logo
The credibility of the National Dialogue is at stake

The credibility of the National Dialogue is at stake

The Citizen4 days ago
Those that walked out must go and sit down away from the public glare and 'talk about talks' until they find common ground.
In the run-up to the election that ushered in democracy in 1994, there were quite a number of bilateral talks that took place, not only between representatives of the then-banned ANC and the government at the time, but also between figures like Harry Schwarz of the liberal United Party and Mangosuthu Buthelezi, the leader of the homeland of KwaZulu-Natal.
These faith-based talks resulted in what came to be known as the Mahlabatini Declaration of Faith. This was in 1974, about 20 years before democracy.
There were also talks between private sector businesspeople and the liberation movements outside of the country and even secret talks between jailed Nelson Mandela and National Intelligence Service leader Neil Barnard.
Some of those talks led to absolutely nothing, but others led to the establishment of the Convention for a Democratic South Africa.
All the talks that preceded that moment were necessary, even the ones that led to nothing.
The Mahlabatini Declaration of Faith, for instance, demonstrated that although people can meet to map out the future of a country in which they deem themselves important enough to engage, credibility cannot be declared by the organisers of the talks themselves, but by those they represent and how they carry the aspirations of those they represent.
ALSO READ: Mr President, delay National Dialogue
The Mahlabatini declaration led to nothing because it lacked credibility. That is the risk that the National Dialogue runs.
To start with, President Cyril Ramaphosa and his advisors should acknowledge that it is the ANC government that brought the country to this moment.
What is this moment? A time when the country feels directionless, where the initial hope and belief in a prosperous future have all but faded.
That admission is not to say that South Africa's problems were all created by the ANC; no, it would simply be an admission that Project South Africa was handed over to the ANC in 1994 with the country trusting and believing that they would steer the project with honesty and integrity, with the sole aim of building a country that all citizens would be proud of, where dignity is restored to every citizen, especially the poorest of the poor.
The admission would be: 'We failed and got distracted by, among other things, the lure of personal wealth.'
The only way the National Dialogue will work and not be a waste of taxpayers' money is if all the players realise that it is not about them.
ALSO READ: Still no confirmation on cost of controversial National Dialogue
It is not about Ramaphosa or former president Thabo Mbeki or even their legacies for that matter.
It should not be about whether the ANC will get bashed just before an election in 2026, or whether the opposition will feel excluded.
It should and must be about whether the South African who lives in a shack in Chris Hani informal settlement, having even given up looking for a job, will have their hope restored.
It should be about whether South Africans going about their daily life feel the government has a handle on their own personal safety.
They must feel the National Dialogue will fix the police force or will provide a way to stop them and their relatives from getting murdered in broad daylight.
How is this going to happen? Those that walked out over the budget and those imposing a budget on the talks need to do what the founders of modern-day South Africa did: go and sit down away from the public glare and 'talk about talks' until they find common ground.
ALSO READ: Who is footing the bill for the National Dialogue? Presidency breaks it down
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Government should hang their heads in shame': Marikana Massacre marks 13 years without justice
‘Government should hang their heads in shame': Marikana Massacre marks 13 years without justice

The Citizen

timean hour ago

  • The Citizen

‘Government should hang their heads in shame': Marikana Massacre marks 13 years without justice

Government has paid more than R350 million in claims linked to the tragedy. Saturday, 16 August 2025, marked 13 years since 34 mineworkers were gunned down by police in what is now remembered as the Marikana massacre. The incident took place at the Lonmin platinum mine (now Sibanye-Stillwater) in North West, during a wage protest in 2012. Ten people were also killed in the days leading up to the Marikana massacre between 12 and 16 August. ALSO READ: Over 1,800 illegal miners arrested in Stilfontein operation, most deported Although a commission of inquiry recommended that a full investigation be conducted to hold police accountable, no officers have faced prosecution to date. Meanwhile, government has paid more than R350 million in claims linked to the tragedy. Marikana Massacre remembered On Saturday, various organisations honoured the victims and renewed calls for accountability. The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) stressed that the slain miners were not criminals, but workers demanding fair wages. 'They were fathers, brothers, and sons, demanding a living wage in the face of exploitation, degradation, and hunger. 'Instead of dialogue and dignity, they were met with the barrels of guns in full view of the world,' the EFF said in a statement. READ MORE: Illegal miner says he will keep digging to survive The party also criticised President Cyril Ramaphosa, who was a shareholder in Lonmin at the time, and the ANC for failing to deliver justice. 'It is not surprising then that the ANC has refused to bring justice to the families of the Marikana victims. 'There have been no prosecutions, no reparations, and no structural change to the mining sector that continues to enrich a few at the expense of the many. 'The workers of Marikana died in vain because their demands remain unmet, their killers remain unpunished, and the system that murdered them remains firmly in place.' The Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg found in July 2022 that Ramaphosa did not carry legal responsibility for the massacre The EFF's Statement on the Anniversary of the Marikana Massacre -The recent unemployment statistics paint a bleak picture: millions without work, millions without hope, and millions trapped in poverty while the political elite grow richer. Black workers, in particular, have… — Economic Freedom Fighters (@EFFSouthAfrica) August 16, 2025 'We will never forget' The Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU) also reiterated demands for justice. 'The families have yet to see justice, victims have yet to be compensated, and those who gave the orders have yet to be brought to account for their criminal conduct,' the union said. AMCU President Joseph Mathunjwa said the ongoing National Dialogue disrespected the memory of the slain workers. 'The government should hang their heads in shame. This slaughter of hard-working men happened under their watch, under their command. 'These workers are not just numbers – they had names, families, and identities. Yet we are still calling for justice thirteen years later. That is a disgrace,' he said. READ MORE: Groups warn against heavy-handed raids in tackling illegal miners The union pointed out that Parliament rejected its calls for 16 August to be declared a public holiday. 'They would not even recognise it as a massacre. They want us to forget, but we will never forget.' AMCU added that, through the Marikana Massacre Trust Fund, it has built houses for the families of 34 victims. Mathunjwa said the day was more than just about remembrance, but a warning. 'That was the day the state showed its true face,' he added. Silence on NPA appeal Furthermore, the Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa (Seri) emphasised that true justice could only come through successful prosecutions. 'The state continues to fail the families of the deceased and the survivors of the massacre,' the NGO said. While the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has prosecuted nine police officers, Seri highlighted that that two trials ended in acquittals. 'In 2023, the NPA issued a statement detailing various personnel and resource constraints as reasons for their failure to prosecute the Marikana case. READ MORE: 'We know it's wrong, but they're trying to make a living,' say families of arrested illegal miners 'However, two more years have passed, and the families and survivors of the massacre have still not seen any progress concerning prosecutions for the massacre of 16 August 2012. 'Following the acquittals in 2024, the families were told that the NPA would consider an appeal but have heard nothing since. 'This inaction reflects a lack of commitment to ensuring the families obtain justice for the deaths of their loved ones.' Seri added that several family members of the victims had died without ever seeing accountability. Marikana Massacre a 'premeditated act of state violence' The South African Federation of Trade Unions (Saftu) declared that the Marikana massacre was not a tragic accident, but 'a premeditated act of state violence in defence of capital'. The federation said the state has ignored or failed to implement the commission's recommendations adequately. 'The state's refusal to fully implement these recommendations confirms Saftu's reluctance to participate in any so-called national dialogue. 'Dialogue without justice is a betrayal to the victims and a mockery to the working class.' NOW READ: SA opened 159 new mines in five years, creating over 15 000 jobs

The SACP comes to General Maphwanya's rescue after criticism for controversial foreign policy comments
The SACP comes to General Maphwanya's rescue after criticism for controversial foreign policy comments

The Citizen

time2 hours ago

  • The Citizen

The SACP comes to General Maphwanya's rescue after criticism for controversial foreign policy comments

South Africa has been criticised for its unclear foreign policy of non-alignment. The South African Communist Party (SACP) has come to the defence of South Africa's army chief, General Rudzana Maphwanya. This comes after the government distanced itself from controversial comments made by Mphwanya during his recent trip to Iran. Maphwananya came under fire for suggesting that South Africa and Iran have common goals. He also criticised Israel for its actions in the ongoing war in Gaza. In a statement on Saturday the SACP said there was nothing wrong with the comments Maphwanya made. 'The SANDF chief's comments in Iran regarding political and policy questions reportedly included South Africa's adopted and correctly articulated policy positions on Palestine.' it said. 'This reflects South Africa's international relations and cooperation policy, including solidarity.' The SACP believes that the government seems to be punishing Maphwanya for his comments. 'The government and the Presidency in particular, appears to have begun to act to isolate and punish the chief of the military for the alleged contravention of military code regarding political statements and policy statements made during the trip. 'This action is not an objective act of correcting the defence conduct of a soldier but is a political capitulation to Western-aligned imperialist, right-wing pressure directly influenced by the imperialists' political interests.' South Africa's foreign policy dilemma The SACP accused the South African government of mixed messages concerning its foreign policy. 'It clearly appears that the government is being cajoled to project itself as pro-West and anti-Iran.' Will action be taken against Maphwanya The party also said Maphwanya's comments should not be compared to the actions of DA MP Andrew Whitfield who went to the US on an unapproved trip during his time as deputy minister of trade, industry and competition. President Cyril Ramaphosa subsequently removed Whitfield as the deputy minister. 'This comparison is incorrect, as Maphwanya's visit took place within the framework of military regulations with the full knowledge of the Minister of Defence whereas Whitfield's visit was unauthorised. 'The SACP rejects the impending acts of isolation and scapegoating of Maphwanya to appease Western imperialist forces and their domestic agents. compromising South Africa's sovereign right to formulate and implement its own foreign policy, including on defence cooperation.' The party said any actions by the government towards Maphwanya as military chief must be based on strengthening the country's military institutions and their capabilities. 'The SACP rejects any attempt at dictating which nations South Africa may have bilateral relations with, including defence, trade and investment. 'We will defend our country's right to build relations based on mutual respect, equality and solidarity, free from the dictatorship of Washington, Brussels or their local political surrogates.' ALSO READ: Ministries distance themselves from SANDF chief's comments in Iran Tensions with the U.S The SACP's remarks come as South Africa is on a mission to reset relations with the US. The Trump administration has also slapped South Africa with a 30% tariff on exports. Relations with the US have been strained since the spreading of misinformation by some civic organisations. NOW READ: Ramaphosa unaware of 'ill-advised' Iran trip by SANDF chief – Magwenya

National Dialogue steering committee aims for broader representation in two weeks
National Dialogue steering committee aims for broader representation in two weeks

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

National Dialogue steering committee aims for broader representation in two weeks

President Cyril Ramaphosa addressing delegates at the national convention, marking the opening of the National Dialogue. The constitution of the steering committee has been delayed by another two weeks. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Media The establishment of the broad-based steering committee to oversee and guide the National Dialogue is expected to be finalised in the next two weeks. The National Dialogue's first national convention at the University of SA's main campus in Pretoria on Saturday could not finalise constituting the steering committee. Mandisa Khanyile, a member of the convention organising committee, said some formations or sectors are not yet ready to make a decision regarding who they are going to have as their steering committee nominees 'What we have decided to do is that we are going to allow a period of two weeks post this convening for those sectors to make that decision,' she said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Khanyile added that sectors should provide two or three nominees for the steering committee or one of its subcommittees. She said organisations and sectors will meet over the next two weeks and include not just people present during the national convention. 'There was a complaint that there were people who are not in this room, that we haven't had access to, this is the time to bring them into the conversation,' Khanyile explained. She said the organising committee wanted the process to be made public. 'If you are going to, for example, have a meeting, that meeting must be available for people online who want to join so that they can see the transparency within the process,' Khanyile added. She clarified that this is a 100% voluntary engagement. 'No one is going to get remunerated for their time. You will not be paid to do this work. 'It is going to be up to you and your organisation and your personal pocket how you fund your participation in this process,' said Khanyile, adding that involvement will be based on ability to participate without necessarily needing compensation. The Rastafari Nation Council representing 26 organisations of Rastafarians and seven orders of the Church of His Majesty or the churches of Rastafari opposed capping the number of steering committee members at 50. A representative of the council from Limpopo said half of the social or civil society movements present at the national convention are already speaking on behalf of the process and there is overrepresentation on their side. 'We have a National Assembly of 400 people, so it shouldn't be a problem having a steering committee as widely representative as possible than to be limiting it to a particular number,' the Rastafari council representative stated. He explained that as long as there is broad representation and inclusivity, they will be happy with that. The Rastafaris claim to be a significant minority of about three million in South Africa. 'We would like to humbly request that we be defined as Rastafari, not grouped with faith-based communities, not grouped with any other groupings because faith plays a smaller role within that. We are also one of the communities which are very much historically marginalised,' the representative added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store