Residents blindsided as insurance companies pull coverage without warning: 'The ability to afford where we live is decreasing rapidly'
As wildfire damage becomes more rampant in the wake of human-induced extreme weather events, insurance companies are losing massive amounts of money to frequent payouts, forcing them to drop coverage, as we see happening to Boulder residents.
Insurance companies are pulling the rug from under Boulder residents for several reasons.
Some residents' coverage was dropped due to living in a high-wildfire-risk zone. Other Boulder residents saw their premiums double, forcing them to reconsider whether staying in the area was feasible. Still, other residents lost coverage due to owning high-value properties (over $1 million in value), which fell outside the purview of insurance company policies.
Boulder resident Kristina Miller Olsen falls in this last category of homeowners, with a property valued at $3.5 million, according to Zillow.
Olsen said the thought of losing her house to a wildfire without full insurance coverage worries her "because we have a fair amount of retirement savings in our property valuation," per Boulder Reporting Lab.
After being dropped by Nationwide due to having a high-value property, Olsen found new coverage with State Farm. However, her premium jumped from $4,510 to $11,947.
Rising home insurance costs are affecting homeowners across the country, including in North Carolina, California, Florida, and Louisiana.
If climate data is any indication of what's to come, rising global temperatures, caused by human activity — including burning dirty fossil fuels for energy — will only bring about more wildfires and other extreme weather events.
The increased wildfire risk not only puts communities at risk, but it also gives insurance companies a reason to pull their coverage from high-risk areas, whether or not that is ethical.
When was your home built?
Less than 10 years ago
10-25 years ago
25-50 years ago
Over 50 years ago
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Homeowners who lose coverage or those who can't afford to pay the inflated premiums risk losing their homes to fire or losing their homes to displacement.
"The ability to afford where we live is decreasing rapidly," Olsen said, per Boulder Reporting Lab.
Colorado policymakers are scrambling to keep homeowners and their homes safe amid disappointing insurance company decisions.
To lower wildfire risk in communities and to appeal to insurance companies, the HB 1182 proposed bill will require insurers to consider wildfire mitigation efforts that homeowners take, to lower premiums.
The state is also creating the Fair Access to Insurance Requirements (FAIR) Plan to provide last-resort coverage (up to $750,000) for high-risk property homeowners. The cost for coverage will be shared among major insurers to cover Colorado homeowners while recognizing the burden that insurers will bear.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meta Platforms (META) Accelerates AI Race With New Lab Structure
Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ:META) is one of the On August 15, The Information reported that Meta is planning its fourth overhaul of artificial intelligence efforts in six months. According to the report, the company is expected to divide its new AI unit, Superintelligence Labs, into four groups. These groups are a new 'TBD Lab,' short for to be determined; a products team including the Meta AI assistant; an infrastructure team; and the Fundamental AI Research (FAIR) lab focused on long-term research. The TDB Lab, developing the newest version of Meta's flagship large language model Llama, is expected to have multiple leaders. With the AI arms race intensifying, CEO Mark Zuckerberg is accelerating his efforts to achieve artificial general intelligence — helping create new revenue streams. A close-up of two software engineers typing away at laptops in a modern, well-lit office. The restructuring plans have not yet been announced internally and could still change, sources told The Information. While we acknowledge the potential of META as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mediobanca receives ECB approval for Banca Generali takeover
Italian merchant bank Mediobanca has received authorisation from the European Central Bank (ECB) to proceed with the €6.3bn purchase of Banca Generali. The ECB also granted approval for the purchase of both direct and indirect stakes that collectively exceed 10% of the consolidated own funds of the Mediobanca Banking Group. Following the acquisition, Mediobanca will be expected to present the ECB with a detailed integration plan within a six-month period. This plan must include the envisioned measures for integration, a timeline for the activities, and an IT integration strategy, among other requirements. Additionally, the ECB has clarified that Banca Generali will be classified as a "significant supervised entity" once Mediobanca acquires de jure control, placing it under the ECB's direct supervision. The decision to acquire Banca Generali is part of Mediobanca's strategy to prevent a takeover by Monte dei Paschi di Siena (MPS), which had offered €13.3bn in an all-share buyout bid for Mediobanca earlier this year. Mediobanca dismissed this bid as 'destructive' for the business and said it lacks 'industrial and financial rationale' for its shareholders. To finance the acquisition, Mediobanca intends to divest its holdings in the insurance arm of Generali. Mediobanca, along with key investors the Del Vecchios and the Caltagirones, are significant shareholders in Generali. Mediobanca is set to conduct a shareholder vote on the proposed acquisition of Banca Generali on 21 August. This step is mandated by Italian takeover regulations, especially given the ongoing bid from MPS, which could potentially escalate in expense should the acquisition of Banca Generali be successful. Earlier this month, Generali, which holds a 50.2% stake in Banca Generali, has signalled a willingness to engage in further discussions regarding Mediobanca's proposal. The insurer has committed to evaluating the offer in accordance with its internal review processes in the upcoming weeks. "Mediobanca receives ECB approval for Banca Generali takeover " was originally created and published by Private Banker International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Heated discussion on Edmonton river valley redevelopment plan at city hall
Critics put the proposed new river valley area redevelopment plan on the hot seat Monday at Edmonton city council. Weak discretionary language, less council scrutiny on developments and a lack of clear binding limits on environmental impact were among top concerns. Howaida Hassan, the city's director of urban growth and open space, told council the administration has asked Edmontonians about this beloved space over four years and gotten diverse feedback. 'As we grow, so does the demand for events and commercial opportunities, facilities, amenities and municipal infrastructure with thoughtful planning and management. We can meet these growing pressures as we look to protect, access and enjoy this space now and into the future,' Hassan said Kacia Kerr, executive director of the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society Northern Alberta chapter, said since 2005 the river valley has lost four per cent of its natural areas and the city as a whole has lost 11 per cent in the same time. 'It is significant given that the proposed bylaw will weaken protections, and if our citywide trend continues, natural areas will become extremely rare within the city,' she said. Without stronger protections, losses will accelerate, Kerr said. She cited changes to words like 'may' and 'should' rather than 'shall' and 'discouraged,' rather than 'prohibited,' have been made even between the May 2025 version and the current version. 'Edmonton's proposed bylaw should match those standards in cities like London, Ont., where ecological integrity is embedded in the urban planning framework, the ecology and the benefits of nature are what make this area desirable for recreation and why we consider it to be the jewel of Edmonton,' Kerr said. 'It's logical to protect the ecology before considering other interests, to ensure it remains intact fo ther future and to continue to provide the many benefits to humans of a healthy river valley ecosystem,' she said. But Kerr said the new plan delegates decisions to city administration for developments under 10,000 square metres— the size of almost two football fields, eliminating council oversight and limits for developments under that size. 'We feel that the changes (in the) new area redevelopment plan will further enhance the cumulative impact of development and loss of natural areas in the river valley and make death by a thousand cuts even more likely,' she said. Raquel Feroe agreed. 'A project of 10,000 square metres, which is the current definition of an intense project, should be an automatic 'no' for the river valley,' Feroe said, adding that complexes like the existing Kinsman complex could be grandfathered in, but more shouldn't be planned for, given existing wildlife 'choke' points. Feroe said council needs to provide second sober thought and reducing the size to 500 square metres would be 'very reasonable.' The 500-member Edmonton Mountain Bike Association (EMBA) does 25 'trail days' a year to maintain trails based on city specifications. More than 90 per cent of the natural surface trails are within areas currently designated as 'preservation' under the Ribbon of Green and so would have been off limits to cyclists under the original terms of that plan. The association appreciates the trail-based recreation subcategory has been added to 'in-theory' permit access to those trails for mountain bikers, trail runners, hikers and event organizers. 'I say in theory because it's become evident since June that the terms of the proposed river valley area redevelopment plan can and will be used by pockets within city administration to thwart that access,' said EMBA president Joe Yerkovich. 'Somehow the bylaw needs to be amended so that pockets within administration don't have the discretion or don't feel compelled to apply the strictest standards against the natural surface trail development,' he said. Patsy Cottrell is opposed to mountain biking in preservation zones, period. 'if we are to retain the river valley in anything like a natural condition, we should be here today debating a bylaw dedicated to environmental protection, rather than a bylaw with the word 'development' in it,' Cottrell said. 'The city seems to believe that biking, including mountain biking, is low impact, but it destroys vegetation, causes habitat loss, soil compaction and erosion. Hikers and off-leash dogs are also culprits,' she said. 'Preservation zones should mean what they say, identified on ecological criteria alone, not pre-existing usage. Human access should be nonexistent or carefully limited in them.' Law student Ansh Gulati said the draft approach to environmental assessment and the mitigation hierarchy in the new document is flawed because the environmental assessment framework states that the environmental assessment is generally completed at later project stages. 'This contradicts the intent of the federal Impact Assessment Act, which calls for an early planning phase before irreversible commitments,' Gulati said. 'Assessment should guide development from the outset, not follow it. It should occur as soon as the full environmental impact can be assessed further without a clear mitigation hierarchy or guidelines to define minimization and regulate offsets. This process risks becoming merely a checkbox exercise,' he said. Among the other ideas raised is a public review process on development, proactively purchasing and adding to land, and reclaiming land rather than grandfathering trails. Eric Gormley noted that in Banff, only one-tenth of trails are open to cyclists, and even cycling advocates have supported the policy. 'Let's leave the river valley in better shape than we found it,' he said. jcarmichael@ Related The 10 best ways to explore Edmonton's river valley this summer Opinion: Edmonton's new river valley bylaw falls short Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don't miss the news you need to know — add and to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here. You can also support our journalism by becoming a digital subscriber. Subscribers gain unlimited access to The Edmonton Journal, Edmonton Sun, National Post and 13 other Canadian news sites. Support us by subscribing today: The Edmonton Journal | The Edmonton Sun.
