Didiza says Parliament considering Mkhwanazi's allegations
Didiza said the allegations presented by Mkhwanazi at the weekend, regarding security matters that she says have "implications for the country's national security", are being considered for debate by the National Assembly.
She said the chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Police, Ian Cameron, has also sought guidance on how to address the matter going forward.
ALSO READ:
- Mkhwanazi names man with alleged links to Mchunu as central to meddling in police cases
- Mkhwanazi raises concerns about classified police files being compromised by outsiders
- Mkhwanazi alleges political involvement in cases being investigated by the police
"The Speaker has since received two letters from political parties requesting a snap debate on the issues raised by General Mkhwanazi, in accordance with the Rules of the National Assembly," said Parliament spokesperson, Moloto Mothapo.
Didiza said she welcomes the president's undertaking to engage with the matter.
"We welcome the statement by the President indicating that he will address this matter upon his return from the BRICS meeting in Rio de Janeiro."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
a day ago
- The South African
KwaZulu-Natal police clamp down on criminal activity
The July revelations of corruption and police capture by the KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner, Nhlanhla Mkwanazi shocked the nation, with many South Africans questioning the integrity of policing. However, a report released by the KZN police commissioner's office indicate inroads made in crime fighting in the month of July. Police arrested 12 624 suspected criminals who are alleged to have committed a wide range of crimes. Routine policing and specialised operations led to: 3741 arrests pertaining to contact crimes. Of these, 216 people were arrested on charges of murder, and 201 for attempted murder. The confiscation of 331 firearms and 16 178 rounds ammunition. On crimes against women and children, 193 alleged rapists were arrested. 50 suspects were arrested for sexual assault, eight for attempted rape and 17 for other sexual offences. 204 arrests related to contravening domestic violence laws and four were charged with child abuse. 201 suspects arrested for allegedly committing various types of robberies. These were business and house robberies, robbery with aggravating circumstances and stealing of motor vehicles. 1720 people put behind bars for assault leading to grievous bodily harm. 925 suspects apprehended for incidents of common assault. 519 motorists were arrested for drunken driving. 2108 people were nabbed for drug related offences. 48 arrests due to incidents of stock theft. Police operations uncovered 610 dangerous weapons, including 536 knives and 36 machetes. While certain police units may successfully nab suspected criminals, South Africa can expect the commencement of the Inquiry into Criminality, Political Interference and Corruption in the Criminal Justice System this month (August). Chaired by the Acting Deputy Chief Justice, Mbuyiseli Madlanga the Commission came into existence on 13 July. Cyril Ramphosa informed the nation of this move following a slew of allegations made by police commissioner Mkhwanazi. At a media briefing on 6 July Mkhwanazi claimed that a syndicate comprising businesspeople, public prosecutors and judges infiltrated law enforcement structures in the country. The commissioner further alleged that Police Minister, Senzo Mchunu was instrumental in disbanding a police task team into investigating political killings in KwaZulu-Natal. This, led to Mchunu placed on special leave, and the appointment of Firoz Cachalia, a former academic, as the new police minister. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news
TimesLIVE
a day ago
- TimesLIVE
Could Trump tariffs become Bric-building blocks?
US President Donald Trump has the Brics group of nations directly in his trade war crosshairs, slapping super-high tariffs on imports from Brazil and India, and accusing them of pursuing 'anti-American' policies. Washington's relations with Brasilia and New Delhi have sunk to new lows. But this belligerence could backfire. The White House said on Wednesday it will impose an additional 25% tariff on goods from India, citing New Delhi's continued imports of Russian oil. That brings the levy on most goods to 50%, among the highest rate faced by any US trading partner. Brazil also faces 50% tariffs on many of its US-bound exports, not because of trade imbalances, but because of Trump's anger at what he calls a 'witch hunt' against his ally, Brazil's former president Jair Bolsonaro, who has been charged with plotting a coup after his election loss in 2022. This breakdown in relations could be Trump's intention: push these countries to the brink so that they'll agree to trade deals that are heavily lopsided in Washington's favour. That strategy seemed to work with Japan and the EU. But hitting these Brics economies with eye-watering tariffs could push them closer together, strengthening the resolve of a group that appeared to be losing whatever momentum, purpose and unity it had.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Exploring the philosophical, political, and human questions shaping the BRICS+ world
This photo taken on July 3, 2025 shows a logo of the BRICS Summit outside the Museum of Modern Art in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The 17th BRICS Summit will be held here from July 6 to 7. Image: Xinhua Does BRICS Have an Ideology? BRICS has become one of the most talked-about formations on the global stage. Described as a counterweight to Western dominance, a champion of the Global South, or a pragmatic coalition of emerging powers, it raises a vital question: does BRICS actually have an ideology? The answer is layered. BRICS is not an ideological bloc. It is a geopolitical coalition, a space where countries with different political systems, economic strategies, and social realities come together to pursue shared interests. What connects them is not a common vision of the world, but a shared dissatisfaction with how global power has been concentrated for decades in the hands of the United States, Europe, and the institutional networks that have shaped global governance – notably NATO, the IMF, the World Bank, and the broader Bretton Woods system. BRICS provides a platform to push back against this order, while opening debate on how economic and political systems might evolve outside Western hegemony. At its heart, BRICS advances the principle of multipolarity – a geoeconomic arrangement that challenges the idea of a single global centre of power. It champions sovereignty, non-interference, fairer trade, and stronger representation for developing countries in global institutions. For much of the Global South, these demands are a response to long histories of colonisation, resource extraction, debt dependency, and exclusion from decision-making. The BRICS reformist drive to challenge and reshape the IMF, World Bank, and the broader Bretton Woods framework is central to this moment, alongside building alternative institutions such as the New Development Bank (NDB), signalling a desire to redistribute not only global influence, but also the terms of development, debt, and investment. Yet a deeper question emerges: how will this new economic arrangement touch the lives of ordinary people, the masses already dispossessed through austerity, inequality, and structural adjustment programmes imposed under the old order? How will it ensure that prosperity does not remain confined to elites but filters down to uplift the many? Each BRICS+ country offers a unique social landscape. Brazil is a powerhouse of agricultural production and industry, yet its indigenous peoples and rural communities face land dispossession and environmental pressure. Urban centres flourish, but inequality persists. India's digital and industrial growth is remarkable, yet caste hierarchies and rural poverty continue to shape life for hundreds of millions. Russia brings energy strength, geopolitical influence, and a commitment to multipolar partnerships, while also confronting regional disparities and social challenges – yet its strategic role within BRICS positions it as a bridge-builder, especially through energy, infrastructure, and security cooperation. China stands out for its vast poverty alleviation achievements, lifting hundreds of millions out of extreme poverty over recent decades through state-led planning, large-scale investment, and targeted social programmes. This is not only a technical achievement but a social transformation that challenges the idea that global integration must leave the vulnerable behind. South Africa brings the symbolic and moral weight of its anti-apartheid struggle, but its post-liberation economy remains marked by white monopoly capital and a comprador elite that has not yet delivered meaningful redistribution to the majority. Land, employment, and economic inclusion remain unfinished work. The Gulf states contribute energy wealth and sovereign funds but come with monarchic and theocratic systems that raise new questions for social policy. In looking to ethical and philosophical guidance, BRICS might draw on its members' cultural foundations. China's traditions, including Taoist ideas of harmony, social balance, and care for the collective, could inform models of development that go beyond profit. Africa offers ubuntu, an ethic of human interconnectedness, dignity, and collective well-being, alongside the political tradition of Pan-Africanism, which calls for solidarity, sovereignty, and justice among historically marginalised peoples. There are examples from history worth studying. Libya, under Muammar Gaddafi, developed a social model that channelled oil wealth into free healthcare, education, housing, and basic income, aiming to circulate resources directly to the population. This system was violently cut short not by internal collapse, but by US and NATO intervention, which destroyed a social contract rare in the region. China's experience shows how state-directed development can change the life chances of hundreds of millions, challenging neoliberal claims that markets alone can deliver inclusion.
