Chinese students allegedly deployed as spies in British Universities: Report
A new report alleges that Chinese students in British universities are being pressured by the CCP to gather intelligence, creating a climate of surveillance and self-censorship. Academics report interference from Chinese diplomats and the suppression of research critical of Beijing, raising concerns about academic freedom and national security.
ANI British universities are being 'infiltrated by Chinese students' who allegedly acted as spies for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), according to a report cited by Breitbart London.The investigation, conducted by UK-China Transparency (UKCT), surveyed academics in Chinese studies programmes across Britain. The findings, reported by Breitbart London, claim that Chinese students studying in the UK are being pressured by CCP officials and police to gather intelligence on classmates, academic discussions, and campus events.One scholar told UKCT that Chinese students admitted "surveillance is omnipresent" and that many are interrogated by Chinese authorities upon returning home. The report, as highlighted by Breitbart London, warns that such tactics are designed to silence debate on issues Beijing deems embarrassing, from human rights abuses in Hong Kong, Tibet, and Xinjiang to scrutiny over its handling of the Covid-19 outbreak.UKCT singled out the Chinese Students and Scholars Associations (CSSAs), which are nominally support networks for Chinese students but have been repeatedly accused of acting as extensions of the CCP. According to Breitbart London, one British academic described CSSAs as "the primary source of student spies on campus," noting their "constant connections with local consulates."The report also alleges that Chinese diplomats and CCP-linked operatives have interfered with UK-based Chinese students and even influenced China-related academic programmes. In some cases, universities have allegedly shut down research projects entirely after direct pressure from the Chinese government, Breitbart London reported.
One academic told UKCT that university management blocked them from pursuing politically sensitive research, warning it could jeopardise funding due to heavy reliance on tuition from Chinese students, often subsidised by CCP scholarships."This is systemic distortion," UKCT stated, as quoted by Breitbart London, "shaping careers and disincentivising research that might be negatively received by the CCP." The think tank warned that such influence could have far-reaching effects on the advice given to the UK government, media, and businesses.Beyond tuition fees, British universities have allegedly received millions from CCP-linked entities, including the controversial Confucius Institutes, widely criticised for promoting pro-Beijing narratives on Western campuses. According to Breitbart London, some UK universities have also been accused of collaborating with Chinese researchers on weapons-related projects, prompting MI6 to investigate hundreds of British academics.The findings suggest a deep and growing CCP footprint in UK academia, one that, if left unchecked, could compromise Britain's intellectual freedom and national security.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
11 minutes ago
- The Print
Tariffs, chips, and China — how Trump's trade playbook affects India
However, the Trump administration may have taken a few steps which could reshuffle the fundamental metrics of the chip war between the US and China. Trump's decision to allow the H20 chips to China after an initial clampdown could reduce the US's AI lead over China. Washington's warming up to China, while doubling down on tariffs with US' allies and partners, could very well initiate a new scramble among other countries to reduce dependence on the US, including on semiconductors. And Taiwan, a leading US ally and arguably the most important node in the semiconductor supply and value chains, is facing new heat from Washington. The semiconductor industry, the world's second most profitable sector , has made further inroads in the bilateral competitive dynamic to become a focal point in the US-China strategic rivalry. Over the past decade, the US has both ramped up domestic production and expanded export restrictions on advanced chips, signalling a bipartisan consensus that semiconductors are critical to national security. In 2022, the US banned Nvidia from exporting A100 and H100 chips to China, citing national security concerns. In response, Nvidia designed downgraded versions, the A800 and H80 chips, to comply with US regulations. When these were also restricted, Nvidia developed the H20 chip to serve the Chinese market. In April 2025, Trump expanded these export controls to require special licenses to distribute the H20 chip. The Nvidia CEO warned that these restrictions could lead to US$15.5 billion in lost revenue and argued they would hurt US businesses more than China. After months of lobbying, the Administration reversed this ban and approved new export licenses for Nvidia to distribute to China. While industry leaders welcomed this reversal, national security analysts are expressing concern that these reversals could weaken long-term efforts to stay ahead of China in AI and semiconductor capabilities. The foundation for these moves was largely laid by the Biden administration. The 2022 CHIPS and Science Act committed US$75 billion in domestic semiconductor subsidies and R&D, prompting firms such as Micron, Intel, TSMC, Texas Instruments and Samsung to announce major fab projects, all expected to be completed within 2024-2026. The China context Since 2015, Xi Jinping has promoted a national strategy of self-reliance called the 'Made in China 2025' Initiative, which initially aimed to increase domestic semiconductor production from 10 percent to 70 percent by 2025, later revised to 75 percent by 2030. To support this goal, China announced over US$150 billion in funding for its chip industry, more than any country at the time. Since 2022, the Chinese company, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) has launched a 12-inch fab which targets mature processing units (28 nm and up) while planning for four more new fabs following 2025. Additionally, Changxin Memory Technologies (CxMT) has been operating two DRAM fabs and building a third in Shanghai. However, not all efforts have been successful. 'Zombie fabs', or fabs which failed due to mismanagement and an over-reliance on government funding, have plagued China, costing investors between US$50-$100 billion dollars. Despite these setbacks and increasing US export restrictions, progress has been notable, like in 2023, when the (SMIC) surprised observers by producing 7-nanometer chips, a milestone many thought was years away. Even without access to cutting-edge technology like the EUV lithography machines, China is working to stay competitive by leveraging its mature nodes (28nm) and developing alternative architectures to optimize performance. To counter US sanctions, China introduced its own restrictions, initially by banning Micron chips in critical infrastructure, citing national security concerns. Two months later, it restricted exports on 38 items, including gallium and germanium, key metals for chipmaking. China also controls roughly 80% of the global refining rare earth refining capacity, and has signaled intent to further restrict access to these strategic resources. Also read: China doesn't trust Nvidia chips—calls it US strategic trap to prolong tech dependence Supply Chain Imperative During the Biden administration, Washington developed multilateral relationships to strengthen ties with semiconductor countries like Japan, the Netherlands, Korea and Taiwan. The most significant of these partnerships was the Chip 4 Alliance, established to reduce reliance on China in advanced semiconductor manufacturing. Together, these countries control 82 percent of the world's semiconductor market, and nearly 99% of memory chip production, an alliance China cannot possibly ignore. These were supplemented by regional partnerships such as the Quad Semiconductors Supply Chains Contingency Network and the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework. The Quad introduced a Memorandum of Cooperation for the Semiconductor Supply Chains Contingency Network, aimed at reducing semiconductor supply chain risks, as well as the Quad Investors Network, which fosters multilateral investment in its semiconductor sector. For the IPEF, the US served as the chair for the IPEF Supply Chain Council, aimed at strengthening cooperation among like-minded countries and eliminating trade bottlenecks. The natural course of the US' supply chain imperative would have expectedly compelled the Trump administration to follow a dual approach to its chip war with China – decouple from China on one hand while seeking to partner with its allies and partners who are strong in the domain, on the other. Instead, Trump seems to be prioritising a resolutely tough onshoring in the domain above traditional alliances, which has put immense pressure on its allies, partners and friends. The uncertainty around Trump's end goal with China has left the US's partners scrambling for options. As such, Trump's tariff strategy, such as his proposal to impose 30 percent tariffs, even on allied countries, has proven to be a hindrance and has infused instability and risks into the chip supply chain dynamic, complicating the US's overall China strategy. What could further impede Washington's competition with China in the chip war is how it positions itself in key geographies, primarily Europe. Europe has emerged as a key theatre for developing semiconductors. European countries like the Netherlands (home to ASML) specialise in EUV technologies, as well as back-end packaging and material science. In another critical geography, Southeast Asia, U.S. companies have accelerated friend-shoring, pressing on the 'Anything but China' policy. Intel invested $7 billion in Penang in 2024, while Thailand recorded a 35 percent surge in semiconductor investment applications. Countries like Malaysia have adopted a neutral stance in the global tech rivalry, enabling Chinese firms to operate with fewer restrictions. Chinese semiconductor firms such as StarFive have established R&D centers in Penang and launched joint labs focused on AI and new materials research. These partnerships, however, remain largely private-led endeavours, and will depend on Washington's embrace of Beijing. To counter American export controls and supply chain realignment efforts, China has expanded its Digital Silk Road initiative, partnering with countries in Asia, Eastern Europe and the Global South. In Russia, despite officially halting operations following the war with Ukraine, Huawei was later found to be spending hundreds of millions of dollars in its Russian operations and supplying nearly 47% of Russia's chipmaking equipment by 2023, filling gaps left by Western firms. In other parts of the Global South, China has turned to R&D agreements with Brazil through MoUs and infrastructure investments in Africa, driven by access to rare earth minerals, which are critical for chip manufacturing. Chinese companies like Huawei and ZTE are expanding their digital infrastructure projects throughout the continent, securing long-term tech dependencies. All these considered, none of these partnerships grants China access to advanced chip technology. Most high-end chips came from Taiwanese (TSMC) and South Korean (Samsung) companies. In mid 2025, the US considered revoking authorizations that allowed TSMC and Samsung to supply their Chinese facilities with US technology, a shift from 2022 which allowed foreign manufacturers the authority to receive goods. This underscored China's vulnerability to foreign export controls. Furthermore, China is allegedly evading export bans by reportedly purchasing chips through third-party markets or shell companies in countries like the United Arab Emirates (UAE), making export control enforcement difficult. By scaling domestic production, investing in R&D, and leveraging regional partnerships, China hopes to build a resilient chip supply chain despite Western sanctions. As the world order matures characterised by the fourth industrial revolution and a third nuclear age, the metrics of great power competition are changing fast and AI led by chips is hurling to be a frontier domain of competition. While the repercussions of this competition is going to play out most outstandingly at the cross sections of geography and technology, how the US and China approach this competition will be immensely consequential for the forthcoming order. Vivek Mishra is the Deputy Director of the Strategic Studies Programme, Observer Research Foundation. Yogesh Mohapatra is a Research Intern with the Observer Research Foundation. Views are personal. This article was originally published on the Observer Research Foundation website.
India.com
11 minutes ago
- India.com
North Koreas Secret Missile Base Revealed: US Report Claims Nuclear Capable Facility Near China Border
North Korea's Secret Missile Base: In what could cause a dual concern for the United States, the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has claimed in its latest report that North Korea has built a secret missile and military base near the Chinese border. The base reportedly houses the newest long-range ballistic missiles, which are capable of carrying nuclear payloads. The report claimed that the construction of the base began sometime around 2004 and was generally complete and operational by 2014. North Korea's Secret Base Location The CSIS said in its report citing satellite imagery from 2003 onwards that the base is active and being well-maintained by North Korean standards. The base is located 27 kms from the China border. "Located approximately 27 kilometers from the China-North Korean border, the Sinpung-dong Missile Operating Base is an undeclared ballistic missile operating base in North Pyongan Province. The base is one of North Korea's approximately 15-20 ballistic missile bases, maintenance, support, missile storage, and warhead storage facilities which North Korea has never declared," said the CSIS in its report. NEW: Sinpung-dong Missile Operating Base is one of the 15-20 ballistic missile bases that North Korea has never declared. @CSISKoreaChair published the first in-depth open-source study confirming the base. Explore their findings: — CSIS (@CSIS) August 20, 2025 Threat To US, East Asia The report claims that the base likely houses a brigade-sized unit equipped with a total of 6-9 nuclear capable Hwasong-15 or -18 intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), or an as yet unknown ICBM. The facility has transporter-erector-launchers (TEL) or mobile-erector-launchers (MEL) for carrying out the launch when needed. "These missiles pose a potential nuclear threat to East Asia and the continental United States," said the report. It further added that the Sinpung-dong Missile Operating Base is not known to have been the subject of any denuclearization negotiations previously conducted between the United States and North Korea. North Korea's Evolving Missile Strategy The CSIS report further claimed that these launchers and missiles will exit the underground base, meet special warhead storage/transportation units, and conduct launch operations from dispersed pre-surveyed sites in case of crisis or war. "The Sinpung-dong Missile Operating Base and the other missile bases within North Korea's strategic ballistic missile belt (including other undeclared bases like the Hoejung-ni, Sangnam-ni and Yongnim Missile Operating Bases) represent the primary components of what is presumed to be North Korea's evolving ballistic missile strategy, and its expanding strategic-level nuclear deterrence and strike capabilities," it said. Number Of Personnel The report further claimed that Sinpung-dong is part of North Korea's strategic (or rear) missile belt, along with the missile operating bases at Hoejung-ni, Sangnam-ni, Yongjo-ri, and Yongnim. "This missile belt is one component of a widely-dispersed nationwide hardened ballistic missile network subordinate to the approximately 10,000-person strong Strategic Force Strategic Force—the Korean People's Army (KPA) organization responsible for all North Korea's 15-20 undeclared ballistic missile bases, maintenance, support, missile storage, and warhead storage facilities," it said.
India.com
11 minutes ago
- India.com
US, Japan Russia to be shaken; China to debut its powerful weapon AJX-002 on September 3, how dangerous is it? Features are..
China is once again gearing up to display its military strength and technology. It is expected that on September 3, at the massive military parade in Beijing commemorating the 80th anniversary of the China-Japan War, the country will display some of its latest and most lethal weapons. Among the latest technologies, the most discussed new weapon is the AJX-002, a new nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable Extra Large Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (XLUUV). What do leaked parade rehearsal images reveal? Leaked images going viral on Chinese social media indicate preparations are already being made in Beijing. The People's Liberation Army (PLA) will display several new land and water-based weapon systems on September 3 to mark the 80th anniversary of Japan's World War II, reported The Independent. The upcoming parade is expected to be one of the biggest ever in China's history, perhaps bigger than the 2015 parade for the 70th Anniversary, which had over 12000 soldiers and had contingents from international partners, such as Russia, Belarus, Mongolia, Cambodia, and others. Add as a Preferred Source This month, Beijing held two large-scale rehearsals on the weekends of 9-10 August and 16-17 August, with 22,000 and 40,000 participants respectively, consisting of troops, the police, and members of the public. According to the Independent report, analysts believe next month's parade will be an opportunity for the Chinese government to send a clear message to its rivals and demonstrate the successes of its ambitious military modernization programme. China will probably showcase a minimum of two types of extra-large uncrewed underwater vehicles (XLUUVs) based on leaked photographs from rehearsals. Naval News states that the underwater drones, which are likely 60 feet in length, were seen being carried across the city on huge trucks. The hulls of the vessels are torpedo shaped, and pump-jet propulsion system suggests that they are designed to be stealthy. Story Highlights The upcoming parade is expected to be one of the biggest ever in China's history Photos showed one of the sea drones was labelled 'AJX-002', while a second type was shown covered and unmarked Photos showed one of the sea drones was labelled 'AJX-002', while a second type was shown covered and unmarked. Six drones were seen during the rehearsal. Four matched the AJX-002 profile and the other two appeared to be slightly larger. The AJX-002 has four lifting lugs along the hull, which suggests that it is to be deployed with a crane. Naval News states China has the biggest XLUUV program in the world and has at least five different types operating in its waters.
