Hamdok: Retaking Khartoum or Forming a Government Won't End Sudan's War
Former Sudanese Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok has warned that recent military gains by the Sudanese army, including the recapture of Khartoum, will not bring an end to the country's devastating civil war.
Speaking on the sidelines of the Mo Ibrahim Governance Forum in Morocco, Hamdok dismissed efforts by the Port Sudan-based authorities to appoint a new prime minister and form a government, calling them 'fake' and 'irrelevant.'
There is no military solution to this conflict, Hamdok told The Associated Press, adding that whether Khartoum is taken or not, 'it doesn't matter,' as neither side can achieve a decisive victory.
The forum, held in Marrakech from June 1 to 3, brought together African and international leaders to discuss governance and development challenges across the continent.
Sudan's conflict dominated the discussions, with members of the civilian coalition Sumud - led by Hamdok - highlighting the scale of the humanitarian catastrophe and rejecting military-led political maneuvers.
Sumud leaders warned that attempts to restore Sudan's African Union membership, suspended after the 2021 military coup, could legitimize a flawed political process. They urged the international community not to fall into what they described as a 'trap' by recognizing unrepresentative governance.
More than two years of fighting between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have left at least 24,000 dead, though many believe the true toll is far higher. Over 13 million people have been displaced, including 4 million who fled to neighboring countries. Famine and disease, including cholera, are spreading rapidly.
Despite the army's territorial gains and the recent appointment of Kamil al-Tayeb Idris as prime minister, the RSF has regrouped in Darfur and advanced in other regions, including Kordofan. Hamdok dismissed suggestions that these developments signal an end to the war, calling such claims 'nonsense.'
Hamdok, Sudan's first civilian prime minister in decades, led a fragile transition following the 2019 ouster of Omar al-Bashir. He resigned in early 2022 after a military coup derailed efforts at democratic reform. Now, he warns that genuine peace is impossible without addressing Sudan's deep-rooted issues, including regional inequality, identity conflicts, and the role of religion in governance.
'Any attempt to rebuild the country while fighting continues is absurd,' Hamdok said. 'Trusting the military to deliver democracy is a dangerous illusion.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Egypt blocks activists aiming to march to Gaza to draw attention to humanitarian crisis
RABAT: Egypt blocked activists planning to take part in a march to Gaza, halting their attempt to reach the border and challenge Israel's blockade on humanitarian aid to the Palestinian territory before it could begin. Egyptian authorities and activists both said Thursday that people planning to march across the Sinai Peninsula were deported. To draw attention to the humanitarian crisis afflicting people in Gaza, marchers have for months planned to trek about 30 miles (about 50 kilometers) from the city of Arish to Egypt's border with the enclave on Sunday to 'create international moral and media pressure' to open the crossing at Rafah and lift a blockade that has prevented aid from entering. Saif Abu Keshek, one of the activists organizing the march, said that about 200 activists — mostly Algerians and Moroccans — were detained or deported. But those arriving to the Cairo International Airport on Thursday afternoon were allowed into Egypt, the Spain-based activist added. Organizers have not received approval from Egyptian authorities for Sunday's march and were evaluating how to proceed, he said. An Egyptian official on Thursday said more than three dozen activists, mostly carrying European passports, were deported upon their arrival at the Cairo International Airport in the past two days. The official said the activists aimed to travel to Northern Sinai 'without obtaining required authorizations.' The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to brief the media.
Al Arabiya
9 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Hundreds of civilians tortured by Wagner mercenaries in Mali: Report
In its more than three years in Mali, the Russian paramilitary group Wagner kidnapped, detained and tortured hundreds of civilians, including at former UN bases and camps shared with the country's army, according to a report published Thursday by a journalist collective. The victims, who were interviewed by a consortium of reporters led by investigative outlet Forbidden Stories, spoke from a refugee camp in neighboring Mauritania about waterboarding, beatings with electrical cables and being burned with cigarette butts. The investigation revealed that the use of illegal detentions and systematic torture, which sometimes led to death, was similar to that which occurred in Ukraine and Russia. The investigation, which was conducted in conjunction with France 24, Le Monde and IStories, identified six detention sites where the Russian paramilitary group held civilians between 2022 and 2024, but the actual number could be much higher, it said. Mali's ruling junta, which seized power in coups in 2020 and 2021, broke off ties with former colonial power France and pivoted towards Russia for political and military support after coming to power. The country never officially admitted Wagner's presence, insisting it only worked with Russian instructors. Nonetheless, last week a Telegram channel affiliated with Wagner announced that the Russian paramilitary group was leaving Mali. Its personnel will be reintegrated into its successor, Africa Corps, another paramilitary group with links to the Kremlin, according to diplomatic and security sources who spoke with AFP. For more than three years, Mali had relied on Wagner in its fight against extremists who have killed thousands across the country. The paramilitary group's brutal methods on the ground in Mali have been regularly denounced by human rights groups. A UN report accused Mali's army and foreign fighters of executing at least 500 people during a March 2022 anti-extremist sweep in Moura -- a claim denied by the junta. Western governments believe the foreign fighters were Wagner mercenaries. Last April, bodies were discovered near a Malian military camp, days after the army and Wagner paramilitaries arrested dozens of civilians, most from the Fulani community.
Asharq Al-Awsat
10 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
The Attack on the Army and the Threats Facing Sudan
A brutal civil war continues to wreak havoc in Sudan, and foreign actors are clearly fueling the conflict. Most recently, we saw the campaign to weaken the Sudanese army at the border triangle between Sudan, Libya, and Egypt. Some are now openly hoping for its defeat and others, behind the veil of calls for 'restructuring' it, are seeking to break the army apart. One broad theme of this campaign is that the Sudanese armed forces are the former regime's (the National Congress Party) army and that it is a partisan militia rather than a national institution. While the army does include figures affiliated with the NCP, men from across the political spectrum are also part of the army. Some have no political affiliations or ties to the former regime. Many of those fighting alongside the army today, including members of the joint forces and the newly mobilized battalions, fall into this category. Some of the youths had participated in the December Revolution and long opposed the previous regime. They cannot be labeled 'NCP'. Despite political divergences, many international and regional actors agree that there is a fundamental need to preserve Sudan's state institutions, chief among them the armed forces. Indeed, the collapse of the army would not simply mean one faction's defeat in an armed conflict. It would mean the collapse of the state itself and introduce chaos and fragmentation. This consensus was not reached out of sentiment but a sober assessment of recent history. There are many tragic cases of nations descending into violent turmoil following the disintegration of their national armies. The violence seen in Iraq after the 2003 invasion stands out: Paul Bremer's dissolution of the Iraqi army created a massive security vacuum that was quickly filled by non-state actors like al-Qaeda and ISIS. Iraqi cities became battlegrounds, state institutions crumbled, and the country drowned in sectarian bloodshed. In Libya, overthrowing Gaddafi's regime without a plan to build a unified army left rival factions fighting a devastating war fueled by foreign intervention. In Somalia, the state collapsed after Siad Barre's regime fell, turning the country into several spheres of influence controlled by warlords. This led to a devastating civil war that went on for nearly two decades and eventually led to the emergence of extremist organizations such as Al-Shabaab. In Africa, this catastrophe has taken a variety of forms. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire), the collapse of Mobutu Sese Seko's army led to the First and Second Congo Wars. Nine African countries took part in the hostilities that claimed the lives of millions. In Liberia, the disintegration of the army led to a civil war that killed nearly a quarter of a million people. The lesson from these precedents is that the national army is the "pillar of the state:" If it collapses, the entire state collapses. If the Sudanese army collapses or is dismantled- whether due to internal conflicts, external pressures, or wrong political decisions- the country would find itself in one of the following catastrophic scenarios: - Security and police agencies would become non-existent, leading to chaos and mass criminality. - The security vacuum would unleash militias vying for power and wealth, and dangerous tribal and regional conflicts would open the door to new demands for secession, especially given the exploitation of marginalized regions. - Cross-border conflicts would be inflamed as militias or armed groups seek refuge or resources. - Terrorist groups would emerge, finding fertile ground for their activity in the chaos and insecurity. They are becoming increasingly active in the Sahel, not far from Sudan's borders. - Instability would pose a threat to neighboring countries in the region. - All of this unrest would lead to unprecedented humanitarian disasters, fueling famine and a refugee crisis. In conclusion, the Sudanese army is the "last line of defense" against the state's collapse. Precedents show that dismantling national armies does not lead to democracy, but rather to chaos, especially in a volatile climate of aggravating regional and global conflicts. Reforming the army is essential, and many other Sudanese state institutions must also be reformed. The military top brass has stressed the need for reform in light of the war, the integration of armed movements that signed the peace agreement, ending the era when there were multiple armed movements and armies in the county, and leaving weapons monopolized by the state. However, this reform should not, under any circumstances, entail dismantling the army or restructuring it in a manner that weakens it. Sudan needs a strong army more than ever, to protect against conspiracies and foreign ambitions. A strong national army that ignores politics and devotes itself to protecting the homeland is the only bulwark against the aggravating assaults on Sudan.
