As Putin and Trump talk Ukraine, what will be on the agenda?
Before his election victory in November 2024, Trump announced he would end the war within the first 24 hours of his term. He is now about 200 days past his own deadline.
Trump said the meeting with Putin will help accelerate the peace process. Here's an overview of what's known so far.
The two leaders will meet next Friday in Alaska, a state in the northwest of the United States. The Kremlin has confirmed the meeting and has also invited Trump to Russia after the talks in Alaska.
Kremlin foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov described the choice of location for the meeting as "logical."
"Russia and the United States are close neighbors, bordering each other," Ushakov said. "It seems quite logical that our delegation should simply fly across the Bering Strait and that such an important and eagerly awaited summit between the leaders of the two countries should be held in Alaska."
For the US president, who portrays himself as an accomplished dealmaker, taking a significant step toward peace would be of personal and reputational importance. His political ally, Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu, recently nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize.
As for the actual conflict, Trump wants a ceasefire at the very least, and a long-term solution, at best.
Trump has said he also wants to arrange a three-way meeting with Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. But neither the Russian nor the Ukrainian leader has agreed to this yet.
The Russian president wants to prevent the NATO military alliance from expanding further eastward. It's likely he will try to convince Trump to vote against Ukraine's NATO membership .
Another important point for Putin is preventing any possible NATO military presence on Ukrainian territory. He also wants a new, Russia-friendly government in Kyiv.
In addition, Putin has repeatedly demanded that certain territories captured by Russian troops during the Ukraine war be permanently transferred to Russia. Putin likely expects Trump to provide assurances on this as well.
What are the negotiating points?
The biggest point of contention is military action. Russian attacks on military and civilian targets in Ukraine have resulted in many deaths and the destruction of Ukrainian infrastructure.
Ukraine is also striking back inside Russia and doing damage there. However, there's an imbalance in terms of population and Ukraine is keen to end the war and, with it, the rising death toll among its own people. But at what cost?
According to experts, Russia probably won't be willing to end the war without some concessions, a pivotal factor being Ukraine's potential NATO membership.
According to Kyiv, NATO membership would significantly reduce the likelihood of another Russian attack in the future because when one NATO member is attacked, the others are required to come to its aid. The security alliance includes the US and other nuclear-armed powers, the United Kingdom and France.
Another negotiating point will be Ukraine's borders. Kyiv has demanded full sovereignty for Ukraine and wants the borders to go back to the way they were before the war. But experts have said it's unlikely Russia would agree, as Putin wants territories currently held by the Russian army to be transferred to Russia.
Russian troops currently occupy a large part of the four eastern Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, territories which Russia claims as its own.
In addition, there are areas elsewhere in Ukraine currently held by the Russian army, as well as the Crimean Peninsula, which Russia annexed in 2014.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
2 hours ago
- Observer
Where is the global resistance to Trump?
America's critics have always depicted it as a selfish country that throws its weight around with little regard for others' well-being. But President Donald Trump's trade policies have been so misguided, erratic and self-defeating as to make even the most cartoonish of such descriptions seem flattering. Still, in a twisted way, his trade follies have laid bare other countries' failures as well, by forcing them to consider what their responses say about their own intentions and capabilities. It is said that one's true character is revealed in the face of adversity, and the same goes for countries and their political systems. Trump's frontal assault on the world economy was a shock to everyone, but it also gave Europe, China and various middle powers an opportunity to make a statement about who they are and what they stand for. It was an invitation to articulate a vision of a new world order that could overcome the imbalances, inequities and unsustainability of the old one, and that would not depend on the leadership – for better or worse – of a single powerful country. But few rose to the challenge. In this respect, the European Union has perhaps been the greatest disappointment. In terms of purchasing power, it is almost as large as the United States – accounting for 14.1 per cent of the world economy, compared to 14.8 per cent for the US and 19.7 per cent for China. Moreover, despite the recent rise of the far right, most European countries have avoided backsliding into authoritarianism. As a collection of democratic nation-states whose geopolitical ambitions do not threaten others, Europe has both the power and the moral authority to provide global leadership. Instead, it dithered and then submitted to Trump's demands. Europe's ambitions were always narrowly parochial; but in folding to Trump, it is not even clear that it served its own immediate interests. The July handshake deal between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen leaves 50 per cent tariffs on European exports of steel and aluminium, places 15 per cent tariffs on most other exports, and commits Europe to ridiculously high levels of energy imports from the US. Rarely has the EU's structural weakness as a confederation of countries without a collective sense of identity been on starker display. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula Da Silva has emerged as the rare exemplary leader who refuses to grovel at Trump's feet. China has played a tougher game, retaliating forcefully with its own tariffs and restricting exports of critical minerals to the US. Trump's vindictive, self-defeating foreign policies have helped China extend its influence and enhance its credibility as a reliable partner for the developing world. But the Chinese leadership has also failed to articulate a practical model for a post-neoliberal global economic order. Notably, China has shown little interest in addressing the two global imbalances that it has caused with its own large external surplus and excess of domestic savings over investment. Meanwhile, smaller countries and middle powers have mostly played the quiet game, pursuing independent bargains with Trump and hoping to limit the damage to their own economies. The exception is Brazil, whose president, Luiz Inácio Lula Da Silva, has emerged as the rare exemplary leader who refuses to grovel at Trump's feet. Despite facing punitive 50 per cent tariffs and pointed personal attacks, he has proudly defended his country's sovereignty, democracy and independent judiciary. As the New York Times puts it, 'There is perhaps no world leader defying President Trump as strongly as Mr Lula.' Such leadership has been sorely lacking around the world. In India, the political commentator Pratap Bhanu Mehta points out that many business and political elites are searching for ways to accommodate Trump. But in doing so, Mehta argues, they are misreading him and the world he is creating. At any other time in recent history, the Trump administration's behaviour would immediately be called out for what it is: imperialism – plain and simple. Imperialism must always be challenged – not accommodated – and that requires both power and purpose. Of course, America has held the reins of the world economy for a very long time. The dollar is firmly entrenched, and the US market remains singularly important. But these advantages are not as strong as they used to be. It would defy political logic and the laws of economic gravity if a country controlling only 15 per cent of the world economy (in terms of purchasing power parity) could dictate the rules of the game to everyone else. Though the rest of the world remains divided, surely everyone has a common interest in repelling Trumpian imperialism – and thus in uniting to resist his demands. Finding common purpose is perhaps the bigger challenge. If Trump 'wins", it will be because other large economies were unable (or unwilling) to articulate an alternative framework for the global economy. Pining after traditional multilateralism and global cooperation – as many targets of Trump's ire have done – is of little use and merely signals weakness. The world needs new ideas and principles for avoiding both the instabilities and inequities of hyper-globalisation and the destructive effects of beggar-thy-neighbour policies. It is not realistic to expect a new Bretton Woods agreement. Nevertheless, middle powers and large economies can still model such principles by putting them to work in their own policies. Trump's actions have held up a mirror to others, and most should recognise that their reflection is not a pretty sight. Fortunately, their apparent helplessness has been self-imposed. It is not too late to choose self-confidence over humiliation. @Project Syndicate, 2025
Observer
2 hours ago
- Observer
Zelensky thanks EU, as Kyiv seeks place with Trump, Putin
KYIV: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky thanked European leaders on Sunday for backing his demand for a seat at the table as Russia and the United States prepare for a summit this week where Kyiv fears they could seek to dictate terms to it for ending the Three-and-a-half-year war. US President Donald Trump, who for weeks had been threatening new sanctions against Russia for failing to halt the conflict, announced instead last Friday that he would hold an August 15 summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. A White House official said on Saturday that Trump was open to Zelensky attending, but that preparations currently were for a bilateral meeting with Putin. The Kremlin leader last week ruled out meeting Zelensky at this point, saying the conditions for such an encounter were "unfortunately still far" from being met. Trump said a potential deal would involve "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both (sides)", a statement that compounded Ukrainian alarm that it may face pressure to surrender more land. Zelensky says any decisions taken without Ukraine will be "stillborn" and unworkable. On Saturday the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Finland and the European Commission said in a joint statement that any diplomatic solution must protect the vital security interests of Ukraine and Europe. "The path to peace cannot be decided without Ukraine", they said, demanding "robust and credible security guarantees" to allow Ukraine to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Zelensky said on Sunday: "The end of the war must be fair and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people today for the sake of peace in Ukraine, which is defending the vital security interests of our European nations". A European official said Europe had come up with a counter-proposal to Trump's, but declined to provide details. Russian officials accused Europe of trying to thwart Trump's efforts to end the war. "The Euro-imbeciles are trying to prevent American efforts to help resolve the Ukrainian conflict", former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev posted on social media on Sunday. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in a vituperative statement that the relationship between Ukraine and the European Union resembled "necrophilia". Roman Alekhin, a Russian war blogger, said Europe had been reduced to the role of a spectator. "If Putin and Trump reach an agreement directly, Europe will be faced with a fait accompli. Kyiv — even more so", he said. No details of the proposed territorial swap that Trump alluded to have been officially announced. Russia, which mounted a full-scale attack of Ukraine in February 2022, holds about a fifth of the country and has claimed the regions of Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia as its own, although it controls only about 70% of the last three. Russia has also taken pockets of territory in the Sumy and Kharkiv regions and said in recent weeks it has captured villages in the Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine says it holds a sliver of the Kursk region in western Russia. Sergei Markov, a pro-Kremlin analyst, said a swap could entail Russia handing over 1,500 sq km to Ukraine and obtaining 7,000 sq km, which he said Russia would capture anyway within about six months. He provided no evidence to back any of those figures. Russia took only about 500 sq km of territory in July, according to Western military analysts who say its grinding advances have come at the cost of very high casualties. Ukraine and its European allies have been haunted for months by the fear that Trump, keen to claim credit for making peace and hoping to seal lucrative joint business deals between the US and Russia, could align with Putin to cut a deal that would be deeply disadvantageous to Kyiv. They had drawn some encouragement lately as Trump, having piled heavy pressure on Zelensky and berated him publicly in the Oval Office in February, began criticising Putin and expressing disgust as Russia pounded Kyiv and other cities with its heaviest air attacks of the war. But the impending Putin-Trump summit, agreed during a trip to Moscow by Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff last week, has revived fears that Kyiv and Europe could be sidelined. — Reuters
Observer
2 hours ago
- Observer
IMF changes tune on global growth as tariffs ease
The world economy will not suffer as badly from President Trump's tariffs as previously thought, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has predicted. Global growth is set to be three per cent this year, the IMF said, which is higher than its previous 2.8 per cent forecast made in April. The world economy will grow by a further 3.1 per cent in 2026, which is also slightly higher than its three per cent growth forecast made earlier this year. Economists at the UN agency said it upgraded its growth forecast due to 'front-loading' before Trump's Liberation Day, where businesses and customers imported goods before tax increases came into effect. But they warned that this burst of activity risked creating 'exposures' that could leave firms vulnerable from having too much stock or holding on to additional costs. The lower-than-expected average tariff rate and improvements in financial markets are also set to benefit the world economy, allowing forecasts to be revised. Deals struck between Trump and his counterparts in China and the EU, which agreed to invest hundreds of billions in US oil in exchange for a reduction in tariffs to 15 per cent , have reflected easing trade war tensions since April. The IMF said tariffs remained a threat given looming deadlines on the expiry of additional tariffs could hamstring activity and unnerve business owners. Despite Donald Trump's trade deal with the UK prime minister, Keir Starmer, to limit tariffs on carmakers and wipe out taxes on aerospace manufacturers, the IMF did not upgrade its growth forecast for the UK. The major forecaster said in April it expected UK GDP to inch up 1.2 per cent this year and 1.4 per cent next year. A general view of stacked shipping containers at Peel Ports Liverpool docks in Liverpool, Britain. Image for illustration only. — Reuters Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'The IMF's forecasts show that the UK remains the fastest growing European economy in the G7 despite the global economic challenges we are facing. 'I am determined to unlock Britain's full potential, which is why we are investing billions of pounds through our Plan for Change – in jobs through better city region transport, record funding for affordable homes, as well as backing major projects like Sizewell C to drive economic growth and put more money into people's pockets.' Shadow Chancellor, Mel Stride said: 'Labour promised growth but the IMF has confirmed what Britain already knows: under Labour, growth is going nowhere.' The US economy received a larger upgrade to its growth forecast for 2026, with its economy now set to expand by two per cent next year. IMF officials also emphasised the importance of the independence of central banks in what appeared to be a comment aimed to address Trump's attack on Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell. Meanwhile, top business executives are set to receive briefings from the Foreign Office on global risks including conflicts and trade tensions as part of a wider strategy to help UK firms expand overseas. Representatives, of Lloyds Bank, PwC and Premier League are among those attending a first-of-its-kind event at Lancaster House where leading diplomats are set to provide advice on doing business in countries across the world. The government's new advisory service, which has been titled the Geopolitical Impact Unit, has been created to give firms 'straight from the source' insight on global tensions and expanding abroad, tying up the government's growth mission with foreign policy amid 'turbulent geopolitical times.' Officials also hope it can replace 'expensive' private consultants, allowing companies to spend less on mitigating costs of risks. Chief diplomat, UK foreign minister, David Lammy said the initiative can help provide businesses with expertise on new areas of interest to the UK and link up business leaders across the world. 'We are helping to equip British business with the insights and contacts they need to compete and win in global markets,' Lammy said.
