NDA authorises PM Narendra Modi, BJP chief JP Nadda to pick V-P candidate ahead of 9 September polls
The decision was taken during the NDA leaders meeting held in the state capital on Thursday, news agencies reported.
Earlier in the day, the Election Commission of India issued a notification for the 9 September election to the vice president's post, kickstarting the nomination process.
With the Election Commissionnotification, nominations for vice presidential elections begin. The date for filing nominations is 21 August. The nominations will be scrutinised on 22 August, and the last date for withdrawing nominations will be 25 August, as per the schedule issued by the Election Commission.
The notification by the Election Commission comes after Jagdeep Dhankhar resigned as Vice President on 21 July, opening the contest for his successor.
Dhankhar, 74, assumed office in August 2022, and his tenure was till 2027.
As per Article 66(1) of the Constitution, the Vice President of India is elected by an Electoral College comprising the elected members of the Rajya Sabha, the nominated members of the Rajya Sabha, and the elected members of the Lok Sabha.
According to Articles 63 to 71 of the Constitution and the Vice President (Election) Rules, 1974, the Election Commission had to hold a formal election within 60 days of Dhankhar's resignation and before 19 September 2025.
The electorate or the electoral college comprises all members of both Houses of Parliament—elected and nominated—using a proportional representation system via a single transferable vote. The MPs will cast a single transferable vote with a secret ballot.
The electoral college currently has 788 MPs, 588 in Lok Sabha and 245 in Rajya Sabha.
The ruling BJP-led National Democratic Alliance(NDA) has a majority in the electorate, which includes the members of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. Both the NDA and the opposition INDIA bloc are expected to nominate candidates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
11 minutes ago
- Economic Times
PM Modi speaks with Brazil President Lula, discuss framework to strengthen trade amid Trump tariff pressure
Synopsis Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva reaffirmed their commitment to elevate the India-Brazil Strategic Partnership during a telephone call on Thursday. Modi recalled his recent visit to Brazil, where both leaders established a framework to enhance collaboration across various sectors, including trade, technology, and defense. PTI PM Narendra Modi with Brazil's Prez Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva
Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
HC refuses to pass order on rally near state secretariat on first anniversary of RG Kar rape-murder
Kolkata, The Calcutta High Court on Thursday did not pass any interim order in a petition against a proposed protest rally near the West Bengal state secretariat 'Nabanna' on August 9. HC refuses to pass order on rally near state secretariat on first anniversary of RG Kar rape-murder On this day last year, the body of an on-duty doctor was found raped and murdered inside the state-run R G Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata, sparking outrage nationwide. The court observed that the persons participating in the rally should protest peacefully as law-abiding citizens and not cause any harm to the police or government authorities, buildings and public properties. While not granting any interim relief as prayed for against the rally, a division bench presided by Justice Sujoy Paul said it will be open for the West Bengal government to implement a prohibitory order imposed in the area near Nabanna and inform the organisers about adequate alternative places for protest. The Kolkata Police arrested one person, and the CBI, which took over the investigation on a Calcutta High Court order, also made him the sole accused in the RG Kat rape-murder case. The trial court on January 20 sentenced the accused Sanjay Roy to life imprisonment till death. The central agency is continuing its investigation into the alleged conspiracy angle of the case. The court on Thursday noted that Article 51A of the Constitution contemplates that it is the duty of every citizen to "Safeguard public property and to abjure violence. The bench, also comprising Justice Smita Das De, directed that the state file a report, if any, in four weeks and the reply affidavit by the petitioner in 15 days therefrom. The court directed that the matter will come up for hearing again thereafter. The petitioner, a resident of Howrah city, sought issuance of an order prohibiting the state from allowing any rally or demonstration in the surrounding areas of the state secretariat. He also prayed that a direction be issued to the government for framing proper guidelines for ensuring public peace, safety and convenience during any such protest. The petitioner's lawyer submitted that following the gruesome crime at R G Kar hospital, a rally took place last year near Nabanna which created chaos and untoward incidents had taken place. Claiming that the protest is being projected on social media in the name of "Parents of RG Kar Student victim", the petitioner prayed that such a protest be prohibited by issuing an interim order. Appearing for the state, Advocate General Kishore Dutta argued that last year's protest march over the issue took an ugly shape and about 47 police personnel were injured. The AG also stated that government properties were destroyed and in this backdrop, it is better if the protest takes place in an alternative place in Howrah city and suggested three other locations - Mandirtala bus station, Howrah Maidan and under Bankim Setu flyover. During the course of hearing, both the petitioner and the state submitted that although the right to protest is a fundamental right under the Constitution, there must be some balancing of fundamental rights. The court noted that the Howrah police commissioner has invoked prohibitory orders under section 163 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita . "In our opinion, the government is best suited to take care of law and order situation," the bench observed. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
BJP accuses Rahul Gandhi of displaying ‘selective outrage' over ECI remarks
The Bharatiya Janata Party on Thursday (August 7, 2025) accused Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi of showing 'selective outrage', stating that his allegation about 'large-scale' electoral roll fraud was a sign of 'frustration and election rage'. Union Minister Dharmendra Pradhan said Mr. Gandhi had completely lost his 'composure in the agony of losing power'. 'The ideologically hollow Congress party is systematically attacking constitutional institutions. It cannot be ruled out that there is a larger conspiracy against India's democracy and Constitution behind this calculated deceit. After all, their family's history is also filled with the dark chapter of the 'Emergency',' he posted on X. Mr. Pradhan said by attacking the EC, Mr. Gandhi was insulting the discerning decision of the public, which was universally accepted in a democracy. 'Where was Rahul Gandhi when the EC invited every party to file complaints regarding the SIR [Special Intensive Revision] in Bihar? Neither Congress nor any party from the INDI Alliance approached the EC at that time,' he said. 'This double standard will no longer work — praising the EC when victorious and calling it biased when defeated! Rahul Gandhi needs to understand that his family's victory is not the definition of democracy. The people of Bihar are now ready to give a befitting reply to such opponents of democracy and the Constitution,' said the Union Minister. At a press conference, BJP MP and spokesperson Sambit Patra said the Congress leader was displaying 'selective outrage' as he never made such accusations with respect to the States where his party won. 'When they got 99 seats in the Lok Sabha election, the Congress celebrated all over the country. They did not allege the EC was compromised,' he said. Mr. Patra said the BJP, which remained in the Opposition for long, never resorted to the kind of indecorous language used by Mr. Gandhi. 'He threatened that if the Opposition comes to power, the EC officials would face 'serious consequences',' he said, adding that the language showed his 'frustration' and 'election rage'. 'If you think that there were irregularities in the Maharashtra polls, you should have instructed your partymen to approach the court within the prescribed time period. You did not go to court, your proxy petitioned the Bombay High Court. The court dismissed the plea terming it a gross abuse of the process of law. Then, a Constitutional Bench of High Court found no evidence of fraud or illegal voting and emphasised that the petitioner had failed to demonstrate any personal legal injury or enforceable right...,' said Mr. Patra. Referring to the EC's letter to Mr. Gandhi asking him to submit through an affidavit the relevant papers supporting the charges made on Thursday, the BJP leader said the Congress's Karnataka unit had gone to the EC on August 3. 'On August 6, the EC asked them to come on August 8. However, Mr. Gandhi held the press conference a day earlier...,' said Mr. Patra. The BJP leader said after Mr. Gandhi raised objections related to the Maharashtra election for the first time in November 2024, the EC had invited him for a discussion. However, he did not meet them. Then, taking note of his news article published on the election, it again sought a meeting, but he did not go. Responding to Mr. Gandhi's 'My word is my oath' remarks, Mr. Patra said the Congress leader's words had 'no meaning'. 'That is the reason you have to give the details in an affidavit to the EC,' he said. Questioning Mr. Gandhi's charge that the BJP used the Pulwama terror attack to reverse 'anti-incumbency', the BJP leader asked if it was an attempt to insinuate that the attack was orchestrated by India. He said the manner in which the Congress leader raised doubts about Operation Sindoor, air strikes, and the surgical strike, and targeted constitutional institutions, the people would start accusing him of being a 'traitor'. Four-term BJP MP from Bangalore Central P. C. Mohan, through a post on X, added: 'Electoral rolls are prepared as per the RP Act, 1950, and the Rules, 1960. Draft rolls (SSR 2024) were shared with Congress in Nov 2024. Not a single appeal was filed after the final publication. Now, after losing Bangalore Central, they cry vote theft at a press conference.'
