitution and laws) and quorum-breaking tactics.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brazil's Supreme Court orders house arrest for former President Bolsonaro, a Trump ally
Brazil's Supreme Court orders house arrest for former President Bolsonaro, a Trump ally

San Francisco Chronicle​

time15 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Brazil's Supreme Court orders house arrest for former President Bolsonaro, a Trump ally

SAO PAULO (AP) — Brazil's Supreme Court on Monday ordered the house arrest for former President Jair Bolsonaro, on trial for allegedly masterminding a coup plot to remain in office despite his defeat in the 2022 election — a case that has gripped the South American country as it faces a trade war with the Trump administration. Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who oversees the case against Bolsonaro before the top court, said in his decision that the 70-year-old former president had violated precautionary measures imposed on him by spreading content through his three lawmaker sons. Bolsonaro's lawyers said in a statement that he will appeal the decision. They said his words 'good afternoon, Copacabana, good afternoon my Brazil, a hug to everyone, this is for our freedom" — broadcast from a cell phone of one of his sons during a Sunday protest in Rio de Janeiro — cannot 'be regarded as ignoring precautionary measures or as a criminal act.' The trial of the far-right leader is receiving renewed attention after U.S. President Donald Trump directly tied a 50% tariff on imported Brazilian goods to his ally's judicial situation. Trump has called the proceedings a ' witch hunt,' triggering nationalist reactions from leaders of all branches of power in Brazil, including President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Hours after the decision, the U.S. State Department's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs said on X that the Trump administration 'condemns (de) Moraes' order imposing house arrest on Bolsonaro and will hold accountable all those aiding and abetting sanctioned conduct.' 'Putting even more restrictions on Jair Bolsonaro's ability to defend himself in public is not a public service. Let Bolsonaro speak!' the U.S. State Department body said. The case against Bolsonaro Brazil's prosecutors accuse Bolsonaro of heading a criminal organization that plotted to overturn the election, including plans to kill Lula and Justice de Moraes after the far-right leader narrowly lost his reelection bid in 2022. Monday's order followed one from the top court last month that ordered Bolsonaro to wear an electronic ankle monitor and imposed a curfew on his activities while the proceedings are underway. Following news of the arrest order, a staffer with Brazil's federal police told The Associated Press that federal agents had seized cell phones at Bolsonaro's residence in the capital of Brasilia, as ordered by de Moraes in his decision. The staffer spoke on condition of anonymity due to their lack of authorization to speak about the matter publicly. Bolsonaro is expected to remain in Brasilia for his house arrest as he is not allowed to travel. He also has a house in Rio de Janeiro, where he held his electoral base as a lawmaker for three decades. The former army captain is the fourth former president of Brazil to be arrested since the end of the country's military rule from 1964 to 1985, which Bolsonaro supported. 'Flagrant disrespect' The move from the Brazilian justice comes a day after tens of thousands of Bolsonaro supporters took the streets in the cities of Sao Paulo and Rio, pleading for Brazil's congress to pardon him and hundreds of others who are either under trial or jailed for their roles in the destruction of government buildings in Brasilia on Jan. 8, 2023. On Sunday, Bolsonaro addressed supporters in Rio through the phone of one of his sons, which de Moraes' described as illegal. 'The flagrant disrespect to the precautionary measures was so obvious that the defendant's son, Sen. Flávio Bolsonaro, decided to remove the posting in his Instagram profile, with the objective of hiding the legal transgression,' de Moraes wrote. Flávio Bolsonaro claimed on X that Brazil 'is officially in a dictatorship' after his father's house arrest. 'The persecution of de Moraes against Bolsonaro has no limits!' the senator wrote. De Moraes added in his ruling that Jair Bolsonaro, who governed Brazil between 2019 and 2022, has spread messages with 'a clear content of encouragement and instigation to attacks against the Supreme Court and a blatant support for foreign intervention in the Brazilian Judiciary' — likely a veiled reference to Trump's support for Bolsonaro. De Moraes also said that Bolsonaro 'addressed protesters gathered in Copacabana, in Rio' on Sunday so his supporters could 'try to coerce the Supreme Court.' Last week, the U.S. Treasury Department announced sanctions on de Moraes over alleged suppression of freedom of expression regarding Bolsonaro's trial. On Monday, the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs called the Brazilian justice 'a U.S.-sanctioned human rights abuser' and accused him of using "institutions to silence opposition and threaten democracy." De Moraes said in his decision that '(Brazil's) judiciary will not allow a defendant to make a fool out of it." "Justice is the same for all. A defendant who willingly ignores precautionary measures — for the second time — must suffer legal consequences,' he said. Possible trouble ahead Creomar de Souza, a political analyst of Dharma Political Risk and Strategy, a political consultancy firm based in Brasilia, said Bolsonaro's house arrest opens a new moment for the country's opposition, which will could gather steam in fighting against Lula's reelection bid next year. Now, de Souza said, 'the 2026 election looks like turmoil' and the political debate in Brazil will likely be split between two key struggles. 'One is the effort of Bolsonaro supporters to keep strong on the right, no matter if it is pushing for amnesty in congress or putting themselves physically out there,' the analyst said. 'The second is how the Lula administration will try to show that the country has a government.' 'This is just the start,' he concluded. The latest decision from the top court keeps Bolsonaro under ankle monitoring, allows only family members and lawyers to visit him and seizes all mobile phones from his home. Lula was imprisoned for 580 days between 2018 and 2019 in a corruption conviction that was later tossed out by the Supreme Court, citing the bias of the judge in the case. Michel Temer, who became president after Dilma Rousseff was impeached in 2016, was arrested for 10 days in 2019 in connection with a graft investigation, which later ended without a conviction. Earlier this year, de Moraes ordered the detention of President Fernando Collor, who was in office from 1990 to 1992 until he was impeached. The 75-year-old former president was convicted for money laundering and corruption in 2023 and is now serving his more than eight-year sentence. Hours after the order, right-wing lawmakers criticized de Moraes' decision and compared Bolsonaro's situation to that of his predecessors. 'House arrest for Jair Bolsonaro by de Moraes. Reason: corruption?' asked lawmaker Nikolas Ferreira. 'No. His kids posted his content on social media. Pathetic.' The far-right leader is already barred from next year's election due to an abuse of power conviction by the country's top electoral court. 'And those who attacked it are about to pay,' Salabert said.

Nebraska Republican faces rowdy town hall with questions about Epstein files and fired BLS chief
Nebraska Republican faces rowdy town hall with questions about Epstein files and fired BLS chief

NBC News

time16 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Nebraska Republican faces rowdy town hall with questions about Epstein files and fired BLS chief

Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb., held a town hall Monday that started with boos from the crowd shortly after he took the stage and ended with chants of 'vote him out' when the event ended. In between, the Nebraska Republican was consistently heckled while responding to questions about releasing more information on Jeffrey Epstein, President Donald Trump's firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner and cuts to Medicaid in the GOP's 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' Audience members began yelling at Flood and booing him when he talked about Medicaid and the impact of Trump's sweeping domestic policy law on hospitals in Nebraska. Flood argued that there's 'a lot of misinformation' about the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' which no Democrats voted for when it made its way through Congress this summer. Later he faced a question that suggested he was covering up files related to Epstein. Flood responded by saying he supports releasing the files and will co-sponsor a non-binding House resolution calling for their publication. Flood added that he supports an effort led by House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, R-Ky., to have Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell sit for a deposition. Comer last week postponed Maxwell's deposition, previously scheduled for Aug. 11, until at least October to let the Supreme Court decide in late September whether it will review her case. Flood also weighed in on the firing of BLS chief Erika McEntarfer, who Trump dismissed Friday shortly after the agency published figures showing that hiring in the U.S. had significantly slowed significantly in recent months. The congressman suggested he might have handled the situation differently, while adding that he does not know 'all the details' about McEntarfer's firing. 'I don't know what the situation was with the Department of Labor person. Neither do you. I don't know. I don't know,' Flood said. 'I can tell you I've been an employer for a lot of years, and there's always two sides to every story, and I don't know what that side was. I will say this, though, if all that person did was get the data out there, if all that, and I don't know that's the case, but if that's all they did, I would not have fired her.' Several Republican senators, as well as economists and statisticians, took issue with Trump terminating McEntarfer last week. Audience members yelled, jeered and booed throughout the event, with audible chants of 'free Palestine,' 'tax the rich,' and during the town hall's conclusion, calls to 'vote him out.' When Flood attempted to engage with audience members on those topics, he was largely met with more protests. Attendees asked at least three different questions about the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, specifically about Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz,' which one attendee called 'Alligator Auschwitz.' Inquiring about the immigration detention facility in Florida, one attendee asked Flood, 'How much do taxpayers have to pay for a fascist country?' Flood responded to by saying the majority of Americans voted for Trump and not for Democratic nominee Kamala Harris. 'Americans voted for a, for a border that is secure, and I support the president enforcing our immigration laws, which, by the way, were written by Congress,' he added, prompting more boos. The Nebraska Democratic Party encouraged people to attend Flood's town hall, telling voters of Nebraska's 1st Congressional District in a social media post, 'you know what to do!' The party also encouraged attendance at Flood's last in-person town hall in the state, in May, when he was grilled by audience members and at one point conceded he had not read a bill in full before voting in favor of it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store