Texas keeps on growing: Lone Star State sees another month of record job growth
In March, Texas saw a new high with the largest labor force in the state's history at 15,778,500, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Texas Workforce Commission.
According to the data, Texas saw a new high of 15,137,500 for Texans working. This number includes those who are self-employed.
The state also added 26,500 nonfarm jobs last month, reaching a new total high of 14,282,600. Between March 2024 and March 2025, the state added 192,100 nonfarm jobs, which was more than any other state.
As of January employment data, the annual nonfarm growth rate in Texas is 1.3%.
"Every month, Texas welcomes businesses from across the country and around the world to innovate and invest in our great state," Gov. Greg Abbott said in a release Friday about the data. "By funding our schools more than ever before and expanding career and technical training programs, we will prepare more Texans for better job and bigger paycheck opportunities to build a more prosperous Texas.'
Job creation, workforce development and education have been major efforts pushed by Abbott this legislative session.
Last month, he released a five-year statewide economic development strategic plan outlining a blueprint for economic expansion and job creation.
The "Bigger. Better. Texas." plan has four main goals:
Establishes a unifying vision for the future of our Texas economy
Identifies new target industry sectors and clusters expected to drive strategic economic growth and job creation
Outlines objectives and initiatives to advance the state's global competitiveness
Provides data and recommendations to inform economic development decisions across the state
To support additional job creation and small businesses in Texas, Abbott also created the Governor's Small Business Freedom Council in December. This month, he announced more than $1.3 million in job training grants to Collin County Community College District for programs in health care, accounting, manufacturing and other high-demand occupations. House Bill 20 and House Bill 120, two bills part of Abbott's career training expansion efforts that was one of his seven emergency items this legislative session, advanced out of the Texas House last week.
Texas saw rapid job growth in 2023 and 2024 as well.
A report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas looking at the outlook of Texas' economy in 2025 said Texas' energy, financial services and construction industries were the fastest-growing job sectors last year, growing 5.5%, 5.1% and 3.1%, respectively. Overall, job growth rose 1.7% lower than initial projections expected in 2024.
Texas added 284,200 jobs from December 2023 to December 2024, according to the Texas Workforce Commission.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Texas sees largest labor force in state history in March
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Redistricting fight escalates as both parties commit to gerrymandering voter maps
Maria Garcia, founder of the Hispanic Republican Club of North Texas, admits her party's attempt to redraw congressional district maps is a straightforward political tactic to gain up to five Republican seats in the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2026 election. It's a tactic she fully supports. Democrats have gerrymandered other states to their advantage, argued Garcia, a former school crossing guard and healthcare worker. Now, it's Republicans' turn in Texas. 'It's just trying to pick better seats so we can continue to have control,' she said. 'I mean, why wouldn't you want that as a Republican?' The push to redraw congressional districts continued to escalate over the weekend as legislators in at least 12 states indicated they could initiate redistricting before the midterm election, which will determine whether Republicans maintain their slim House majority. A win by Democrats would present the first real challenge to President Donald Trump's second-term America-first agenda, which has so far moved forward with little pushback from Republican lawmakers. The moves come after Texas Republicans, at the request of Trump, agreed to consider redrawing the state's map during a special session called by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to wrap up unfinished business on flood relief and public education. In response, Democrats left the state Aug. 3 to deny Republicans the quorum required to vote on the redistricting plan, calling the effort a blatant attempt to stack the deck ahead of the 2026 election. Democrats said they plan to stay away until the end of the special session Aug. 19, but Abbott threatened Sunday to continue to call special sessions indefinitely until they return to the statehouse. 'This could literally last years,' Abbott said on 'Fox News Sunday.' 'As soon as this one is over, I'm going to call another one, then another one, then another one, then another one.' Now, legislators in blue states like California, New York, Illinois, New Jersey and Maryland have all indicated they might redraw their congressional districts in favor of Democrats if Texas moves forward with its plan. Republican leaders in Indiana, Ohio, Missouri and Florida said they are also discussing new maps after Trump made clear his desire to win House seats through redistricting efforts. States are required to redraw congressional districts every 10 years following the U.S. Census, but numerous states have also had to redistrict following judicial rulings that find the maps unconstitutional. Some states also allow redistricting between censuses, such as Texas, but midterm redistricting rarely happens. Still, redrawing gerrymandered districts before a midterm isn't illegal. The U.S. Supreme Court in a 2019 case ruled that federal judges have no authority to decide whether partisan gerrymandering goes too far. State supreme courts could make a ruling, but some have also determined they don't have the authority to regulate gerrymandering. The one exception is maps that divide up districts based on race, which in some cases have been determined to violate the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Partisan practice Political tampering with voting maps isn't unique to either major party. Both blue and red states where one party controls the legislature and governor's seat have historically gerrymandered maps in favor of their party. Today, deep red states like Texas and Florida and deep blue states like Illinois and Oregon still have hyper-partisan congressional districts, according to The Gerrymandering Project at Princeton University. In total, 15 states received a failing grade on drawing congressional district maps without partisan motives. What makes the escalating redistricting showdown different from past efforts is the deep current political polarization in which both parties see each other as disloyal enemies, argued Kirby Goidel, a political scientist at Texas A&M University. 'Part of it is rooted in this idea that the people that I don't agree with, the people of the other party, aren't Americans who want the best for America,' he said. 'They're evil. They're bad. They're cheaters.' Hayden Padgett, chairman of the Young Republican National Federation, lives in Plano, Texas. He argued that the new congressional map is 'more in line' with what the average Texas voter wants. He called Democrats who have fled the state 'untrustworthy partners' who refuse to work with Republicans. 'They're just pissing everybody off and making it completely unlikely they're going to get anything they want, not only on this, but on things in the future,' Padgett said. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, a Democrat, on Sunday called Trump a 'cheater' during an interview with NBC News, and said the new Texas map violates the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution. Republicans 'know that they're going to lose (Congress) in 2026, so they're trying to steal seats. ... That is what these Texas Democrats are trying to stand up against,' Pritzker said. In California, legislators have said they plan to unveil this week a proposed new congressional map favoring Democrats. The map would be decided on by voters during a special election in November. California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday told Trump in a letter that his state would call off its potential plan if the president ended efforts in Texas and other GOP-led states to redraw their maps. Newsom called Republicans' efforts an 'unprecedented' attempt to rig the 2026 election. 'You are playing with fire, risking the destabilization of our democracy, while knowing that California can neutralize any gains you hope to make,' Newsom wrote. Garcia with the Hispanic Republican Club of North Texas argued the ability to gerrymander means the Trump-led tactic is fair game in order to keep a majority in the House. She said Democrats have 'done even worse things' to gain power, and it only makes sense Republicans do the same. 'Why can't we do what we need to do with Texas?' she said. 'We're just trying to help our party wherever we can.' But Goidel, the Texas A&M political scientist, worries that such an attitude could spell disaster for American democracy. Voters lose trust in the government when they believe the system is rigged, he noted. If states across the nation start redrawing voter maps as part of a partisan power grab, that distrust could reach a fever pitch, Goidel cautioned. 'I don't see how we end up at 2026 without a loss of faith in fair-and-free elections,' he said. 'People will see it's not fair. Everything's a game of just trying to manipulate the outcome.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How Did TWFG, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:TWFG) 11% ROE Fare Against The Industry?
Explore TWFG's Fair Values from the Community and select yours One of the best investments we can make is in our own knowledge and skill set. With that in mind, this article will work through how we can use Return On Equity (ROE) to better understand a business. To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand TWFG, Inc. (NASDAQ:TWFG). Shop Top Mortgage Rates A quicker path to financial freedom Personalized rates in minutes Your Path to Homeownership ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. How To Calculate Return On Equity? The formula for return on equity is: Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity So, based on the above formula, the ROE for TWFG is: 11% = US$31m ÷ US$289m (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2025). The 'return' refers to a company's earnings over the last year. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.11 in profit. View our latest analysis for TWFG Does TWFG Have A Good ROE? One simple way to determine if a company has a good return on equity is to compare it to the average for its industry. However, this method is only useful as a rough check, because companies do differ quite a bit within the same industry classification. You can see in the graphic below that TWFG has an ROE that is fairly close to the average for the Insurance industry (13%). That isn't amazing, but it is respectable. Although the ROE is similar to the industry, we should still perform further checks to see if the company's ROE is being boosted by high debt levels. If a company takes on too much debt, it is at higher risk of defaulting on interest payments. How Does Debt Impact ROE? Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used. Combining TWFG's Debt And Its 11% Return On Equity While TWFG does have a tiny amount of debt, with a debt to equity ratio of just 0.032, we think the use of debt is very modest. Its ROE isn't particularly impressive, but the debt levels are quite modest, so the business probably has some real potential. Judicious use of debt to improve returns can certainly be a good thing, although it does elevate risk slightly and reduce future optionality. Conclusion Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE. But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company. But note: TWFG may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with high ROE and low debt. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Why mocktails cost as much as cocktails in S.F.
Grabbing a cocktail in San Francisco is not cheap. A drink can easily cost $20 — even when there's no alcohol in it. Over the past few years, there's been a growing market for nonalcoholic beer, wine and cocktails. But patrons are puzzled as to why these drinks can cost as much as their boozy counterparts. 'There's a lot of misunderstandings, misconceptions, misinformation, all because it's under this fear of being a new industry,' said Joshua James, owner of Ocean Beach Cafe, which became San Francisco's first nonalcoholic bar when it opened in 2021. James, who previously worked in alcohol for 20 years, understands the general frustration, but thinks it mainly has to do with a misconception of non-alcohol cocktails being just a 'mix of juices.' Bar managers around San Francisco say the combination of labor, presentation and high-quality ingredients make these drinks worth the price. The rise in mocktails is reflective of Gen Z's increasing aversion to nightlife and drinking alcohol. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics found that while boomers spend $25 billion per year on alcohol, Gen Z spends only $3.1 billion. Eddy Singh, an owner of low-proof cocktail bar Red Window in North Beach, has noticed an increase in young customers ordering mocktails. ' We get a lot of young people in our space, and we notice they're going towards a very healthy lifestyle,' he said. 'They're coming in with their friends who also don't drink, so what options can we provide? Because we still want to give them a similar experience.' Although Red Window offers sodas for $5, Singh says that most young people opt for something more elaborate like the Mango Lassi Remix ($14) or Cucumber Craze ($14), a fruity, refreshing mix of cucumber, pineapple, lemon, hibiscus syrup and seltzer. These drinks cost only $2 less than the alcoholic cocktails because they use similar ingredients and require the same labor, Singh said. Some bars use nonalcoholic spirits as the base of their mocktails to contribute a similar flavor profile, such as the juniper and citrus of gin. These spirits are typically as expensive as, if not pricier than, actual alcohol. For instance, a 750-ml bottle of Amass Riverine Non-Alcoholic Spirit, a juniper-forward alternative for gin costs $10 more than a bottle of Junipero American Craft Gin in the same size. Neutral grain alcohols, such as vodka or gin, are relatively cheap to make in large batches. Nonalcoholic spirits, on the other hand, need double, sometimes triple, the botanical load — ingredients used to give the drink flavor — to get the desired taste. More ingredients can mean a higher cost of production. At high-end Indian restaurant Copra, there are four nonalcoholic cocktails with completely different flavor profiles — and most of them rely on the complexity of non-alcohol spirits. Bar director Christopher Longoria recommends the Tiger's Eye ($15) for diners who enjoy powerful bitterness, like with a Negroni. Wilderton Lustre provides bitter orange while Wilderton Bittersweet Aperitivo lends aromatic herbs and grapefruit, alongside cinnamon and star anise. For someone looking for a bright, approachable drink, Longoria suggests the Honey Dove ($17), which blends chamomile, honey and pepper with Seedlip Spice, a booze-free spirit that's warm with cardamom. Meanwhile, there's a growing demand for so-called 'functional drinks,' which James has coined the 'alternative buzz market.' These drinks can mimic some of the positive effects that come with alcohol consumption, such as increased sociability and relaxation, without the hangover. Popular ingredients include L-Theanine, an amino acid found in tea leaves that's said to promote relaxation, and ashwagandha, an herb believed to relieve stress. 'These are supplements that people take daily, and now they're seeing that they can get that in their really tasty beverage,' James said. At Ocean Beach Cafe, there's one functional ingredient that James just can't keep in stock: kava. James pays $53 for a 750-ml bottle of the bitter root, which provides a 'body buzz.' It numbs your mouth and relaxes your muscles, making it a popular alternative to alcohol. Kava shots cost $7 at Ocean Beach Cafe, and the two kava 'cocktails' cost $17. For Longoria, the popularity of kava and other functional ingredients speaks to a wider phenomenon within American culture of focusing on the end result. In his view, ordering a drink should not just be for the 'buzz' you feel, or the supposed health benefits — it should be about the overall experience. 'Why can't one enjoy a drink simply for enjoying it?' Longoria said. In his view, that alone is well worth $17.
