Hakeem Jeffries breaks record for longest House floor speech while opposing GOP tax bill
Early on Thursday, after a marathon night of arm-twisting, cajoling and pressure by tweet, House Republicans said they were finally ready to vote on Trump's $4.5tn tax-and-spending package – a colossal piece of legislation the president wants passed by Friday, the Independence Day holiday.
Final debate on the 887-page bill began in the pre-dawn hours of Thursday morning, and Jeffries began his speech shortly before 5am, railing against the legislation he and Democrats have warned will slash social safety-net programs that millions of American families and children rely on.
Related: What's in Trump's major tax bill? Extended cuts, deportations and more
Jeffries used his so-called 'magic minute' – a tradition that allows House leaders to speak for as long as they want after a floor debate has concluded.
In 2021, the then House Republican leader, Kevin McCarthy, spoke for a record-setting eight hours and 32 minutes, in protest of Joe Biden's signature domestic policy legislation, which ultimately passed when he ceded the floor.
Jeffries started speaking shortly before 5am and passed McCarthy's record at 1.26pm. His speech concluded shortly after.
Democrats are united against what they have renamed the 'big ugly' bill. Jeffries spent more than eight hours sharing stories of Americans across the country who will be hurt by the bill, which he says takes a 'chainsaw' to Medicare, Medicaid, nutritional assistance for hungry children and vulnerable Americans. The Democratic leader had stacks of binders next to his podium, and he read the stories of people who will lose health insurance, food assistance and other crucial benefits.
Jeffries called the bill a 'crime scene', and an 'abomination' that will benefit billionaires.
'People will die. Tens of thousands, perhaps year after year after year, as a result of the Republican assault on the healthcare of the American people,' Jeffries said.
Republicans continue to defend Trump's signature bill. On Wednesday night, the House speaker, Mike Johnson, was optimistic and said lawmakers had a 'long, productive day' discussing the issues. He also praised Trump for making phone calls to the holdouts through the early hours of Thursday morning.
Trump spent much of Wednesday holding meetings and phone calls with skeptical Republican lawmakers.
As the rule stalled, he threatened the holdout lawmakers, writing on Truth Social: 'What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove??? MAGA IS NOT HAPPY, AND IT'S COSTING YOU VOTES!!!'
Democrats are increasingly using aggressive tactics such as marathon speeches to oppose Trump's agenda. In April, Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey spoke on the Senate floor for 25 hours, earning him praise from other Democrats and voters. Later that month, Jeffries and Booker held a 12-hour sit-in on the US Capitol steps to protest Republicans' funding plans. Billed as an 'Urgent Conversation With the American People', the livestreamed discussion included other Democratic lawmakers, such as Senator Raphael Warnock, who spoke as the sit-in passed the 10-hour mark.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AICPA submits recommendations for transition to EFDS
The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) has submitted recommendations to the Department of the Treasury concerning the transition to an electronic federal disbursements system (EFDS), as mandated by Executive Order 14247, Modernizing Payments To and From America's Bank Accounts. The order stipulates that all federal payments should be processed electronically by ceasing issuance of paper checks by 30 September 2025 and aims to enhance efficiency and security while reducing costs. The AICPA supports the move towards electronic payments but highlights the challenges it poses, particularly for taxpayers without a US bank account. This includes seniors and the unbanked population, who may be excluded from the system due to international banking regulations that restrict automated clearing house transfers with non-US financial institutions. The AICPA's letter references a Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration report indicating that nearly seven million taxpayers received refunds through non-electronic means in the latest tax year. The AICPA's recommendations include exceptions for individuals and entities not based in the US or without a US bank account, and exemptions for temporary non-US individuals. It also suggests expanding the capabilities of the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System to allow business accounts to process payments on behalf of individuals, and delaying the implementation for trusts and estates until the IRS can address specific administrative issues. Furthermore, the AICPA proposes guidance for applying exceptions for qualified taxpayers, extending the timeframe for implementing the order, seeking statutory authority for the mandates, and involving stakeholders in establishing the rules for the transition. AICPA senior manager for Tax Policy & Advocacy Daniel Hauffe said: 'For many years, the AICPA has advocated for and supported the modernisation of the IRS and its payment systems; although this executive order is a step in the right direction, there are many considerations before implementing changes, which means updated processes and carefully tailored rules will need to be developed.' 'The AICPA's recommendations allow for the modernisation of the IRS' tax payment systems while mitigating the impact of the administrative burden on taxpayers, tax practitioners and the IRS, that could be caused by this executive order.' In June 2025, the AICPA also expressed concerns regarding the pass-through entity tax state and local tax (SALT) deductions in recent reconciliation bills. "AICPA submits recommendations for transition to EFDS" was originally created and published by The Accountant, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Are Texans Most Likely To Lose the Most Due to Tariffs?
The Trump administration's campaign of taxing foreign governments in an effort to 'Make America Great Again' may have unforeseen domestic ramifications. This is particularly true in the state of Texas, as its economy is intimately tied to its southern neighbor Mexico. In fact, some analysts foresee nothing short of a calamity for the Texas economy if the tariffs go forth as planned. But that's also a big 'if.' Read Next: Check Out: Here's a look at the potential effect on the Texas economy due to the Trump administration's tariffs as currently planned. One of the problems with economic indicators is that some are lagging, meaning they only give a picture of what has already happened. On that level, Texas looks A-OK, as job growth was good in the first quarter of 2025. But according to the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank, which has more up-to-date information on economic trends and sentiment, business activity is weakening. And this is before the full effect of the tariffs are even being felt. Be Aware: Every month, the Dallas Fed conducts a manufacturing outlook survey to gauge the real-time, on-the-ground response of businesses to various economic stimuli. In the first quarter of 2025, manufacturing activity actually picked up a bit in Texas, but some of that was likely due to orders being pulled forward ahead of the implementation of tariffs. The fact that manufacturing activity is now rapidly declining, with the index actually turning negative in April, helps validate that theory. Perhaps not surprisingly, businesses are uncertain about the future due primarily to the tariff policy. According to the Dallas Fed, the uncertainty level among Texas businesses has reached multiyear highs, and this in and of itself can hurt economic prospects. Businesses that are unsure what to expect may opt to hunker down and reduce capital expenditures or even hiring until the path ahead becomes more clear. This self-imposed slowdown can exacerbate the economic damage created by the actual tariffs themselves. Texas is the leading trade state in the country, so tariffs on foreign countries are likely to affect it disproportionately. Mexico is the state's No. 1 trading partner, according to the Office of the Governor of Texas, to the tune of $272.3 billion worth of goods exchanged in 2023 alone. And it's not just one-way trade either. Mexico is both the leading source of imports and the top export market for Texas. The bottom line here is that when Mexico is subject to tariffs, it also has a large effect on the state of Texas. According to Trade Partnership Worldwide, Texas businesses could see a $47 billion economic loss. And a Perryman Group analysis found that a sustained 25% tariff on Mexican goods could cost the state over 287,000 jobs. Although no one can tell with 100% accuracy what the final tariff policy will be — and how it will affect Texans — there are some steps you can take to prepare. Just as businesses are hunkering down in the wake of the tariff uncertainty, it makes sense as an individual to boost your cash reserves as well. Since any type of economic contraction could lead to job loss, it's best to sock away at least three to six months' worth of income in a savings account. From a longer-term perspective, it can make sense to upskill yourself so that your value as an employee can outlast any economic turndowns. This will help ensure job security even beyond the potentially temporary tariff issues. If you have the luxury of flexibility, consider exploring other industries that might be less affected by tariff concerns than, for example, construction and auto manufacturing. Service-oriented industries are a good option, as are businesses that don't source materials or trade with tariff-impacted countries like Mexico. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Are You Rich or Middle Class? 8 Ways To Tell That Go Beyond Your Paycheck This article originally appeared on Are Texans Most Likely To Lose the Most Due to Tariffs? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Washington Post
35 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Once it was mostly a taco website. Now it's covering L.A. ICE raids.
It all happened so quickly. On June 6, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents descended upon Los Angeles, raiding businesses and arresting more than 40 people. Once word got out on social media, protests began and L.A. Taco's six-person news team headed out to the streets. Investigative reporter Lexis-Olivier Ray captured video of police firing pepper balls at protesters and media at the downtown Los Angeles Federal Building. The next day, law enforcement shot pepper balls at him and other journalists, he said. In five years of covering protests and civil unrest in the city, he had never seen anything like that.
