EU Digital Fairness Act is for business as much as consumers, says justice commissioner
Speaking at the European Retail Innovation Summit in Brussels on Wednesday, McGrath described the new law as 'both a pro-consumer and pro-business initiative'. His remarks were aimed at reassuring retailers and digital firms wary of yet another layer of EU regulation, following the implementation of the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act.
'We want to reduce administrative burdens to create a competitive and pro-business environment,' McGrath told the audience of industry representatives and policy experts.
The Digital Fairness Act is being designed to tackle manipulative and unethical commercial practices in the digital space. It will draw on findings from the Commission's
Digital Fairness Fitness Check
, a major review of EU consumer law published last October. That report identified persistent gaps in regulation, including the widespread use of so-called 'dark patterns' – design tricks that mislead or pressure users into making ill-informed choices.
The legislation is also expected to address influencer marketing, the addictive design of digital services,
personalised pricing
based on user profiling,
video games currency
and other emerging risks that current consumer rules are deemed ill-equipped to handle.
McGrath acknowledged that complying with EU-wide consumer protection laws costs businesses millions of euros each year. He insisted the new law would offer greater legal certainty and lighten the administrative load on companies, particularly smaller ones.
A public consultation is due to launch 'in the coming weeks', with a legislative proposal expected by mid-2026.
Maria-Myrto Kanellopoulou, who heads the European Commission's consumer law unit, said the law would be developed with 'careful' and 'thorough' consultations, 'we will to take the time' she told attendees.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
13 hours ago
- Euronews
Planes drop aid into Gaza as Israeli fire reportedly kills at least 18
Planes dropped aid from European countries and beyond into Gaza on Saturday, though both aid groups and Palestinians say changes have been only incremental. The aid comes from a coalition of Jordan-led nations, including Germany, France and Spain. To circumvent restrictions on aid trucks crossing overland into Gaza, they have orchestrated parcels being dropped from the skies. French President Emmanuel Macron said that the first French aid drop of several tonnes of food was carried out on Friday and that more would continue over the weekend. Spain reportedly dropped 12 tonnes of aid deployed in 24 parachutes. This is enough for around 11,000 people, according to Spanish Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares. Germany said 14 tonnes of food and medical aid was dropped off by plane, but German Foreign Minister Johan Wadephul said that 'sufficient quantities of relief supplies can only be provided to the people by land.' Both Italy and the Netherlands are set to begin airdropping aid into Gaza next week, according to the country's governments. 'We expect Israel to do more to enable humanitarian aid via land routes and to fully honour its humanitarian agreements with the EU,' Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp told the Dutch parliament. 'The humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza must end.' Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said he had given the green light to military forces for the 'transport and airdrop of basic necessities to civilians in Gaza, who have been severely affected by the ongoing conflict.' Hunger has grown in Gaza during the past 22 months of war between Israel and Hamas because of aid restrictions, humanitarian workers warn. Experts say the 'worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in Gaza.' Israel enforced a complete blockade on food and other supplies for two and a half months beginning in March. It said its objective was to increase pressure on Hamas to release dozens of hostages it has held since its attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Though the flow of aid resumed in May, the amount is a fraction of what aid organizations say is needed. Situation on the ground At least 18 people were killed by Israeli fire in Gaza on Saturday, according to local hospitals. Eight of these people were reportedly aid seekers. Near a Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) distribution site, Yahia Youssef, who had come to seek aid Saturday morning, described a panicked scene now grimly familiar. After helping carry out three people wounded by gunshots, he said he looked around and saw many others lying on the ground bleeding. 'It's the same daily episode,' Youssef said. In response to questions about several eyewitness accounts of violence at the northernmost of the Israeli-backed American contractor's four sites, the GHF media office said 'nothing (happened) at or near our sites.' The group's efforts to deliver aid to Gaza has been marred by violence and controversy. However, Israel and the GHF have said they have only fired warning shots and that the death toll of aid seekers has been exaggerated. An Israeli strike also hit a family house in an area between the towns of Zawaida and Deir al-Balah, killing two parents and their three children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Another strike hit a tent close to the gate of a closed prison where the displaced have sheltered in Khan Younis, killing a mother and her daughter, they said. Israel's military did not immediately respond to questions about the strikes or deaths near the aid sites. Hostage's families protest to end war Families of Israeli hostages held in Gaza and their supporters protested in Tel Aviv and urged their government to push harder for the release of their loved ones. US President Donald Trump's special envoy to the region Steve Witkoff joined them a day after visiting Gaza. Of the 251 hostages who were abducted when Hamas led an attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, around 20 are believed to be alive in Gaza. The war began when Hamas militants attacked southern Israel on 7 October 2023, killing 1,200 people, most of them civilians. A subsequent Israeli offensive has to date killed over 60,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry whose figure does not distinguish between fighters and civilians. The Israeli military says almost 900 of its soldiers have died since the start of the war.
Local France
14 hours ago
- Local France
French phrase of the Day: L'état de droit
Why do I need to know l'état de droit? Because it's a fundamental principle of any democracy. What does it mean? L'état de droit - pronounced lay tat de dwah - literally translates as 'the state of right' but its real meaning is 'the state of law' - or the principle that a society should be governed by laws and a justice system. It's usually used as the opposite of vigilante justice, or the idea of people taking the law into their own hands and administering their own punishments to people they feel have wronged them. The most common use of it has a slightly clumsy near-repetition - L'Etat de droit doit primer - the rule of law must prevail. Advertisement The French word droit means right in the sense of the opposite of left ( gauche ). But it also means right as in the political right (in fact the whole concept of a political right and a political left comes from the layout of the French parliament) and also means 'rights' in the sense of fundamental entitlements of a person of group. When talking about 'rights' it is plural ( droits ), just as in English. Use it like this Le respect des droits de l'homme et des libertés fondamentales, ainsique de l'État de droit, principes qui sont communs aux États membres - Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, along with the rule of law, are common values for EU member states. Sans l'état de droit, nous aurions une société de justiciers - Without the rule of law, we would have a vigilante society Évidemment, nous comprenons l'émotion de ce père de famille : comment agirions-nous à la place de cette personne, il est difficile de le dire. Ce que je peux vous dire comme porte-parole du gouvernement, c'est ma conviction profonde que l'État de droit doit primer et que nous ne souhaitons pas rentrer dans ce modèle de société où les gens se feraient justice eux-mêmes. Clearly we understand the emotions of this family man; how we would act in his place it's difficult to say. What I can tell you as the government spokesman is my deep conviction that the rule of law must prevail and that we do not wish to enter a model of society where people take the law into their own hands. [Quote from former government spokesman Olivier Véran, via Le Parisien ]
Euronews
16 hours ago
- Euronews
EU AI Act doesn't do enough to protect artists' copyright, groups say
As the European Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act)comes into force, groups representing artists say there are still many loopholes that need to be fixed for them to thrive in a creative world increasingly dominated by AI. The AI Act, celebrated for being the first comprehensive legislation to regulate AI globally, is riddled with problems, these organisations say. Groups like the European Composer and Songwriter Alliance (ECSA) and the European Grouping of Societies of Authors and Composers (GESAC) argue that it fails to protect creators whose works are used to train generative AI models. Without a clear way to opt out or get paid when tech companies use their music, books, movies, and other art to train their AI models, experts say that their work is continually at risk. 'The work of our members should not be used without transparency, consent, and remuneration, and we see that the implementation of the AI Act does not give us,' Marc du Moulin, ECSA's secretary general, told Euronews Next. 'Putting the cart before the horse' The purpose of the AI Act is to make sure AI stays 'safe, transparent, traceable, non-discriminatory and environmentally friendly,' the European Commission, the European Union's executive body, says in an explainer on the law. The law rates AI companies based on four levels of risk: minimal, limited, high, or unacceptable. Those in the unacceptable range are already banned, for example AIs that are manipulative or that conduct social scoring, where they rank individuals based on behaviour or economic status. Most generative AI falls into a minimal risk category, the Commission says. The owners of those technologies still have some requirements, like publishing summaries of the copyrighted data that companies used to train their AIs. Under the EU's copyright laws, companies are allowed to use copyrighted materials for text and data mining, like they do in AI training, unless a creator has 'reserved their rights,' Du Moulin said. Du Moulin said it's unclear how an artist can go about opting out of their work being shared with AI companies. 'This whole conversation is putting the cart before the horse. You don't know how to opt out, but your work is already being used,' he said. The EU's AI Code of Practice on General-Purpose (GPAI), a voluntary agreement for AI companies, asks providers to commit to a copyright policy, put in place safeguards to avoid any infringements of rights, and designate a place to receive and process complaints. Signatories so far include major tech and AI companies such as Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI. AI providers have to respect copyright laws, the Commission says The additional transparency requirements under the AI Act give artists clarity on who has already used their material and when, du Moulin added, making it difficult to claim any payment for work that's already been scraped to train AI models. 'Even if the AI Act has some good legal implications, it only works for the future – it will not be retroactive,' Du Moulin said. 'So everything which has been scraped already … it's a free lunch for generative AI providers who did not pay anything'. Adriana Moscono, GESAC's general manager, said some of her members tried opting out by sending letters and emails to individual AI companies to get a license for their content, but were not successful. 'There was no answer,' Moscono told Euronews Next. 'There was absolute denial of the recognition of … the need to respect copyright and to get a license. So please, European Commission, encourage licensing'. Thomas Regnier, a Commission spokesperson, said in a statement to Euronews Next that AI providers have to respect the rights holders when they carry out text and data mining, and if there have been infringements, they can settle it privately. The AI Act 'in no way affects existing EU copyright laws,' Regnier continued. Mandate licence negotiations, groups ask Du Moulin and Moscono are asking the Commission to urgently clarify the rules around opting out and copyright protection in the law. 'The code of practice, the template and the guidelines, they don't provide us any capacity to improve our situation,' Moscono said. 'They're not guaranteeing … a proper application of the AI Act'. The advocates said the Commission could also mandate that AI companies negotiate blanket or collective licenses with the respective artist groups. Germany's Society for Musical Performing and Mechanical Reproduction Rights (GEMA) filed two copyright lawsuits against AI companies OpenAI, the parent of ChatGPT, and Suno AI, an AI music generation app. While not directly related to the AI Act, Du Moulin says the verdict could determine to what extent AI companies could be bound to copyright laws. The Commission and the European Court of Justice, the EU's high court, have also signalled that they will review the text and data mining exemption in the copyright legislation issued in 2019, Du Moulin said. New AI companies have to make sure they are compliant with the AI Act's regulations by 2026. That deadline extends to 2027 to companies already operating in the EU.
