Brazil's top court rules US laws do not apply to its territory
Moraes is also the judge which banned the social network X, formerly Twitter, in Brazil last year.
"Judge Flavio Dino, of the Federal Supreme Court, suspended the effectiveness of judicial decisions, laws, decrees, and executive orders of foreign nations in our country," Brazil's high court said in a statement.
According to the Constitution of Brazil, foreign court decisions "can only be enforced in Brazil upon approval or in compliance with international judicial cooperation mechanisms," the court said.
Dino said this same principle applied to recent decisions from UK court rulings made against the Brazilian Mining Association (Ibram) for the Mariana and Brumadinho dam disasters.
Although the ruling did not explicitly mention the Magnitsky Act, a Brazilian court source told AFP that the ruling "in theory" invalidates the law in Brazil -- though Washington has already contested this interpretation.
"No foreign court can invalidate United States sanctions -- or spare anyone from the steep consequences of violating them," the US government's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs said in a statement on X after the ruling.
"Alexandre de Moraes is toxic to all legitimate businesses and individuals seeking access to the US and its markets," it continued.
"US persons are prohibited from transacting with him and non-US persons must tread carefully: those providing material support to human rights abusers face sanctions risk themselves."
The United States at the end of July had blocked all of Moraes' assets in the country as a result of his work on the Bolsonaro trial.
The case against the former Brazilian president, an ally of US President Donald Trump, has sparked a diplomatic and trade spat between Brasilia and Washington.
The verdict for the trial is expected to be announced by the court between September 2 and 12.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
11 hours ago
- France 24
Brazil asks Meta to remove chatbots that 'eroticize' children
Users of Meta's platforms, which include Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp, can create and customize such bots using the company's generative artificial intelligence, AI Studio. The AGU said in a statement that Meta must "immediately" remove "artificial intelligence robots that simulate profiles with childlike language and appearance and are allowed to engage in sexually explicit dialogue." It denounced the "proliferation" of such bots in what it called an "extrajudicial notice" sent to Meta last week, adding that they "promote the eroticization of children." The document cited several examples of sexually charged conversations with bots pretending to be minors. The AGU's request does not include sanctions, but the agency said it had reminded Meta that online platforms in Brazil must take down illicit content created by their users, even without a court order. It comes at a time of outrage in the South American nation over a case of alleged child sexual exploitation by Hytalo Santos, a well-known influencer who posted content on Instagram featuring partially naked minors taking part in suggestive dances. Santos was arrested last week as part of an investigation into "exposure with sexual connotations" to adolescents, and his Instagram account is no longer available. In June, Brazil's Supreme Court voted to require tech companies to assume greater responsibility for user-generated content.
France 24
18 hours ago
- France 24
Brazil's top court rules US laws do not apply to its territory
Washington used the Magnitsky Act, a US law which provides for sanctions against individuals accused of human rights violations around the globe, to impose restrictions on Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is presiding over the trial of former president Jair Bolsonaro's alleged coup plot. Moraes is also the judge which banned the social network X, formerly Twitter, in Brazil last year. "Judge Flavio Dino, of the Federal Supreme Court, suspended the effectiveness of judicial decisions, laws, decrees, and executive orders of foreign nations in our country," Brazil's high court said in a statement. According to the Constitution of Brazil, foreign court decisions "can only be enforced in Brazil upon approval or in compliance with international judicial cooperation mechanisms," the court said. Dino said this same principle applied to recent decisions from UK court rulings made against the Brazilian Mining Association (Ibram) for the Mariana and Brumadinho dam disasters. Although the ruling did not explicitly mention the Magnitsky Act, a Brazilian court source told AFP that the ruling "in theory" invalidates the law in Brazil -- though Washington has already contested this interpretation. "No foreign court can invalidate United States sanctions -- or spare anyone from the steep consequences of violating them," the US government's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs said in a statement on X after the ruling. "Alexandre de Moraes is toxic to all legitimate businesses and individuals seeking access to the US and its markets," it continued. "US persons are prohibited from transacting with him and non-US persons must tread carefully: those providing material support to human rights abusers face sanctions risk themselves." The United States at the end of July had blocked all of Moraes' assets in the country as a result of his work on the Bolsonaro trial. The case against the former Brazilian president, an ally of US President Donald Trump, has sparked a diplomatic and trade spat between Brasilia and Washington. The verdict for the trial is expected to be announced by the court between September 2 and 12. © 2025 AFP
France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Excessive force used against LA protesters: rights group
Scores of people were injured as officers fired hard foam rounds, flash-bang grenades, pepper balls and tear gas from close range, during the largely peaceful response to a dramatic increase in immigration arrests across Southern California. "Law enforcement brutal, excessive, and unnecessary force against people standing up for human rights and those reporting on the protests," said Ida Sawyer, the rights group's crisis, conflict and arms director. The protests erupted on June 6, in anger at raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which has been ordered by the Trump administration to target undocumented migrants across the sprawling, heavily Latino city. The demonstrations were mainly confined to a small section of downtown Los Angeles. Largely non-violent, they at times spiraled into chaotic scenes that Trump pounced on to send 4,000 National Guard and 700 Marines into the city -- a move loudly protested by local officials. Compiling the report, Human Rights Watch staff observed protests, visited locations of immigration raids in mid-June, and interviewed dozens of people. The report documented 65 cases in which law enforcement officers injured protesters and journalists but warned that the "actual number is most likely much higher." On one occasion, a police officer shot three people at "very close range with kinetic impact projectiles," leaving them in serious pain for days. "Before shooting one of them in the groin, the officer said: 'I'm going to pop you, as you are taking up my focus,'" the report found. Other reported injuries included broken bones, concussions, an amputated finger, and severe eye damage. An Agence France-Presse photographer was shot in the face with a rubber bullet by law enforcement while covering a protest in downtown Los Angeles on June 14. At least three other journalists were also injured. The US Constitution guarantees the right to free speech and peaceful assembly, and protects against the use of excessive force by law enforcement. California has laws restricting the use of "less lethal weapons" during protests, and protecting the rights of journalists.
