The enigma of Tiger Woods
It's the Tiger Slam rather than the Grand Slam because purists will argue that technically (purists always argue 'technically') Woods did not win all four trophies in the same year: he took the British and US Opens and the PGA in 2000 and added the Masters in April 2001. Whatever. The fact remains that Woods is the only player ever to hold all four titles simultaneously. Given how transient form on the golf course is, he is likely to be the only one who will ever do so. Whatever we choose to call it, it is a truth universally acknowledged that Woods's run from the summer of 2000 into the spring of 2001 constitutes a phase with very few parallels in sport. It is a subject worthy of a truly deep dive. For reasons we'll come to, this book isn't quite it.
There's still much for the Tiger fiend to enjoy. Brody Miller wonderfully recreates moments like the 3-wood Woods blasted 20 yards past Phil Mickelson's driver on the 13th at Augusta on his way to winning the 2001 Masters, a shot he had been practising for months. (Mickelson asks Woods if he always hits his 3-wood that far. 'No, further,' Tiger replies. Ouch.) Or the exchange between Woods and his caddie Steve Williams on the 14th fairway at St Andrews in 2000, when Woods was facing a blind shot into high wind and Williams urged him to hit the ball on the line of a specific cathedral spire in the distance. 'Is that the one you're talking about?' Woods says dryly, twirling his club after executing the shot perfectly – one he still regards as the greatest he ever hit in competition.
And so it goes, with Miller alternating between reconstructing the peerless rounds of golf Woods put together back then and recapping what was going on in the man's life at the same time. It's here that we run into problems; and they are ones you knew were coming from the moment you encountered this sentence in the introduction: 'Woods declined to speak to us for The Year of the Tiger.'
Well colour me stunned. Having made the mistake of chatting freely to sports journalists at the beginning of his career, Woods simply stopped talking to writers. He went into sphinx-mode and has remained locked in it ever since. Without recourse to the man himself, Miller can only resort to secondary texts. So you're very quickly into the realms of stuff you've read about many times before. Another rehash of Earl Woods's deeply unreasonable military-style tutoring techniques, anyone?
The Tiger book industry – and it is exactly that – has now reached a pitch where there is shelf after shelf of the stuff. A pitch where, earlier this year, the not-cash-averse James Patterson (or perhaps some writer who toils at James Patterson Industries) entered the fray with a scissors-and-paste job imaginatively titled Tiger Tiger purporting to be 'a new biography uncovering the life of golf superstar Tiger Woods. What makes Tiger tick?'
Those who really were there have already told their stories. Step forward Williams (The Caddie's Tale) and Hank Haney (The Coach's Tale). Those who were there-adjacent have told theirs, too. (Any number of the sportswriters who Woods spent 15 minutes with early on.) Even Williams now has his own biography. We're probably not far away from seeing 'How I Made Tiger's foot-long Turkey on Wholemeal,' and then the biography of the sandwich-maker. By James Patterson. ('It was a blazingly hot August day in the staff room at the Jupiter Island branch of Subway as Marianne F. Jenkins prepared for an eight-hour shift. Little did she know what customer fate would soon be sending her way.')
Miller does a perfectly decent job of putting you inside the ropes for Woods's finest hours. But the chapters around this feel padded; and ultimately The Year of the Tiger reads like a Vanity Fair piece fleshed out to book length. Sadly, until Woods himself decides to sit down in front of the computer screen – or Dictaphone – and say 'Here's what I was thinking…', most of the books about him will continue to fail in the same way.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Emma Raducanu and Carlos Alcaraz confirmed for US Open mixed doubles event
The mixed doubles championship will take place before the main tournament on August 19 and 20, where one million US dollars (£750,000) in prize money is at stake for the winners. Raducanu and Alcaraz are one of six teams who have received wild cards so far and two further wild cards are set to be announced at a later date to take the overall number of teams competing to 16. Eight of the total 16 pairs have received direct entry into the draw, including Emma Navarro and Jannik Sinner along with Iga Swiatek and Casper Ruud. Britain's Jack Draper is also in the main draw, paired with Paula Badosa and US duo Jessica Pegula and Tommy Paul will play together in front of their home crowd. Other notable wild cards include Novak Djokovic and Olga Danilovic, while two-time grand slam mixed doubles champion Venus Williams will compete with Reilly Opelka. Current US Open mixed doubles champions Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori have also received wild cards.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Emma Raducanu and Carlos Alcaraz granted wildcard as US Open confirms pairings for controversial mixed doubles event
The US Open has confirmed 14 teams that will feature in its controversial, revamped mixed doubles tournament this year, with a further two wildcard spots to be allocated at a later date. The organisers announced in February that the mixed doubles event would be radically overhauled, moving to a two-day event before the start of the official tournament, with sets played to four games with a tiebreak at 4-4, no-ad scoring, and a 10-point tiebreak instead of a third set. The quicker format, the move to qualifying week, and the huge increase in prize money - up to $1m, an $800,000 increase from the 2024 edition - was designed to attract singles stars to the event. And of the 14 teams confirmed as participants this week, only one team is an established mixed doubles pairing: last year's champions Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori. Recent Wimbledon mixed doubles champions Katerina Siniakova and Sam Verbeek are not on the list, but could still receive a wildcard entry closer to the tournament start. Both were among many doubles specialists - Errani and Vavassori included - who objected to the changed format and emphasis on singles players. 'It's a shame they decided to do it,' Siniakova told BBC Sport during Wimbledon. 'I think it's a marketing step, but they are taking (away the) chance of doubles players.' Verbeek added: 'I'm not going to actively root against it for it not to be a success. The positive I can think of is that there's going to be more people that can see the top single stars earlier in the tournament when they are maybe a bit more accessible to the public. But as a doubles athlete, my heart is bleeding.' The teams include eight which have directly earned a place as a result of their combined singles ranking, while Errani and Vavassori are one of six teams granted wildcards, with two more to follow. Nine grand slam singles champions are on the list of confirmed pairings, including recently-crowned Wimbledon champions Jannik Sinner and Iga Swiatek, who have direct entry into the draw alongside partners Emma Navarro and Casper Ruud, respectively. Emma Raducanu and Carlos Alcaraz have been given a wildcard, along with all-American pairings Madison Keys and Frances Tiafoe, and Taylor Townsend - the women's doubles No 1 - and Ben Shelton. Venus Williams, who recently made her singles comeback in Washington, and Reilly Opelka have also been granted a wildcard, as have Serbia's Olga Danilovic and Novak Djokovic. British No 1 Jack Draper had entered the draw alongside Zheng Qinwen, but has now been granted direct entry alongside Spain's former world No 2 Paula Badosa after Zheng withdrew following elbow surgery. The small draw and popularity of the event among singles players means it's not just established doubles pairings who will miss out: Alex de Minaur took to social media after the announcement to say, 'Katie [Boulter, his fiancee] and I would like to ask for a WC pretty pretty please'.
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Kyren Wilson blows shot at snooker history as 'silly' act leaves him with egg on his face
Former snooker world champion Kyren Wilson attempted a no-look shot at the conclusion of his clash with Si Jiahui at the Shanghai Masters, completely unaware of the stakes at play Kyren Wilson says he doesn't regret his botched no-look shot against Si Jiahui at the Shanghai Masters, despite it costing him a piece of snooker history. The 2024 World Snooker Championship victor faced off against the gifted Chinese player in the last 16 of the tournament. During their best-of-11 encounter, Wilson and Jiahui managed six century breaks between them. This accumulation matched the record set by Judd Trump and Neil Robertson at the 2016 Masters, plus Robertson's later battle with Mark Selby in 2020. Having reached 97 in the decisive frame, Wilson had the chance to pot the black and set a new record for most centuries in a best-of-11 clash. Rather than rolling the black safely into the corner, Wilson looked away from the table and attempted to smash the black into the pocket with sheer force. His calculations were slightly off, as the ball bounced off the cushions and rolled clear of the pocket. Wilson did not realise the importance of that moment, but maintained he would have attempted the same audacious shot regardless. When asked about his final attempt by the World Snooker Tour, he cheekily responded: "Oh no! I did the silly no-look thing." The World No. 2 then added: "Especially in China, I feel like the sport is blowing up over here and a lot of it is about doing things a little bit differently to other players. "So try to have a bit of fun with no-look blacks. The crowd really appreciate that sort of thing and they like to see a little bit of characters from the players. "Disappointed it didn't break the record, but I didn't know that. It was an amazing game to be involved in, every frame had a break over 70 or 80 or something like that. "It was crazy, but so happy to win it. There's no chance I'd have just rolled that black in. I'd still do even if I knew about the record. "It is still about trying to do things differently. We are stepping into a modern era in snooker, and nice to see someone doing things a little bit different." Wilson might have concluded with a touch of showmanship, but he was tested throughout by the World No. 15. The Kettering ace found himself behind at 3-1, 4-3 and 5-4 but still managed to overcome the Shaoxing potter, who compiled breaks of 55, 124, 139, 95 and 127, whilst Wilson notched up 120, 82, 114, 114 and 83. Reflecting on the encounter, the 33-year-old, who will meet either Ronnie O'Sullivan or Barry Hawkins in the quarter-final, heaped praise on his opponent, saying: "I don't think a game can get any harder than that. "I think up until the deciding frame he missed one ball. He was relentless and some of the balls he knocks in are frightening. "I worked hard going into this event, and I'm glad I can see that hard work shining through. That has allowed me to battle back into the game and doing enough to win it. It is nice to still be involved."
