Six months on, Syria has to secure its recovery
Six months on from the fall of Bashar Al Assad and despite the series of profound changes that have taken place in Syria since then, the country is best described as one that's in a state of flux.
In many ways, the transformation seen so far is remarkable – millions who had been forced into exile are now able to visit their home country for the first time in many years, the misshapen command economy of the Assad era is giving way to billions of dollars in outside investment, thousands of Syrians are returning from exile, the banking sector is re-establishing itself and the new administration in Damascus is renewing important ties with governments across the Middle East and further afield.
However, to prevent this transition from stalling, the country's people and foreign investors need to feel that Syria is a safe place. Without law and order or a professional, modern military and police force to maintain stability, there is the danger that Syria's recovery will prove to be a house built on sand.
There are signs that Damascus is heading in the right direction on this critical issue. In a recent exclusive interview, a Syrian military official told The National that the authorities have so far recruited half of a planned 200,000-man army. Among this number is a 3,500-man brigade, comprising mostly of foreign fighters, allies of Hayat Tahrir Al Sham – the group that led the rebel offensive that removed the former regime last year.
In one sense, this is a sound strategic move; bringing HTS's civil war allies into the fold meets a major US demand to contain them. It is also far from unprecedented – many professional armies employ foreigners or have entire units that are made up of foreign citizens or former militia members. However, caveats remain. Many of the fighters in Syria are not just foreign citizens, they have a political and religious agenda or loyalty to individual commanders. Some may be wanted men in their own countries.
Those overseeing Syria's new army will have to monitor their ranks closely and build a culture of loyalty to the state and its laws. This is a test of Syrian unity, and although mistakes and setbacks should be expected, it is a test that Syria cannot be allowed to fail. The people must have confidence in those whose job it is to protect them.
Where the country stands six months from now will reveal if the government's choices were the right ones
Similarly, the people must have confidence that the new government can deliver overall. Speaking recently to The National, a Damascus doctor gave a sober assessment of the country: 'Economically, nothing has changed. People are still tired, salaries are low, there's no money in the country, and there's no electricity.' Without tangible improvements in employment, services and security, the momentum behind Syria's transformation could wane.
In addition, the country faces a string of challenges. Significant armed groups, such as the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces and members of the Syrian National Army, remain outside the control of Damascus. SDF-run camps still house thousands of ISIS prisoners and their families. Meanwhile, Israeli troops continue to occupy Syrian territory, posing a significant and destabilising security problem.
But there are signs of progress on the security front. Last week, Syrian Interior Minister Anas Khattab said the government had seized control of all Captagon laboratories in the country, undermining a deadly criminal trade over the past decade that affected the entire region. When taken with moves to build a dependable army, it is possible to see the Syrian authorities building upon the euphoria the followed the end of the Assad era. Where the country stands six months from now will reveal if the government's choices were the right ones.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
14 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
Hamas military chief Sinwar's body found in tunnel under Gaza hospital
The Israeli army said on Sunday it had retrieved the body of Hamas' military chief Mohammed Sinwar in an underground tunnel beneath a hospital in southern Gaza, following a targeted operation last month. Another senior Hamas leader, Mohammad Shabana, commander of the Rafah Brigade, was also found dead at the scene along with a number of other militants, who are still being identified, said IDF spokesperson, Brigadier General Effie Defrin. Israeli forces gave a small group of foreign reporters a tour of the tunnel that had been uncovered beneath the European Hospital in Khan Younis, which Defrin said was a major command and control compound for Hamas. "This is another example of the cynical use by Hamas, using civilians as human shields, using civilian infrastructure, hospitals, again and again," said Defrin. "We found underneath the hospital, right under the emergency room, a compound of a few rooms. In one of them we found, we killed Mohammed Sinwar," he said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced Sinwar's death last month, but Defrin said they now had his DNA which proved beyond doubt it was him. Hamas has not commented on reports of the death of either Sinwar or Shabana. Sinwar was the younger brother of Yahya Sinwar, the Palestinian group's deceased leader and mastermind of the October 2023 attack on Israel that killed 1,200 people according to Israeli tallies, and which triggered the brutal Israeli attacks in Gaza. Shabana was one of Hamas's most senior and battle-hardened commanders in southern Gaza. He played a central role in constructing the network of tunnels under the southern city of Rafah, which were used for ambushes and cross-border raids. Destruction The drive to Khan Younis in Israeli military vehicles showed widespread devastation, with countless buildings lying in ruins, and piles of rubble collected at the roadside. The Israeli military has raided or besieged numerous hospitals during the war, alleging that Hamas uses them to conceal fighters and orchestrate operations — a charge Hamas has repeatedly denied. While Israel has presented evidence in certain cases, some of its assertions remain unverified. Defrin said the army had carefully planned the strike near the European Hospital in order not to damage it. A large trench dug infront of the Emergency Room entrance led down to a hole in the claustrophobic, concrete tunnel, that was used as a hideaway by Hamas fighters, the army said. During the search of the site, Israeli forces recovered weapon stockpiles, ammunition, cash and documents that are now being reviewed for intelligence value. "We will dismantle Hamas because we cannot live with this terror organisation right in our backyard, right across our border," Defrin said. More than 54,000 Palestinians have died during the ongoing Israeli attacks, according to Gaza health authorities. The UN has warned that most of Gaza's 2.3 million population is at risk of famine.
Khaleej Times
29 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
Israeli forces seize Gaza aid boat Madleen carrying Greta Thunberg
Israeli forces have taken command of a charity vessel that had tried to break a naval blockade of the Gaza Strip and the boat with its crew of 12 including activist Greta Thunberg is now heading to a port in Israel, officials said on Sunday. The British-flagged yacht Madleen, which is operated by the pro-Palestinian Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC), was aiming to deliver a symbolic amount of aid to Gaza later on Monday and raise international awareness of the humanitarian crisis there. However, the boat was boarded during the night before it could reach shore, the FFC said on its Telegram account. The Israeli Foreign Ministry later confirmed that it was under Israeli control. "The 'selfie yacht' of the 'celebrities' is safely making its way to the shores of Israel. The passengers are expected to return to their home countries," the ministry wrote on X. All passengers were safe and unharmed, the ministry later added. "They were provided with sandwiches and water. The show is over." Among the 12-strong crew are Swedish climate campaigner Thunberg and Rima Hassan, a French member of the European Parliament. "The crew of the Freedom Flotilla was arrested by the Israeli army in international waters around 2am," Hassan posted on X. A photograph showed the crew seated on the boat, all wearing life jackets, with their hands in the air. The yacht is carrying a small shipment of humanitarian aid, including rice and baby formula. The Foreign Ministry said it would be taken to Gaza. "The tiny amount of aid that was on the yacht and not consumed by the 'celebrities' will be transferred to Gaza through real humanitarian channels," it wrote. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz ordered the military on Sunday to prevent the Madleen from reaching Gaza, calling the mission a propaganda effort in support of Hamas. Israel imposed a naval blockade on the coastal enclave after Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007. The blockade has remained in place through multiple conflicts, including the current war, which began after a Hamas-led assault on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, that killed more than 1,200 people, according to an Israeli tally. Over 54,000 Palestinians have been killed since the start of Israel's brutal attacks. The United Nations has warned that most of Gaza's more than 2 million residents are facing famine. The Israeli government says the blockade is essential to prevent weapons from reaching Hamas. The United Nations' special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories, Francesca Albanese, has supported the FFC operation and on Sunday, urged other boats to challenge the Gaza blockade. "Madleen's journey may have ended, but the mission isn't over. Every Mediterranean port must send boats with aid and solidarity to Gaza," she wrote on X.
Gulf Business
43 minutes ago
- Gulf Business
Beyond the risk register: Why future-ready leadership demands strategic discomfort
Image: Supplied The year is 2029, and vertical farming has become a symbol of national resilience in the Middle East. Governments had have poured billions into hydroponic megafarms. Food security indices have climbed and export deals rolled in. The region has also been hailed globally as a pioneer of agricultural innovation – a place where technology had triumphed over land scarcity and climate stress. And then it all collapses. A fungal microbe, exploiting the genetic uniformity of hydroponic crops, mutated in a single facility, sweeps through the region's interconnected systems. Within six weeks, 40 per cent of regional crop output is lost. Emergency imports are then scrambled at record costs. What seemed like a shining example of resilience is exposed as dangerously brittle. The risk was known. The signals were there – just not heard, or not heeded. This isn't a possible 'future' story about agriculture. It spotlights leadership under complexity. From pandemic blindspots to supply chain fragilities and climate volatility to AI backlash, organisations across every sector continue to be surprised by visible and often documented disruptions that were ultimately sidelined. Known, but ignored Why does this keep happening? Not because the risks are invisible but because they're inconvenient, ambiguous, or don't fit the dominant narrative. In environments that reward momentum and performance, there is often little appetite for the slow work of horizon scanning or scenario stress-testing – especially when things appear to be going well. Risks that are uncomfortable or unfamiliar are easily dismissed as fringe. And when success stories dominate, dissenting signals – especially weak ones – struggle to break through. The vertical farming collapse followed this exact pattern. Early warnings were buried in obscure journals, dismissed as edge-case thinking. There was no lack of intelligence. But attention was highly selective. The illusion of the list Many organisations believe that because a risk appears on a register, it is being managed. But listing a risk and engaging with it are two very different things. Take the World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report . Each year, it publishes a heat map identifying the most severe and likely risks facing the world over the next decade. Climate volatility. Biodiversity loss. Emerging infectious diseases. Cybercrime. Water crises. Year after year, these threats are mapped, flagged, and even color-coded – often with 'blobs' so large they're impossible to miss. And yet the most common organisational response is to file these risks under 'context', rather than integrate them into core planning. They are acknowledged, but rarely rehearsed. The problem isn't the heat map. The problem is what happens after. The mere appearance of a threat on a list can create a false sense of preparedness – a box ticked, a risk 'covered'. Risk registers often serve as a checklist – useful for reporting, but misleading when it comes to real readiness. Rarely do leadership teams ask: What would we actually do if this happened tomorrow? And most registers fail to consider how risks interact. A CEO scandal, shifting consumer ethics, a tech system failure, and policy fragmentation – individually manageable, perhaps. Together? Catastrophic. Strategic foresight starts where the risk register ends – not with what's on the list but with how those risks might collide. From risk registers to risk realism So, what does it take to build a future-ready organisation in a time of converging disruption? We propose three shifts: Expand peripheral vision: Build structured capacity to detect early signals from the margins – in scientific literature, startup ecosystems, citizen movements, and niche media. Weak signals are often the earliest indicators of system shifts. Unless you design for it, they won't rise through the usual filters. Institutionalise strategic discomfort: Challenge internal optimism regularly. Build in moments to stress-test assumptions and rehearse disruption. Reward people who challenge prevailing wisdom, not just those who confirm it. Map risk interdependencies: Move beyond lists. Use systems thinking to explore how risks could combine. Model chain reactions and secondary effects. Ask not just 'What could go wrong?', but 'What could go wrong together ?' Future-readiness is a cultural trait Foresight isn't about crystal balls or radical prediction. It's about readiness for uncertainty – and a willingness to engage the uncomfortable. The most resilient organisations aren't those that see the future clearly but those that build the muscles to adapt to futures they can't fully see. That begins with humility, curiosity, and the courage to ask: What might we be missing? This demands a cultural shift. One that values critical inquiry over certainty. Signals over noise. And reflection over reaction. In the aftermath of every high-profile shock – from pandemics to tech crashes – leaders demand tighter regulation, faster protocols, and better reporting. But those alone won't build adaptive capacity. Because in every one of these cases, there were warnings. The failure was not one of ignorance – but of attention. Foresight failed because it asked the system to be uncomfortable – and the system declined. Three questions every board should be asking Which of our success stories might be blinding us to emerging fragilities? What signals are we currently incentivised to ignore? If three of our 'low-impact' risks hit at once – what would break first? If your strategy doesn't create space for doubt, it's not a strategy – it's a narrative. If your risk register doesn't provoke discomfort, it's incomplete. And if your future looks smooth and linear, it's probably fiction. Doris Viljoen is a director at the Institute for Futures Research at Read:
