DCC negligent: flood action group
Speaking at hearings for the council's nine-year plan and Local Water Done Well — government reform on the future delivery of drinking water, wastewater and stormwater — Surrey St Flood Action Group convener Lynne Newell said residents had been seeking justice for years on the issue.
"We counted over 30 years of fruitless submissions and millions of dollars spent commissioning engineering firms to investigate the waste and stormwater situation in South Dunedin and further afield," she said.
"They designed engineering solutions to our problems that could have had us drying out by now, but they were ignored."
Ms Newell said the South Dunedin Future programme was a deliberate "delaying tactic" to appease residents.
The joint programme between the Dunedin City Council and the Otago Regional Council is investigating seven options to respond to climate change and flooding problems in South Dunedin, which range from boosting flood defences to large-scale relocation of homes and infrastructure.
The cost of options range from $2 billion to $7.1b.
"Nothing new has been learnt from this costly project as many of the people in South Dunedin know," Ms Newell said.
"All they have come up with is unknowable, estimated costs, an option of mass exodus of people to God knows where and leave the best land in the city to ducks and eels."
She said by diverting wastewater and stormwater from the hill suburbs to South Dunedin, the council was knowingly risking the health of residents.
Justice and a public apology was needed for "decades of putting [Surrey St] residents and ultimately the whole of South Dunedin at risk of serious disease and possibly deaths".
She said flooding risk across Dunedin and the Taieri was not caused by climate change — it was instead caused by land impermeability from increased housing development, population density and a decaying piping and pumping network system.
"At the end of the day, the most important thing a council has to do is ensure that you've got clean drinking water, that you're taking away the sewage and that people can travel safely around the city.
"That's your core business — all the other frills are nice-to-have.
She also asked for the council to implement a "mana-enhancing" media policy for South Dunedin, to give residents and business owners respect and promote the area as a valuable flat land asset.
ruby.shaw@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Bill to replace Three Waters passes final hurdle
By Lillian Hanley of RNZ The government's final piece of legislation to implement 'Local Water Done Well', replacing Labour's Three Waters, has passed its third reading. National MP Ryan Hamilton hailed the legislation, saying "hello localism and choice", while Te Pāti Māori MP Mariameno Kapa-Kingi called it "an atrocious piece of work." The government has said the Local Government (Water Services) Bill and the Local Government (Water Services) (Repeals and Amendments) Bill provide a "flexible" framework for local councils to address challenges related to drinking water, waste water and stormwater services. NZ First's Casey Costello led the debate, calling it the government's "urgently required" plan to "address challenges with New Zealand's water services." "Simply put, chronic underinvestment and the lack of sustainable management of local government water services has come home to roost." Costello said councils would be able to choose the best structure for "financially sustainable water services that meet regulatory requirements and local needs". "I want to keep repeating that Local Water Done Well will maintain local ownership, choice, and decision-making. That gives councils the best shot at identifying their most pressing problems and the right approach to solving them." National MP Ryan Hamilton hailed the passing of the government's Three Waters replacement. "Goodbye Three Waters, hello Local Water Done Well. Goodbye co-governance, hello locally chosen and designed options. "Hello localism and choice." NZ First's Jamie Arbuckle highlighted the removal of "co-governance" in the legislation. "Isn't it great to get rid of co-governance from this piece of legislation? Get rid of it! We are about New Zealanders. We are about Kiwis." But the opposition slammed the legislation, with Labour's Megan Woods saying it "shifts the financial risk" to councils and ratepayers. She criticised the government's response to Three Waters as it had got rid of the economies of scale and "the money that could have been saved", allowing for a "proliferation" of water service entities. "What the government said was 'Oh no there's two few entities, there's not enough room for local decision making under the previous government plans'." But the changes had led to an average increase in water charges for households, she said. Tangi Utikere, Labour's spokesperson for local government, said there was no adequate financial support to those councils for the changes the government was seeking to implement. Te Pāti Māori's Mariameno Kapa-Kingi criticised the government for "ignoring the role of Māori in the delivery of water services." "Removing these provisions is not progress, it is reform, it is regression and it is deeply and only racist." She said the bill in its thinking and design ignored and dismissed how "tangata tiriti get to live here", referencing Te Tiriti o Waitangi. She implored the government to "get the education" and concluded by saying "what an atrocious piece of work."
RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
Legislation to implement Three Waters replacement passes third reading
'Local Water Done Well' is replacing Labour's Three Waters. (File photo) Photo: 123RF The government's final piece of legislation to implement 'Local Water Done Well' , replacing Labour's Three Waters, has passed its third reading. National MP Ryan Hamilton hailed the legislation, and said "hello localism, and choice" while Te Pāti Māori MP Mariameno Kapa-Kingi called it "an atrocious piece of work." The government has said the Local Government (Water Services) Bill and the Local Government (Water Services) (Repeals and Amendments) Bill provide a "flexible" framework for local councils to address challenges related to drinking-water, waste-water, and stormwater services. NZ First's Casey Costello led the debate, calling it the government's "urgently required" plan to "address challenges with New Zealand's water services." "Simply put, chronic underinvestment and the lack of sustainable management of local government water services has come home to roost." Costello said councils would be able to choose the best structure for "financially sustainable water services that meet regulatory requirements and local needs." NZ First's Casey Costello led the debate. (File photo) Photo: VNP / Louis Collins "I want to keep repeating that Local Water Done Well will maintain local ownership, choice, and decision-making. "That gives councils the best shot at identifying their most pressing problems and the right approach to solving them." National MP Ryan Hamilton hailed the passing of the government's Three Waters replacement. "Goodbye Three Waters, hello Local Water Done Well. Goodbye co-governance, hello locally chosen and designed options. "Hello localism and choice." NZ First's Jamie Arbuckle highlighted the removal of "co-governance" in the legislation. "Isn't it great to get rid of co-governance from this piece of legislation? Get rid of it! We are about New Zealanders. We are about Kiwis." But the opposition slammed the legislation, with Labour's Megan Woods saying it "shifts the financial risk" to councils and ratepayers. Labour's Megan Woods slammed the legislation. (File photo) Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone She criticised the government's response to Three Waters, and said it had got rid of the economies of scale and "the money that could have been saved", allowing for a "proliferation" of water service entities. "What the government said was 'oh no there's two few entities, there's not enough room for local decision making under the previous government plans'." But she said the changes had led to an average increase in water charges for households. Tangi Utikere, Labour's spokesperson for local government, echoed her, and said there was no adequate financial support to those councils for the changes the government was seeking to implement. Te Pāti Māori's Mariameno Kapa-Kingi criticised the government for "ignoring the role of Māori in the delivery of water services." "Removing these provisions is not progress, it is reform, it is regression and it is deeply and only racist." She said the bill in its thinking and design ignored and dismissed how "tangata tiriti get to live here", referencing Te Tiriti o Waitangi. She implored the government to "get the education" and concluded by saying "what an atrocious piece of work." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Report on council boss leaked to DCC candidates
The Privacy Commissioner will be notified after a confidential report about behaviour by the Dunedin City Council chief executive was leaked among election candidates. A series of candidates for the council said they received an email disclosing the content of a report by King's Counsel Maria Dew about council boss Sandy Graham's conduct. Until this week, only a few people had seen the investigator's report and most city councillors had not been allowed access to a copy. Ms Dew had looked into a complaint about Ms Graham's conduct and the council said the investigation was extremely thorough. It resulted in "a resolution that involved an apology by Ms Graham and additional leadership training", a council spokesman said. "The matter is now at an end. "We encourage all parties — including councillors and election candidates — to respect the ongoing legal and privacy obligations in relation to this matter." This included warning them against forwarding or sharing confidential information, as this risked breaching the Privacy Act. "The DCC will be notifying the Privacy Commissioner," the spokesman said. Candidates had a mix of reactions to the leaks, including one producing a video on social media and others deleting the report or declining to read it. The Otago Daily Times cannot report on the content of the report for legal reasons. Mayoralty candidate Andrew Simms, who is leading a Future Dunedin team ticket, said the whole issue had not been handled well by the council. He was one person who noted a decision-making panel of three saw the investigator's report — Dunedin Mayor Jules Radich and Crs Bill Acklin and Marie Laufiso — but a dozen councillors were denied official access. "The whole matter is gravely concerning and the disappointment for me is that it wasn't decisively dealt with at the time," Mr Simms said. The situation now was "furthering the impression that things are not as they should be between the mayor, the council and the chief executive officer". Otago Peninsula Community Board chairman Paul Pope responded to an email chain that he did not want to be involved, as he still had to work with the council and staff until the election. "I have a responsibility to my community to look after their interests, rather than my own political ones, and I have a job to do until then," Mr Pope wrote. "With that in mind, I want no part of it and I don't want to be sent a copy." Mr Pope later received an email and said he stopped reading it once he worked out what it was. Cr Andrew Whiley said the report was filtered out into his junk email and he deleted the file without looking at it. He was concerned the report had been received and read by some people in the community. Cr Whiley said he did not believe the council's one-year extension of the chief executive's contract should be revisited. Cr Sophie Barker said she was appalled a confidential employment matter had been leaked. As a past employer of staff, she was highly aware of proper processes and the legal and moral obligations to follow them, she said. Cr Steve Walker said he did not have a copy of the report. "I always adhere to the various confidentiality requirements when they are imposed upon us, and I have no doubt that the public expect us to uphold that responsibility," he said. Confidentiality existed to protect the health and safety of employees and councillors had a duty to uphold trust, he said. Green Party mayoral candidate Mickey Treadwell said he had not received a copy of the report. He was not interested in reading it unless it was a publicly available document, he said. "I appreciate transparency around council matters, certainly, but there are things that are confidential for a reason."
