BOK calls for oversight body to regulate stablecoins
In a recent submission to the policy planning committee under President Lee Jae Myung, the central bank suggested that any issuance of won-backed stablecoins should require consensus among relevant institutions, including the BOK itself.
While the BOK had remained wary over adopting a won-backed stablecoin, the committee has reportedly been pressuring the BOK to incorporate the digital asset.
'A pan-governmental regulatory response is necessary,' the BOK stated. 'A policy body consisting of relevant authorities should be considered.'
The BOK cited the Stablecoin Certification and Review Committee under the US Genius Act as a precedent to support its stance. The bill, passed by the US Senate, stipulates that only deposit-taking institutions, or simply banking entities, approved by the Federal Reserve may issue stablecoins.
To ensure a thorough vetting process, public companies that are not primarily engaged in financial services, or non-banking entities, should obtain unanimous approval from the committee to issue stablecoins.
The proposal marks a turn from the BOK's previous stance on stablecoins. The central bank had touted its pilot project for a central bank digital currency as a state-led alternative to private stablecoins, repeatedly citing concerns against the payment instrument in terms of operating monetary policy and foreign exchange rules.
But it recently backed down, putting the pilot test for tokenized deposit on a halt, citing 'regulatory uncertainty.'
Though the two digital currencies are not mutually exclusive, the growing support for stablecoins could cast doubt on the CBDC's role in digital payment landscape.
'Given this new demand, we definitely have to recalibrate the plan,' BOK Gov. Rhee Chang-yong said in a media interview earlier this month, referring to the momentum building up for won-denominated stablecoins.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
6 hours ago
- Korea Herald
S. Korea to soon repatriate 6 N. Koreans rescued at sea: source
The South Korean government has decided to soon repatriate six North Koreans, rescued from the southern side of the inter-Korean maritime border, via a sea route, a government source said Monday. "President (Lee Jae Myung) has ordered a swift and safe repatriation because the matter of stranded people is a humanitarian issue," the high-ranking government official said on condition of anonymity, suggesting that the repatriation will take place in the near future. In May, South Korea rescued four North Koreans aboard a ship who had drifted into the South Korean side of the East Sea, following a similar case in March in which two North Koreans were rescued in the Yellow Sea. All of them have expressed a wish to go back to the North. The repatriation plan comes as North Korea remains unresponsive to Seoul's repeated calls, made through the US-led UN Command (UNC) and the news media, to arrange the North Koreans' return, with inter-Korean communication channels still severed amid strained ties. Regardless of whether the North responds, the South Korean government is expected to carry out the repatriation as early as this week, depending on weather conditions. The government reportedly considered the sea route for the repatriation, as using the land route through the inter-Korean border village of Panmunjom would require the supervision of the UNC, which is negative about unilateral repatriation. The government may place them back on the wooden boats they were rescued in and send them across the Northern Limit Line, the de facto maritime boundary, as it did in 2017. In May 2017, while communication lines between the two Koreas were suspended, South Korea unilaterally repatriated six fishermen rescued on the South Korean side of the sea, after repairing their boat and boarding them on it. While confirming the planned repatriation, presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said Lee had remarked it would be desirable to respect the wishes of the stranded North Koreans if related circumstances revealed no issues. "If they simply drifted across the Military Demarcation Line and wish to return to their hometown, where their families and livelihoods are, President Lee believes their wishes should be respected from a humanitarian perspective," Kang said.
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] Power without restraint
A contentious budget vote lays bare deep gulf between power politics, democratic principles Late Friday night, as the nation's attention was focused elsewhere, South Korea's ruling Democratic Party of Korea passed a supplementary budget worth 31.8 trillion won ($23.3 billion). The party acted alone. No opposition lawmakers took part. There was no compromise, no negotiation. This was no routine fiscal exercise. It was the first major budget under President Lee Jae Myung's administration, pushed through just a month after his inauguration. Yet the process followed a now familiar pattern of majoritarian dominance. Backed by its commanding parliamentary majority, the ruling party advanced its agenda without regard for political dialogue or consensus. At the heart of the dispute was an unlikely but revealing issue: 'special activity funds,' allocated to the presidential office and other powerful agencies. Only months ago, the Democratic Party had denounced these funds as slush money and led efforts to eliminate them under the previous administration. Now, with the same party in power, those funds have not only been restored, but expanded — a move that drew immediate accusations of hypocrisy from the conservative People Power Party, which responded by walking out of the vote. This clash over opaque budget items points to a deeper malaise in South Korean politics. Too often, principles voiced in opposition are abandoned once power is secured. The Democratic Party offered no credible explanation for its reversal, nor did it attempt to persuade the opposition to participate in the legislative process. Instead, it proceeded unilaterally — as it did days earlier when confirming Kim Min-seok as prime minister, another vote conducted without opposition lawmakers present. The irony is hard to miss. Lee and his allies have repeatedly called for 'political normalization' to restore stability after years of partisan strife. Yet their approach — marked by unilateral actions and selective memory — could deepen, rather than heal, political divides. The ruling party's justification is straightforward: The economy is in crisis, and swift action is needed. But urgency cannot justify the erosion of democratic procedure and institutional trust. Serious questions also surround the economic merits of the budget. Expanded consumer subsidies may deliver a short-term lift to domestic demand, but economists warn of inflation risks and mounting public debt, which now exceeds 1,300 trillion won. The inclusion of politically contentious items, such as increased special funds, further undermines the credibility of the government's fiscal priorities. Still, the ruling party does not bear sole responsibility for the breakdown. The People Power Party's decision to boycott the process reflects its own reluctance to engage constructively. Rather than confronting the government with reasoned arguments and detailed alternatives, it chose to abstain — a tactic that neither reins in the majority nor earns broader public support. Its tendency to obstruct rather than persuade has become habitual. Nor can the presidential office afford to remain aloof. While the president has urged swift implementation of the budget, general appeals for cooperation ring hollow without tangible efforts to rebuild trust across party lines. Leadership requires more than administrative efficiency; it demands political judgment and the discipline to prioritize long-term democratic stability over short-term political advantage. If both sides persist in this cycle of boycotts and unilateralism, the consequences will reach beyond the National Assembly. South Korea faces severe economic headwinds, geopolitical uncertainty and fragile public confidence. What the country needs is governance that prizes stability over confrontation. Ultimately, the true measure of political strength lies not in the ability to prevail in votes but in the willingness to exercise restraint. Power, used responsibly, can fortify democratic institutions and restore public trust. Without such restraint, the current standoff in Seoul may shift from a story of economic recovery to a cautionary tale of deepening dysfunction.
![[Yoo Choon-sik] Uncertainty rises as AI law decrees miss schedule](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F07%2F06%2Fnews-p.v1.20250706.6242a3149f1140fbb7a84430839a0c1d_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
[Yoo Choon-sik] Uncertainty rises as AI law decrees miss schedule
South Korea has missed its self-imposed deadline of June 30 to disclose draft versions of enforcement decrees and rules for its basic artificial intelligence law. The National Assembly overwhelmingly passed the AI Basic Act — officially the Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of Foundation for Trust — in late December 2024. It took markets around the world by surprise, given that the country was quickly slipping into one of the worst political turmoils in years after then-President Yoon Suk Yeol's failed attempt to impose martial law triggered widespread unrest. The subsequent promulgation of the law by the Cabinet Council in January this year also came as a surprise, given that the government was being run by an acting president. The Ministry of Science and ICT said at that time that it would disclose draft versions of enforcement decrees and rules by the end of June for public comment so that they could be finalized early enough for companies and users alike to prepare for the January 2026 implementation of the law and ensure smoother compliance. On the surface, the delay is understandable, given that President Lee Jae Myung, who is just over a month into his tenure, has yet to get his administration completely into shape. Lee started work without the usual transition period because the election was held to fill the presidency vacated by the forced removal of Yoon by the Constitutional Court after his impeachment a few months earlier. However, companies are growing nervous as the period of darkness is extended regarding the subordinate legislation process, because they have to prepare strategies for what will emerge as one of the region's major markets for AI business opportunities, with limited clarity and time to act accordingly. The delay also comes amid complaints among many stakeholders within and outside South Korea that the country, while enacting the law later than the European Union, will be the first jurisdiction in the world to implement regulatory obligations. The EU is not due to enforce its provisions until several months after South Korea shows its hand. For instance, while South Korea's AI Basic Law is set to take effect in late January 2026, most regulatory provisions of the EU AI Act — such as those on high-risk systems, general-purpose models, governance, penalties and national authorities — are due to take effect from August 2026 in multiple steps, with staggered deadlines. By the time South Korea's government and National Assembly hurriedly passed the law in late 2024, policymakers and industry experts alike thought having the law in place would help the country's AI companies doing business in major markets, where they expected authorities to introduce tough regulations. However, earlier this year, the global AI policy landscape took a dramatic turn toward prioritizing the development of AI innovation, especially since the announcement by DeepSeek and other Chinese developers of the successful development of world-class AI systems. Major countries including the United States, Britain, Canada and Germany have recently taken bold steps to foster AI development, with some of them explicitly shifting their policy stance away from regulation. This change in the global landscape has raised concerns that South Korea may have moved too hastily, locking itself into a regulatory-first approach. Uncertainty is worse than anything These concerns even led to the then-opposition Democratic Party of Korea — now the ruling party — proposing a revision bill in April to suspend regulatory provisions for three years, emphasizing that 'the AI-related trends in the US, the EU, and Japan, have been shifting away from regulation toward promotion and industry growth.' There is no indication of the revision bill proceeding swiftly, with the leader of the proposing lawmakers acknowledging that the revision may not be approved quickly, according to media reports. However, these concerns apparently have prompted the Ministry of Science and ICT to seek ways to effectively delay full implementation of the bill's obligations to avoid stifling innovation. '(The ministry) is considering introducing a grace period on the provision imposing fines for some time after the enforcement of the law so that there will be an effect similar to a delay in the regulatory measure,' the ministry recently told President Lee's state affairs planning committee, according to media reports published recently. The ministry was referring to Article 43 of the law, stipulating that the Minister of Science and ICT could levy a fine of up to 30 million won ($22,000) for those in violation of obligations listed in Articles 31, 36, and 40. However, the same article delegates further details to a presidential decree, allowing flexibility in enforcement. The planning team has been receiving briefings from the outgoing government's ministries, so this plan may still change when the new minister takes office. Bae Kyung-hoon, head of LG AI Research, was nominated to be the first minister of science and ICT under the Lee administration, but has yet to take office after confirmation hearings held last month. All issues related to subordinate legislation also remain highly uncertain because Lee has yet to unveil how to implement his election pledges, including one to revamp the Presidential Committee on AI — launched in late 2024 by his predecessor to review and coordinate AI policy issues but inactive for several months, mainly due to the political turmoil of that period. It remains to be seen how many of the tentative plans prepared by the outgoing government will be upheld by the Lee administration and how soon South Korea will clear the remaining uncertainty regarding some conflicting regulatory obligations between different laws and guidelines, experts said. In stark contrast to the heightened uncertainty continuing, there is one thing that everyone agrees always makes sense: Uncertainty is worse than anything for the business world as well as for the investor sentiment toward South Korea, especially in the fast-moving domain of artificial intelligence. Yoo Choon-sik worked for nearly 30 years at Reuters, including as the chief Korea economics correspondent, and briefly worked as a business strategy consultant. The views expressed here are the writer's own. — Ed.
