EU climate goals at risk as ailing forests absorb less CO2, scientists say
By Alison Withers, Kate Abnett and Simon Johnson
COPENHAGEN/BRUSSELS/STOCKHOLM (Reuters) -Damage to European forests from increased logging, wildfires, drought and pests is reducing their ability to absorb carbon dioxide, putting European Union emissions targets at risk, scientists warned on Wednesday.
The European Union has committed to reaching net zero emissions by 2050. The target includes the expectation that forests will suck up hundreds of millions of tonnes of CO2 emissions and store it in trees and soil, to compensate for pollution from industry.
But that assumption is now in doubt. The average annual amount of CO2 Europe's forests removed from the atmosphere in 2020-2022 was nearly a third lower than in the 2010-2014 period, according to a paper led by scientists from the EU's Joint Research Centre - its independent science research service.
In the later period, forests absorbed around 332 million net tonnes of CO2 equivalent per year, said the paper, published in the journal Nature. Recent data from EU countries suggest an even steeper decline.
"This trend, combined with the declining climate resilience of European forests, indicates that the EU's climate targets, which rely on an increasing carbon sink, might be at risk," the paper said.
Today, Europe's land and forestry sector offsets around 6% of the EU's annual greenhouse gas emissions. That's 2% short of the amount the EU calculates is needed to meet climate goals - with the gap expected to widen by 2030.
Agustín Rubio Sánchez, professor of ecology and soil science at the Polytechnic University of Madrid, said it was "wishful thinking" to rely on forests to meet climate targets.
"Forests can help, but they shouldn't be assigned quantities to balance carbon budgets," he told Reuters.
The findings are a political headache for EU governments, who are negotiating a new, legally-binding 2040 climate target - which is designed to use forests to offset pollution that industries cannot eliminate.
Already, some are warning this won't be possible.
"What should we do when there are factors that we, as countries, as governments, have not much ability to control - like forest fires or drought," Sweden's environment minister Romina Pourmokhtari said in a news conference last week.
Over-harvesting, climate change-fuelled wildfires and droughts, and pest outbreaks are all depleting forests' carbon storage.
However, some of these risks can be managed - for example, by reducing intense logging, or planting more diverse tree species, which may enhance CO2 storage and help forests withstand climate extremes and pests, the paper said.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
As Earth Warms, California Fire Season Is Starting Earlier, Study Finds
California's main wildfire season is starting earlier in the year, and human-caused climate change is a major reason, new research finds. The onset of summertime fire activity in large parts of the state has crept into spring by up to two months since the early 1990s, according to a study published Wednesday in the journal Science Advances. The change has been especially pronounced in the Cascade Range in Northern California, the coastal mountains of Central California and coastal Southern California from Monterey to San Diego. Officials and disaster managers in the state now often speak of fire as a year-round hazard, instead of a seasonal threat. The study rules out two factors that might theoretically be behind the shift: buildups of vegetation and changes in the number of fires ignited, either accidentally or on purpose, by humans. The more important drivers, the researchers found, are the effects of greenhouse warming, including earlier and faster snowmelt and a warmer atmosphere that pulls more moisture out of soil and vegetation. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Signs of million-year-old ancient humans found on Australia's doorstep
Over a million years ago, an ancient human ancestor arrived on an island north of Australia, and no one knows how they got there or why they disappeared, but several theories have emerged. All that remains of these mysterious people are stone tools unearthed from a pit beneath a modern-day cornfield that was once a fertile riverbed. Because they lived on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi, it's possible they were small like the now extinct 'Hobbit' people who lived on neighbouring Flores. Until their bones are found, it will be impossible to know what they look like or how they evolved. The discovery was revealed on Thursday, with details published in the prestigious journal Nature by Budianto Hakim from the National Research and Innovation Agency of Indonesia and Professor Adam Brumm from Griffith University. A total of seven tools were found in sedimentary layers of a sandstone in the town of Calio, and they've been dated to the early Pleistocene (the last great ice age), making them the oldest signs of hominid activity on the island. Even though it was colder, there weren't glaciers in the region because it was still the tropics, although it was more arid. Large robust pigs with tusks that projected from their mouths, and an extinct species of elephant called stegodon, roamed the island. Although it's unknown what sort of plants grew during the era. Pieces of the puzzle are slowly coming together, but there are a lot that are still Adam Brumm How did these ancient humans cross the ocean? Speaking with Yahoo News Australia, Prof Brumm said it was 'fascinating' that human ancestors arrived on Australia's 'doorstep' but couldn't get any further. He doesn't believe they travelled using boats because they would have lacked the cognitive skills to create them, and they would have been more widely dispersed across the region. 'If they had boats, there's nothing that would have stopped them getting to Australia, and we don't have any evidence of that,' he said. 'I think it's more likely to be some freak geological event, involving hominoids being washed out to sea by a tsunami from mainland Asia, and clinging to floating trees. Other species, including rats, monkeys, and even early elephants, have also conquered new islands by sea. Humans have occupied Australia for at least 65,000 years. The Sulawesi discovery dates from at least 1.04 million years ago. Signs of Flores's Hobbit people are from 1.02 million years ago. Why did these ancient humans vanish? Archaeologists are excavating a second site on Sulawesi that they're hopeful will register the arrival of modern humans. At 174,600 square kilometres, Sulawesi is the eleventh largest island in the world, and so it's possible they co-existed with early hominids for generations. 'There are a lot of places they could have retreated to avoid modern humans. There's a very interesting story waiting to be revealed on that island, but as of yet we just don't have the evidence to tell us what it is,' Professor Brumm said. Sadly, it's easy to guess what eventually happened because whenever humans conquer new territory, extinctions follow. It's believed we played a role in wiping out the Neanderthals, as well as hundreds of thousands of other animal species like the dodo, Steller's sea cow, dodo, thylacine, and giant moa. Solution to Great Barrier Reef problem as new report released Australia greenlights plan to build airport road through rare animal's grassland home Authorities caught unlawfully using 'cruel' devices to catch dingoes Over time, modern humans likely began to dominate Sulawesi, but when the extinction of their predecessor occurred is unknown. 'Humans are not very nice. We seem compelled to do what we do. Our very way of life tends to result in not very good outcomes for the other species we share the planet with,' Prof Brumm said. Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Chris Wright Touts Energy Department Report's Misleading Climate Claims
While promoting his agency's recently released climate report, US Energy Secretary Chris Wright has said that climate change is not making extreme weather more intense and more common. That's counter to authoritative climate science research. His statements come amid a push by the Trump administration to eliminate climate programs and scientist positions and to reduce access to past US-produced scientific reports, while issuing new material that goes against mainstream findings.
