Blinded by devotion to power and her son
The cold facts of the Emergency are chilling; 34,988 people were detained under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act whilst 75,818 were arrested under the Defence of India rules; practically the entire Opposition was jailed; the press was censored; the Constitution brutally amended; and even the judiciary accepted that the right to life had been suspended.
At the height of the Emergency, LK Advani wrote in his diary that Indian democracy was over and done with. At the time, most people would have agreed with him.
There can be little doubt that the Emergency was declared to protect Gandhi's political career after the Allahabad High Court struck down her election and the Supreme Court only gave her a conditional stay. Her claim that it was necessary because the Opposition was trying to paralyse the government and Jayaprakash Narayan had called on the Army and the police to disobey orders was just a trumped-up excuse.
Raghavan believes the actual declaration of the Emergency on June 25, 1975 was 'a coup d'etat'. First, under the Constitution there can only be one emergency at a time and in 1975 there was already an external emergency going back to the Bangladesh war of 1971.
Second, under Article 352, the President can only proclaim an emergency on the written recommendation of the council of ministers. President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed didn't wait for that. He did it at the Prime Minister's personal request.
Third, the mass arrests and the cutting of power to newspaper establishments on the night of June 25 /26 'had no legal basis and were done entirely at the behest of the Prime Minister'.
At this point let's ask if Indira Gandhi was justified in claiming there was an 'imminent threat to the security of India'? The Intelligence Bureau had not submitted any such report nor did the state governments convey such information to the Union home ministry. So, did Indira Gandhi make up and manufacture this alleged internal threat? It seems like it.
The truth is, as Raghavan's book points out, Indira Gandhi never thought very highly of democracy. She once wrote to the violinist Yehudi Menuhin: 'Democracy is not an end. It is merely a system by which one proceeds towards the goal. Hence democracy cannot be more important than the progress, unity or survival of the country.'
Most people remember the Emergency for the two campaigns it is closely associated with – sterilisation and slum clearance. Both had at their head Gandhi's younger son, Sanjay. And both destroyed the credibility of the Emergency and Gandhi's personal reputation.
Yet so dependent was Indira Gandhi on Sanjay that she was blind to this. She's even on record claiming he was like an elder brother. Certainly, she considered him her strongest and most loyal supporter after the Allahabad High Court verdict. As her principal secretary, PN Haksar, points out: 'She was absolutely blind as far as that boy was concerned.'
To everyone's astonishment, in January 1977 Indira Gandhi called elections even though they weren't due for another year. It led to the collapse of her rule and the end of the Emergency. Did she do it because she thought she could win and legitimise the Emergency? Or was this a way of accepting it was a mistake and getting off the tiger's back?
The truth is Indira Gandhi never apologised for the Emergency nor accepted it was a mistake. She only regretted aspects of it which she considered excesses. Asked by Paul Brass on March 26, 1978: 'Would you have done anything differently in relation to the Emergency?', her answer began with the word 'No'. It couldn't have been more pointed.
Karan Thapar is the author of Devil's Advocate: The Untold Story. The views expressed are personal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Justice Pardiwala's anti-quota remark expunged in 2015
NEW DELHI: The age-old saying that a human being's life moves in a cycle is strangely true for judges of constitutional courts, especially for Justice J B Pardiwala who became a judge of Gujarat HC in Feb 2011 and was fast-tracked to Supreme Court in May 2022. No one other than Justice Pardiwala can better explain the complications that entail when a constitutional court judge sidetracks the issue before him and makes observations not germane to the pleadings before courts of record - SC and HCs. Unfortunately, Justice Pardiwala did not fall back on his own experience while dictating the order on Aug 4 making harsh comments about the competence of an Allahabad HC judge in criminal matters, and worse barring him from touching criminal cases for adjudication for his entire tenure as an HC judge. CJI B R Gavai's intervention and the graciousness of Justices Pardiwala and R Mahadevan to expunge the remarks against the HC judge may have helped salvage the HC judge's stature, but he may have to live with the memory of the odium. Interestingly in Dec 2015, Justice Pardiwala, as a Gujarat HC judge, while refusing to quash sedition charges against Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti convener Hardik Patel, had drifted away from the criminal case before him to make sweeping anti-reservation comments. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like She Mixed Pink Salt With This - Now She Can't Stop Losing Weight Break The Weight Learn More Undo In his judgment, he had said, "If I am asked by anyone to name two things, which has destroyed this country or rather, has not allowed the country to progress in the right direction, then the same is - reservation and corruption. It is very shameful for any citizen of this country to ask for reservation after 65 years of independence. When our Constitution was framed, it was understood that reservation would remain for a period of 10 years but unfortunately it has continued even after 65 years of independence. The biggest threat, today, for the country is corruption." Saying that reservations have caused social divisiveness, Justice Pardiwala had observed, "The parody of the situation is that India must be the only country wherein some of the citizens crave to be called backward." This anti-quota remark in a judgment incensed many political leaders and 58 Rajya Sabha MPs moved a notice for initiation of his removal from judgeship. Within a few hours of the motion being filed by the MPs, the Gujarat govt came to Justice Pardiwala's rescue by moving an application requesting the judge to expunge the 'offensive' remarks. Justice Pardiwala acted swiftly and expunged the entire paragraph 62 from his judgment. He directed the HC registry to issue a fresh certified copy of the judgment sans Paragraph 62 which had contained the controversial anti-quota observation.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Shared with BLAs list of those who didn't submit forms for SIR draft roll, EC tells Supreme Court
The Election Commission on Saturday told the Supreme Court that it shared the list of electors whose enumeration forms had not been received during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar with Booth Level Agents (BLAs) of recognised political parties even before publishing the draft roll. In an additional affidavit filed in the Supreme Court, the poll body also sought to assure that no voters' name will be deleted from the draft roll, published on August 1, without prior notice, hearing and a speaking order. The EC's affidavit comes after the court on Wednesday asked it to reply to a plea by the Association for Democratic Reforms, one of the petitioners who had challenged the SIR exercise. In its application, the ADR had sought directions to the commission to publish the list of names and other details of the 65 lakh electors removed from the rolls in the draft stage. The SC is scheduled to hear petitions regarding the SIR next on August 12. The EC said, 'As a matter of policy and in strict adherence to the principles of natural justice, no deletion of any elector's name from the draft electoral roll, published on 1st August 2025, shall be undertaken without: (i) issuance of a prior notice to the concerned elector indicating the proposed deletion and the grounds thereof, (ii) affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard and furnishing relevant documents, and (iii) passing of a reasoned and speaking order by the competent authority.' It added that 'these safeguards are further reinforced by a robust two-tier appeal mechanism prescribed under the relevant rules, thereby ensuring that every elector has adequate recourse against any adverse action. The affidavit said 'the Commission, in an effort to ensure inclusion of every eligible elector whose enumeration forms had not been received, caused the list of such electors be shared with Booth Level Agents of the recognised political parties by 20th July 2025 itself…so that, in cases where such entries required reconsideration, appropriate corrective action could be taken and the names included in the draft roll.' 'Subsequently, upon noting the proactive efforts of the political parties, updated lists were again shared with their representatives for further follow-up,' it said. The commission pointed out that it had issued a detailed press note dated 27.07.2025, placing in the public domain the progress of the SIR. 'To ensure that no eligible elector in Bihar is left behind, awareness campaigns through SMS, meetings, and repeated BLO visits were conducted, with provision for any BLA to submit up to 50 enumeration forms per day' and 'to ensure that no temporary migrant from Bihar is excluded, advertisements in Hindi were issued in 246 newspapers and the CEOs of all States/UTs, were requested for facilitating filing of forms from outside the state through both online and physical means,' it said. The poll body pointed out that special urban camps were organised in all 261 urban local bodies and 'to enrol all young electors attaining the qualifying age on or before 1st October 2025', advance applications were being accepted with special campaigns scheduled for the claims and objections period. The EC said to maintain regular involvement of electors and political parties, it provided booth-level lists to parties during the process. The commission said 'to promptly address any issues raised during the enumeration phase, including those reported through print, television, or social media, DEOs have taken corrective actions' and 'to facilitate thorough scrutiny of the draft roll from 1st August to 1st September 2025, printed and digital copies of draft rolls have been made available to political parties, and online facility for the public at large'. 'In order to ensure that no eligible elector is excluded, the Commission had deployed about 2.5 lakhs volunteers, most of whom are also officers of the Government of Bihar, to assist electors, including in procuring the requisite documents from various State departments… Accordingly, even in cases where any vulnerable elector does not presently possess any document, he/she would be facilitated in the process of obtaining such documents,' the affidavit said. The poll body said 'the SIR has yielded substantial progress.' '…Out of 7.89 crore electors, over 7.24 crore submitted their enumeration forms with the active involvement of the Chief Electoral Officer of Bihar, 38 District Election Officers (DEOs), 243 Electoral Registration Officers (EROs), 2,976 Assistant Electoral Registration Officers (AEROs), 77,895 BLOs, 2,45,716 volunteers and 1,60,813 BLAs…' The Commission added that it 'has been issuing daily press releases/bulletins to keep the public informed on Claims and Objections received from public or political parties, on which action will be taken by the competent authority, after notice period, as per law'. Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Shinde reaffirms support for tribal community & women
Nashik: Deputy chief minister Eknath Shinde addressed a gathering of tribal community members celebrating Jagtik Adivasi Divas at Akole in Ahilyanagar on Saturday. He expressed his pride in being the 'Ladka Bhau' of the Ladkya Bahini (Sisters). Shinde added that, despite the opposition's claims, govt will continue to support the sisters and the farming community in the state. "Positions may come, go, and come again. But the title 'Ladka Bhau' attached to me is supreme. All three — the chief minister and both deputy CMs — decided to launch the scheme, and all are committed to the same. Ladki Bahin Yojana will continue to support women from the needy homes," Shinde said. Under the scheme, women between the ages of 21 and 65 years receive a monthly payout of Rs 1,500 provided they fulfil the conditions laid down by govt. Shinde alleged that Congress always wanted tribal community members to remain poor and, hence, when Centre and state govt implemented upliftment plans, the party claimed that govt was planning to change the Constitution, affecting reservations. "This ploy did give them some help in the Lok Sabha poll in the state but tribal community members understood the false claims and again supported the development-oriented politics by ensuring victory to Mahayuti," Shinde said. He also said govt has aided farmers by providing Rs 45,000 crore through schemes and will never backtrack on its promises to state's people. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Raksha Bandhan wishes , messages and quotes !
