World knows the truth, we have to reiterate it: Rajya Sabha MP Rekha Sharma on all-party delegation's visit to partner countries
Rekha Sharma is part of an all-party delegation led by BJP MP Baijayant Panda. The delegation will visit Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Algeria to showcase India's continued fight against terrorism.
'The world knows the truth, we just have to reiterate it; the lies that Pakistan is telling the world and the narrative it is setting, we have to prove them wrong and put the truth in front. Pakistan is a terrorist nation', Rekha Sharma told ANI.
The Rajya Sabha MP said that terrorist attacks in the whole world are being carried out by Pakistan or the terrorist groups that it backs. She added that Pakistan has been attacking India since its formation, especially in Kashmir, through its 'terror' cells.
'Not only in India, but in many countries of the world, attacks have been carried out by Pakistan or their terrorist groups... Pakistan has been attacking India, especially in Kashmir, through its terror cells since its formation; these are terrorists sponsored by their government. We have to put all these truths in front of the world ', Rekha Sharma added.
Earlier on Friday, multiple delegations were briefed by the Foreign Secretary before going to various countries. Certain delegations have already met with representatives of various countries. Shiv Sena MP Shrikant Eknath Shinde, who is leading one of the delegations, held a press conference in the United Arab Emirates, calling for international solidarity in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack.
DMK MP Kanimozhi-led delegation met with former Prime Minister of Russia Mikhail Fradkov and discussed current global issues, with a particular emphasis on the threats posed by terrorism.
Operation Sindoor was launched on May 7, targeting terror bases in Pakistan in retaliation for the deadly Pahalgam terror attack on April 22, which killed 26 people. The operation targeted terror infrastructure deep inside Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, eliminating over 100 terrorists linked to Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
6 minutes ago
- Hans India
Political Firestorm Erupts As Former Minister Challenges Pakistan Terror Link Claims
A major political controversy has engulfed the national discourse following senior Congress figure P Chidambaram's public questioning of the government's assertions linking Pakistan to the devastating Pahalgam terror incident. The former Union Minister's comments have triggered fierce exchanges between ruling and opposition parties, with accusations of undermining national security flying from multiple quarters. The contentious remarks emerged during Chidambaram's interview with The Quint, where he challenged the evidence presented by authorities connecting the April 22 attack to Pakistani elements. The assault, which claimed 26 lives including numerous civilians in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam region, has become a focal point of political debate regarding India's counter-terrorism approach and intelligence capabilities. In his controversial statements, Chidambaram questioned whether investigators had successfully identified the perpetrators or established their origins, suggesting the possibility that the attackers could have been domestically radicalized individuals rather than foreign operatives. His remarks specifically challenged the automatic assumption of Pakistani involvement, citing what he described as insufficient evidence to support such conclusions. The veteran politician has since responded vigorously to what he characterizes as a coordinated misinformation campaign designed to distort his actual position. Writing on social media platform X, Chidambaram accused critics of deliberately manipulating his interview by selectively editing portions and removing crucial context that would clarify his intended meaning. Chidambaram's defense focused on the methodology used by his critics, describing them as employing deceptive tactics by suppressing the complete recorded interview while extracting isolated sentences and muting specific words to create misleading impressions. He characterized such behavior as representing the most harmful form of information manipulation in contemporary political discourse. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party launched an immediate and aggressive response to Chidambaram's statements, with senior leaders accusing the Congress party of providing unwarranted support to Pakistan's position while undermining India's national security interests. BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya questioned why Congress leaders consistently appeared to defend Pakistan following terrorist incidents, comparing their responses to those of legal advocates for Islamabad rather than responsible opposition politicians. The criticism intensified with BJP parliamentarian Nishikant Dubey adopting particularly harsh language, characterizing the Congress organization as fundamentally treasonous in its approach to national security matters. Dubey connected Chidambaram's remarks to broader allegations against Congress leadership, including claims about Rahul Gandhi's international engagements and corruption allegations, suggesting a pattern of anti-national behavior. Additional BJP voices joined the chorus of condemnation, with MP Deepak Prakash asserting that Congress leaders were aligning themselves with traitorous elements and predicting that Indian voters would never forgive such positions. The coordinated nature of the BJP response suggested a strategic decision to maximize political damage from Chidambaram's controversial statements. Congress leadership rallied behind their senior colleague, with multiple party representatives defending his right to question government evidence while redirecting criticism toward the ruling party's perceived failures in addressing terrorism effectively. MP Manickam Tagore characterized the BJP's response as a diversionary tactic designed to deflect attention from what he described as the Modi government's inadequate follow-through on Operation Sindoor. Senior Congress figure Pramod Tiwari amplified the party's counter-narrative by highlighting the extended timeframe since the attack without successful identification of the perpetrators. His emotional appeal referenced the families of victims while questioning the government's effectiveness in delivering justice and accountability for the tragic incident. Interestingly, the controversy also revealed divisions within opposition ranks, as Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi publicly disagreed with Chidambaram's position. Drawing on her experience and historical precedent, Chaturvedi argued that Pakistan's involvement in such attacks represented an established pattern spanning decades, pointing to The Resistance Front's initial claim of responsibility and Pakistan's advocacy for such groups in international forums. The political battle over Chidambaram's statements reflects deeper tensions regarding opposition responsibilities in matters of national security, the appropriate level of scrutiny for government claims, and the boundaries of legitimate political criticism during ongoing security investigations. The controversy has effectively overshadowed substantive discussions about the actual investigation's progress and the broader implications for India's counter-terrorism strategy. The timing of this political confrontation, occurring as Parliament prepared to discuss the Pahalgam attack and related security operations, has added another layer of complexity to an already charged political environment. The incident demonstrates how quickly national security matters can become partisan battlegrounds, potentially complicating efforts to achieve bipartisan cooperation on critical security challenges facing the nation.
Hans India
6 minutes ago
- Hans India
Parliamentary Chaos Derails Critical Security Debate As Opposition Protests Force Triple Adjournment
India's legislative proceedings descended into complete disarray as persistent opposition protests successfully blocked the commencement of crucial national security discussions that were scheduled to address the Pahalgam terror incident and Operation Sindoor. The highly anticipated debate, originally planned to begin during Monday's Monsoon Session, faced insurmountable obstacles as demonstrating lawmakers created an atmosphere of sustained chaos within both parliamentary chambers. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla found himself compelled to suspend proceedings until 2 PM following relentless disruptions from opposition benches, marking the third consecutive adjournment within a single day. The unprecedented level of parliamentary paralysis effectively prevented any meaningful discourse on matters of critical national importance, despite prior agreements between ruling and opposition parties to conduct comprehensive discussions. The scheduled parliamentary agenda featured an impressive roster of prominent political figures prepared to contribute to the debate. Defense Minister Rajnath Singh, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, BJP leaders Bajyant Panda, Tejaswi Surya, Sanjay Jaiswal, and Anurag Thakur were among the notable speakers listed for the discussions. Regional party representatives including TDP members Lavu Srikrishna and Harish Balyogi, Samajwadi Party's Ramashankar Rajbhar and Chhotelal, AITC's Kalyan Banerjee and Sayoni Ghosh, and DMK's A. Raja and K. Kanimozhi were also positioned to participate in the proceedings. Congress party leadership had strategically arranged their speaking order with Gaurav Gogoi designated to initiate the opposition's perspective, followed by significant contributions from Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Deependra Hooda, Praneeti Shinde, Saptagiri Ulaka, and Bijendra Ola. The party had reserved a prominent slot for Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi to deliver his remarks during Tuesday's continuation of the debate. However, internal party dynamics within Congress revealed interesting tensions regarding the party's approach to Operation Sindoor. Veteran parliamentarian Shashi Tharoor made an unprecedented decision to decline participation in the debate despite direct requests from both the Leader of Opposition's office and the party's deputy leadership in the Lok Sabha. Sources within the Congress revealed that Tharoor's withdrawal stemmed from fundamental disagreements with the party's current critical assessment of the military operation. Tharoor's position represents a significant departure from his party's official stance, as he maintains his longstanding evaluation that Operation Sindoor constituted a successful military endeavor. According to party insiders, when informed that adherence to the party's more critical narrative would be necessary for his participation, Tharoor chose to abstain entirely rather than compromise his personal convictions regarding the operation's effectiveness. The foundation for these discussions was established on July 25 when opposition parties formally agreed to participate in extensive 16-hour debates across both parliamentary chambers. The discussions were designed to comprehensively examine the government's response to the April 22 Pahalgam attack, which resulted in the tragic loss of 26 civilian lives and raised serious questions about security preparedness and intelligence coordination. Opposition leadership, spearheaded by Rahul Gandhi and other prominent figures, has consistently challenged the government's handling of the crisis, pointing to apparent intelligence lapses and questioning India's international diplomatic positioning. Particular scrutiny has focused on claims made by US President Donald Trump regarding potential mediation between India and Pakistan, assertions that the Indian government has categorically denied. The parliamentary impasse reflects deeper political tensions surrounding national security discourse, with opposition parties seeking accountability for security failures while the ruling dispensation attempts to defend its counter-terrorism strategies and diplomatic approaches. The inability to commence these discussions despite prior agreements highlights the deteriorating state of parliamentary cooperation and the increasing polarization affecting even matters of national security. The disrupted proceedings underscore the challenges facing India's democratic institutions when partisan politics override substantive policy discussions on critical security matters. The repeated adjournments not only delay important national conversations but also demonstrate the extent to which political rivalries can paralyze constitutional processes designed to ensure governmental accountability and public discourse on vital issues affecting national interests.
United News of India
6 minutes ago
- United News of India
NDA VP candidate meets PM
New Delhi, Aug 18 (UNI) NDA Vice Presidential candidate C P Radhakrishnan met Prime Minister Narendra Modi here today. The Prime Minister tweeted that Mr Radhakrishnan's long years of public service and experience across domains would greatly enrich the nation. ''Met Thiru CP Radhakrishnan Ji. Conveyed my best wishes on his being the NDA's Vice Presidential nominee. His long years of public service and experience across domains will greatly enrich our nation. May he continue to serve the nation with the same dedication and resolve he has always demonstrated,'' the Prime Minister tweeted. UNI RB 1606 Tharoor hails Shubhanshu Shukla's ISS mission amid Opposition skipping special discussion 18 Aug 2025 | 2:56 PM New Delhi, Aug 18 (UNI) With the Opposition abstaining from a special prliamentary discussion, senior Congress leader Shashi Tharoor took the opportunity to express national pride over Commander Shubhanshu Shukla's recent mission to the International Space Station (ISS), calling it a landmark moment in India's space journey. see more.. AAP hits out at Delhi, Central govts for failing to ensure security to students 18 Aug 2025 | 2:50 PM New Delhi, Aug 18 (UNI) The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) today criticized the BJP-led central and local governments, accusing them of failing to ensure security in the national capital. see more.. Cash-for-jobs scam: SC grants bail to former Bengal Minister Partha Chatterjee, others 18 Aug 2025 | 2:49 PM New Delhi, Aug 18 (UNI) The Supreme Court today granted bail to former West Bengal Education Minister Partha Chatterjee, former Vice Chancellor Dr. Subires Bhattacharyya, and senior education official SP Sinha in the multi-crore cash-for-jobs (teacher recruitment) scam being investigated by the CBI. see more.. AIMPLB moves Supreme Court against 'Umeed Portal', seeks suspension pending Waqf Act challenge 18 Aug 2025 | 2:04 PM New Delhi, Aug 18 (UNI) The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has approached the Supreme Court seeking suspension of the Union government's recently launched 'Umeed Portal', arguing that it undermines ongoing challenges to the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. see more..
