logo
'We want our PM to come forward and say that Trump is saying rubbish,' says John Brittas in Rajya Sabha

'We want our PM to come forward and say that Trump is saying rubbish,' says John Brittas in Rajya Sabha

Time of India4 days ago
NEW DELHI: Communist Party of India (Marxist) MP John Brittas on Wednesday criticised Prime Minister
Narendra Modi
in the Rajya Sabha for not speaking about US President
Donald Trump
's claims on the Pahalgam
terror attack
.
Brittas said the
Pulwama attack
was one of the biggest security failures in independent India and said "New Bharat" seems to be celebrating past failures.
Addressing the Rajya Sabha during a special discussion on Operation Sindoor, Brittas said, "This so-called 'New Bharat' is turning into a celebration of past failures, be it the Parliament attack, Uri, Pulwama, or Pahalgam. Pulwama, in fact, remains one of the biggest security failures in independent India's history."
Brittas said the Prime Minister spoke for over an hour in Parliament but did not mention Trump. He urged the PM to clearly say that "Donald Trump is saying rubbish" and condemn the statement.
"I listened carefully to Prime Minister Modi's 1-hour-42-minute-long reply in Parliament yesterday. Not once did he mention Donald Trump. Why is he afraid to speak? "...We want our PM to come forward and say that Donald Trump is saying rubbish, and we condemn it.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Uncover cards that can help you get seat upgrades
Intuit Credit Karma
Learn More
Undo
And we will support you (Government)," he added.
Speaking earlier in the Upper House today, Union Minister JP Nadda accused the previous Congress-led UPA government of "inaction" over repeated terror strikes during its tenure.
Nadda said that despite repeated terror attacks from Pakistan, the Congress government continued with confidence-building measures. "While they kept firing bullets at us, we went ahead to offer them biryani," the minister said in Rajya Sabha during a special discussion on Operation Sindoor.
"...We need to understand the limits of their (then Congress govt) appeasement that after 2008 Jaipur bomb blasts by Indian Mujahideen, India and Pakistan agreed on a specific confidence-building measures...Woh hume goliyoon se bhunte rahe aur hum unko birykhilane chale...They gave permission for a triple-entry permit to cross LoC..."
Nadda said no strong steps were taken after major attacks like the 2005 Delhi blasts, the 2006 Varanasi and Mumbai train bombings. He added that despite these incidents, trade and tourism with Pakistan continued.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's America First biodiesel policy could cost US companies, consumers, trade groups warn
Trump's America First biodiesel policy could cost US companies, consumers, trade groups warn

Time of India

time15 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump's America First biodiesel policy could cost US companies, consumers, trade groups warn

The Trump administration's push to discourage the use of foreign feedstocks in domestic biodiesel could lead to higher energy prices for US consumers and restricted domestic production, according to some refining and biofuel trade groups. The warning reflects ongoing friction between President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency and the administration's traditional allies in the energy and agriculture industries over biofuels policy. Trump has promised to slash consumer energy costs , but is also trying to advance his America First agenda to support domestic production through trade protectionism - which can often make costs go up instead. At issue is a proposal from the EPA in June that would for the first time allocate only half as many tradable renewable fuel credits to biodiesel that is either imported or made with foreign feedstocks. Under the Renewable Fuel Standard, refiners must blend large volumes of biofuels into the US fuel supply or purchase the credits, called RINs, from those that do. While meant to help domestic farmers and producers, the new proposal - set to be finalized this autumn - would place unprecedented demand on domestic raw materials needed to make biodiesel like soybean oil, used cooking oil, and animal fat, in a market that currently must look abroad to meet its needs. Meanwhile, restricting the number of RINs that can be generated through such imports will raise credit prices, with a potential spillover impact on diesel and home heating oil, according to the industry groups. "This credit restriction ... will jeopardize the economic viability of renewable fuel production assets and raise overall compliance costs for all obligated parties, which ultimately harms US consumers," Chet Thompson, head of the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers group representing refiners, said in a July 25 letter to top Republican lawmakers. The Advanced Biofuels Association also said the policy could mean ramped up consumer costs, by putting a $250 per metric ton premium on domestic versus imported feedstocks, according to a study it commissioned. "Economic analysis shows this would impose significant costs on US biorefineries, raise fuel prices for millions of Americans, and benefit only a narrow set of stakeholders," ABFA President Michael McAdams said in a statement. The White House and EPA declined to comment directly on the price concerns, saying the administration is still seeking public comment on the proposal until August 8. Others in the biofuel industry backed the proposal. "American farmers need all the demand they can get. We should be developing our capacity here, rather than relying on imported used cooking oil from China, or giving Brazilian feedstocks preferential treatment at the expense of US producers and their farm partners," said Emily Skor, CEO of Growth Energy. However, US companies such as ADM, Bunge and Cargill that have global assets and process US soy, as well as foreign companies with significant US operations, will likely see negative effects. That includes Australia's Nufarm , which contracts with farmers in South America to grow new oilseed crops. Uncertain numbers The biofuel industry had not been seeking the import shift in EPA's June proposal, according to multiple renewable fuel lobbyists and company officials. The White House has since held several meetings with industry officials to hear about potential unintended consequences of the changes, according to multiple sources. The EPA's proposal in June was meant to set out biofuel blending mandates for the next two years. It included a quota of 7.12 billion biomass-based diesel RINs for 2026 - a measurement of the number of tradable credits generated by blending the fuel - and projected that mandate would lead to the blending of 5.61 billion gallons. The biofuels industry and the American Petroleum Institute, an oil trade group, had banded together to lobby the administration to set biomass-based diesel mandates to at least 5.25 billion gallons. The mandate was just 3.35 billion gallons in 2025. Still, there are scenarios in the EPA's accounting that could lead to a lower volume outcome. If all the biodiesel and renewable diesel used in the US next year came from domestic feedstocks, for example, the RIN mandate would yield just 4.45 billion gallons, according to several industry analyses reviewed by Reuters. Ditching the penalty on imported feedstocks could help raise that number, according to the analyses. "That probably aligns with what the administration was trying to do in terms of supporting the agricultural side and farmers," said one industry analyst, who asked to remain anonymous to speak candidly.

P Chidambaram's BIG charge against Election Commission: ‘Abusing its powers and trying to change electoral character'
P Chidambaram's BIG charge against Election Commission: ‘Abusing its powers and trying to change electoral character'

Mint

time15 minutes ago

  • Mint

P Chidambaram's BIG charge against Election Commission: ‘Abusing its powers and trying to change electoral character'

Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram on Sunday alleged that the Election Commission is trying to change the electoral character and patterns of states. The former Union Minister's allegation comes amid a raging row over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar Chidambaram asserted that this 'abuse of powers' must be fought politically and legally. The former home minister said the Bihar voter revision exercise is getting curiouser and curiouser. While 65 lakh voters are in danger of being disenfranchised in Bihar, reports of 'adding' 6.5 lakh persons as voters in Tamil Nadu is alarming and patently illegal, Chidambaram said in a post on X. "Calling them 'permanently migrated' is an insult to the migrant workers and a gross interference in the right of the electorate of Tamil Nadu to elect a government of its choice," the Rajya Sabha MP said. Why should the migrant worker not return to Bihar or his/her home state to vote in the State Assembly election, as they usually do, Chidambaram asked. "Does not the migrant worker return to Bihar at the time of the Chhath puja festival?" he said. "A person to be enrolled as a voter must have a fixed and permanent legal home. The migrant worker has such a home in Bihar (or another state). How can he/she be enrolled as a voter in Tamil Nadu?" Chidambaram said. If the migrant worker's family has a permanent home in Bihar and lives in Bihar, how can the migrant worker be considered as "permanently migrated" to Tamil Nadu, he further asked. "The ECI is abusing its powers and trying to change the electoral character and patterns of States. This abuse of powers must be fought politically and legally," Chidambaram said. The opposition has been protesting in both Houses of Parliament against the SIR, alleging the EC's exercise was aimed at "disenfranchising voters" in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections. They have been demanding a discussion on the issue in both Houses of Parliament. Key Takeaways Concerns over the legitimacy of the Election Commission's voter roll revisions. Impact of migrant workers on electoral processes in their home states. The necessity for political and legal action against perceived electoral abuses.

'They Tortured Hindus': Sadhvi Pragya Alleges 'Congress Conspiracy' In Malegaon Blast Case
'They Tortured Hindus': Sadhvi Pragya Alleges 'Congress Conspiracy' In Malegaon Blast Case

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

'They Tortured Hindus': Sadhvi Pragya Alleges 'Congress Conspiracy' In Malegaon Blast Case

Curated By : Last Updated: August 03, 2025, 11:43 IST Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur (Image: X) Days after a special NIA court of Mumbai acquitted all seven accused in the Malegaon blast case, Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur on Sunday said that 'truth has triumphed". The former BJP MP received a warm welcome as she arrived at Raja Bhoj Airport in Madhya Pradesh. 'Dharma and truth were on our side, so we were bound to win. Satyameva Jayate! I had said this earlier, and this has been proven now. Vidharmion ke, deshdrohion ke munh kaale huye hain. They have received a reply. The country has always been with Dharma and truth, and it will always be," she added. Launching a scathing attack at Congress, she alleged that they 'tortured" Hindus and jailed them, slapping false cases, and stressed that the case was a conspiracy by Congress. 'Congresspeople have always adopted appeasement politics for Muslims. They used this in their regime. They tortured Hindus in every manner, jailed them and slapped false cases on them. They called it 'saffron terror' and 'Hindutva terror'. Congress harbours such a petty mindset. This was a conspiracy by Congress, and this qualifies as treason," she said. #WATCH | 2008 Malegaon blast case all accused acquitted | Bhopal, MP: BJP leader Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur says, 'I have said this again and again that Parambir Singh is a terrible man. He crossed all limits and broke all laws. He tortured me outside the framework of law. I was… ANI (@ANI) August 3, 2025 She further alleged that when Congress was in power in Maharashtra and Centre, they 'misused all government agencies and turned them corrupt. This was done by the UPA Govt". 'Officers of ATS had created this atmosphere of fear in the country, so nobody was able to express themselves… It was an attempt to scare people because there was a Congress government in Maharashtra and the Center," she said. Swipe Left For Next Video View all 'This was done by the UPA government… Several people, who were tortured by ATS, lost their life. But their family doesn't know where their body is…Several were killed, but their record was scrubbed," she added. On September 29, 2008, a bomb attached to a motorcycle exploded in Malegaon — a town with a significant Muslim population—killing six people and injuring around 100 others. view comments News india 'They Tortured Hindus': Sadhvi Pragya Alleges 'Congress Conspiracy' In Malegaon Blast Case Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Read More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store