Boko Haram's resurgence: Why Nigeria's military is struggling to hold the line
By TAIWO ADEBAYO
A resurgence of Boko Haram attacks is shaking Nigeria's northeast, as Islamic extremists have repeatedly overrun military outposts, mined roads with bombs, and raided civilian communities since the start of the year, raising fears of a possible return to peak Boko Haram-era insecurity despite the military's claims of successes.
Boko Haram, Nigeria's homegrown jihadis, took up arms in 2009 to fight Western education and impose their radical version of Islamic law. The conflict, now Africa's longest struggle with militancy, has spilled into Nigeria's northern neighbors, resulted in the death of around 35,000 civilians and the displacement of more than 2 million others, according to the United Nations.
In the latest attack late last week in the village of Gajibo in Borno state, the epicenter of the crisis, the extremists killed nine members of a local militia that supports the Nigerian military, after soldiers deserted the base when becoming aware of the insurgents' advance, according to the group's claim and local aid workers. That is in addition to roadside bombs and deadly attacks on villages in recent months.
Boko Haram has since broken into two factions.
One of the them is backed by the Islamic State group and is known as the Islamic State West Africa Province, or ISWAP. It has become notorious for targeting military positions and has overrun the military on at least 15 occasions this year, killing soldiers and stealing weapons, according to an Associated Press count, experts and security reports reviewed for this story.
On the other hand, the Jama'atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda'awati wal-Jihad, or JAS, faction has increasingly resorted to attacking civilians and perceived collaborators, and thrives on robberies and abductions for ransom.
In May, ISWAP struck outposts in Gajibo, Buni Gari, Marte, Izge, Rann, and launched a twin assault on the Nigeria-Cameroon joint base in Wulgo and Soueram in Cameroon. Other attacks this year have hit Malam Fatori, Goniri, Sabon Gari, Wajiroko and Monguno, among others. The group often attacks at night.
Malik Samuel, senior researcher at non-profit Good Governance Africa, said that ISWAP's success is as a result of its territorial expansion following gains against rival JAS as well as a decentralized structure that has enhanced its ability to conduct "coordinated, near-simultaneous attacks across different regions,' Samuel said.
'The unpredictability of attacks under this framework illustrates ISWAP's growing strategic sophistication,' Samuel said.
External support from IS in Iraq and Syria is also a critical resource to the militants, said Samuel, who has interviewed ex-fighters. Such support is evident in ISWAP's evolving tactics, including nighttime raids, rapid assaults with light but effective weaponry, and the use of modified commercial drones to drop explosives, Samuel said.
Ali Abani, a local nonprofit worker familiar with the military operations in Borno's strategic town of Dikwa, said that the army bases are understaffed and located in remote areas, making them vulnerable to attacks.
"When these gunmen come, they just overpower the soldiers,' Abani said.
Reinforcements, either in the form of air support or nearby ground troops, are often too slow to arrive, allowing the militants enough time to strip the outposts of weapons needed to bolster their arsenal, he added, recalling a May 12 attack during which soldiers fled as they were outnumbered, leaving the extremists to cart away weaponry.
There also have been reports of former militants who continued to work as informants and logistics handlers after claiming to have repented.
At its peak in 2013 and 2014, Boko Haram gained global notoriety after kidnapping 276 Chibok schoolgirls and controlled an area the size of Belgium.
While it has lost much of that territory on the back of military campaigns, the new surge in Boko Haram attacks has raised fears about a possible return to such a gloomy past.
Borno Gov. Babagana Zulum warned recently of lost gains after raising concerns that military formations in the state are being dislodged 'almost on a daily basis without confrontation.'
Federal lawmakers continue to highlight the extremists' growing sophistication and advanced weaponry, calling on the government to bolster the capabilities of the military.
The Nigerian military didn't respond to a request for comment. Last Friday, senior commanders visited one of the troubled areas, Gamboru on the border with Cameroon, promising the deployment of more troops to combat Boko Haram.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asahi Shimbun
a day ago
- Asahi Shimbun
INTERVIEW/ Philip Davidson: China's military buildup targets deterrence of U.S. and partners
The 'incredible' expansion of China's military forces is eroding the deterrent effect that the United States, Japan and other countries have enjoyed over the past six decades, warned a retired commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command. 'With its military capability, along with its diplomatic and economic weight, China is strongly messaging that the West and Western institutions are in decline and that Chinese institutions are on the rise,' Adm. Philip Davidson told The Asahi Shimbun in a recent interview. In 2021, the last year when he led Indo-Pacific Command, Davidson warned that a conflict could occur in the Taiwan Strait by 2027. 'I don't think it is China's current strategy to proceed to force or coercion,' Davidson said about Taiwan during the interview. 'Their current strategy is to erode everything around Taiwan, the diplomatic environment, the economic environment and the military environment, in a way in which the international community just becomes inured and everybody will accept that's the way things are.' Excerpts from the interview follow: * * * Question: Will you share your assessment of the current environment of the Asia-Pacific region? Davidson: The security environment for the United States and Japan is the most serious in the last 35 years since the end of the Cold War with the Soviet Union. When I traveled to Taiwan just about two years ago, they certainly described their security environment as the most severe that they had experienced in their modern history. (It is) a quite difficult period in which China has stated plainly that its long-term objective is to supplant the global leadership role of countries like the United States and Japan that have led the international community for more than 70 years now and replace it with one that's led by the Chinese Communist Party. I think that's the most severe threat to the United States and Japan. Q: Specifically, what is the threat that China poses? A: It is the incredible expansion of all of its military forces throughout the 21st century, particularly over the last 13 years or so (after Xi Jinping took office as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party). China has greatly expanded its sea, air and ground forces, as well as its rocket and nuclear forces, when the United States and Japan have been essentially stagnant in their force levels. With its military capability, along with its diplomatic and economic weight, China is strongly messaging that the West and Western institutions are in decline and that Chinese institutions are on the rise. The real threat is that (China's military expansion) has served to erode the conventional deterrent that the United States, Japan and other allies and partners have exhibited in the region and provided in the security environment for these 60 years or so. Q: What is China's intention of deploying naval ships around the world and conducting military exercises? A: For more than a dozen years now, China has been making global deployments, whether to the Persian Gulf, the North Arabian Sea, South America or Europe, to demonstrate that they have a military capable of engaging globally. They're also trying to demonstrate that they're a rising power that's challenging the United States and Western nations like Japan in their capability to cast global doubt on our leadership and our long-term trajectory of power. Q: How do you assess the capabilities of China's large warships and fighter jets? A: China is definitely increasing the numbers of its warships and weapons, but the United States and Japan still hold the edge in capability. The capabilities of modern weapons that countries like the United States and Japan possess, such as the Aegis Weapon System, the F-35 stealth fighters and the SM-2 and SM-3 surface-to-air missiles, exceed those of Chinese weapons. There have been 170-plus attacks (from Yemen's Houthi rebels) using drones, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles against U.S. Navy forces in the Red Sea in the last 20 months, and we've defeated all of them using our missiles and electronic warfare systems. In addition to the capability of those systems, we also possess the edge in the talent of our people and the way we fight. We have much more experience in warfare than China has, and our deep relationship and exercises in our alliance help keep our nations side by side in demonstrating that capability and upholding the talent of our people. Q: China has been forging ahead with an arms buildup toward the goal of making the People's Liberation Army a 'world-class military' by 2049, the centenary of the founding of China. How should Japan and the United States respond? A: The power of deterrence relies on the collective will (of allies and partners). Each nation needs to show what they're capable of. When Xi and other Chinese leaders pull back the curtain and see nations (in the Asia-Pacific region) working collectively against China's objectives, or in support of (their) collective objective, that's a really difficult place for them to be. When they draw back that curtain and see not only the U.S.-Japan alliance but also improvements in the U.S.-Japan-South Korea trilateral relationship as well as in Japan's relationships with South Korea, the Philippines or many of its partners in Southeast Asia and the Pacific, that's not a good picture for them to make a conflict decision on. (The Chinese leaders) see that collective capability and will out there, and it is deterring the potential for coercion and force use in the region. Q: You told a U.S. Senate committee hearing in 2021: 'Taiwan is clearly one of their ambitions. … And I think the threat is manifest during this decade, in fact in the next six years.' What was your intention? A: It wasn't the entirety of my thesis. The charge for the Indo-Pacific Command commander is to prevent a 'coerced'—which is the operative and most important term--unification between Taiwan and China. You see many of the activities that China is doing in the military space, such as blockade rehearsals, and in the diplomatic space to isolate Taiwan from its partners. China has engaged in a military buildup within the South China Sea and also implemented the National Security Law in Hong Kong. We've seen a great international city basically disappear. I was trying to describe that the potential for a coerced outcome was much closer than people might have thought—that (it could happen sooner than) 2049 or 2035 (a waypoint year for Xi's goal of making China a 'great modern socialist country'). I was really concerned about the six years (through 2027, when Xi's third term ends), and the timing of his entering a potential fourth term is a factor in that. Q: China has repeatedly conducted military exercises around Taiwan in recent years in a show of force. What is China's goal? A: I don't think it is China's current strategy to proceed to force or coercion. Their current strategy is to erode everything around Taiwan, the diplomatic environment, the economic environment and the military environment, in a way in which the international community just becomes inured and everybody will accept that's the way things are. That's a very dangerous place to be. The coercion and force piece relates to the fact that China continues to repeat that they are not taking force off the table. We have to take them at their word. Q: Japan plans to raise its defense spending to 2 percent of its gross domestic product by fiscal 2027, but concerns remain about an escalating arms race. Can't we restrain China's high-handed behavior without increasing our defense outlays? A: I do not think that we can reverse the erosion of our conventional deterrent without increasing our defense budgets. It's not a decision that we take lightly, but we're going to have to invest to restore our deterrent. China has deployed many warships and numbers do matter. The great capacity that China has here is a concern. The United States can work much more closely with Japan, South Korea, Australia and the Philippines, all of which have incredible shipbuilding capability and complementary capability. Japanese and Americans have worked closely on advanced programs, such as the Aegis system, the F-35 and the SM-3. Deepening our relationship in defenses and industries, especially shipbuilding, would help all of our needs. (This article is based on an interview by Atsushi Okudera, a senior staff writer.) * * * Retired Adm. Philip Davidson commanded U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, America's oldest and largest military combatant command with about 380,000 members, between 2018 and 2021. He previously commanded U.S. Fleet Forces Command and the U.S. 6th Fleet. Davidson currently serves as an advisory committee member for Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA.
Japan Times
2 days ago
- Japan Times
From Nigeria to Pakistan, TB testing 'in a coma' after U.S. aid cuts
At a tense meeting in Nigeria's capital, Abuja, health workers pored over drug registers and testing records to gauge whether U.S. aid cuts would unravel years of painstaking work against tuberculosis in one of Africa's hardest hit countries. For several days in May, they brainstormed ways to limit the fallout from a halt to U.S. funding for the TB Local Network (TB LON), which delivers screening, diagnosis and treatment. "To tackle the spread of TB, you must identify cases and that is in a coma because of the aid cuts," said Ibrahim Umoru, coordinator of the African TB Coalition civil society network, who was at the Abuja meeting.
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 days ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Set to Waive Some Legal Requirements to Boost Critical Minerals
Reuters file photo U.S. President Donald Trump gestures, as he departs for Pennsylvania, on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 30, 2025. June 3 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump is set to use emergency powers and slash legal requirements – including some congressional funding approvals -relating to a law aimed at lifting U.S. production of critical minerals and weapons, according to a document seen by Reuters. Trump's action would apply to the Defense Production Act, a U.S. law that grants the president broad emergency powers to control domestic industries and resources during national security emergencies. The move would represent the latest attempt by the White House to reshape a critical mineral industry dominated by China, the top U.S. economic rival. China is using its leverage in response to Trump's trade war, recently halting critical mineral exports and rattling global supply chains. The document is expected to be published on the Federal Register on Wednesday, the government web site shows. Trump invoked the Korean War-era law in March to help boost domestic production of critical minerals used to make consumer goods, computer chips, robots and advanced weaponry. The law places some restrictions on the president's authority, such as requiring the White House to seek congressional approval for projects over $50 million and forcing project delivery dates within a one-year time frame. The president can waive those requirements in the event of an emergency and Trump is expected to invoke those powers, according to the document seen by Reuters on Tuesday, ahead of its expected publication. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Former President Joe Biden signed similar waivers to speed up production of vaccines and medical equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic. John Paul Helveston, a professor at George Washington University, said U.S. investments in critical minerals represent a long-term solution to the problem, leaving the nation vulnerable to China's trade policy in the short run. 'This all means that if the U.S. wants to have access to these minerals over the next 5-10 years, the U.S. will have to maintain a trade relationship with China,' Helveston said.
