Residents blindsided as insurance companies pull coverage without warning: 'The ability to afford where we live is decreasing rapidly'
Data from the National Interagency Fire Center shows that the extent of area burned by wildfires in the U.S. appears to have increased since the 1980s, per the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
As wildfire damage becomes more rampant in the wake of human-induced extreme weather events, insurance companies are losing massive amounts of money to frequent payouts, forcing them to drop coverage, as we see happening to Boulder residents.
Insurance companies are pulling the rug from under Boulder residents for several reasons.
Some residents' coverage was dropped due to living in a high-wildfire-risk zone. Other Boulder residents saw their premiums double, forcing them to reconsider whether staying in the area was feasible. Still, other residents lost coverage due to owning high-value properties (over $1 million in value), which fell outside the purview of insurance company policies.
Boulder resident Kristina Miller Olsen falls in this last category of homeowners, with a property valued at $3.5 million, according to Zillow.
Olsen said the thought of losing her house to a wildfire without full insurance coverage worries her "because we have a fair amount of retirement savings in our property valuation," per Boulder Reporting Lab.
After being dropped by Nationwide due to having a high-value property, Olsen found new coverage with State Farm. However, her premium jumped from $4,510 to $11,947.
Rising home insurance costs are affecting homeowners across the country, including in North Carolina, California, Florida, and Louisiana.
If climate data is any indication of what's to come, rising global temperatures, caused by human activity — including burning dirty fossil fuels for energy — will only bring about more wildfires and other extreme weather events.
The increased wildfire risk not only puts communities at risk, but it also gives insurance companies a reason to pull their coverage from high-risk areas, whether or not that is ethical.
When was your home built?
Less than 10 years ago
10-25 years ago
25-50 years ago
Over 50 years ago
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Homeowners who lose coverage or those who can't afford to pay the inflated premiums risk losing their homes to fire or losing their homes to displacement.
"The ability to afford where we live is decreasing rapidly," Olsen said, per Boulder Reporting Lab.
Colorado policymakers are scrambling to keep homeowners and their homes safe amid disappointing insurance company decisions.
To lower wildfire risk in communities and to appeal to insurance companies, the HB 1182 proposed bill will require insurers to consider wildfire mitigation efforts that homeowners take, to lower premiums.
The state is also creating the Fair Access to Insurance Requirements (FAIR) Plan to provide last-resort coverage (up to $750,000) for high-risk property homeowners. The cost for coverage will be shared among major insurers to cover Colorado homeowners while recognizing the burden that insurers will bear.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
What EPA's new coolant requirement means for your AC unit
HOUSTON - This year, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency began requiring the use of new, more environmentally friendly refrigerants in new HVAC units, R-454B and R-32. A shortage of R-454B is already being reported. This means current refrigerants, like R-410A, will be phased out. While technicians say there is still a supply of R-410A, and they can still install units that use it through this year, over time it will become harder to find parts to repair older units that work with this refrigerant. What you can do Technicians recommend having your unit serviced to repair any problems before they can become worse, and owners of older units may want to consider replacing them. We talked with Joe Bany with John Moore Services about how to navigate the refrigerant change to ensure you stay cool through the summer. The Source Information in this article is from our interview with John Moore Services and the U.S. EPA.
Associated Press
17 hours ago
- Associated Press
INVESTOR NOTICE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Investor Class Action Lawsuit
SAN DIEGO, June 09, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCAT) securities between March 18, 2022 and January 15, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'), have until Tuesday, July 22, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Red Cat class action lawsuit. Captioned Olsen v. Red Cat Holdings, Inc., No. 25-cv-05427 (D.N.J.), the Red Cat class action lawsuit charges Red Cat and certain of Red Cat's top current and former executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Red Cat class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: You can also contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at [email protected]. CASE ALLEGATIONS: Red Cat, together with its subsidiaries, provides products and solutions to drone industry. Red Cat's products include, among others, the 'Teal 2' drone, a small, unmanned aircraft system designed to purportedly 'Dominate the Night' during nighttime military operations. The Red Cat class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Red Cat's Salt Lake City facility's production capacity, and defendants' progress in developing the same, was overstated; and (ii) the overall value of Red Cat's Short Range Reconnaissance Program of Record Tranche 2 contract (the 'SRR Contract') was overstated. The Red Cat class action lawsuit further alleges that on July 27, 2023, Red Cat revealed that its Salt Lake City facility could only currently produce 100 drones per month, the facility was still being built, refined, and expanded, and that construction of the facility was only 'substantially completed' and potentially could reach a production capacity of 1,000 drones per month over the next 2 to 3 years, but only with additional capital investments and manufacturing efficiencies realized. On this news, the price of Red Cat stock fell nearly 9%, according to the complaint. Then, on September 23, 2024, the Red Cat class action lawsuit further alleges that Red Cat announced its financial results for the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, reporting losses per share of $0.17, missing consensus estimates by $0.09, and revenue of $2.8 million, missing consensus estimates by $1.07 million. According to the complaint, Red Cat further disclosed that Red Cat had spent 'the past four months . . . retooling [the Salt Lake City facility] and preparing for high volume production,' while admitting that a 'pause in manufacturing of Teal 2 and building Army prototypes impacted Teal 2 sales' because, among other things, Red Cat 'couldn't produce and sell Teal 2 units while retooling [its] factory.' The Red Cat class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of Red Cat stock fell more than 25%. Finally, the Red Cat class action lawsuit further alleges that on January 16, 2025, Kerrisdale Capital published a report alleging that '[t]he SRR contract that Red Cat won in November and preemptively announced without the Army's permission is much smaller and less favorable than management as intimated,' and that '[i]t's highly implausible that a mass-production facility for manufacturing drones has been built at any point in the last two years for less than $1 million.' On this news, the price of Red Cat stock fell more than 21% over two trading sessions, according to the complaint. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Red Cat securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Red Cat class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Red Cat class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Red Cat class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Red Cat class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. Contact: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP J.C. Sanchez, Jennifer N. Caringal 655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101 800-449-4900 [email protected]
The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
As nations abandon climate goals, cities are more important than ever
A series of recent actions by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to roll back environmental regulations includes plans to eliminate all limits on greenhouse gases from coal and gas-fired power plants and to rescind the 2009 finding that planet-heating gases, like carbon dioxide, pose a real threat to human health. These rollbacks also come on the heels of recent proposals from the European Union, Australia and Canada to relax rules related to emissions and environmental protections. The overwhelming international scientific consensus is that if we are to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, global net human-caused emissions of carbon dioxide need to fall by about 45 percent from 2010 levels by 2030 and reach net-zero around 2050. Unfortunately, current commitments from the international community through the Paris Agreement fall far short of reaching those goals. Despite the grim reality of weakened national ambition, cities continue to lead with bold and transformative climate action. Global cities are increasingly working collaboratively toward achieving carbon neutrality through innovative solutions and policy approaches that are replicable and scalable worldwide. Some have even set their sights on becoming climate-positive by removing carbon from the atmosphere to undo past emissions. New York City, which has committed to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent within the next 25 years, is one such example. It has developed a number of innovative approaches to reducing emissions, including offering a range of resources to help commercial and large-scale residential buildings with energy retrofits, expanding low-carbon transportation options and cutting emissions from all foods served in city-operated premises. At the same time, the Big Apple has invested over $20 billion to adapt neighborhoods to climate change risks such as flooding, heat, and sea-level rise. The City of Helsinki in Finland has announced its goals to be carbon neutral by 2030, zero carbon by 2040, and thereafter, carbon negative. It is working to achieve this by reducing embodied carbon in buildings by setting limits on the amount of carbon emitted by buildings over their entire lifecycle, including from the production and transportation of the building materials. Construction companies are working to stay under the limit by combining a range of solutions, including changes in the choice of materials, heating solutions and building operations, and repurposing and reusing building elements. Among other innovations, Helsinki's energy company Helen closed its last coal-burning plant in 2025 and is cutting emissions in Helsinki by 30 percent compared to 2024. Helen is also building one of the country's largest underground heat storage facilities in former oil storage caves. The facility is projected to reduce Helen's carbon dioxide emissions by 21,000 tons annually. In the Netherlands, Amsterdam's goal is to achieve a 60 percent reduction in emissions by 2030, and a 95 percent reduction by 2050. The city's Climate Neutral Program focuses on reducing carbon dioxide released within the city of Amsterdam by phasing out the use of fossil fuels such as oil, natural gas and coal and structurally transitioning to cleaner energy such as geothermal and solar. The city is also providing grants, loans and free advice to its citizens to help accelerate the energy transition and phase out the use of natural gas in homes. Vancouver, Canada, is another city taking the lead, reducing carbon pollution by 50 percent by 2030 and taking proactive action to prepare for and respond to the impacts of climate change. Its Climate Emergency Action Plan identifies a suite of actions focused on land-use planning, transportation and buildings. These actions collectively position Vancouver to reach three targets to cut carbon pollution from trips taken within the city: 90 percent of residents being within an easy walk, bike or roll of their daily needs, two-thirds of all trips being by active transportation or transit and 50 percent of all kilometers driven in Vancouver by electric vehicles. Two targets aim to cut carbon pollution from buildings in half from what it was in 2007 and to reduce embodied emissions from new buildings and construction projects by 40 percent compared to 2018. The Climate Change Adaptation Strategy provides a roadmap for addressing the top five climate change-related hazards that Vancouver faces. Sydney, Australia, has three long-standing business partnership programs. Through the Better Buildings Partnership, the city collaborates with property owners representing 55 percent of its office space. The partnership members have reduced emissions intensity by 95 percent. The CitySwitch program supports office-based businesses on their net-zero journey, and 80 percent of members have now switched to using renewable electricity. The Sustainable Destination Partnership brings together businesses in Sydney's accommodation and entertainment sector to reduce emissions, water, and waste. The programs all function as collaborative partnerships, with the city playing the role of convenor and facilitator. These cities are among 23 working together with my organization, Carbon Neutral Cities Alliance, to achieve carbon neutrality, not just through incremental improvements but rather through radical, transformative changes to core city systems. The goal is to demonstrate innovative solutions and policy approaches that are replicable and that can inspire other cities to take action to reach carbon neutrality as soon as possible. And, as cities learn from each other about what works to achieve these goals, they are paying it forward by sharing the work and encouraging other cities to take similar action. Why is the work of cities so vital to addressing climate change? Urban areas are responsible for an estimated 75 percent of all global greenhouse gas emissions. By setting and achieving these carbon neutrality goals, global cities have the ability to keep us on track toward the Paris Agreement climate goals despite wavering support from the U.S. and other governments. Most critically, these efforts are vital to offsetting the threat to natural systems and promoting the health and well-being of all its citizens. Simone Mangili is the executive director of The Carbon Neutral Cities Alliance.
