Builders hail building regulations, seek amendments to NALA Act
This means that builders of structures up to G+4 categories or flats under 300-400 sq m will have ample options and relief from some restrictions, thereby helping them join the real estate and urban development sector in cities like Visakhapatnam.
However, builders have expressed dissatisfaction over the lack of clarity on the Non-Agricultural Land Assessment (NALA) Act. As per the statements made by Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu on several occasions, including the third District Collectors' meeting held in March, the NALA Act is expected to be repealed, citing it as a major impediment to urban and real estate development.
'We have come to know that the government is discussing the implementation of 4% charges for land conversion (agriculture to commercial) under the NALA Act, instead of 5% charged by the previous government. We want the Act abolished. We have urged the government to amend the law on land conversion in terms of acres instead of square yards in urban areas. This will be beneficial to urban developers. We are not worried about 4% or 5% charges for conversion,' said a senior builder on the condition of anonymity on Wednesday.
In Visakhapatnam, the real estate sector has an annual turnover of around ₹700 to ₹800 crore. It is expected to touch ₹1,000 crore mark annually. This will be possible if the government accelerates projects like operation of software companies, employment generation and flow of financial transactions. The GVMC and VMRDA should complete the master plan roads and projects as soon as possible, they said.
'We discussed the need for basic completion of roads with the GVMC Commissioner. We are expecting a boost in the real estate sector as the market has been sluggish for the last 18 months. Approximately 10,000 residential units still remain vacant due to no sale. Now, the market is gaining some momentum,' said CREDAI city president E. Ashok Kumar.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Punjab: Court again defers order on Majithia's bail plea for August 12
The local court on Monday again reserved its order on the bail application filed by Shiromani Akali Dal leader Bikram Singh Majithia, who was arrested in a disproportionate assets case, for August 12. This is the fifth time the court has deferred its verdict. Shiromani Akali Dal leader Bikram Singh Majithia The hearing on his bail plea lasted for about an hour. After listening to the submissions, the court reserved its verdict for one more day and fixed the next hearing for August 12. On the same day, the court will also pronounce its decision on Majithia's plea seeking a change of jail barracks. During the proceedings, Majithia's wife and MLA, Ganieve Kaur Majithia, was present in court. Majithia's counsel, advocate Arshdeep Kaler, confirmed that for the fifth time, the court has reserved its decision on his bail plea. On June 25, Majithia was arrested by the Vigilance Bureau at his residence in Amritsar in connection with the disproportionate assets case. He is currently lodged in Nabha Jail, and his barrack-change plea will also be heard on August 12. The disproportionate assets case against Majithia stems from an ongoing investigation by a special investigation team (SIT) of the Punjab Police, which is also probing his alleged involvement in the 2021 drug case. Majithia had earlier been booked under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, based on a 2018 report submitted by the state's Anti-Drug Special Task Force (STF). He spent over five months in Patiala Jail before being granted bail by the Punjab and Haryana high court in August 2022.
Hans India
16 minutes ago
- Hans India
Delay in streamlining pension system leading to human suffering
In a country where social welfare is often the last lifeline for millions, denial or delay in disbursing pensions can be a question of life and death. A Central Information Commission 2014 order, though based on a case from Delhi, offers a crucial precedent that must not be ignored especially in light of mounting complaints of non-payment of pensions to BPL citizens in Telangana. In this particular case, an elderly, impoverished woman—wholly dependent on her monthly pension from the Department of Women & Child Development—suddenly stopped receiving payments from April 2012. The department failed to notify her, offer any rationale, or provide support for over two years. Her desperate RTI (Right to Information) plea in June 2013 went unanswered or incompletely answered for months. Despite repeated visits to the office, there was only silence. Stopping pension for no reason: The appellant stated that she had been receiving a pension from the Department of Women and Child Development (WCD)/Social Welfare of the Delhi government under their pension scheme. From April 2012 she was not getting the pension amount from the department, which also filed to proactively provide any information on why her pension was abruptly stopped. The last pension payment that she received was on 6-3¬2012. It was Rs 4, 500 for the January to March 2012 quarter. Eventually, the matter reached the CIC. The Commission's order was damning. It held the Public Information Officer (PIO) accountable for dereliction of duty and awarded the woman Rs 43,500 in unpaid dues, simple interest from the date of non-payment, and Rs 5,000 in compensation. It noted that the failure to respond to the RTI within 48 hours, especially since the request pertained to 'life and liberty', was a serious violation of the RTI Act. What makes this case profoundly relevant to Telangana is its glaring similarity to the state's ongoing pension crisis. Reports from districts like Mahbubnagar, Nalgonda, and Warangal reveal that thousands of senior citizens and widows had not received pensions for months, citing bureaucratic gaps, digitization issues, and account linkage problems. Similar is the fate of those in many states, including Andhra Pradesh. But here's the core issue: Can a government that claims to serve the poor afford to neglect the very system that ensures their daily survival? The Delhi CIC's ruling strongly criticized the reasoning that the pension was stopped due to the absence of a bank account. Instead, it stated that reasonability and commonsense demand that payments should have continued through existing post office accounts until the transition was complete. The same logic must apply to Telangana, where Aadhaar and bank linkage have become hurdles for many poor beneficiaries who are digitally illiterate or live in remote areas. Under Section 4(1)(d) of the RTI Act, every public authority must suo motu inform affected persons of decisions that impact them. The woman in this case should never have had to file an RTI to discover why her pension was stopped. The fact that she had to go through two appeals, spend years in uncertainty, and live off food donated by neighbors is not just an administrative lapse—it is a violation of basic human dignity. The appellant stated that under Section 4 (1)(d), WCD was obligated to inform her on its own about the decision taken by it to stop her pension payments. If the department had provided complete information about its decision with respect to her pension, it would have enabled her to challenge the department's decision to stop her pension or at least make alternative arrangements for her financial security. She stated that she is extremely poor and old and is wholly dependent on the pension given by the department. The Commission further directed the public authority to establish mechanisms that prevent abrupt stoppage of pensions and to ensure that communication is made before any disruption in benefits. It emphasized that RTI requests involving life and liberty must be handled within 48 hours. Payments for government pensioners in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana are generally credited to their accounts on or before the last working day of each month, except for the month of March, where the pension is credited on or after April 1. However, it has been observed that payment of pension to pensioners is not credited in the account on the due date, as a result of which EPS pensioners face difficulties. As of Apr 28, 2024, these beneficiaries account for 25.30 per cent of the total pensioners is 16,57,361 of the total 65,49,864, and the payment methods include Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT). Yhe Governments need to explain the reasons for the non-payment of pension in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. Non-payment of pensions in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh today could be due to several reasons, including: Potential reasons for non-payment: Bank holidays: While August 10th is a Sunday, pension disbursement generally occurs on the last working day of the month. If the preceding day was also a non-working day, then that could explain why it hasn't been credited yet. Administrative delays: These can arise from issues at the pension disbursing agency (bank), or with the head of office, which might lead to delays in crediting pension amounts to pensioners' accounts on the due date. Pension verification issues: Some states, including Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, require pensioners, especially those under specific schemes like the 'Aasara' scheme in Telangana, to periodically verify their eligibility. Failing to do so can result in temporary suspension of pension payments. For example, in Andhra Pradesh, disabled pensioners need to complete a verification process according to a specific schedule. Changes in pension schemes: The Aasara Pension Scheme has been replaced by the Cheyutha Pension Scheme, and beneficiaries are now slated to receive a higher monthly pension. Such transitions may lead to temporary delays during the initial implementation phase. Non-submission of relevant documents: Some might not have received their pension if they have not submitted the necessary periodic certificates related to re-employment/employment, remarriage/marriage to their Pension Disbursing Authority (PDA) on the due dates. Technical glitches or errors: Issues with the pension payment system itself, either at the state government level or at the bank, might lead to payment delays. Notional increments and arrears: There have been protests and demands in Telangana regarding the non-implementation of Supreme Court judgments on notional increments for retirees and the reduction of the commutation restoration period. These issues are distinct from regular monthly pension payments but can still be a source of grievance. Telangana must take urgent lessons from this. Immediate audit of delayed/stopped pensions: The Department of Women & Child Welfare and other welfare agencies must publish district-wise data on pending pension cases, clearly stating reasons. 48-hour response protocol for RTI on life/liberty issues: Any RTI concerning loss of livelihood or survival issues must trigger emergency response systems in all departments. Compensation for delayed payments: As has been ruled by the CIC, Telangana must consider compensating pensioners who have suffered due to administrative lapses. Alternative disbursement mechanisms: When bank accounts are unavailable or inactive, payments should be routed via post office accounts or cash disbursements through local municipal officers. Officials' accountability: Non-compliance with RTI mandates or FAA orders must lead to disciplinary action, including financial penalties. Communication in local language: In rural Telangana, lack of awareness about pension status arises from poor communication. All decisions must be conveyed in Telugu and tribal dialects through notice boards, community radios, or local panchayat. Inaction and silence from the government can destroy lives when it comes to welfare programs. Telangana's poor citizens deserve more than schemes on paper; they deserve consistent support, timely payments, and a dignified life. Pension is not charity. It is a right earned through age, need, or circumstance. Denial without reason is not just negligence. It is an injustice. (Based on CIC/DS/A/2013/001589-SA Mrs. Sumitra Devi Vs. Women & Child Dev. Dept GNCTD) (The writer is a former CIC and Advisor, School of Law, Mahindra University, Hyderabad)
Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
FRA warns colleges against charging excess fees
Pune: In a significant directive, the Maharashtra Fee Regulatory Authority (FRA) has directed all private professional colleges across the state to refrain from collecting any deposits or fees beyond the officially approved amounts. The authority has also warned that strict action will be taken against institutions if students or parents report violations of this mandate. The order was issued on August 10. FRA warns colleges against charging excess fees Arjun Chikhale, FRA secretary, said, 'Colleges have been reminded that the maximum permissible deposit amount is already fixed. This guideline, framed during the FRA's meeting on August 28, 2024, and later included in the academic year 2025–26 regulations published in October 2024, clearly states that the deposit should be collected only once and not under multiple names.' The FRA has emphasised that the deposit amount must be refunded to students upon completion of their course. Further, as per Section 14(5) of the Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Fees) Act, 2015, no institution is allowed to collect fees exceeding the total annual cost for a given academic year. The circular comes at a time when admission processes are underway for various professional courses, including engineering, management, hotel management, and law. The authority has also cautioned that any breach of the 2015 Act or its rules will invite action under Section 20 of the Act if violations are confirmed through complaints. Chikhale said, 'Many colleges in the state offer hostel and mess facilities to students. The FRA has clarified that these amenities must remain optional and that no student should be compelled to avail them. Institutions have been instructed to ensure that opting out of hostel or mess services does not affect a student's admission or access to academic facilities'. With these directives, the FRA aims to curb unfair fee practices and ensure transparency, especially during the crucial admission period. 'Many of us have been forced to pay extra deposits, and we never get the money again. This directive will give us the confidence to question such demands,' said a parent of an engineering student 'Not every student wants to stay in the hostel or take the mess food, but colleges make it compulsory to avail the facility. The change will save us thousands of rupees every year,' said Khushi Tarekar, a student.
