Spirit Airlines passenger calls in fake bomb threat
A bone-headed passenger booked on a Spirit Airlines flight out of Detroit called in a fake bomb threat after learning he would miss his trip - sparking hysteria at the airport and forcing the flight to be canceled.
John Charles Robinson, of Monroe, Michigan, is accused of calling Detroit Metropolitan Airport on Thursday morning and reporting that a person planned to blow up the Los Angeles-bound plane. The 23-year-old had a ticket for Spirit Airlines Flight 2145 but missed the boarding window, according to the US Attorney's Office.
After learning at the gate that he had to reschedule his trip, Robinson called the airport at around 6:25am and told the alarming lie, authorities said. 'I was calling about 2145… because I have information about that flight,' he told an employee, according to an affidavit.
'Please don't let that flight board,' he allegedly pleaded. The flight was immediately canceled, forcing passengers and crew off the aircraft. Bomb-sniffing dogs and FBI agents swarmed the plane but found nothing.
FBI agents learned Robinson had missed the flight and arrested him when he returned to the airport for his rescheduled trip to LA. Officials said the suspect admitted to making the call, ABC News reported.
Robinson allegedly confirmed the phone number used to make the call was his and gave written permission to agents to search the device. He was charged with using a cellphone to threaten/maliciously convey false information concerning an attempt or alleged attempt to damage/destroy an airplane by means of an explosive, as well false information and hoaxes.
Robinson appeared in court on Friday and was released on $10,000 bond. He is scheduled to appear before a judge again on June 27. 'No American wants to hear the words "bomb" and "airplane" in the same sentence,' US Attorney Jerome F. Gorgon, Jr. said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Finextra
40 minutes ago
- Finextra
My Big Coin founder fined for crypto fraud
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission today announced the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts entered a final default judgement against Mark Gillespie of Michigan, John Roche of California, My Big Coin Pay, Inc., and My Big Coin, Inc., both of Nevada. 0 This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author. The order requires Gillespie, My Big Coin Pay, Inc., My Big Coin, Inc., and Roche to pay, jointly and severally a $19,326,324 civil monetary penalty and $6,442,108 in restitution to defrauded victims in connection with their role in a digital asset fraud scheme. The order also imposes a permanent injunction against the defendants and bans them from trading in any CFTC-regulated markets; entering into any transactions involving commodity interests or digital asset commodities; and registering with the CFTC. Case Background The default order finds from at least January 2014 through June 2017, Gillespie, My Big Coin Pay, Inc., My Big Coin, Inc., and Roche, together with co-defendant Randall Crater, one of the other co-defendants named in the CFTC's amended complaint, operated a digital asset scheme in which they fraudulently offered the sale of a fully-functioning virtual currency, My Big Coin (MBC), a commodity in interstate commerce. The CFTC dismissed its enforcement action against named co-defendant Michael Kruger because of his death. The defendants obtained more than $6 million from at least 28 customers through fraudulent solicitations, including false and misleading claims and omissions about MBC's value, usage, and trade status, and that MBC was backed by gold. Crater misappropriated virtually all the money solicited from customers, using those misappropriated funds wrongfully. The order resolves the claims against Gillespie, Roche, My Big Coin Pay, Inc., and My Big Coin, Inc., in the CFTC's enforcement action. [See CFTC Press Release 7678-18] The court had previously entered a consent order resolving the CFTC's claims against Crater, who is currently imprisoned for his role in the scheme. [See CFTC Press Release 9051-25] The CFTC cautions that orders requiring repayment of funds to victims may not result in the recovery of any money lost because the wrongdoers may not have sufficient funds or assets. The CFTC will continue to fight vigorously for the protection of customers and to ensure the wrongdoers are held accountable. Parallel Criminal Action On January 18, 2022, a grand jury returned an eight-count superseding indictment charging Crater with wire fraud, unlawful monetary transactions, and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business based on the same conduct alleged in the CFTC's amended complaint. [United States v. Randall Crater, No. 1:19-cr-10063-DJC (D. Mass. Jan. 18, 2022)).] Crater was found guilty of those charges on July 21, 2022, and was sentenced to 100 months in prison and ordered to pay $7,668,317.50 in restitution to defrauded customers and to forfeit $7,668,317.50, which represented the proceeds he received from his violations. The CFTC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts, the Fraud Section of the U.S. Department of Justice, and the FBI. Division of Enforcement staff responsible for this case are Traci Rodriguez, Daniel Ullman II, Chrystal Gonnella, Dmitriy Vilenskiy, Paul G. Hayeck, and former Division staff members Jonah E. McCarthy, Jason Mahoney, John Einstman, Hillary Van Tassel, Patricia Gomersall, and Kyong J. Koh.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Wild moment federal agents zone in on 'violent rioter' accused of attacking border agent on Los Angeles street
Federal agents in unmarked vehicles were seen ramming a suspect's car as they narrowed in on a 'violent rioter' wanted for punching a border agent. In dramatic footage shared online, the suspect is seen turning onto the road in the 3700 block of Whittier Boulevard. In just seconds, an unmarked light blue van car maneuvers in front while another boxes the vehicle in from behind. Federal agents then exited the vehicle with guns drawn and appeared to release tear gas as they attempted to make an arrest. The video appeared to depict the suspect putting his hands in the air and behind his head. Witness accounts appear to contradict the footage, however, with claims the driver was dragged out of his car. The shocking event comes as Los Angeles has been embroiled in days-long protests against ICE raids in the city. As the video circulated on social media with varying theories, the Department of Homeland Security made a statement explaining the operation was a 'targeted arrest' of a man described as a 'violent rioter who punched a CBP officer'. 'This was no hit and run. This was a targeted arrest of a violent rioter who PUNCHED a CBP officer,' DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin wrote in a statement on X. 'When Homeland Security Investigations tried to arrest Christian Damian Cerno-Camacho for the assault, he attempted to flee. He was ultimately arrested and taken into custody.' Christian Damian Cerno-Camacho was in the vehicle with a woman passenger, a toddler, and a baby in the backseat when the two cars pinned the vehicle, the Los Angeles Police Department told local ABC affiliate, KABC. The woman was identified as his wife and was seen in other videos in a heated confrontation with officers as protesters gathered at the scene. The LAPD added that the incident was being investigated as a possible assault with a deadly weapon involving federal agents. reached out to the LAPD for additional details, but didn't immediately hear back. 'Our officers are facing a 413% increase in assaults against them as they put their lives on the line to arrest murders, rapists, and gang members,' DHS said in a statement. 'Secretary Noem's message to the LA rioters is clear: you will not stop us or slow us down. ICE and our federal law enforcement partners will continue to enforce the law.' 'And if you lay a hand on a law enforcement officer, you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.' The man who was arrested was driving a white sedan with a female passenger and two children when the unmarked vehicle rammed into the rear of their car Witnesses told the Los Angeles Times that a smoke device was dispersed during the altercation. An employee at a nearby grocery store told the publication that after the man was arrested, the woman and children in the car went to the business for almost three hours before family picked them up. Jesus Trujillo, told KABC, that he was a friend of the family and said Cerno-Camacho is an American citizen. reached out to DHS for confirmation on Cerno-Camacho's immigration status, but didn't immediately hear back. Community activist Verita Topete echoed a similar claim, questioning why DHS arrested the man. Topete said that agents were pointing guns at the family's car. 'We saw her [the female passenger] with one of her hands up and her toddler child in the other hand.' A family friend, Jesus Trujillo, told KABC that Cerno-Camacho was an American citizen and slammed the federal agents for arresting him in front of the family 'He was crying and the mother was in a lot of distress. She was frantic, she was in distress.' Another witness, John Lopez, told the LA Times that he speculated the agents were with ICE, but was confused as to why they pinned the suspect's car. DHS said Cerno-Camacho was arrested and taken into custody, but it's unclear where he's being held and how long he was detained.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Weinstein jury still has 1 charge to go after partial verdict in sex crimes retrial
After a partial verdict in a chaotic day at Harvey Weinstein 's sex crimes retrial, jurors are due Thursday to return to deliberations on a remaining charge — if the foreperson will join in. The jury delivered its partial verdict Wednesday, convicting the ex-studio boss of one of the top charges but acquitting him of another. Both charges concern accusations of forcing oral sex on women in 2006. The jury of seven women and five men unanimously reached those decisions last Friday, the foreperson later told the judge. The verdict was delivered Wednesday only because Judge Curtis Farber asked whether there was agreement on any of the charges. The group was stuck on the third charge: a rape accusation involving a woman who also said she had a consensual relationship with the Oscar-winning producer. Under New York law, the third-degree rape charge carries a lesser penalty than the other two counts. Weinstein denies all the charges. In an unusual exchange with the judge during some legal arguments before the partial verdict was disclosed Wednesday, he insisted it was unfair to continue the trial after two jurors came forward with concerns about the proceedings. 'I can't be judged by a situation that's going on like this,' said Weinstein, 73, saying the judge was 'endangering' him. Jury-room strains started leaking into public view Friday, when a juror asked to be excused because he felt another was being treated unfairly. Then Monday, the foreperson complained that other jurors were pushing people to change their minds and talking about information beyond the charges. The man raised concerns again Wednesday. In a closed-door discussion with prosecutors, defense lawyers and the judge, the foreperson said another juror was yelling at him for sticking to his opinion and at one point vowed, 'You going to see me outside.' 'I feel afraid inside there,' the foreperson told the judge and attorneys, according to a transcript. The judge sent the jury home for the day after the partial verdict, but the foreperson later asked to come back and recapped his concerns to Farber in court. The foreperson said he was willing to return Thursday, with Farber saying the man wouldn't be forced to go into the jury room if he didn't want to. It's unclear how deliberations could proceed if that happens, and it's equally uncertain what the court would then do. Weinstein's initial conviction five years ago seemed to cement the downfall of one of Hollywood's most powerful men in a pivotal moment for the #MeToo movement against sexual misconduct. But that conviction was overturned last year, and the case was sent back for retrial in the same Manhattan courthouse. Weinstein's accusers said he exploited his Tinseltown influence to dangle career help, get them alone and then trap and force them into sexual encounters. His defense portrayed his accusers as Hollywood wannabes and hangers-on who willingly hooked up with him to court opportunity, then later said they were victimized to collect settlement funds and #MeToo approbation. Miriam Haley, the producer and production assistant whom Weinstein was convicted — twice, now — of sexually assaulting, said outside court Wednesday that the new verdict 'gives me hope.' Accuser Kaja Sokola also called it 'a big win for everyone,' even though Weinstein was acquitted of forcibly performing oral sex on her when she was a 19-year-old fashion model. Her allegation was added to the case after the retrial was ordered. The third accuser, Jessica Mann, was still waiting for an outcome. The hairstylist and actor testified for days — as she did in 2020 — about the rape she said she endured in a Manhattan hotel room and about why she continued to see and have consensual encounters with Weinstein afterward. 'Rape can happen in relationships — and in dynamics where power and manipulation control the narrative," Mann said in a statement Wednesday. Weinstein also was convicted of raping another woman in California. He's appealing that conviction. The Associated Press generally does not name people who say they have been sexually assaulted, unless they agree to be identified. Haley, Mann and Sokola did so.
