
California is still the state to beat on corporate emissions
KEEPING THE TORCH: California is still the only game in town when it comes to corporate climate disclosure — even if it's taking its time on implementation.
After California passed its pair of laws requiring big companies to report their emissions and their climate-related business risks and not only promptly got sued, but started watering down the requirements and timeline for enforcement, other states started stepping up to fill the void.
But bills in Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Colorado and Washington have all stalled this year, leaving California as the de facto leader after the Trump-era Securities and Exchange Commission rolled back its federal rule.
'We didn't make it across the finish line,' said New York state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, whose second attempt to compel large businesses in his state to report their pollution failed last month. 'That's disappointing.'
He conceded that there isn't yet the same level of support California saw for SB 253 and SB 261, when tech giants like Apple and Google came on board late in the 2023 session to push them over the finish line.
'I don't think it was a lack of interest or effort,' Hoylman-Sigal said. 'I think it was mostly due to a shorter legislative session. It's a complicated, big, important bill.' He said he thinks it can pass next year — but someone else will have to shepherd it, since he's leaving the Legislature to run for Manhattan borough president.
Other bills have yet to be taken up or were scaled back. Washington's measure was turned into a study bill before failing to advance, while New Jersey's is expected to fall prey to lawmakers' election-year ambitions.
Environmentalists who had been getting impatient with California's pace of implementation have since made their peace.
Ceres, a sustainability nonprofit that counts Amazon, Bank of America and Target among its member companies, had gotten frustrated enough that it started backing copycat legislation in other states — a reversal from when both Ceres and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which is suing over the rules, agreed a 'regulatory patchwork' would be counterproductive.
Now, Steven Rothstein, managing director of the Ceres Accelerator for Sustainable Capital Markets, said he feels comfortable enough with CARB Chair Liane Randolph's commitment to finalize rulemaking by the end of the year before companies start making disclosures of scopes 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions in 2026.
'We are responding to inquiries from states all the time,' Rothstein said. 'But we're not going out and beating the bushes.'
The shift in tone is a notable new vote of confidence in CARB after we reported late last year that the agency won't seek corporate penalties for 'incomplete reporting' so long as a company makes a 'good faith effort' to retain data relevant to its carbon footprint, sparking a backlash from disclosure supporters. Gov. Gavin Newsom had also sought to delay corporate climate reporting by two years, and CARB suggested scrapping Scope 3 reporting requirements, which remain in the law and will kick in in 2027.
But Rothstein said he's encouraged by the progress he's seen, which includes a workshop CARB held in May on the issue.
'We're eager to do it, but it's more important that it be done thoughtfully and in a diligent manner than a few months' delay,' he said. — JW
Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here!
SOLAR TRUCE: A controversial proposal to reduce subsidies for a wide swath of rooftop solar customers is no more.
Assemblymember Lisa Calderon agreed Tuesday to remove language from AB 942 that would have lowered payments to homeowners who installed solar panels before 2023 for surplus energy they sell back to the electric grid through a process called net metering.
The amended measure cleared the Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee on Tuesday on a 9-4 vote.
The bill would have aligned payments to early adopters of solar with less lucrative subsidies for homeowners who installed solar panels after the California Public Utilities Commission voted in 2022 to end net metering.
That concept sparked a heated debate over who benefits from higher subsidies and whether rolling back net metering has hampered the state's climate goals.
Utilities, labor unions and ratepayer advocates argue that subsidizing solar customers' energy bills means that homes without rooftop solar pay a disproportionate amount to maintain the electric grid. Meanwhile, the solar industry, developers and realtors argued that the proposal to reduce payments would have retroactively broken contracts between home sellers and buyers.
The bill is now narrowly tailored to ding residential customers whose annual electric bills are under $300. They would no longer be eligible to receive a separate credit funded with cap-and-trade auction revenues. — AN
SPEAKING OF AMENDMENTS: Senate Democrats also nixed language from a bill that would have required CPUC appointees to represent different regions of the state.
Committee Chair Josh Becker said during a hearing Tuesday that the decision was made in light of Newsom's veto of a similar bill in 2022. At the time, the governor said mandating that commissioners come from different regions was unnecessary because he was committed to having state boards that 'represent California's diversity.'
Assemblymember Rhodesia Ransom, author of AB 13, reluctantly accepted the amendment to the current bill, telling the committee that she was 'not excited' about the changes.
Some lawmakers and ratepayer advocates have expressed concern that all five of the CPUC's current commissioners — each of whom was appointed by Newsom — live in the Bay Area or Sacramento region, which is served by one utility: Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
The bill still contains a handful of proposed changes to CPUC's rules, including a requirement that at least one commissioner have a background in consumer protection and new reporting mandates when the commission decides to increase rates. — AN
POINTING FINGERS: Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson said Tuesday that the federal government has not seen California's 'formal request' for wildfire aid, saying that there is a 'multistep process' that has not been completed.
'For whatever reason, Gavin Newsom seems to enjoy trying to stick his thumb in the eye of the White House and Congress, which seems to be counter purpose if he is requesting relief,' he said.
Newsom's office clarified in a post on X that they have been in contact with the speaker's office.
'It's our understanding that the Speaker was referring specifically to the White House's formal appropriations request,' they clarified.
Newsom took a trip to Washington in February to meet with lawmakers on both sides of the aisle on the issue. That month, he also sent a letter to Johnson and other House leaders asking for almost $40 billion to help with immediate and long-term recovery. — NN
AI OBSTACLE — Looming budget cuts at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration could undermine the country's AI-powered weather forecasting capabilities. The funding threat comes as California tech companies have been seizing their moment in Washington in hearings focused on wildfire policy and technology.
The Trump administration wants to slash the agency's budget by $2.2 billion — a move that experts say could stymie the improvement of AI weather models, Chelsea Harvey reports for POLITICO's E&E News.
While AI did not predict the floods in Texas, the technology was showing potential with weather forecasting and new models are 'certainly capable of predicting 'out-of-sample' events — events that they haven't seen before,' said Corey Potvin, a scientist at NOAA's National Severe Storms Laboratory in Norman, Oklahoma.
Meanwhile, Kim Doster, NOAA's director of communications, dismissed concerns, saying in an email that cuts would not negatively impact research and forecasting at NOAA. – JV
— The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection put out a new map that shows the severity of all fires over 1,000 acres since 2015.
— A new report on state efforts to reduce plastic pollution ranks California as the nation's leader.
— The 2026 FIFA World Cup, hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, is going to have an extreme heat problem.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump admin plans first ‘Golden Dome' test of space-based missile defense system: report
Pentagon officials are aiming to test President Trump's space-based Golden Dome missile defense system to safeguard the US in the fourth quarter of 2028, according to a report. That timeframe lines up with Trump's ambitious goal to 'have it done in three years' and comes amid pitches from defense contractors to score coveted contracts to develop the cutting-edge system. 'They want a win to point to in November [2028],' a defense official told CNN. 'And DoD [Department of Defense] wants to avoid anything they perceive will slow them down.' Advertisement The test, which will be conducted by the Missile Defense Agency, is expected to be called FTI-X, which stands for 'Flight Test Integrated,' in a nod to how it will assess the Golden Dome's vast array of sensors and weapons systems, according to the report. Development of the state-of-the-art missile defense system is expected to cost about $175 billion, according to Trump, who tapped Gen. Michael Guetlein, vice chair of operations at the Space Force, to oversee the ambitious project in May. 4 President Trump wants the US to develop a state-of-the-art missile defense system to protect the homeland from advanced attacks. Getty Images Advertisement 4 The Golden Dome system is intended to safeguard the colossal continental US. AP Congress has already allocated $25 billion in funding for the Golden Dome in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which Trump signed into law last month. Military officials have explored space-based missile defense technologies for decades, including during Ronald Reagan's Star Wars program, also known as the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Space-based missile defense technology can be advantageous because it can help thwart an enemy missile much earlier in its trajectory than other technologies that the US currently has in its arsenal. Advertisement It can also reduce geographical barriers and catch certain types of enemy missiles at a stage when they are slower and easier to intercept. However, there are many drawbacks. The US would need to make significant technological advances to develop that system, which is likely to be very costly and could entice other countries to weaponize space. 4 Skeptics have raised questions about whether the Golden Dome can be completed on time and within the budget President Trump laid out. Getty Images The defense official called it a 'hard problem, and technically very risky,' CNN reported. Advertisement 'The possible number of satellites needed to achieve a probability of engagement success is going to be very high, given the time and area needed to cover the continental United States,' the defense official said. Plans for the test in 2028 are expected to be 'phase one' of the project. A deluge of defense contractors and other private companies have been jockeying for contracts to help develop the massive defense system. Precise details of how the Golden Dome system will function are not fully known. Trump has taken inspiration from Israel's feted Iron Dome system, which helps defend populated areas from short-range attacks. Trump's plans would encompass much more sophisticated missiles, such as ballistic and hypersonic missiles, that may potentially be fired off from much more distant locations than what Iron Dome defends against. 'Once fully constructed, the Golden Dome will be capable of intercepting missiles even if they are launched from other sides of the world,' Trump teased in May. 4 Precise details about how the Golden Dome system will function are not clear. Getty Images Guetlein has admitted that the Pentagon faces enormous challenges in successfully completing the project. Advertisement 'I think the real technical challenge will be building of the space-based interceptor,' Guetlein said at a summit last month. 'That technology exists, I believe. I believe we have proven every element of the physics, that we can make it work.' 'What we have not proven is, first, can I do it economically, and then second, can I do it at scale? Can I build enough satellites to get after the threat? Can I expand the industrial base fast enough to build those satellites?' The initiative comes amid advancements in the American space industry, with tycoons such as Elon Musk working to bring down the costs of launching satellites. The Defense Department didn't reply to a request for comment Sunday.


The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Most education reformers have no idea what parents and kids want — and they don't care
Most education reformers — especially those interested in low-income communities — rightly focus on the needs and interests of students, whether they are discussing short-term outcomes like standardized testing results, or longer term results like rates of college acceptance and graduation. But the most important question they should be asking is: What do the parents in these communities want for their children? What do their extended family, mentors and pastors want? Unfortunately, even the best-intentioned reformers rarely entertain this question. Parents are the most important stakeholders in matters of education after the children themselves, yet reformers' ideological and emotional interests consistently take precedence over those of the parents and the local community. All too often, the education of poor or marginalized children gets lost in ideological battles between groups of elites who are completely removed from the communities they purport to defend. Elitist social justice initiatives — such as tossing out commonsense academic and behavioral standards because of supposed racial justice concerns — are a prime example of this 'soft bigotry of low expectations.' Is it acceptable to lower standards for certain children even if their parents want them to be held to a higher standard? Respect and consideration of parental priorities is one of the major reasons that indigenous, community-oriented and community-generated educational projects produce objectively excellent and even superior outcomes to top-down interventions from reformers outside the community. Take the Rosenwald schools: Booker T. Washington of the Tuskegee Institute and Julius Rosenwald, then-president of Sears Roebuck, joined to create one of the most remarkable educational successes of American history — yet remarkably few people know that they ever existed. Noting the dire lack of funding for education of Black children in the Jim Crow-era South, the Rosenwald Fund contributed $4.3 million — matched and exceeded by $4.7 million raised by Black communities themselves — to build over 5,000 schools, shops and associated homes across the segregated South. The Rosenwald schools were both very successful and indigenous projects: The seed money empowered local men, women and children to narrow the racial literacy gap in the Jim Crow-era American South by a stunning 40 percent. Within a generation, a three-year racial education gap shrank to well under a year. These highly localized, community-driven projects succeeded in the face of widespread, bitter discrimination. A modern-day example of indigenously led excellence can be seen in the Piney Woods School, a challenging preparatory school serving underprivileged children that was founded by Laurence Clifton Jones in 1909. Piney Woods serves a student body that wouldn't otherwise have access to a high-quality education, and relies largely on the generosity of donors to fund the scholarships for many of those who attend. But these kids, and their families, don't want a handout. They don't want low expectations. They want a challenge. And a challenge is what they receive. The school emphasizes self-responsibility, self-government and empowerment from within the communities and families it serves rather than from outside or 'above' them. Every student commits to working an on-campus job — in fact, the bulk of the campus buildings were built by students themselves. And their families donate or contribute to the school. They aren't looking to be accommodated or coddled. They don't want to be excused, and never have — even in the face of clear racism. There is a cautionary tale of reform, however, and it is the charter school movement. Charter schools are an increasingly common and often promising mode of educational reform, but they often flounder on the simple fact that reformers eventually rely on politics, rather than community interests, to guide their decisions. Former inner-city public school teacher Robert Pondiscio, in his recent review of Steve Wilson's book 'The Lost Decade,' briefly recounts the rise and fall of the 'no excuses' charter school model. In its ascendant years, the model allowed urban and underprivileged students to excel beyond anyone's expectations. But then it failed, catastrophically, under the growing weight of social justice culture. The schools that offered an irreplaceable chance at academic excellence — and long-term professional success — to Black students all over the country were sabotaged by the anxieties of political elites locked in pointless ideological battles over 'whiteness.' White guilt became more important than Black excellence. These charter schools abandoned the 'no excuses' standards that had helped lift students up from disadvantaged backgrounds as outdated or racist, replacing them with 'equity' initiatives that are leading today to low scores and low achievement. But no one asked the community leaders, who stand to gain or lose the most, if they were on board with these changes. Parents are stakeholders. Children are stakeholders. Siblings, aunts and uncles, mentors, pastors — anyone invested in these kids' lives are stakeholders. And that is the only real safeguard that communities have here: direct participation in and influence over the well-being of the children. If we want to build a more just society, we can and should begin by abandoning the top-down, ideologically-motivated model of educational reform. We must stop letting the elites destroy the strongest chance our most vulnerable children have at improving their station in life. Indigenous projects are the very best of our past — and they will be the very best of our future. Bob Woodson is the founder and president of the Woodson Center, and editor of the book ' A Pathway to American Renewal: Red, White, and Black Vol II. ' Will Crossley is the executive vice president of the Woodson Center and president of the Piney Woods School.


Miami Herald
10 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Miami judge becomes first confirmed U.S. attorney during Trump's second term
President Donald Trump's first confirmed nominee for U.S. Attorney is a Miami-Dade judge whose professional background includes poor job evaluations in the office he will now lead. On Saturday, Judge Jason A. Reding Quiñones secured a 49-44 cloture vote in the U.S. Senate. He will now head the U.S. Attorney's Office in South Florida, replacing interim U.S. Attorney Hayden O'Byrne. READ MORE: Trump picks U.S. attorney in Miami. As criminal prosecutor, he received poor evaluations Trump posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, 'Very proud of our great Republican Senators for fighting, over the Weekend and far beyond, if necessary, in order to get my great Appointments approved, and on their way to helping us MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' The Miami Herald could not reach Reding Quiñones for comment. Reding Quiñones, formerly a federal prosecutor in the Miami office, was appointed as a Miami-Dade County judge a year ago by Gov. Ron DeSantis and is a lieutenant colonel in the Air Force Reserve. After graduating from Florida International University's law school in 2008, he began his career practicing corporate law before transitioning to a military lawyer for the U.S. Air Force and then joining the Justice Department. Soon after, he joined the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami as a prosecutor in the major crimes section, where he would receive poor evaluations from supervisors relating to incompetence; however, Reding Quiñones filed a discrimination complaint claiming he was being targeted because of his race. He would later drop that complaint and continue on in the Miami office's civil division, where he recieved satisfactory job evaluations. Despite this history, University of Richmond Law Professor Carl Tobias said it likely wouldn't have a big impact on his confirmation by the Senate. The Senate Judiciary Committe process for evaluating U.S Attorney nominees is 'not very rigorous,' Tobias said. That's because, he said, the panel doesn't have the resources to conduct hearings and instead relies on staff analysis and recommendations. 'Practically all nominees receive no discussion and voice votes, unless staff detects red flags,' he said. Tobias believes confirmations have grown increasingly politicized, but in a rare occurrence, Reding Quiñones received a 12-9 committee party line vote before the process continued to the Senate where he would be confirmed. The confirmation is not only a victory for the president, but also a much-needed move for the Miami office, which has remained one of the busiest in the country despite growing struggles. Since the resignation of former U.S. Attorney Markenzy Lapointe, the first Black lawyer to hold the position in South Florida, earlier this year, the office has lost a half a dozen senior career prosecutors. READ MORE: Miami U.S. Attorney, first Haitian-American in post, to resign before Trump takes office 'The [South Florida office] does critical law enforcement work and its several hundred attorneys function more smoothly when the office has a permanent, Senate-confirmed leader, who cooperates effectively with the Justice Department and other US Attorneys,' Tobias said. While the U.S. Attorney position may now be filled, other seats in South Florida and the rest of the state have not made it through Senate confirmation hearings yet. The Senate failed to confirm one Trump federal judge nominee who would preside in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and three nominees for the Middle District. Tobias noted that these are emergency vacancies, as both districts have substantial caseloads that are reaching or already surpassing protracted lengths without resolution. The Senate is now in recess, which means any appointments will have to wait until September when it resumes session. 'The diligent, overloaded Southern and Middle District judges and the people of Florida must wait for relief,' Tobias said.