Michigan House committee moves bill to remove non-voters from qualified voter file
Michigan lawmakers on the state House Election Integrity Committee approved a bill Tuesday aimed at confirming if longtime non-voters are still eligible to vote before elections.
Many people have lost trust in elections, Rep. Mike Hoadley (R-Au Gres) told lawmakers on the committee last week as he presented his bill, House Bill 4356, aimed to 'clean up' the qualified voter file of eligible voters. Hoadley, whose 2022 House campaign was backed by President Donald Trump, remarked that after weeks of testimony from individuals, many of which question the integrity of the 2020 election where Trump lost to former President Joe Biden, that there are real doubts from Michiganders about the sanctity of electoral processes.
Speakers who have provided testimony to the committee over the first few weeks of the committee have included a Detroit-area pastor who delivered the benediction at President Donald Trump's second inauguration in January and vocal critic of Michigan's voter roll and co-founder of Check My Vote Phani Mantravadi.
House Bill 4356 would require the Michigan Secretary of State to send mailed notices to Michigan voters who have not voted in the last 10 years in order for them to confirm they're still eligible voters who should remain on the qualified voter file.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Those notices would have to be sent to voters within 180 days after each general November election with information on what will happen if a response is not received. Parties interested in remaining on the voter file would have to complete and sign a card enclosed in the notice confirming their current address to their local clerk at least 15 days before the next election.
If the person does not submit the card or engage in a 'voting-related activity' such as requesting an absentee voter application or updating their voter registration, they would have to confirm their current address at the polls before they could vote.
Upon receiving the card from a voter who would like to remain on the voter file, the local city or township clerk would compare the signature on the card to the one on file in the qualified voter file and if the signatures don't match, the registration will be considered 'challenged' and that person would have to provide proof of their residency and their voter certification when trying to vote.
The process of sending the notices and processing them will take time, Hoadley told the committee last week, but it's 'time well spent'.
The committee cleared the bill to be considered by the House as a whole with approval from all of the Republican members of the committee except for Rep. Joseph Fox (R-Fremont) who voted against the bill while the three Democratic members passed.
Oversight Committee Chair Jay DeBoyer (R-Clay Twp.), who previously served as the clerk of St. Clair County, overseeing elections, supported Hoadley's sentiments last week, telling the committee that whether elections have been secure or not in the past, there are plenty of people who have completely lost confidence.
'At the end of the day, that confidence in the electorate and the outcome of an election is what matters, and that confidence, whether it's founded or unfounded, still matters, so we have to provide tools to the Department of State or the Office of the Secretary of State for them to navigate their duties and their roles and provide us with a more secure voter roll list,' DeBoyer said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
Coming up on ‘Fox News Sunday': August 17, 2025
This week on 'Fox News Sunday,' Shannon Bream speaks with Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff about his firsthand account of being in the room during the meeting between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.


Chicago Tribune
18 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Trump administration to keep DC police chief in place, but under immigration enforcement order
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration on Friday reversed course and agreed to leave the Washington, D.C., police chief in control of the department, while Attorney General Pam Bondi, in a new memo, directed the District's police to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. The order from Bondi came after officials in the nation's capital sued Friday to block President Donald Trump's takeover of the Washington police. The night before, his administration had escalated its intervention into the city's law enforcement by naming a federal official as the new emergency head of the department, essentially placing the police force under the full control of the federal government. The attorney general's new order represents a partial retreat for the Trump administration in the face of intense skepticism from a judge over the legality of Bondi's earlier directive. But Bondi also signaled the administration would continue to pressure D.C. leaders to help federal authorities aggressively pursue immigrants in the country illegally, despite city laws on the books that limit cooperation between police and immigration authorities. In a social media post Friday evening, Bondi criticized D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb, saying he 'continues to oppose our efforts to improve public safety.' But she added, 'We remain committed to working closely with Mayor Bowser.' Mayor Muriel Bowser's office said late Friday that it was still evaluating how it can comply with the new Bondi order on immigration enforcement operations. The police department already eased some restrictions on cooperating with federal officials facilitating Trump's mass-deportation campaign but reaffirmed that it would follow the district's sanctuary city laws. In a letter sent Friday night to D.C. citizens, Bowser wrote: 'It has been an unsettling and unprecedented week in our city. Over the course of a week, the surge in federal law enforcement across D.C. has created waves of anxiety.' She added that 'our limited self-government has never faced the type of test we are facing right now,' but added that if Washingtonians stick together, 'we will show the entire nation what it looks like to fight for American democracy – even when we don't have full access to it.' The legal battle was the latest evidence of the escalating tensions in a mostly Democratic city that now has its police department largely under the control of the Republican president's administration. Trump's takeover is historic, yet it had played out with a slow ramp-up in federal law enforcement officials and National Guard troops to start the week. As the weekend approached, though, signs across the city — from the streets to the legal system — suggested a deepening crisis over who controls the city's immigration and policing policies, the district's right to govern itself and daily life for the millions of people who live and work in the metro area. The two sides sparred in court for hours Friday before U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, who is overseeing the district's lawsuit. She indicated the law likely doesn't grant the Trump administration power to fully take over city police, but it probably does give the president more power than the city might like. 'The way I read the statute, the president can ask, the mayor must provide, but the president can't control,' said Reyes, who was nominated to the bench by Democratic President Joe Biden. The judge pushed the two sides to make a compromise. An attorney for the Trump administration, Yaakov Roth, said the move to sideline Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith came after an immigration order that still held back some aid to federal authorities. He argued that the president has broad authority to determine what kind of help police in Washington must provide. The police takeover is the latest move by Trump to test the limits of his legal authorities to carry out his agenda, relying on obscure statutes and a supposed state of emergency to bolster his tough-on-crime message and his plans to speed up the mass deportation of people in the United States illegally. It also marks one of the most sweeping assertions of federal authority over a local government in modern times. While Washington has grappled with spikes in violence and visible homelessness, the city's homicide rate ranks below those of several other major U.S. cities, and the capital is not in the throes of the public safety collapse the Trump administration has portrayed. The president has more power over the nation's capital than other cities, but D.C. has elected its own mayor and city council since the Home Rule Act was signed in 1973. Trump is the first president to exert control over the city's police force since it was passed. The law limits that control to 30 days without congressional approval, though Trump has suggested he'd seek to extend it. Bondi's Thursday night directive to place the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Terry Cole, in charge of the police department came even after Smith had told MPD officers hours earlier to share information with immigration agencies regarding people not in custody, such as someone involved in a traffic stop or checkpoint. The Justice Department said Bondi disagreed with the police chief's instructions because they allowed for continued practice of 'sanctuary policies,' which generally limit cooperation by local law enforcement with federal immigration officers. Meanwhile, advocates in Washington were trying to advise immigrants on how to respond. Anusce Sanai, associate legal director for the Washington-based immigrant nonprofit Ayuda, said they're still parsing the legal aspects of the policies. 'Even with the most anti-immigrant administration, we would always tell our clients that they must call the police, that they should call the police,' Sanai said. 'But now we find ourselves that we have to be very careful on what we advise.' Amy Fischer, an organizer with Migrant Solidarity Mutual Aid, said that before the federal takeover, most of what they had seen in the nation's capital was Immigration and Customs Enforcement targeting specific individuals. But since last Friday night they've seen a 'really significant change,' she said, with ICE and federal officers doing roving patrols around the city. She said a hotline set up by immigration advocates to report ICE activity 'is receiving calls almost off the hook.' ICE said in a post on X that their teams had arrested 'several' people in Washington Friday. A video posted on X showed two uniformed personnel putting handcuffs on someone while standing outside a white transport van. A population already tense from days of ramp-up has begun seeing more significant shows of force across the city. National Guard troops watched over some of the world's most renowned landmarks, and Humvees took position in front of the busy main train station. Volunteers helped homeless people leave long-standing encampments — to where was often unclear. Friday night along the district's U Street, a popular nightlife corridor, an Associated Press photographer saw officers from the FBI, the DEA, the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Park Police, U.S. Marshals and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. As the District challenged the Trump administration in court Friday, more than 100 protesters gathered less than a block away in front of police headquarters, chanting 'Protect home rule!' and waving signs saying 'Resist!'


Fox News
30 minutes ago
- Fox News
World leader who took swipe at Trump over tariffs appears to cozy up to China
Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva declared his country open to foreign companies at the inauguration of Chinese automaker GWM's factory in São Paulo. The remarks come as Brazil faces steep U.S. tariffs, which Lula has repeatedly denounced. By making the statement at a Chinese factory opening, Lula signaled a possible pivot further away from Washington and toward Beijing. "Count on the Brazilian government. Whoever wants to leave, leave. Whoever wants to come, we welcome you with open arms," Lula said at the ceremony, according to Reuters. The news agency also reported he criticized President Donald Trump's tariffs as "unnecessary turbulence." Both Brazil and China face tariffs, though at different levels. China's tariffs, once as high as 145%, now stand at 30% but could rise if Beijing and Washington fail to reach a deal. Brazil, meanwhile, is facing a 50% tariff on its goods. Lula and Chinese President Xi Jinping, both BRICS leaders, spoke earlier in the week ahead of the factory's opening. The call followed Lula's comments to Reuters that he planned to raise the issue of responding to U.S. tariffs with fellow BRICS leaders. On Wednesday, the Brazilian government unveiled an aid package for companies hurt by U.S. tariffs. According to Reuters, the package focused on credit lines for exporters and government purchases of products struggling to find new markets. The U.S. tariffs on Brazil are expected to impact the coffee, beef, seafood, textiles, footwear and fruit industries, Reuters reported. Earlier this month, Lula told Reuters he was willing to talk to Trump but would not "humiliate" himself by trying to engage while the U.S. president "doesn't want to talk." However, Trump has said that Lula is free to "talk to me anytime he wants." Tensions between the two leaders extend beyond tariffs into politics. The Trump administration has lambasted Brazil's treatment of former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is under house arrest. Trump commented on the situation in an executive order in which he denounced Brazil's "politically motivated persecution, intimidation, harassment, censorship, and prosecution" of Bolsonaro. Lula told Reuters that Brazil's Supreme Court "does not care what Trump says, and it should not." He also reportedly said that Bolsonaro was a "traitor to the homeland" who should face another trial for provoking Trump's intervention.