Italy economy minister says would quit if defied on UniCredit-BPM deal
ROME, May 28 (Reuters) - Italian Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti said on Wednesday he would resign if he were overruled on "golden power" conditions the government has tied to UniCredit's (CRDI.MI), opens new tab bid for smaller bank Banco BPM (BAMI.MI), opens new tab.
Giorgetti was speaking in the Senate after reports in Italian newspapers, citing government sources, suggested that changes in the conditions were possible, but were being resisted by the minister.
He told senators that if there was any divergence on UniCredit-BPM between his position and that of Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, he would quit immediately.
"If there were the slightest misalignment (with Meloni) you wouldn't find a resignation threat, but the resignation itself. You don't announce your resignation, you do it," Giorgetti said.
UniCredit's swoop on BPM, which derailed Rome's plans to combine BPM with state-backed Monte dei Paschi di Siena (BMPS.MI), opens new tab, is part of a wave of proposed takeover bids rocking Italian banking.
In order to clear the deal, Meloni's administration has given UniCredit nine months to cease its activities in Russia and asked it not to reduce BPM's loan-to-deposit ratio for five years.
Giorgetti said the government was focused on monitoring compliance with the golden power conditions, and its response to issues raised by both Banco BPM and UniCredit would be fully coordinated between the Treasury and Meloni's office.
UniCredit has appealed to an administrative court against the terms set by the government, and its CEO Andrea Orcel said on Tuesday it could let the offer lapse because it was no longer financially advantageous under the conditions imposed.
Banco BPM also said it would appeal to an administrative court against a decision by Italian market regulator Consob to suspend the buyout offer for 30 days, to give UniCredit time to negotiate the golden power terms with the government.
"They all go to court in this country and things get messy," Giorgetti said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Karol Nawrocki's win: Poland first, perhaps – but Europe comes last
Europe's latest presidential election appears to have delivered not a statesman but a slogan – 'Poland first' – and with it, a rebuke to the centrist prime minister, Donald Tusk. Poland's new head of state will be Karol Nawrocki, a conservative historian endorsed by Donald Trump. Mr Nawrocki's improbable rise – from relative obscurity to the presidency – signals the unfortunate entrenchment of nationalist grievance in Polish politics. He now stands poised to paralyse Mr Tusk's agenda and perhaps derail Polish access to European funds – using his presidential power of veto to block government legislation or simply relying on the influence of the conservative constitutional court. Key reforms – judicial overhaul, civil partnerships and abortion rights – are off the table. For a country that once dreamed of anchoring the EU's eastern flank, it is a backward lurch. Mr Tusk's government is a coalition born out of a determination to oust the nationalist-conservative Law and Justice party (PiS), which gained full control of government in 2015 and implemented sweeping changes to the judiciary, media and education. Clashes with Brussels over rule-of-law concerns were a feature of its time in office. However, Mr Tusk's ideologically diverse alliance is fraying under the weight of its own contradictions. Bound more by opposition to the previous regime than a cohesive vision, the coalition has stumbled, hindered by internal conflict between agrarian conservatives and urban progressives. It had hoped its liberal candidate could break the deadlock. As a historian, Mr Nawrocki will be familiar with PiS's winning strategy. This mixes reactionary populism with a cultural reprogramming that seeks to rewrite Poland's recent past to polarise opinion. The party aims to renarrate the country's history with controversial interpretations of Poland's role in the Holocaust, 'decommunisation' and a left-sounding critique of post-1989 economic liberalism. Mr Nawrocki triumphed by tapping conservative, rural and anti-elite sentiment, but also by posing as an outsider. A political novice and former head of a state historical institute, he carried no party baggage and could disavow past PiS failings while vowing to block Mr Tusk at every turn. His blend of historical populism and Euroscepticism struck a chord in a Poland still wrestling with its past and wary of Brussels. Meanwhile, Mr Tusk's popularity is eroding and his authority is weakening: the left calls him ineffective, the right accuses him of betrayal. His hope that voters would tolerate paralysis for the sake of stability has proven misplaced. With President Nawrocki in office until 2030, key reforms are blocked and a second term in 2027 looks unlikely. A resurgent PiS and rising far-right Confederation threaten to consolidate an illiberal majority. Mr Tusk may pursue secondary legislation to get his way. He is calling his allies' bluff with a confidence vote. However, unless the coalition proves it can govern, disillusionment will deepen. Poland's economic success – rooted in EU funds, German supply chains and monetary sovereignty – has produced a paradoxical politics. As Jarosław Kuisz observes in The New Politics of Poland, PiS took Brussels' money while scorning its values. Mr Tusk must defend democracy not just with words but with outcomes. If pro-European governments cannot deliver tangible change, voters will fall for the empty authoritarian promises of certainty. To defeat the populist right, Europeans must prove that democracy works – not just in principle, but in people's lives.
The Sun
31 minutes ago
- The Sun
Shocking moment tennis star Musetti BOOTS ball at female line judge's chest sparking fan fury at French Open
ITALIAN STALLION Lorenzo Musetti risked a possible default from the French Open after he kicked a ball into a line judge's chest. The Wimbledon semi-finalist, 23, beat American Frances Tiafoe 6-2 4-6 7-5 6-2 in the quarter-finals at Roland Garros. 7 7 7 Yet he was fortunate not to be disqualified from the competition for his actions after losing game eight of the second set when he kicked a stray ball in frustration right at a female official. Tiafoe, 27, highlighted the situation to the umpire as he went to change racquets. In the end, the No.8 seed received a warning for unsportsmanlike conduct but it could have been much worse. There have been precedents for this – Novak Djokovic was eliminated from the 2020 US Open for the same thing and Tim Henman was famously KO-ed from Wimbledon for injuring a poor ball girl in 1995. Henman, working as an analyst on TNT Sports, said: 'By the letter of the law, if you hit or kick a ball away in frustration, and it hits a ballboy, line-judge or umpire that can be a disqualification. 'When you look at that, the umpire could have interpreted that as a disqualification. 'If Musetti was disqualified for that, he'd feel very unlucky and aggrieved. 'But when you're kicking a ball away, you've either got to be a better footballer and kick it in the right direction. Or you are risking something like that.' 7 7 Musetti – who showed off his muscles to the crowd when he won – is the third Italian, after Matteo Berrettini and Jannik Sinner, to reach semi-finals on multiple surfaces at Grand Slams. Boris Becker, the three-time Wimbledon champion, said: 'The German umpire Timo Janzen did an excellent job. Novak Djokovic digs out French Open rival for 'spying' on him and seeing Champions League trophy 'You can't disqualify Musetti over something like that. The warning was justified, but you can't compare it to Djokovic. 'The internet needs to calm down. Everyone's trying to be holier than the Pope. But let's keep things in perspective. It was a warning, not a disqualification.' Fans online were less forgiving than the two retired pros, making their feelings clear on social media. One asked: "How is this not a default??" While another added: "Djokovic was banned for a whole tournament for a lot less!" A third wrote: "Default. Rules are rules. Foe should be through. It's a disgrace." And a fourth posted: "Default. The inconsistency and double standards in decision-making is making me grow cold toward tennis." 7
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Whistleblower sacked after accusing HS2 bosses of fraud for ignoring warnings about the true cost of the project wins over £300,000
A 'brave' whistleblower who lost his job after accusing HS2 executives of fraud over the true cost of the controversial project has won more than £300,000 in compensation. Risk management expert Stephen Cresswell repeatedly raised concerns that the cost of the high speed rail line - which could end up landing the taxpayer with a bill of more than £80billion - was being 'actively misrepresented'. The consultant was told by one HS2 executive to 'disregard' scenarios he had prepared which forecast a 'significant' increase in the price to the public, an employment tribunal heard. As a result, Mr Cresswell warned that he found himself in a 'very uncomfortable position' of having a 'very different' view to the high speed rail line company's 'documented position'. The tribunal heard that in a meeting with bosses he said 'fraud had been committed because he understood fraud to be making false statement so as to secure a benefit'. After losing his job, Mr Cresswell took HS2 to an employment tribunal, claiming he had his contract terminated and been denied other work as a result of blowing the whistle. After the rail firm admitted that he had not given adequate levels of protection following his disclosures he has now been awarded £319,070 in damages. In response, campaigners said it was not to late for Labour to consider scrapping high speed rail over years of 'catastrophic mishandling'. But HS2 bosses said the firm is 'now under new leadership', adding that it had not accepted Mr Cresswell's allegations. The project to build a high speed line between London, the Midlands and the North was announced in 2010 by then Conservative Transport Secretary Philip Hammond. But ever since it has been beset by controversy amid ballooning costs - including spending £100million on a tunnel for bats. In an interview with the Sunday Times, Mr Cresswell later accused HS2 of having deployed a 'classic playbook' used on major taxpayer-funded construction projects, by holding back accurate cost predictions to ensure government kept money flowing in. Following his tribunal win he said: 'In my opinion HS2 is not an organisation that should be trusted with public money. 'HS2 is destroying taxpayer value, a properly functioning administration would mothball the programme and undertake a full independent investigation.' Today John O'Connell, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'HS2 has rightly become a byword for incompetence and scandal given the catastrophic mishandling of the project by one of Britain's most hopeless and profligate quangos. 'One of the biggest problems was an embarrassing underestimate of the costs and overestimate of the benefits, despite warnings from industry experts and campaigners including this brave whistleblower. 'Even at this late stage Labour ministers should consider abolishing the project entirely.' HS2 Ltd says investigations into Mr Cresswell's claims found no evidence of fraud or illegal activity. In a statement it said: 'HS2 Ltd has accepted that Mr Cresswell raised concerns as a whistleblower and was not then given the appropriate level of protection when his contract came to an end. 'This is regrettable and HS2 Ltd is committed to ensuring that staff and others can raise concerns in confidence. 'This admission does not mean that HS2 Ltd accepts the specific allegations around cost estimating practices raised by Mr Cresswell. 'However, the company is under now under new leadership and a comprehensive review of its skills and structures is being carried out.' Last month a DfT spokesperson said: 'We take all whistleblowing allegations seriously and it is important that individuals are given appropriate levels of protection, which clearly was not the case for Mr Cresswell. 'There is a lot of hard work still to do to get this project back on track, which is why we are overseeing a total reset of HS2, and reviewing the programme's costs, schedule and culture.'
