China hopes for 'reciprocity' at trade talks with US in Stockholm
Talks in the Swedish capital between the world's top two economies are expected to last two days.
They came a day after US President Donald Trump reached a deal that will see imports from the European Union taxed at 15% and the clock ticking down for many countries to reach deals or face high US tariffs.
Beijing said on Monday it hoped the two sides could hold talks in the spirit of "mutual respect and reciprocity".
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said Beijing sought to "enhance consensus through dialogue and communication, reduce misunderstandings, strengthen cooperation and promote the stable, healthy and sustainable development of China-US relations".
For dozens of trading partners, failing to strike an agreement in the coming days means they could face significant tariff hikes on exports to the US come Friday, Aug 1.
The steeper rates, threatened against partners like Brazil and India, would raise the duties their products face from a "baseline" of 10 percent now to levels up to 50%.
Tariffs imposed by the Trump administration have already effectively raised duties on US imports to levels not seen since the 1930s, according to data from The Budget Lab research centre at Yale University.
For now, all eyes are on discussions between Washington and Beijing as a delegation including US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent meets a Chinese team led by Vice Premier He Lifeng in Sweden.
In Stockholm, Chinese and US flags were raised in front of Rosenbad, the seat of the Swedish government.
While both countries in April imposed tariffs on each other's products that reached triple-digit levels, US duties this year have temporarily been lowered to 30 percent and China's countermeasures slashed to 10 percent.
But the 90-day truce, instituted after talks in Geneva in May, is set to expire on Aug 12.
Since the Geneva meeting, the two sides have convened in London to iron out disagreements.
China progress?
"There seems to have been a fairly significant shift in (US) administration thinking on China since particularly the London talks," said Emily Benson, head of strategy at Minerva Technology Futures.
"The mood now is much more focused on what's possible to achieve, on warming relations where possible and restraining any factors that could increase tensions," she told AFP.
Talks with China have not produced a deal but Benson said both countries have made progress, with certain rare earth and semiconductor flows restarting.
"Secretary Bessent has also signalled that he thinks a concrete outcome will be to delay the 90-day tariff pause," she said. "That's also promising, because it indicates that something potentially more substantive is on the horizon."
The South China Morning Post, citing sources on both sides, reported Sunday that Washington and Beijing are expected to extend their tariff pause by another 90 days.
Trump has announced pacts so far with the European Union, Britain, Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines, although details have been sparse.
An extension of the US-China deal to keep tariffs at reduced levels "would show that both sides see value in continuing talks", said Thibault Denamiel, a fellow at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
US-China Business Council president Sean Stein said the market was not anticipating a detailed readout from Stockholm: "What's more important is the atmosphere coming out."
"The business community is optimistic that the two presidents will meet later this year, hopefully in Beijing," he told AFP.
"It's clear that on both sides, the final decision-maker is going to be the president."
For others, the prospect of higher US tariffs and few details from fresh trade deals mark "a far cry from the ideal scenario", said Denamiel.
But they show some progress, particularly with partners Washington has signalled are on its priority list like the EU, Japan, the Philippines and South Korea.
The EU unveiled a pact with Washington on Sunday while Seoul is rushing to strike an agreement, after Japan and the Philippines already reached the outlines of deals.
Breakthroughs have been patchy since Washington promised a flurry of agreements after unveiling, and then swiftly postponing, tariff hikes targeting dozens of economies in April.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
3 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Opposition to submit urgent motion on trade talks with US
The opposition will this week submit an urgent motion involving trade negotiations with the United States and the border conflict with Cambodia following US President Donald Trump's call for a ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia. Pakornwut Udompipatsakul, a People's Party list-MP and chief opposition whip, said on Tuesday the planned motion concerns Mr Trump's move to link the ongoing trade talks between the US and Thailand to a resolution of the border conflict. The US president allegedly warned that the 36% tariff on certain Thai exports would remain non-negotiable if fighting continued and threatened to halt trade deals with both Thailand and Cambodia unless talks resumed. Mr Pakornwut said that the interconnection between the border issue and trade negotiations would be brought up in this week's House session. While a ceasefire has been agreed upon, he expressed concerns about its fragility and urged the military to prioritise the national interest and public safety. Thailand and Cambodia agreed to an unconditional ceasefire, effective from midnight Sunday, following high-level negotiations held in Malaysia, which is the Asean chair. Bilateral military meetings were scheduled on Tuesday, with a full meeting of the General Border Committee to take place in Phnom Penh on Monday. People's Party list-MP Parit Wacharasindhu on Tuesday urged the government to quickly communicate on two fronts after Cambodia reportedly violated the ceasefire agreement. He wrote on Facebook that the government must inform the international community that Thailand adhered to the ceasefire and only responded in self-defence. It must also clearly communicate to those in risk zones to ensure their safety, he added. Meanwhile, a senator on Tuesday floated an eight-point proposal, including declaring martial law in seven provinces along the Thai-Cambodian border, to give the armed forces full power to protect national sovereignty. The proposal, made by Lt Gen Sukij Thangthong before the Senate session started, included the shutdown of all border checkpoints, cutting utilities until the border situation returns to normal, suspending all energy exports, and severing diplomatic ties until boundary disputes are fully resolved. The Senate observed a minute's silence for those killed in the border clashes before approving an urgent motion proposed by Sen Gen Sawat Thassana to discuss assistance for communities affected by the border clashes. Koon Kantho, 68, collects items from her house destroyed during Cambodia's artillery attacks, in Kantharalak district in Si Sa Ket province on Tuesday. (Photo: Reuters)
Bangkok Post
10 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
ZTE Launches Children Care Charity Campaign in Thailand
Bangkok, July 29, 2025 — ZTE Corporation ( / a global leading provider of integrated information and communication technology solutions, has successfully concluded its charity initiative "Warm Little Hearts, Light Up Bright Future", reaffirming its commitment to corporate social responsibility in Thailand. The initiative saw ZTE donate essential supplies and digital connectivity solutions worth 1 million THB to a Public charity organisation, Baan Nokkamin Foundation, to support underprivileged children across the country. As a key partner in Thailand's 4G and 5G infrastructure rollout, working closely with major operators such as AIS, TrueMove, and DTAC, ZTE has consistently aligned its technological expertise with social impact. The latest campaign reflects the company's "Tech for Good" philosophy, leveraging innovation to empower vulnerable communities and nurture future generations. The year 2025 marks the 50th anniversary of China-Thailand diplomatic relations, with both nations having achieved fruitful cooperation across economic, trade, and cultural domains. At this significant milestone, ZTE launched a charitable donation program specifically targeting underprivileged children and vulnerable groups in Thailand, aiming to enhance their access to education, healthcare, and digital connectivity. In June 2025, ZTE and VST ECS (Thailand) Co., Ltd. donated 20 ZTE nubia A35e smartphones with annual SIM packages to Pakayon Village in Phetchaburi Province. The contribution brought first-time mobile connectivity to a remote Karen community lacking access to electricity, marking a small but significant step toward digital inclusion. Building on this momentum, ZTE launched the "Care for Orphanage Children" initiative in July, in collaboration with the Baan Nokkamin Foundation, a public charity organisation that operates three branches across Thailand. This foundation provides foster family-style care for orphans, nursery care, educational support, skill development, and health and hygiene management support to over 800 vulnerable children." Following consultations with Chairat Midchid, fundraiser of the foundation, ZTE identified urgent supply needs of the organisation's Bangkok branch. With complimentary logistics support from Sinotrans Thailand, ZTE promptly initiated a 1-million-THB donation programme, culminating in a ceremony held on July 9 at Baan Nokkamin Foundation's Bangkok Children's Home. ZTE Thailand executives, including CEO Yan Changzhi, CMO Huang Wulong, CTO Wang Fei, and other members, joined with Surachai Sanmi, Director of Baan Nokkamin Foundation, and over 20 children for the occasion. Each child received a personalised gift bag containing socks, toys, and a symbolic Year of the Snake mystery box figurine, offered as a gesture of encouragement, wishing the children wisdom and agility as they pursue their futures. This initiative underscores ZTE's commitment and responsibility as a global corporate citizen, while representing our active contribution to Thai society. By combining technological innovation with compassion, the company aims to foster inclusive growth and create a lasting impact in communities where it operates.
Bangkok Post
11 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Global banking rules need review
In an era of shrinking resources for development finance, global policymakers must shift their focus to making better use of existing funds. Identifying and removing regulatory barriers that hinder the efficient deployment of capital to emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs) is a good place to start. The Basel III framework, developed in response to the 2008 global financial crisis, has played a crucial role in preventing another systemic collapse. But it has also inadvertently discouraged banks from financing infrastructure projects in EMDEs. At the same time, advanced economies, with debt-to-GDP ratios at historic highs, face mounting fiscal pressures. Servicing these debts consumes a growing share of public budgets just as governments must ramp up defence spending and boost economic competitiveness, resulting in cuts to foreign aid. Together, these pressures underscore the urgent need to mobilise more private capital for investment in EMDEs. Building resilient and sustainable economies will require transformational investments across the developing world in infrastructure, technology, health, and education. According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), EMDEs must raise more than $3 trillion annually beyond what they can raise through public revenues to meet critical development and climate targets. Amid these challenges, prudential regulation impedes the ability of EMDEs to raise private capital. This issue can be traced back to the global financial crisis, which wiped out $15 trillion in global GDP between 2008 and 2011. Since the crisis stemmed from weak capital and liquidity controls, as well as the unchecked growth of innovative and opaque financial products, Basel III was designed to close regulatory loopholes and bolster oversight, particularly in response to the rise of the non-bank financial sector. While the revised framework addresses the vulnerabilities that triggered the 2008 crisis, its focus on advanced economies and systemically important financial institutions inadvertently imposes several requirements that restrict capital flows to EMDEs. For example, Basel III requires banks to hold disproportionately high levels of capital to cover the perceived risks of financing infrastructure projects in EMDEs. But these risks are often overestimated. In fact, the data suggest that by year five, the marginal default rates for development loans are lower than those for corporate loans extended to investment-grade borrowers. But despite the lower risk profile, banks are required to hold more capital against development-finance loans than they do against loans to unrated companies over the life of the project. Insurers encounter similar regulatory barriers. Under the European Union's Solvency II framework, an insurer investing in an EMDE infrastructure project faces a capital charge of 49% -- nearly double the 25% required for a comparable project in an OECD country. Historical data show that infrastructure loans in EMDEs perform just as well as those in advanced economies. The significantly higher capital costs that banks incur when making infrastructure loans to EMDEs deter them from supporting transformative, high-impact projects, steering capital toward safer, low-impact investments. Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) -- international financial institutions, backed by guarantees from developed-economy shareholders and AAA credit ratings, can help reduce capital costs by co-financing EMDE projects and providing lenders with additional assurances. But even when MDBs share the risk, the resulting exposures often remain subject to a 100% capital charge, undermining the very benefits that multilateral engagement is meant to provide. To be sure, Basel III's foundational principles are sound. Capital buffers and liquidity ratios that reflect institutional risk profiles are essential for maintaining financial stability. But several rules within the otherwise well-designed Basel III framework limit EMDEs' ability to pursue sustainable development while doing little to mitigate systemic risk. To improve the regulatory framework for EMDEs, the G20 must take four key actions, using this week's meeting of G20 finance ministers and central-bank governors in Durban, South Africa as a platform for cooperative leadership. First, recalibrate capital requirements for infrastructure project finance to reflect real-world default performance, particularly in the post-construction phase. Second, expand the list of MDBs eligible for 0% risk-weighting under Basel III to include high-performing regional institutions, such as the Africa Finance Corporation, that have investment-grade ratings. Third, clarify the definition of "unconditional guarantees" so that more MDB-backed risk-sharing instruments can qualify for favourable regulatory treatment. And lastly, introduce capital-charge discounts for blended finance structures co-financed by A-rated institutions, with the level of discount varying by rating. These reforms do not require new taxpayer commitments; they simply align regulation with actual risk. Implementing them would crowd in more private investment, reduce borrowing costs for developing countries, and accelerate progress toward transformative development that creates much-needed jobs. The G20 must address these regulatory roadblocks so that capital can flow to where it delivers the greatest value. Reaching consensus on how to lower capital costs for emerging-market economies is one of the top priorities at the meeting of G20 finance chiefs. Reforming the Basel III framework would be a relatively low-cost, high-impact way to mobilise investment, drive job creation, and support sustainable growth in emerging markets. ©2025 Project Syndicate. Vera Songwe, is a non-resident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. Jendayi Frazer, is a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution. Peter Blair Henry is the Class of 1984 Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution.
