Horry County solicitor says he has no knowledge of luxury items mentioned in procurement lawsuit
Two former Horry County procurement officials fired last June were in the midst of a 'broad, sweeping investigation' into the potential misuse of the purchasing cards by judicial branch employees, state and federal lawsuits allege.
Lauren DeMasi, who worked as procurement specialist for the county, filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Florence on March 31, naming the county, Assistant Human Resoures Director Katie Badgett, employee Tara Chestnut-Smith, Director of Airports Judi Olmstead, Procurement Director Tammy Stevens, Administrator Barry Spivey and employee April Kelly.
Jessica Williams, who worked as the deputy director of the procurement department, followed with a lawsuit in Horry County Common Pleas Court on Tuesday. It named the county, Chestnut-Smith and Kelly. Both complaints also accuse officials of violating the state's whistleblower act, wrongful termination and defamation, among other things.
DeMasi's lawsuit says she made a troubling discovery last summer while reviewing an employee expense spreadsheet: Many purchases made by the county's magistrate and solicitor's offices had delivery addresses not tied to public property and were instead sent to private residences.
'(DeMasi) realized during this process that it appeared that Horry County procurement funds were being impermissibly used to direct goods such as golf equipment, large-screen televisions and other luxury items to the homes of Horry County employees,' her lawsuit says.
Solicitor Jimmy Richardson addressed that allegation in a lengthy email statement on Friday, in which he said it was an effort to be 'transparent.' Because 'the complaint could have been better drafted, I wanted to provide this individualized accounting.'
'I know nothing about items such as golf clubs or televisions; however, I was asked about 17 specific boxes that were sent to an employee's address in the 2023 and 2024 fiscal years,' Richardson said. 'All of these items were delivered to a home address because delivery was scheduled when the office was closed (weekends or after hours). Also, that office where delivery is usually made is not located in the courthouse and there is no secured mailroom.'
Richardson explained what was in each of the 17 boxes — saying they all contained items used exclusively for work purposes.
He said five of the boxes were textbooks for domestic violence defendants and treatment court clients. Another box, according to Richardson, contained textbooks called 'Responsible Decisions' and 'My Personal Journey.'
'Boxes seven and eight were full of graduation tassels and robes and were used for treatment court graduations,' he said. 'Box nine was full of diplomas for treatment court graduates.'
The eight other boxes had items like crowd control barriers, magnets and decorations with inspirational quotes for treatment court, urine testing strips for drug tests, office furniture, urine collection cups, air purifiers and two Ring doorbells, Richardson said.
'None of these items are luxury items,' he said. 'All of these items are work items. All of these items are currently at treatment court and were brought to treatment court within 48 hours of delivery. All receipts have been kept and provided to the county auditors and public safety director and the procurement director.'
Richardson said he will not comment further about the allegations.
* * *
Caleb is a digital producer at News13. Caleb joined the team in January 2023 after graduating from Liberty University. He is from Northern Virginia. Follow Caleb on X, formerly Twitter, and read more of his work here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
8 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Former NBA star Gilbert Arenas facing federal charges for illegal poker games
Former NBA All-Star guard Gilbert Arenas and five other defendants were arrested Wednesday on a federal indictment alleging they operated an illegal gambling business running high-stakes poker games at Arenas' mansion in Encino, Calif., according to the United States Attorney's Office of the Central District of California. Arenas, 43, of Woodland Hills, Calif., is charged with one count of conspiracy to operate an illegal gambling business, one count of operating an illegal gambling business, and one count of making false statements to federal investigators. He is scheduled to make his initial appearance and be arraigned on Wednesday afternoon in U.S. District Court in downtown Los Angeles. If convicted, he would face a statutory maximum sentence of five years in federal prison for each count. Also charged on Wednesday in the indictment were Yevgeni "Giora" Gershman, 49, of Woodland Hills; Allan "Elica" Austria, 52, of West Hills,Calif.; and Evgenni "Eugne" Tourevski, 48, Yarin "YC" Cohen, 27 and Ievgen Krachun, 43, all of Tarzana, Calif. Gershman is a suspected high-level organized crime figure from Israel, according to the news release from the U.S. attorney's office. Arenas and the other defendants operated an illegal gambling business from September 2021 to July 2022, according to the indictment that was unsealed on Wednesday. Arenas rented out the Encino mansion for the co-conspirators to host the illegal "Pot Limit Omaha" poker games, among other illegal games, with a fee charged from each pot either as a percentage or a fixed amount per hand. Gershman hired women who were paid in tips and served drinks, provided massages and offered companionship to the poker players -- with the women charged a percentage of their earnings by the business operators, per the indictment. Chefs, valets and armed security guards also were hired to staff the games. Arenas was a three-time All-Star, and All-NBA second-team selection in 2006-07 and third team in 2004-05 and 2005-06. He averaged 20.7 points, 5.3 assists, 3.9 rebounds and 1.6 steals in 552 regular-season games (455 starts) for the Golden State Warriors (2001-03), Washington Wizards (2003-10), Orlando Magic (2010-11) and Memphis Grizzlies (2012). His NBA career was overshadowed by a locker-run incident in December 2009 in which he and Washington teammate Javaris Crittenden brought guns into the locker room two days after having a dispute on a flight during a card game. Arenas was suspended for the remainder of the 2009-10 season. The Warriors selected Arenas in the second round (31st overall) of the 2001 NBA Draft out of Arizona. --Field Level Media Field Level Media 2023 - All Rights Reserved
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fired Veterinarian's Lawsuit Against Hawthorne Dismissed
Fired Veterinarian's Lawsuit Against Hawthorne Dismissed originally appeared on Paulick Report. A federal lawsuit filed by former Hawthorne veterinarian Dr. Christine Tuma has been dismissed by a U.S. District Court judge, reports the Daily Racing to the Daily Racing Form, Judge Jeffery Cummings of the Northern District of Illinois ruled that Tuma's claims in the suit did not establish direct harm or qualify for adjudication under the broad anti-conspiracy law known as RICO. The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice, which allows Tuma to re-file the suit without alleging harm. In the lawsuit, Tuma alleged that Hawthorne allowed horses to race, despite her diagnoses that they were unfit to do so. She also alleged that the track fired her after reporting the overturned diagnoses to the federal Horseracing Safety and Integrity defendants listed in the lawsuit were: Hawthorne Race Course; the Illinois Racing Board; Jim Miller, Hawthorne director of racing; and state chief veterinarian Dawn more at This story was originally reported by Paulick Report on Jul 30, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
California leads coalition suing Trump administration over SNAP data
This story was originally published on Grocery Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Grocery Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: The office of California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced Monday that it is suing the USDA, arguing that the agency is illegally demanding that states provide personal and sensitive information about millions of SNAP participants. California is leading a coalition of attorneys general from 20 states and Washington, D.C., in filing the lawsuit. The lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claims that President Donald Trump's administration is trying to collect unrelated, protected data to fuel mass deportation efforts and says that the USDA has threatened to pull funding from states that do not comply with the data request. Dive Insight: The lawsuit comes after Bonta led a coalition of 14 attorneys general earlier this month criticizing the USDA's demand in May that states turn over information about SNAP participants. In the May letter, the USDA said it was trying to eliminate 'information silos' within the SNAP program, citing a recent executive order focused on stopping waste, fraud and abuse, according to the lawsuit. 'USDA claimed the agency would use this data to 'ensure program integrity,' including by verifying the eligibility of recipients, even though Congress has delegated that task to the States,' the lawsuit says. The USDA directed states to provide personally identifiable information, including names, dates of birth, personal addresses, Social Security numbers and the total amount of benefits received for all SNAP applicants and recipients since January 2020, according to the lawsuit. While the USDA says it wants this information to improve the SNAP program, the lawsuit claims that this request is part of 'a number of similar moves by federal agencies to obtain and disclose highly sensitive [personally identifiable information], not for program purposes, but for the creation of a surveillance system to advance the President's agenda, including by facilitating the President's mass deportation efforts.' The agency threatened to take action against states that didn't comply, such as potentially pulling SNAP funding, in the May letter and again in July, the lawsuit claims. 'Any delay in that funding could be catastrophic for the State and the residents who rely on SNAP to meet their basic nutritional needs,' the lawsuit says. The USDA said in early July that it wants states to provide the data no later than July 30 — just days after the July 23 deadline for public comments on the proposed action. The lawsuit said this quick turnaround made clear that the 'USDA had no intention of modifying the proposed data collection based on any public comments it received.' A USDA spokesperson told Grocery Dive the agency does not comment on pending litigation. The state attorneys general argue that the USDA's actions violate state and federal privacy and security laws, including the Privacy Act. Bonta and the coalition also argue that the USDA has failed to meet the public comment requirements for this type of action and exceeded the agency's statutory authority. The coalition is asking the court to declare the Trump administration's demands unlawful and seeking an injunction to block the USDA from initiating noncompliance procedures. Editor's note: This story has been updated with input from the USDA. Recommended Reading SNAP to drive growth in consumables throughout 2025: report