Country diary: What has the head of an ant, eyes of a housefly and legs of a spider?
It looked like a composite of insect body parts – a broad, flattened ant's head, a housefly's large compound eyes, spidery legs and damselfly-like wings with intricate venation. The presence of a formidable-looking long, needle‑like ovipositor indicated that this individual was female. Most unique was her elongated neck-like pronotum, which, when she reared up at the approach of my finger, gave her the appearance of a cobra poised to strike. It's this distinctive feature that gives these fantastical creatures their colloquial name.
Snakeflies aren't flies (Diptera). They're related to the lacewings and antlions (Neuroptera), but are classified in a separate relictual order, Raphidioptera. They're considered living fossils, as they closely resemble species from the early Jurassic period, about 140m years ago. There are about 260 extant snakefly species worldwide, all found in temperate regions of the northern hemisphere, but only four have been recorded in the UK.
Their strong mandibles seem at odds with a diet of soft-bodied prey, but they are voracious predators of aphids, mites and other small arthropods, their flexible pronotum enabling them to pursue prey into tight nooks and crannies. A recent stretch of warm weather, combined with high humidity, extended daylight hours and an abundance of succulent new growth, has created ideal conditions for an aphid population boom. Many trees in the locality have curled, distorted foliage – a telltale sign that sap-suckers have been piercing the leaf cuticle. But the oak was virtually unblemished, suggesting that the snakeflies are helping keep this damage in check.
Under the Changing Skies: The Best of the Guardian's Country Diary, 2018-2024 is published by Guardian Faber; order at guardianbookshop.com and get a 15% discount
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
6 hours ago
- Metro
Meet the strange creatures thriving in the darkest depths of the Pacific
Next time you're taking a dip in the ocean, just know some very, very strange things are underneath you. And no, we're not talking about sharks. It's the depths of the ocean, an impenetrably dark and crushing place where, somehow, life thrives. A team of scientists boarded a submersible to the bottom of two trenches in a patch of the northwest Pacific Ocean, between Japan and Alaska. The sub reached a depth of 31,000 feet, three times deeper than where the shipwreck of the Titanic is. They weren't looking for shipwrecks of long-lost treasure; rather, the groovy critters that live so far down that sunbeams can't penetrate. When we think of life at these depths, we end up picturing fearsome, glowing monsters with fishing rod-like appendages that eat almost everything. But what the submersible vessel, Fendouzhe, photographed was a little different. They found fields of frenulate siboglinids, tube worms stretching 30cm tall and just 1mm thick. These crimson worms were seen reaching out with their 'red haemoglobin-filled' tentacles, with white snails perched on top of them, according to a paper published in the journal Nature Wednesday. Crawling over them were white, spiky creatures called macellicephaloides grandicirra, about as big as a light bulb. Clusters of yapping, nine-inch clams and wispy anemones were also photographed in the Kuril-Kamchatka and Aleutian habal trenches. What might look like slivers of half-melted snow were actually microbial mats, dusting dozens of feet of the ocean floor. The hadal trenches can be thought of like an upside-down mountain, where the 'peak' is the edge of one tectonic plate sliding into another. Anything at these depths is constantly being crushed by up to 98 megapascals (MPa), a unit of pressure, or about 140 times the pressure of an elephant standing on you. Rather than lap up the Sun like plants or us with SAD lamps, these floppy worms rely on chemical reactions, called chemosynthesis, to survive. Covering these bottom dwellers are microbes that view the deep sea as an all-you-can-eat buffet, where tasty methane and hydrogen sulphide are burped out of cracks in the Earth's crust. It converts these fumes into organic compounds, including sugars, for the tube worms, clams and the other 'thriving communities' that call the deep sea home to eat, the Chinese Academy of Sciences' Institute of Deep Sea Science and Engineering team said. Given how many scientists believe that all terrestrial life sprang out of the depths of the Earth's oceans, the researchers were excited by what they saw, to say the least. They said: 'This groundbreaking discovery not only challenges conventional wisdom about the ability of life to survive at extreme depths but also provides a new perspective on the complex mechanisms of the deep-sea carbon cycle.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: I've studied tsunamis for 25 years – here are the deadly warning signs one is on its way MORE: Tsunami warnings still in place after 8.8 magnitude Russian earthquake MORE: Whales eerily become beached hours before earthquake – do they predict them?
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Scientists make a shocking discovery in the Queensland rainforest
What could be Australia's heaviest insect has been discovered in northern Australia's high altitude rainforests. The supersized stick insect, about 40cm long, was discovered in high altitude trees in Millaa Millaa in Queensland 's Atherton Tablelands and identified by James Cook University researcher Angus Emmott and wildlife expert Ross Coupland. 'They live high up in the rainforest canopy, and accessing that is almost impossible,' Professor Emmott told AAP. 'You've got to wait until, for instance, a bird knocks one down or you get a big storm and they get knocked down. It's very, very hard to find them in situ.' The female specimen weighed 44g, just less than a golf ball, but significantly heftier than Australia's heaviest insect, the up to 30g giant wood moth. 'The females have wings, but because of their heavy bodies, they're not really great flyers,' Prof Emmott said. The specimen, along with another female, are now in Queensland Museum's collection. The next step in identifying and eventually naming the species is finding a male, which is proving difficult, and not just because they are as thin as a stick. Male stick insects tend to be significantly smaller and visually distinct from females that in other cases pairs have been described not only as different species, but different from a different genus altogether. 'You really need to find the male copulating with the female,' Prof Emmott said. 'You know what it is then and you collect the eggs and you can actually ascertain that they're one of the same thing.' The eggs of the newly-discovered stick insect were key to its identification, as no two species' eggs are the same. Stick insects tend to be quite still in daylight hours to avoid predation by birds, so researchers traipse through the rainforest at night with head torches for the best chance of glimpsing them. Likewise, their lifespan remains somewhat camouflaged. 'We don't actually don't know that yet, but I imagine only a couple of years maximum,' he said. 'Because, yes, there's a lot of pressure on them with birds looking for them and eating them all the time, and I guess that's why they're so cryptic.' The depth and density of life in Queensland's rainforests mean untold numbers of insect species remain undefined or undiscovered. 'Up here in the tropics, in northern Australia, we've got so many insects that are as yet undescribed,' Prof Emmott said. 'For instance, I've got an undescribed cicada in the garden here that a friend of mine is in the process of describing, and I've been working on the moths up here as quite a number of them are undescribed.'
Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Health Rounds: Virtual labs with AI scientists produce promising result in Stanford study
July 30 (Reuters) - (This is an excerpt of the Health Rounds newsletter, where we present latest medical studies on Tuesdays and Thursdays. To receive the full newsletter in your inbox for free sign up here.) Virtual scientists in a virtual lab at Stanford University are coming up with unorthodox ways to address clinical challenges, researchers reported on Tuesday in Nature, opens new tab. The virtual lab is modeled after a well-established Stanford School of Medicine research group, complete with a principal investigator and seasoned scientists, the report says. As in human-run research labs, the virtual lab has regular meetings during which agents generate ideas and engage in a conversational back-and-forth. They also have one-on-one meetings, allowing the virtual lab members to meet with the virtual principal investigator individually to discuss ideas. Unlike human meetings, the virtual gatherings take a few seconds or minutes. When humans tasked the virtual team with devising a better vaccine for the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19, they equipped the virtual scientists with tools and software to stimulate creative 'thinking' skills. The virtual scientists even created their own wish list. 'They would ask for access to certain tools, and we'd build it into the model to let them use it,' study leader James Zou said in a statement. Instead of opting for the usual vaccine design using an antibody, the AI team came up with using a nanobody, an antibody fragment that's smaller and simpler. 'From the beginning of their meetings, the AI scientists decided that nanobodies would be a more promising strategy,' Zou said. 'They said nanobodies are typically much smaller than antibodies, so that makes the machine learning scientist's job much easier," Zou said, "because when you computationally model proteins, working with smaller molecules means you can have more confidence in modeling and designing them.' When humans created the AI researchers' nanobody in a real-world lab, they found it was stable and could attach itself to one of the COVID virus variants more tightly than existing antibodies - a key factor in determining vaccine effectiveness. Aside from the initial prompt, the main guideline consistently given to the AI lab members was budget-related. Zou estimates that he or his lab members intervene about 1% of the time. 'I don't want to tell the AI scientists exactly how they should do their work. That really limits their creativity,' Zou said. 'I want them to come up with new solutions and ideas that are beyond what I would think about.' SCIENTISTS FIND GENES THAT CAUSE STUTTERING A new study found a clear genetic basis for stuttering, the speech disorder that affects more than 400 million people worldwide. Overall, as reported in Nature Genetics, opens new tab, the researchers identified 57 distinct regions on 48 genes associated with stuttering. Some of the same genetic variants involved in stuttering can also contribute to autism, depression and musicality, they found. Stuttering, characterized by syllable and word repetitions, sound prolongations, and breaks between words, is the most common fluency disorder, the researchers said. 'There have been hundreds of years of misconceptions about what causes stuttering, from ideas about left-handedness to childhood trauma to overbearing mothers,' study leader Jennifer (Piper) Below of Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville said in a statement. 'Rather than being caused by personal or familial failings or intelligence, our study shows that stuttering is influenced by our genes.' Young people who stutter report increased bullying, decreased classroom participation, and a more negative educational experience, her team noted. Stuttering can also negatively impact employment opportunities and perceived job performance, as well as mental and social well-being. Dillon Pruett, a postdoctoral fellow at Vanderbilt and a co-author of the study, stutters. 'As someone personally affected, I wanted to contribute to this body of research,' he said. 'Our study found that there are many genes that ultimately contribute to stuttering risk, and we hope to use this knowledge to dispel stigma related to stuttering and also to hopefully develop new therapeutic approaches in the future.' AT THE SIGHT OF A SICK PERSON, THE BRAIN GOES ON ALERT At the mere sight of a possibly contagious person, the human brain launches its germ-fighting preparations, researchers say. In virtual reality experiments using Google's Oculus Rift headsets, 248 healthy young adults were approached by human-like avatars, some of which showed visible signs of infection, such as rashes or coughing. Other avatars appeared neutral or fearful. As the infectious avatars moved closer, noninvasive monitoring showed changes in brain regions involved in integrating awareness of the body's position, movement, and relationship to the surrounding environment, which was not seen in response to the approaching neutral or fearful faces, the researchers reported in Nature Neuroscience, opens new tab. Participants were more reactive to touch when the sick-looking avatars were nearby, the researchers also found. Blood samples showed that exposure to the infectious-appearing avatars triggered an increase in volunteers' innate lymphoid cell activity, a key component of the immune system, which is typically seen during responses to real infections or vaccines. The results illustrate the power of the brain 'to predict what is going on (and) to select the proper response,' study co-author Andrea Serino of University Hospital of Lausanne, Switzerland said in an accompanying news article, opens new tab in the journal. The researchers said that someday, virtual reality might be employed to boost the efficacy of vaccines by boosting the brain's effect on immune responses. (To receive the full newsletter in your inbox for free sign up here)
