logo
Tight blood pressure control called healthy, cost-effective

Tight blood pressure control called healthy, cost-effective

UPI4 hours ago
Controlling blood pressure to below 120 systolic prevents more heart attacks, strokes, cases of heart failure and other heart-related health problems, compared with higher targets, researchers report in the Annals of Internal Medicine. Photo by Adobe Stock
Aug. 20 (UPI) -- Tight control over blood pressure is not only good for patients, but is also cost-effective health care, a new study says.
Controlling blood pressure to below 120 systolic prevents more heart attacks, strokes, cases of heart failure and other heart-related health problems, compared with higher targets, researchers report in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
It's also cost-effective, with tight blood pressure control increasing treatment expenses only slightly, researchers found.
"This study should give patients at high cardiovascular risk and their clinicians more confidence in pursuing an intensive blood pressure goal," lead researcher Karen Smith, an investigator at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, said in a news release.
"Our findings suggest the intensive less than 120 mm/Hg target prevents more cardiovascular events and provides good value, and this holds true even when measurements aren't perfect," she said.
Current blood pressure guidelines define high blood pressure at 130 systolic or higher. Systolic blood pressure is the pressure within blood vessels during a heartbeat.
Normal blood pressure is less than 120 systolic, and blood pressure between 120 and 129 systolic is considered elevated, according to the American Heart Association.
For the new study, researchers combined data gathered between 2013 and 2018 by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the groundbreaking Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), and other published studies.
The team used this data to simulate lifetime heart health risks for patients over 50 years old whose systolic blood pressure was controlled to less than 120; less than 130; or less than 140.
Researchers also considered the potential risk of serious side effects posed by blood pressure medications, and accounted for common errors made in regular blood pressure readings.
Even when including occasionally erroneous blood pressure readings, the researchers' model found that the 120 blood pressure target prevented more heart health problems than the 130 target.
The lower target also was more expensive, due to more prescriptions and doctor visits, and led to more adverse events related to treatment, such as falls, kidney damage, low blood pressure and slow heart beat, researchers found.
Nevertheless, the 120 target remained cost-effective compared to the higher targets, researchers concluded.
For example, the target of less than 120 was associated with a cost of $42,000 per life-year gained, only $1,300 more than the 130 target, results show.
However, such tight blood pressure control isn't necessarily a good idea for everyone, Smith said.
"Given the additional risk of adverse events related to antihypertensives, intensive treatment will not be optimal for all patients," Smith warned. "Patients and clinicians should work together to determine the appropriate medication intensity based on patient preferences."
More information
The American Heart Association has more on blood pressure guidelines.
Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NASA's TOMEX+ rockets to study turbulence in Earth's mesosphere
NASA's TOMEX+ rockets to study turbulence in Earth's mesosphere

UPI

time2 hours ago

  • UPI

NASA's TOMEX+ rockets to study turbulence in Earth's mesosphere

One of the three rockets for the TOMEX+ mission sits on a launcher at Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia. Photo by Danielle Johnson/NASA Aug. 20 (UPI) -- NASA is planning to launch TOMEX+ rocket mission to study the turbulence where Earth's atmosphere ends and outer space begins sometime over the next two weeks. The earliest the agency expects to launch the three sounding rockets is Saturday, with the launch window closing Sept. 3, NASA announced Wednesday. The launch window has been repeatedly pushed back, this time due to high sea states in the rocket recovery area from Hurricane Erin. Sounding rockets are those that can be aimed to reach the Earth's mesopause, an area of the atmosphere that's too high for weather balloons and too low for traditional satellites to reach. The mesosphere is the coldest layer of Earth's atmosphere and is the place where weather patterns on the planet can transfer energy into space, creating turbulence that can affect satellites. NASA will use three sounding rockets to carry out the study, the first two launching within about a minute of each other. They will release vapor that will help scientists on the ground map wind patterns in the mesosphere. The third rocket will then use a lidar -- light detection and ranging -- device to send out pulses of light to detect sodium atoms in the mesosphere. The sodium comes from tiny grains of dust that enter the Earth's atmosphere from space. The lidar will allow scientists to further map the mesosphere's density and motion over time. "Together, the TOMEX+ payloads will provide the clearest 3D view yet of turbulence at the edge of space, improving our understanding of high-altitude cloud formation, satellite drag and even atmospheric processes on other planets," NASA said in a blog post on the project. NASA will launch the rockets from Wallops Flight Facility on Wallops Island, Va. The project is led by Jim Clemmons, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of New Hampshire.

California resident tests positive for plague after flea bite
California resident tests positive for plague after flea bite

UPI

time3 hours ago

  • UPI

California resident tests positive for plague after flea bite

Aug. 20 (UPI) -- A person in California tested positive for the plague after likely getting bit via an infected flea during a camping trip in the Lake Tahoe area. Health officials in El Dorado County's Public Health Division announced Tuesday that a positive case of the potentially life-threatening disease turned up in a South Lake Tahoe resident after the virus-filled flea bit the unidentified victim. "It's important that individuals take precautions for themselves and their pets when outdoors, especially while walking, hiking, or camping in areas where wild rodents are present," stated Kyle Fliflet, acting director of El Dorado County's public health. As of Tuesday, the patient was recovering at home under medical care. Worldwide, 3,248 human plague cases were reported between 2010 and 2015, according to World Health Organization data. The disease, commonly referred to as as "the plague," caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis, occurs naturally in the western parts of the country and typically spreads via fleas or wild rodents. "Plague is naturally present in many parts of California, including higher elevation areas of El Dorado County," added Fliflet. Pets, but particularly dogs and cats, are susceptible to carrying plague-infected fleas. The plague, oftentimes referred to as the Black Death, is estimated to have killed roughly half of Europe's population during the 14th century. An investigation into the exact circumstances is underway, according to officials.

Developmental impairments in kids linked to pesticide exposure
Developmental impairments in kids linked to pesticide exposure

UPI

time4 hours ago

  • UPI

Developmental impairments in kids linked to pesticide exposure

Columbia University researchers said exposure to common pesticide chlorpyrifos during pregnancy can impair children's brain development and motor function for years to come. Photo by Adobe Stock/HealthDay News Exposure to a common pesticide during pregnancy can impair children's brain development and motor function for years to come, a new study says. The widely used pesticide chlorpyrifos is linked to altered brain function and poorer fine motor control among children exposed to it while in the womb, researchers report in JAMA Neurology. "The disturbances in brain tissue and metabolism that we observed with prenatal exposure to this one pesticide were remarkably widespread throughout the brain," lead researcher Dr. Bradley Peterson said in a news release. He's chief of child and adolescent psychiatry at the University of Southern California's Keck School of Medicine. For the study, researchers conducted behavioral assessments and MRI scans of 270 kids in upper Manhattan whose mothers had been exposed to CPF during pregnancy when their apartments were fumigated. These assessments occurred between 1998 and mid-2005. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency banned CPF for residential use in 2001, but it's still used as an agricultural pesticide for non-organic fruits, vegetables and grains such as apples, strawberries, asparagus, tart cherries, citrus and peaches, researchers noted. CPF is an organophosphate pesticide, in the same chemical family as nerve gas, researchers note. The chemical can cross the placenta to the fetus, and easily traverse the fetal blood-brain barrier. CPF has been used to control cockroaches, fleas and termites, and has been an active ingredient in some flea and tick collars for pets, according to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. The MRI scans revealed that the children had specific changes in their brain's cortex, white matter, network pathways and nerve insulation, all of which could impair development, motor control and brain function. Further, progressively higher exposure to CPF was significantly associated with increasingly greater alterations in brain structure and function, as well as poorer motor function, researchers said. "More CPF exposure led to more thickening of the cerebral cortex -- the area of the brain that directs functions like thinking, memory and movement," Peterson said. "We don't know the consequences of these brain effects, but we found that CPF exposure most impairs motor functioning." The data strongly suggest that CPF exposure affects the way that neurons develop, Peterson said. "That happens early in pregnancy, when neurons develop in the cortex and differentiate into cortical gray matter -- densely packed nerve cells which process information -- and underlying white matter -- which is mostly nerve fibers that connect neurons," Peterson said. "All these abnormalities can contribute to poor motor function in these kids," he continued. "The contributing mechanisms seem to be the inflammation and oxidative stress that CPF and other pesticides produce." Results also showed that children exposed to CPF had dramatically reduced blood flow to the brain. "To me, this is the most profound finding because it's so powerful and very rare to see something like this," Peterson said. "Blood flow is an important indicator of underlying metabolism -- the energy used by brain tissue. In my opinion, it's maybe the most important finding of the paper, because it says that globally there's a problem with brain metabolism in direct proportion to how much CPF exposure they had." Toxic exposure to CPF continues to be a risk during pregnancy, either through the food supply or from outdoor air and dust near farmland, researchers said. "Current widespread exposures, at levels comparable to those experienced in this sample, continue to place farm workers, pregnant women and unborn children in harm's way," senior researcher Virginia Rauh said in a news release. She's a professor of population and family health at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health in New York City. "It is vitally important that we continue to monitor the levels of exposure in potentially vulnerable populations, especially in pregnant women in agricultural communities, as their infants continue to be at risk," Rauh added. Peterson said pregnant women also should be wary of potential exposure through produce. "It's in our food supply," he said. "And other chemicals used in the home act in similar ways and almost certainly increase inflammation and oxidative stress. This is why it is important to do these studies about the chemicals in our environment to protect children's health." More information The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has more about chlorpyrifos. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store