
Brand First: How Retailers Win Hearts, Wallets & The Algorithm
Showing up where your shoppers actually look has always been tough—and today it's tougher. Search isn't what it used to be; you can't rely on keywords, links, or banner noise to climb the results. Discovery now flows across search engines, social feeds, retail media networks, marketplaces, and AI assistants that stitch signals together in real time. In this AI‑curated path to purchase, retailers win by being smarter—not louder—through structured data, credible content, and a clear, consistent brand that shoppers trust and algorithms surface.
Generative AI enters the conversation
Generative AI (gen AI) is reimagining the digital shopping experience by making the product search experience conversational. It used to be that consumers searched for a brand or a product by using brand names, or information such as pricing to pull up results. But now, they can ask for advice and recommendations.
Accenture's recently published Consumer Pulse Survey of more than 18,000 people across 14 countries, found that approximately half of consumers have made a purchase decision with the support of gen AI—making it the fastest-growing source of buying advice in the past year. And for active users— defined as people using gen AI tools at least weekly for personal and/or professional reasons, it's now the second highest source for product recommendations after physical stores.
The survey also found gen AI is no longer just a tool for speed and personalization—it's becoming a confidant and trusted advisor. Accenture's survey found that more than one-third (36%) of active gen AI users now consider the technology 'a good friend,' with a large proportion (93%) relying on it for personal development advice and 1 in 10 calling it their most trusted source for purchase decisions.
When consumers trust AI as they would a close friend, every interaction becomes an opportunity to deepen—or lose—that relationship.
Personalized recommendations
A great example of tapping AI to deeper consumer relationships is AI-powered multi-brand beauty startup, Noli, founded and backed by the L'Oréal Groupe. Noli—which stands for (No One Like I')—is on a mission to empower every beauty consumer with their own intelligent, trusted advisor.
Noli is reinventing how people discover and shop beauty products by addressing the number one pain point for beauty customers—too many options, and lack of unbiased, often conflicting, advice in the market.
Noli cuts through the beauty noise with AI diagnostics trained on 1M+ skin data points and thousands of product formulations. It decodes each user's beauty profile and delivers confident product picks to their door. Co‑Founder & CEO Amos Susskind says, 'Beauty is full of choice, opinions, claims, noise, and emotional stakes, making it the perfect category for personalization and expert guidance.'
Master the large language model ecosystem
It is easy to see how large language models (LLMs) are fast becoming the new influencers. According to Accenture's survey consumers are already using gen AI to inform purchase decisions, making it the fastest-growing source for recommendations.
To avoid being misrepresented, or excluded from consumer consideration entirely, retailers need to take an active role in the LLM ecosystem – a network of models, platforms, and data sources.
Winning now means optimizing for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) as well as classic SEO—because AI assistants don't crawl, index, and rank like traditional search; they synthesize, summarize, and represent your brand.
Feed them structured, high‑quality, rights‑cleared content that's current and consistent; refresh it often; tag it so context is clear; and monitor AI surfaces to correct drift. Do that, and your brand story shows up accurately—and gets recommended—across AI chats, agents, and shoppable answers.
Prepare for Agentic Personal Shoppers
Then there's the newer member of the AI family, agentic AI, a technology that can act autonomously on behalf of consumers—making purchases without the traditional shopping journey. In fact, 75% of consumers told Accenture they are open to using a trusted AI-powered personal shopper that understands their needs.
When shoppers delegate decisions to agentic shopping agents, AI effectively becomes the buyer of record. Traditional retail media—banner ads, paid search slots, even your website—can be skipped as agents source the 'best fit' directly from data feeds, reviews, inventory, and price APIs. That's the threat: a frictionless race to the lowest acceptable price.
The opportunity? Make sure your brand carries machine‑readable reasons to choose you—quality signals, experience benefits, sustainability creds, fit/usage guidance, service guarantees—that matter to humans and to their agents. Give AI more to weigh than price, and you stay in the basket.
The trust imperative
Consumers are sceptical: 41% say AI content can feel inauthentic and 45% say it lacks a human touch (Accenture). Trust hinges on transparent, consent‑based data use—shoppers are used to tuning their own recommendation feeds and don't want their data repurposed in ways that surprise them.
Protect that trust with strong cybersecurity and data governance. Keep humans in the loop so AI reflects brand values and delivers the service customers expect. The win: AI experiences that are personal and trustworthy sustained by ongoing investment in tech, training, and teams that keep great retail brands real.
The time to act is now
The investments retailers and brands make today will determine whether they remain visible, relevant, and indispensable in an AI-driven world of tomorrow. While some retailers debate whether to embrace AI, others are already reshaping the industry by using AI to become more empathetic, more responsive, and more valuable to consumers than ever before. But they'll do so while maintaining the human touch—be that the store associate or customer service agent—that makes brands memorable and meaningful. The question is: will your brand be among them?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The 10 Most Hated Billionaires in 2025
Every time a wealthy person crosses over into billionaire status, those of us in lower wealth echelons may show the limitations of our ability for empathy. Generally, the 'have-nots' do not celebrate the 'have-way-too-much.' Watching Elon Musk get richer and richer while many struggle to get above living paycheck to paycheck can really suck. 'Hate' is a strong word, but it may be pretty close to (if not exactly) what many people feel toward billionaires. Find Out: Read Next: A recent study by found the 10 most hated billionaires of 2025. Data was collected from the number of Google search results containing the billionaire's name combined with terms like 'controversy,' 'scam' and 'fraud;' a sentiment-based 'Reddit hate score' on the social news aggregation and forum site, and the billionaire's public disapproval rating that factored in overall negative news coverage (for President Donald Trump, we didn't use public disapproval rating, but instead used fresh data from The Economist). Additionally, net worths were sourced from Forbes. See the 10 most hated billionaires, along with the companies they own and their respective net worths. 10. George Soros Key areas of success or businesses: Open Society Foundations, Soros Foundation Net worth: $7.5 billion Reddit hate score: 5.9 Public disapproval rating: 26% Overall hate score: 36 Check Out: 9. Bill Gates Key areas of success or businesses: Microsoft Net worth: $117 billion Reddit hate score: 8.2 Public disapproval rating: 27% Overall hate score: 41 8. Vince McMahon Key areas of success or businesses: WWE Net worth: $3 billion Reddit hate score: 8.6 Public disapproval rating: 23% Overall hate score: 43 7. Jamie Dimon Key areas of success or businesses: J.P. Morgan Chase/banking Net worth: $2.8 billion Reddit hate score: 9 Public disapproval rating: 25% Overall hate score: 46 6. Jeff Bezos Key areas of success or businesses: Amazon Net worth: $241.3 billion Reddit hate score: 8.2 Public disapproval rating: 30% Overall hate score: 47 5. Mark Zuckerberg Key areas of success or businesses: Meta/Facebook Net worth: $246 billion Reddit hate score: 9.1 Public disapproval rating: 40% Overall hate score: 56 4. Gautam Adani Key areas of success or businesses: Adani Group Net worth: $68 billion Reddit hate score: 7.1 Public disapproval rating: 51% Overall hate score: 56 3. Rupert Murdoch Key areas of success or businesses: Fox News, Sky News Net worth: $24 billion Reddit hate score: 9.2 Public disapproval rating: 55% Overall hate score: 64 2. Elon Musk Key areas of success or businesses: Tesla, SpaceX Net worth: $409 billion Reddit hate score: 9.4 Public disapproval rating: 36% Overall hate score: 92 1. Donald Trump Key areas of success or businesses: Real estate and politics Net worth: $5.5 billion Reddit hate score: 9.5 Public disapproval rating: 55% Overall hate score: 100 More From GOBankingRates 6 Popular SUVs That Aren't Worth the Cost -- and 6 Affordable Alternatives This article originally appeared on The 10 Most Hated Billionaires in 2025
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Travelzoo (TZOO) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Revenue Growth Amidst Rising Member ...
Revenue: $23.9 million, up 13% from the prior year; $23.5 million in constant currencies, up 12%. Operating Profit: $2.1 million, 9% of revenue, down from $44 million in the prior year. Member Acquisition Cost: $38 in Q2, up from $28 in Q1. Membership Fee Revenue: Increased to $3 million. Advertising and Commerce Revenue: $20.9 million for Q2 2025. GAAP Operating Margin: 9% in Q2 2025. Non-GAAP Operating Profit: $2.4 million, 10% of revenue, compared to $4.8 million in the prior year period. Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash: $11.2 million as of June 30, 2025. Cash Flow from Operations: $1.3 million. Jack's Flight Club Revenue: Increased by 33% year over year. Premium Subscribers for Jack's Flight Club: Increased by 15%. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Sign with TZOO. Release Date: July 23, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Travelzoo (NASDAQ:TZOO) reported a 13% increase in consolidated Q2 revenue compared to the prior year. The company achieved a favorable payback on the acquisition of new club members, with immediate revenue generation from membership fees. Jack's Flight Club segment saw a 33% increase in revenue, driven by growth in premium subscribers. Travelzoo (NASDAQ:TZOO) plans to continue leveraging its global reach and strong relationships with travel suppliers to offer exclusive club offers. The company expects revenue growth to accelerate in future quarters as membership fee revenue is recognized over the subscription period. Negative Points Operating profit decreased due to increased investment in member growth, impacting EPS negatively. Higher member acquisition expenses led to a reduction in EPS by $0.13 for the quarter. Operating profit decreased in both North America and Europe segments, despite an increase in Jack's Flight Club. GAAP operating margin was reduced to 9% due to the impact of acquiring more club members. The travel industry is experiencing weaker demand, particularly in hotels, which may affect future opportunities. Q & A Highlights Q: Can you explain the dynamics of profitability going forward, especially regarding the $0.13 loss in Q2? A: (Holger Bartel, CEO) The $0.13 loss in Q2 was due to marketing expenses for acquiring new members. However, in future quarters, we will continue to generate revenue from these members without incurring additional acquisition costs. This ongoing revenue from previously acquired members will drive profitability in the coming quarters and more significantly next year. Q: What is the expected frequency of club offers? A: (Holger Bartel, CEO) We release several club offers per week, usually a few dozen. Press releases highlight examples of these offers, but not every offer is announced via press release. Q: Can you address the increase in cost of revenues this quarter? A: (Holger Bartel, CEO) We had opportunities to purchase distressed inventory at discounted prices, which allowed us to create strong club offers. These expenses are classified under cost of revenue and are crucial for attracting new members and converting legacy members. Q: Should we expect continued investment in marketing and member acquisition in the second half of the year? A: (Holger Bartel, CEO) Yes, as long as the payback remains favorable. We will continue to invest in member acquisition as long as the cost remains below $40. The market conditions will dictate the extent of our investment. Q: Are there plans for a premium subscription level in the future? A: (Holger Bartel, CEO) Currently, we are not looking at a premium subscription level. We aim to keep things simple with one tier. However, we recognize that our membership fee might be too low and will evaluate potential increases for 2026. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Intel plans deep job cuts to streamline operations
Intel is set to conclude the year with a workforce more than 20% smaller than last year, as part of CEO Lip Bu Tan's strategy to streamline operations and rectify past management errors. Since assuming leadership in March, Tan has initiated job cuts and asset divestments to refocus the company's efforts on core businesses. The majority of these job cuts have already been executed, resulting in an overall reduction of around 15%. The cuts have predominantly targeted middle management, with CFO David Zinsner confirming a reduction of about 50% in management layers, reported Reuters. Intel's staff will decrease from 96,400 at the end of June to approximately 75,000 by the year-end. These changes align with Tan's directive that investments must be economically justified and tailored to customer demand. The firm's underperformance in key sectors like AI chips, which is dominated by Nvidia, and personal computer semiconductors, where AMD has gained ground, has prompted this restructuring. Additionally, Intel's attempt to build a competitive chip contracting business against Taiwan's TSMC has not progressed as planned. Financial forecasts for the third quarter predict a loss of $0.24 per share, with projected revenue between $12.6bn and $13.6bn. In the second quarter ended 28 June 2025, Intel reported flat revenue year-over-year at $12.9bn, with earnings impacted by restructuring charges amounting to $1.9bn. CEO Tan emphasised a shift in manufacturing strategy in his memo to employees, stating Intel will only construct new facilities based on actual demand rather than speculative growth. This approach marks a departure from previous practices where factories were built ahead of need. Tan also addressed Intel's 18A manufacturing process during an analyst call, noting its potential profitability if deployed for Intel's own products. However, he acknowledged that without securing significant external customers for the next-generation 14A process technology, exiting the chip manufacturing business might be necessary. Going forward, Intel plans to consolidate packaging operations across several countries while slowing or halting new factory construction in locations like Ohio, Poland, and Germany as part of its strategic realignment. Tan said: 'We are laser-focused on strengthening our core product portfolio and our AI roadmap to better serve customers. We are also taking the actions needed to build a more financially disciplined foundry. 'It's going to take time, but we see clear opportunities to enhance our competitive position, improve our profitability and create long-term shareholder value.' Separately, a US federal judge dismissed a lawsuit alleging Intel misled shareholders about issues in its foundry business. The court ruled that Intel did not delay disclosing a major operating loss and maintained transparency regarding its operations. "Intel plans deep job cuts to streamline operations" was originally created and published by Verdict, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data