
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Sinks to New Low
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Donald Trump's public approval has dropped to its lowest level in months, according to newly released polling data.
The latest Reuters/Ipsos poll shows that Trump's approval rating has dropped to 40 percent, with 56 percent disapproving, giving him a net approval rating of -16 points.
Trump previously had a net approval rating of -16 in late June. But at that point, 41 percent approved and 57 percent disapproved, so the latest result marks his lowest approval rating of his second term.
The latest YouGov/Economist poll also showed Trump's approval rating at its lowest level yet, with 40 percent approving and 55 percent disapproving.
The polls are in line with other recent surveys which have also shown Trump's support drop to its lowest point so far. A recent Navigator Research put the president at 42 percent approval and 54 percent disapproval, bringing his net approval rating down to -12 points, while Gallup and The Bullfinch Group report even lower ratings, with net approval as low as -21.
President Donald Trump walks from Marine One after arriving on the South Lawn of the White House on July 29, 2025, in Washington, D.C.
President Donald Trump walks from Marine One after arriving on the South Lawn of the White House on July 29, 2025, in Washington, D.C.
Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP
Trump's Approval Rating Stagnates
The surveys also mirror recent polls, which show Trump's approval rating stagnating.
The YouGov/Economist poll only showed a marginal change in Trump's approval rating from last week when 41 percent approved and 55 percent disapproved of his job performance. The president's approval rating has remained between 40 and 42 percent since mid -June, while his disapproval rating has remained between 53 and 55 percent.
The Reuters/Ipsos poll showed slightly more movement, with Trump's approval rating decreasing by 1 point and his disapproval increasing by 2 points since last week. But like the YouGov/Economist polls, his approval rating has remained between 40 and 42 percent since mid-May, while his disapproval rating has sat between 52 and 56 percent.
Similarly, McLaughlin & Associates, Quantus Insights, RMG Research, and Emerson College all show his approval holding steady between 46 and 52 percent in recent months, with little movement in net approval.
According to Quantus pollster Jason Corley, that is because Trump is still overwhelmingly popular among Republicans, but his support has not seen much of a boost among key demographics such as women, young voters and independents. "For a president who thrives on momentum, the static nature of these numbers is a signal: the base is holding, but the middle isn't moving," Corley wrote in a blog post.
The Reuters/Ipsos survey reflects this trend, showing a highly polarized electorate. According to the poll, 83 percent of Republicans back Trump, compared to just 3 percent of Democrats and about one-third of independents. That is largely unchanged from a month ago, when 84 percent of Republicans said they approve of Trump, as well as 4 percent of Democrats and 40 percent of independents.
The latest YouGov/Economist poll also underscores the deep polarization that continues to define the American electorate, with support for Trump largely divided along partisan lines. However, support has only shifted marginally since June.
Republican approval of Trump remains overwhelmingly high, though it dipped slightly from 89 percent in June to 86 percent in July. Among Democrats, approval rose modestly from 3 percent to 6 percent, while independents showed a slight decline, from 34 percent to 29 percent.
And both polls showed only marginal changes in Trump's approval on issues like the economy, inflation and immigration—which were cornerstones of his campaign.
The Economist/YouGov poll found that approval of Trump's handling of the economy—long seen as one of his strongest areas—dipped slightly from 43 percent in June to 40 percent in July, while disapproval remained at 51 percent.
On inflation and prices, where voter concern remains especially high, approval declined from 35 percent to 34 percent, and disapproval stayed at 59 percent.
Similarly, on immigration, a central pillar of Trump's platform, approval dropped from 47 percent to 44 percent, while disapproval remained at 50 percent. All of these movements fall within the poll's margin of error.
Findings from the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll reinforce the overall stability of public opinion. That survey showed a modest increase in Trump's economic approval—from 35 percent in June to 38 percent in July—and a 2-point rise on immigration, from 41 percent to 43 percent. But like the Economist/YouGov data, these changes remain statistically insignificant.
Trump's Approval Rating Shows Signs Of Recovery
Some polls, however, show signs of recovery for the president. Newsweek's approval tracker shows Trump's net approval at -6 (45 percent approve, 51 percent disapprove), up from -7 at the end of last week and -10 earlier in the week.
The latest Morning Consult survey showed Trump's approval rising to 47 percent, up 2 points from the previous week, while his disapproval dropped to 50 percent, down 2 points. His net approval rating improved from -7 points to -3 points.
It comes as the U.S. economy has mostly avoided a feared downturn from Trump's tariffs introduced earlier this year, ABC News reported.
Meanwhile, unemployment remains near historic lows, and while job growth has cooled, it is still strong.
However, inflation hit 2.7 percent in June, up from 2.4 percent the previous month, according to the Consumer Price Index, but is still lower than when Trump took office.
Overall, economists estimate the economy grew at a 2.3-percent annual rate from April to June, bouncing back from a -0.5-percent decline in the previous quarter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hensoldt Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS Misses Expectations
Hensoldt (ETR:HAG) Second Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: €549.0m (up 5.6% from 2Q 2024). Net loss: €12.0m (loss widened by 20% from 2Q 2024). €0.10 loss per share (further deteriorated from €0.081 loss in 2Q 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Hensoldt Earnings Insights Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 15% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 20% growth forecast for the Aerospace & Defense industry in Germany. Performance of the German Aerospace & Defense industry. The company's shares are down 5.5% from a week ago. Risk Analysis It's necessary to consider the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Hensoldt (at least 1 which is a bit concerning), and understanding them should be part of your investment process. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Unilever First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: €1.43 (vs €1.48 in 1H 2024)
Unilever (LON:ULVR) First Half 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: €30.1b (down 3.2% from 1H 2024). Net income: €3.51b (down 5.1% from 1H 2024). Profit margin: 12% (in line with 1H 2024). EPS: €1.43 (down from €1.48 in 1H 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Unilever Earnings Insights Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 2.8% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 2.9% growth forecast for the Personal Products industry in the United Kingdom. Performance of the British Personal Products industry. The company's shares are up 1.5% from a week ago. Risk Analysis You should always think about risks. Case in point, we've spotted 2 warning signs for Unilever you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio


CNN
11 minutes ago
- CNN
A viable Palestinian state remains far off, despite growing international clamor
First France, then the United Kingdom, and now Canada. Three of the world's most powerful Western nations have added their economic and geopolitical clout to calls for a Palestinian state, an idea already endorsed by more than 140 other countries. The moves have many motives, from a sense of frustration with Israel, to domestic pressure, to outrage over the images of starving Palestinians. Whatever the reason, Palestinians have welcomed the announcements as a boost for their cause. The Israeli government has rejected the calls, describing them as tantamount to rewarding terrorism. US President Donald Trump meanwhile seems increasingly frustrated with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, particularly over the starvation in Gaza that the Israeli leader denies, but has disturbed Trump. Trump wants regional peace, as well as the accolades – namely a Nobel Peace Prize – for making it happen. He wants Saudi Arabia to normalize relations with Israel, expanding the Abraham Accords he cemented between Israel and several other Arab states during his first term. But Riyadh has been firm that this cannot happen without an irreversible path to a Palestinian state. But the latest moves by US allies France, Britain and Canada – while in many ways largely symbolic – have left Washington increasingly isolated over its backing for Israel. Palestinian statehood could help bring an end to a war that has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians in Gaza since Hamas's brutal October 7 attack killed around 1,200 people in Israel almost two years ago, as well as bring home the hostages still being held in Gaza. But one of the toughest challenges is imagining what it looks like, because a modern Palestinian state has never existed before. When Israel was founded in the aftermath of World War II it quickly gained international recognition. That same period, for Palestinians, is remembered as al-Naqba, or 'the catastrophe' – the moment when hundreds of thousands of people fled or were forced from their homes. Since then, Israel has expanded, most significantly during the 'Six Day War' of 1967, when Israel turned the tables on a coalition of Arab states and gained East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza. Palestinian territory has meanwhile only shrunk and splintered. The closest to what a future Palestinian state may look like was hashed out in a peace process in the 1990s which came to be known as the Oslo Accords. Roughly speaking, the Palestinian state envisaged in Oslo, agreed to by both Palestinian and Israeli negotiators, would be based on Israel's 1967 borders. The broad outline of Oslo was to have some land trades, a little bit given in one place for the removal of an Israeli settlement, in a negotiated process. The historic handshake on the White House lawn by Israel's then Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat hosted by then-US president Bill Clinton remains one of the triumphs of modern diplomacy. Rabin's assassination by a far-right fanatic in 1995 robbed Israel of its peacemaker leader. And while the framework of Oslo lived on in negotiations and academia, there is little initiative now. What was on offer back then is no longer realistic. In recent years, Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank have expanded massively, often with the encouragement of the Israeli government, threatening the chances of creating a contiguous Palestinian state in the region. Then there is the question of who would govern a future Palestinian state. The Palestinian Authority, which governs parts of the West Bank, is distrusted by many Palestinians who view it as weak or corrupt. Even without all these complications, Netanyahu won't accept a Palestinian state, which he has recently claimed would be 'a launch pad to annihilate Israel.' Some members of his cabinet are far more hard-line, not only refusing to countenance an independent state but wanting to annex the territory. These ministers propping up Netanyahu's government have said they would starve Palestinians in Gaza rather than feed them, and would collapse the coalition if he so much as suggested giving in to the growing international pressure on Israel. Netanyahu has shown no intention of backing down, and will wear whatever France, the UK, and any others force on him as a badge of honor. Without a partner in the Israeli government, recognition of a Palestinian state will fall flat, and could even entrench Netanyahu further. It would be a big price to pay if the outcome were Israel making the possibility of a Palestinian state all the more distant. But at the same time, with a growing number of angry ex-partners in the international community who are likely to increase their pressure on Trump to shift his position, it is Israel that may find itself disadvantaged, however strongly it protests.