Man United's £4,000-a-seat season ticket 'licence': New £2bn stadium plans being drawn up with proposal for a US-style ticketing model - and it doesn't even guarantee you a seat
Mail Sport understands what a highly controversial introduction of a 'Personal Seat Licence' – a system commonplace in America but not yet seen in the Premier League – was one of a number of proposals presented to fans by US-based consultants CSL International.
While United officials have stressed no final decisions have been made and that they are at an exploratory stage, such a move would see supporters forced to pay thousands, before then having to shell out separately for their season tickets.
Under the system, which is often used across the Atlantic to part-fund new stadiums, fans who fork out for a PSL would then have first refusal on the seat for the next 30 years. However, should they fail to buy a season ticket they would automatically lose the licence.
Following the arrival of co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe and his Ineos group, United unveiled concept designs drawn up by the award-winning architect Lord Norman Foster for a new 100,000-capacity stadium to be built at the side of Old Trafford.
It is expected that such a venue would cost north of £2bn. The club are seeking government funding for the wider infrastructure of what is a vast regeneration project, but would raise money for the stadium construction themselves.
Earlier this month, Mail Sport revealed Lord Seb Coe is to spearhead the plans, with United hoping to host the 2035 women's World Cup Final at what would be their new home.
They are targeting the 2031-32 season for a grand opening, although the situation is currently being complicated by a failure to come to an agreement over the purchase of the Freightliner Terminal, behind the Stretford End, which is crucial to the proposed build.
United insiders insist the introduction of a PSL is hypothetical and part of wide-ranging options for ticket pricing models in a new stadium.
They were discussed with focus groups in the second week of July with season ticket holders, members and corporate customers.
United sources say they were part of a range of early ideas and themes which were presented to fans to find out what resonates and what needs refinement.
They added that a survey will follow to all fans in due course.
Opposition to PSLs would undoubtedly be strong. Adult season tickets for the forthcoming campaign will cost United fans between £608 and £1,121, an increase of five per cent. Prices for Under 16s remain unchanged.
Most NFL franchises use some form of PSL system. At the Levi's Stadium, home of the San Francisco 49ers, seat licenses can cost up to £60,000, although fans can pay in instalments.
In 2017, it was reported that the Los Angeles Rams, owned by Arsenal owner Stan Kroenke, were set to charge up to £166,000 for seat licences at their £2bn SoFi Stadium – far eclipsing the £110,000 charged by the Dallas Cowboys at their AT&T Stadium.
In football, some have targeted wealthy individuals as part of a limited PSL system. La Liga giants Barcelona and Real Madrid, for example, raised tens of millions by selling seat licenses in the VIP areas of their revamped stadiums to high net worth individuals.
Around 20 per cent of United's stadium, should it be built, is expected to consist of corporate offerings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Evening Standard
25 minutes ago
- Evening Standard
Arsenal FC: Viktor Gyokeres shirt number confirmed as new striker picks iconic squad spot
While he caught the eye of top clubs across Europe by contributing to 67 goals in 52 Sporting appearances last season, some are concerned he will not be able to replicate that form in the Premier League.
Metro
25 minutes ago
- Metro
Newcastle United plot move for £50m Chelsea striker to replace Alexander Isak
Newcastle United are interested in a deal to sign Chelsea striker Nicolas Jackson as a replacement for Alexander Isak, according to reports. Eddie Howe's side have ramped up plans to sign a new forward after Isak told the club he wanted to leave St James' Park in the summer window. Isak has been strongly linked with a move to Premier League champions Liverpool, who are believed to be plotting a massive offer for the Swede. Newcastle are considering a number of players to replace Isak and have now added Jackson to their list of potential options, the Daily Mail report. Jackson, who scored 10 Premier League goals in 30 games last term, has also attracted interest from Manchester United ahead of the new season. Wake up to find news on your club in your inbox every morning with Metro's Football Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your team in the link we'll send you so we can get football news tailored to you. The 24-year-old Senegal international has been at Stamford Bridge since June 2023, with the Blues paying a £32m fee to sign him from Villarreal. It's believed that Chelsea want around £50m in order to let Jackson leave the west London club, with the player under contract until 2033. Jackson has played a total of 81 games for Chelsea to date across all competitions, producing 30 goals and 12 assists. It was reported in June that Italian side Juventus had made contact with Jackson's representatives and were considering a bid for the player. Arsenal have also been linked to Chelsea striker Jackson this summer – and the same is true for AC Milan – as well as Aston Villa. Chelsea have brought in two new strikers this summer with Liam Delap arriving from Ipswich and Joao Pedro coming in from Brighton. That has called into question their plans for Jackson, who now faces a lot of competition up front and may well have fallen down the pecking order. It should be noted, though, that Jackson is not the only striker Newcastle are looking at as a potential replacement for wantaway star Isak. More Trending Ollie Watkins is thought to be a possible option for Newcastle, although it remains to be seen if Aston Villa would allow him to join a top-flight rival. Newcastle are also weighing up a move for Brentford forward Yoane Wissa, who scored 19 Premier League goals in 35 games last season. The Magpies have made an enquiry for RB Leipzig striker Benjamin Sesko too. MORE: Everton make surprise £31m offer for Chelsea and Liverpool transfer target MORE: Arsenal star agrees shock exit ahead of Viktor Gyokeres' £63m arrival MORE: Ruben Amorim drops biggest hint yet that Man Utd aren't signing a striker
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
The government must ensure the promise of free childcare is delivered
Takeup of the government's offer of free childcare has been one-quarter higher than predicted, which has prompted some voices in the sector to warn of its imminent 'collapse', because it is unclear how the planned expansion of the scheme in September will be funded. Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, in an exclusive interview with The Independent, says the unexpectedly high numbers signing up for the scheme is a 'good problem to have'. There is no doubt that there is a problem, however. The higher takeup meant that the Department for Education spent £2bn on the scheme in the last financial year, covering most of the first year of the Labour government, rather than the planned £1.6bn. That gap was covered by additional funding announced in the spending review in March, but as we report today, the Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that the gap will continue to widen as the scheme expands. The next expansion will happen in September, when working parents with children aged nine months and older will be offered 30 hours a week of 'free' childcare. Of course, the care is not 'free' in that it has to be paid for by taxpayers generally – on the grounds that helping the parents of young children to work is a public good. As Ms Phillipson puts it: 'If people are able to work, or work a few more hours, that helps us all as a society as well and it gets economic growth going.' The funding of the scheme will continue to be under pressure, but the most important fact about the scheme so far is that it has not collapsed. The Independent was among those voices warning that it had been underfunded by the Conservative government, but to its credit the new government has increased the money available. The finances of the scheme may be stretched, and many childcare providers continue to say that they cannot recruit enough staff at the wages they can afford, but the gloomier warnings of chaos and thousands of parents left without places have not yet been borne out. It is crucial to remain vigilant as the scheme expands so that remains the case. At the insistence of Jeremy Hunt, the chancellor in the previous government, the scheme was designed to start small, with a limited offer of free hours to older children, before expanding gradually to provide full coverage. This September's expansion is the final stage of that planned rollout, which so far has gone more smoothly than we expected. If the last stage is a stretch too far and some parents cannot immediately find the places they want, that would be a blow to the government's ambitions. Ms Phillipson is right that the problem facing the scheme in its final phase is the problem of success. The higher-than-expected demand means additional pressure on the public finances in the later years of this parliament – pressure that coincides with other increased demands on Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, from slow growth, higher interest rates and a government U-turn on disability benefits spending. Providing greater access to free childcare is a good policy that will help working families. Its success and ambition should be applauded. The government must now make sure that its expansion is a success.
