A solar farm approved in weeks shows how renewables rollout could be sped up
The government is also using the speedy approval of the 90-megawatt Summerville solar farm in Nationals deputy Kevin Hogan's seat of Page to twist the knife into the opposition, as the Coalition fights over its commitment to net zero emissions.
But the green-lighting of the 244-hectare site in the Richmond Valley in northern NSW also highlights how other energy projects have sat in the queue for years waiting for environmental approval, under outdated laws that business, environment groups, the government and opposition all say are no longer working.
Analysis by the Clean Energy Investor Group last year found the average solar project in NSW took 705 days to win approval — with wind farms taking on average almost a decade — a pace that would make it very difficult for Australia to meet its climate targets.
"If you get the system right and everyone is working cooperatively, it is possible to get much faster approvals while also generating environmental gains," Senator Watt said.
"Unfortunately, while there are these sorts of good examples to point to, we aren't seeing these in as many cases as we should, and that is one of the reasons we do need to reform our environmental laws.
The minister said the Summerville solar farm and battery, which will generate enough energy to power 36,000 homes, was a case study in how carefully selecting sites could lead to energy projects being delivered faster.
Senator Watt said early cooperation had allowed for design changes that preserved energy generation while being more sensitive to the environment — which also avoided delays from an intensive environmental assessment.
Those early negotiations led to changes in how the panels would be laid out, limiting their environmental impact, as well as the panels being lifted to allow for land to still be used for grazing.
"It does show, despite what some politicians claim, it is possible for agriculture and renewable energy to coexist and deliver more jobs and more investment for our regional communities," Senator Watt said.
The minister said reforms he was developing would allow for earlier engagement more often, and avoid projects having to be assessed twice by both state and federal agencies.
Senator Watt has been tasked with making another attempt to modernise the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act, which governs environmental approvals for major projects, but has been little changed for more than two decades.
Successive governments have failed to pass reforms to the EPBC Act since an independent review concluded the laws were no longer working for business or the environment.
Ahead of a productivity roundtable, former Treasury boss Ken Henry named it the single most important item for reform, adding the degradation of Australia's environment proved it was failing to protect wildlife.
The now-chair of the Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation is among a chorus of voices who have expressed their frustration that the laws have still not been updated — a promise made last term that was shelved in the face of fierce resistance from West Australian Premier Roger Cook.
Senator Watt acknowledged last month that much of the government's economic agenda, including housing and productivity, depended on fixing the laws.
Shadow Environment Minister Angie Bell said last week she had met with Senator Watt on moving EPBC reforms forward.
"I think if Labor were to go in partnership with the Greens on EPBC reform, that would be disastrous for, again, livelihoods, for industry. It would decimate thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of jobs around the country. And so, I think on EPBC reform, we need to strike a balance," Ms Bell said.
"And that balance needs to be minimising red tape, of course, and approvals, but also protecting our environment."
The latest project approval comes as the Coalition debates how it will respond to climate change, after its nuclear proposal was rejected by voters at the federal election.
Half a dozen Nationals MPs stood on the lawns of Parliament House yesterday morning in support of their colleague Barnaby Joyce, who introduced a bill to parliament to repeal several laws that relate to renewable energy.
Despite the Coalition saying it has not decided a position on its current commitment to pursue net zero emissions by 2050, with two internal reviews underway, a number of Nationals have ignored that process to openly advocate for the net zero commitment to be dumped.
While Mr Joyce's bill has no chance of passing, the government intends to allow the parliament to debate it without limits, as it seeks to exploit divisions within the opposition.
Senator Watt said the government was continuing with its renewables rollout.
"At the very same time the Albanese government is getting on with delivering cleaner, cheaper energy and jobs for the Northern Rivers, the Member for Page Kevin Hogan is engaged in Coalition squabbling over the science of climate change," Senator Watt said.
This morning, Mr Hogan told Sky News it was good that Mr Joyce introduced his private member's bill to repeal net zero, saying he was representing millions of Australians who agreed with him.
"We're not a croquet club down here. We are a very important legislative body here in Canberra. Views need to be articulated," Mr Hogan said.
He said the majority of the Nationals party room supported the Coalition reviews of net zero.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
ASX drops, Trump's tariffs on Australian imports remain at 10pc
The local share market fell almost 1 per cent despite Australia managing to avoid the latest round of US President Donald Trump's tariff increases, as finance presenter David Chau explains.

News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
AFP Commissioner Reece Kershaw mum on resignation rumours after Dural caravan controversy
The future of the Australian Federal Police Commissioner Reece Kershaw is uncertain after speculation within the rank and file that he is planning to leave. The straight-shooting chief of police would not confirm last night that he planned to give four weeks' notice. The AFP gave a statement saying: 'Commissioner Kershaw has not submitted his resignation and the AFP has no further comment at this stage.' Commissioner Kershaw was besieged by intense political pressure in recent months over his handling of the January 19 Dural caravan terror saga, with some accusing him of stonewalling and contributing to a public overreaction to what was later found to be a bogus terror plot. Commissioner Kershaw refused to confirm when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was briefed on the alleged plan to use a caravan in a terrorist act targeting Sydney's Jewish community. Commissioner Kershaw told a Senate committee in February that providing further details could compromise operational integrity: 'I will not provide updates in public forums.' 'Details provided, whether it seems innocuous or not, can have an impact on investigations,' he said. The opposition seized on Kershaw's silence, suggesting the Albanese government may have delayed disclosure for political reasons. 'This is looking more and more like a political cover-up,' former opposition leader Peter Dutton said, calling for an independent inquiry. 'It is inconceivable that the Prime Minister was not briefed on a matter of this gravity at the earliest opportunity.' Commissioner Kershaw has also faced criticism for inconsistencies in briefing protocols. Liberal Senator James Paterson questioned why ministers were informed immediately in previous security incidents but not in this case. 'The public deserves transparency and the reassurance that our security agencies are acting without fear or favour,' he said. Commissioner Kershaw declined to respond directly, saying only, 'I briefed ministers at the appropriate time … I'm not going to speculate – it's not helpful to our investigation.' The pressure intensified after AFP Deputy Commissioner Krissy Barrett confirmed in March that the caravan plot had been 'a criminal con job' rather than a legitimate terrorist threat. Questions were raised about the AFP and its inaction regarding the public alarm over the alleged threat, which went unchecked for weeks.


Daily Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Daily Telegraph
APRA's refusal to revise the 3 per cent stress test keeps Aussies locked in mortgage prison
Are you stuck in mortgage prison? Picture: Jake Nowakowski ANALYSIS If you're in mortgage prison, you just had a parole hearing. And the result? Parole denied. That was the outcome when the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced recently that it would be keeping the 3 per cent mortgage repayment 'stress test' buffer in place. That's right, we're not being prudent enough! And we must be regulated. The buffer dictates that anyone applying for a home loan is 'stress tested' at a loan repayment rate 3 per cent higher than what they will actually be paying if successful in their loan application. MORE: Shock RBA twist as home prices surge So, if you want to borrow money at 6 per cent, the bank will check your income and financial habits to make sure you could make repayments at 9 per cent interest. You know, just in case there is a series of rate rises. They don't want you to default and lose that dream home. Only problem is, for a lot of people, the rule is stopping them getting a home at all. Let's be real here. Interest rates are coming down. They are not going to go up 3 per cent in the near term. The stress buffer started out at 2 per cent in 2014. It went to 2.5 per cent in 2019 on the back of a growth cycle that left many borrowers overexposed to the risk of a market correction. It was rightly increased to 3 per cent in October 2021 when the official cash rate was at 0.1 per cent and there were variable rate home loans with interest rates below 2 per cent. The only way was up at that time. Mortgage prison is not where you want to be. Now is a completely different story. We have seen a cost of living crisis, stagnant wages, and rising house prices, yet someone who has somehow managed to scrape a deposit together needs to be able to show they can make repayments at a level not seen from variable interest rates since before the 2008 GFC. MORE: 34-year-old goes from broke to $100m This is especially difficult for young people, as noted by my colleague Jonathan Chancellor in his Sydney Weekend column, who quoted Michael Sukkar, the Coalition's shadow housing minster during the 2025 election campaign, criticising APRA's 'one size fits all' rule as preventing nearly 40 per cent of first home buyers from getting a loan. That type of outcome is disastrous for future generations. But possibly the most absurd thing is that some people already with a mortgage who are struggling to make repayments might see a loan out there with a lower interest rate, but they won't be able to refinance to it because they don't pass the stress test. They might be paying 6 per cent currently, but if they wanted to pay 5.5 per cent, they'd have to prove they can pay 8.5 per cent. The mortgage stress test can cause plenty of stress for would-be borrowers. MORE:Aus bank slashes rates to lowest level in two years Just that 0.5 per cent difference would save you more than $300 a month on a $1 million mortgage and $114,000 over 30 years. Granted, there is a workaround for some lenders, who are able to use discretion to assess some borrowers at 1 or 2 per cent buffers, but for those who don't qualify? They are stuck in mortgage prison. And it's looking like APRA hasn't just left the keys in its 'other pants', but has thrown them away altogether. The 3 per cent buffer stayed in place even when the cash rate was at 4.35 per cent and there were borrowers being assessed at 10 per cent in order to get a 7 per cent home loan. Now that the cash rate and variable rates are both on the way down, adjusting the buffer is becoming less urgent, so expect more borrowers to miss out as APRA stays firm.