MPs call for sanctions over British man detained in Dubai for 17 years
Mr Cornelius, now 71, was detained for 10 years in 2008 as part of a bank fraud case, and the detention was extended by 20 years in 2018.
A UN working group has found he is subject to arbitrary detention and last week the European Parliament passed a resolution condemning his detention in 'inhumane conditions' and calling for his 'immediate and unconditional release'.
After the European Parliament resolution, Sir Iain and his colleagues asked Mr Lammy to 'immediately clarify the Government's position on Mr Cornelius's case and confirm what steps you will now take to press for his release'.
Specifically, they asked whether the Government would make 'strong representations to the UAE on his behalf', publicly call for his release and impose 'targeted' sanctions on those responsible for his detention.
They said: 'The UK has a moral and legal duty to act, as well as a diplomatic responsibility to defend its citizens abroad from such mistreatment.
'We urge the Government to act with the utmost urgency to secure his release.'
Sir Iain said it was 'vital' for the Government to take 'decisive action' to secure Mr Cornelius's release.
Foreign Office minister Hamish Falconer has previously said the Government would 'continue to highlight their concerns' in talks with the UAE and was providing Mr Cornelius with consular assistance, while it took reports of human rights violations 'very seriously'.
But the UK's response to his detention has been criticised by Mr Cornelius's wife Heather and brother-in-law Chris Pagett.
They said: 'For more than 17 years, we have had nothing but defensive waffle from the British Foreign Office.
'The European Parliament has made a strong and direct call to the UAE for Ryan's release within months of our taking his case to them.
'The contrast is shameful. The British people deserve better.'
It is understood that the Government is supporting Mr Cornelius's application for clemency, and the issue was raised by the Foreign Secretary during a trip to the UAE in December last year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
We shouldn't have to ask for Trump police costs help. Sadly we must
The Scottish Government has to be delighted that what is by any measure a personal trip by the man who just happens to be the 47th President of the United States has a meeting with Keir Starmer baked into the schedule. This gives rise to the ludicrous claim this golf trip is in fact a working visit – but it is that label which will allow for to-ing and fro-ing with the Treasury over which government foots the bill, and arguably helps avoid a financial headache for Shona Robison. Policing in Scotland is fully devolved, and in the ordinary run of events you would expect the burden of policing costs to fall entirely on Holyrood. But whenever an event carries any form of UK badge, the expectation for the Treasury to put its hands in its pockets to pay for it is not entirely unreasonable. That basic premise, however, rarely runs seamlessly and is often a source of political tension and institutional headaches. Despite the façade, the 2012 Olympics were by any stretch of casual observation a London-based Games. The tokenistic events in the other home nations – principally to avoid shelling out approximately half a billion pounds of Barnett consequentials to Holyrood, Stormont, and the Senedd – were shown to be just that the moment sudden and unforeseen costs were encountered. Read more by Calum Steele The failure of private security contractor G4S to provide the promised security for the football in Glasgow was catastrophic. A flagship event at the biggest sporting event in the world was in jeopardy. The reputation of the Games, and the nation as a whole, required some decisive leadership – which came in the shape of the then Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police, Sir Stephen House, who didn't hesitate to take over the security at enormous and unbudgeted cost to his force. That invariably led to a political tug of war over who should meet those costs. Treasury was resolute that it would not be doing so, as in its view it had already provided additional funding for the Games to Scotland. The Scottish Government argued that as these were meant to be UK Games (despite the less-than-subtle Games logo and marketing), the additional costs should come from the Treasury, leaving only one loser – Strathclyde Police. Ultimately, only dogged perseverance by the force itself saw the costs of fixing G4S's failures being eventually reimbursed by G4S and the Home Office, delivering a moral and financial victory for Sir Stephen and the Scottish Government. Whilst these kinds of technical spats are bread and butter for political geeks and policy wonks, they should be of much wider interest to us all. The nature of devolved politics will always throw up disputes of this kind, and when they do, they actually tell us so much about the way in which the critical infrastructure in the country is formed and functions; and crucially, just how fragile the trust upon which it is built can be. Policing in the UK spans three distinct legal systems. Baked into the structure is a 'mutual aid' system – where any police force in the UK can call upon others for help. The UK's mutual aid system allows police forces to share the load in times of sudden demand or extreme emergency. It's a model found nowhere else in the world. Arguments can be made both ways over which makes most sense, but self-sufficiency signals a national confidence and competence in a way that the perceived pragmatism of sharing capacity doesn't. The truth of it is £5m ought to be chicken-feed when looking at the costs of guaranteeing the safety and security of the President of the United States. Arguments over who pays, or the fact there is a question of anyone other than the Scottish Government picking up the costs, miss the wider point altogether – and that is that despite a police service of some 16,000 officers, our national police service has to call on mutual aid at all. Stephen House agreed to take over the security of the 2012 Olympic football in Glasgow at enormous and unbudgeted cost to his force (Image: Danny Lawson) There is no doubt the Police Scotland of 2025 is a much weaker beast than that of 2018 and is more reliant on mutual aid now than then. Some will argue that's what the system allows for and we should be proud to call on assistance from elsewhere. I don't buy that. Calling for help in times of extreme emergencies is one thing, but calling for help for what should be a fundamental capability of the police service of our nation is not something we should boast about. The simple fact is Donald Trump is the first American President since Ronald Reagan to legitimately claim direct Scottish lineage. Whether he's the first or last of a Trump dynasty in the White House remains to be seen – but his ties to Scotland are indisputable. Any US President with clear links to Scotland should be acknowledged – strategically, if not personally – for the potential soft-power benefits of claiming the world's most powerful leader as a son of the nation are inescapable. Whether we like it or not, Trump will almost certainly continue to visit his mother's homeland long after leaving office – and wherever he goes, the scale of security required to accommodate him will far exceed that of any predecessor. It ought not to be a controversial matter for any nation's police service to be able to say unequivocally that they could keep him safe, nor, for that matter, for any government to easily be able to pay for it. One thing is for sure – the 'working visit' label will cease to apply once he leaves office, leaving only one budget to pay for it – the Scottish one. If we can't manage now – how on earth will we manage then? Calum Steele is a former General Secretary of the Scottish Police Federation, and former general secretary of the International Council of Police Representative Associations. He remains an advisor to both.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Westminster urged to increase ScotGov borrowing limits by MPs
Currently, the Government is limited to borrowing £600 million for day-to-day spending and £450 million for capital projects. A committee of MPs has told the UK Government to look at increasing the Scottish Government 's capital borrowing limits. But in a report from the Scottish Affairs Committee at Westminster on the fiscal arrangements north of the border, MPs pushed for the limits to be increased. The report said: 'At present, the Scottish Government's limited borrowing powers constrain its ability to manage fiscal shocks, as it is only able to borrow for resource purposes to cover forecast errors. 'Capital borrowing limits are currently linked to, and grow in line with, inflation, which may not necessarily be the highest metric of growth.' It added: 'We agree with the Secretary of State that borrowing limits should be linked to the measure which offers the Scottish Government the highest level of flexibility but, crucially, we note that which metric delivers this remains undetermined. 'The UK Government should therefore publish a transparent analysis of what borrowing limits would look like based on the different metrics advised in the evidence for this inquiry. 'At the next fiscal framework review, we encourage the UK Government to consider reforming the Scottish Government's capital borrowing powers, by automatically coupling borrowing to the metric which offers the highest limit.' Read More The report comes at the end of an inquiry by the committee which sought to gauge the effectiveness of the Barnett Formula – the measure which dictates the level of funding the UK Government sends to Scotland every year. The MPs found the measure was 'fit for purpose', although it is 'imperfect'. The committee also rejected calls for the formula to shift and provide funding to Scotland based on need. Scotland, the report said, already receives more funding per head than any other country in the UK and a change in the framework could see funding cut. In written evidence to the committee, Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison reiterated the Scottish Government's support for full fiscal autonomy – an arrangement which would see powers over tax and spending devolved. But the committee dismissed such a move as not being a 'realistic prospect'. 'Fundamental questions remain about how full fiscal autonomy would work in practice, and whether it would be operable within the constraints of the UK's current devolution settlement,' the report said. 'Practicality aside, we do not believe that a compelling case has been made that such a change would automatically result in Scotland receiving a higher level of funding.' Ms Robison declined an invitation to appear before the committee, leading the MPs to say 'do not see how we can consider this a serious proposition, and we remain to be convinced that this proposal is desirable in principle, let alone workable in practice'. Responding to the report, Ms Robison said: 'This report rightly recognises that Scotland's finances remain largely dictated by the UK Government's spending decisions, irrespective of the impact on Scottish public services. 'That has meant Scotland has been left with a shortfall of £400 million to pay for the Chancellor's national insurance increase, and saw Scotland short-changed by more than a billion pounds over the next three years at the recent spending review. 'The decisions we have taken to ask higher earners to pay a little bit more – while most income tax payers pay less than in the rest of the UK – mean that we can support vital public services and provide free tuition, prescriptions and the Scottish child payment to help tackle child poverty.' Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said: 'The spending review provided the Scottish Government with an extra £9.1 billion, giving them a record settlement. 'People will expect that to deliver better outcomes for Scots – lower NHS waiting lists and better attainment in our schools. 'Spending per head in Scotland is around 20% higher than the rest of the UK thanks to the Barnett formula. This report confirms that it appears to be the position of the Scottish Government to scrap that formula that delivers higher funding – they should explain why they want less money for public services in Scotland. 'Their plans for full fiscal autonomy would mean a £12 billion cut in public spending for Scotland.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trade group warns of hit to Scotland from Labour's Invest 2035 plan
They warn that the strategy "does not fully reflect Scotland's unique industrial profile or specific challenges communities" and "lacks specific mechanisms for supporting regions heavily exposed to oil and gas decline". It also comes as concerns continue to surface over the future of the last remaining commercial shipyard firm on the Clyde, the nationalised Ferguson Marine which has until recently and just one contract remaining on its books - to finish the long-delayed and wildly over-budget ferry MV Glen Rosa. READ MORE by Martin Williams Why are there concerns for Scotland over the UK Government's Invest 2035 'Shut it down' demands as Scotland's last nuclear plant breaches a safety limit Union seeks more public money support for bus firm looking to move to England Row over ScotGov failure to track jobs supported by public millions The yard's business plan to 2029 had assumed that it would get a direct award for the Scottish Government's small vessel replacement programme. But the Scottish Government decided this was not possible due to UK subsidy laws and the yard lost out to Polish firm Remotnowa on the first phase of the programme to deliver seven ferries. Sir Keir Starmer launched Invest 2035 (Image: Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Str) Inverclyde MP Martin McClusky has been further urging the Scottish Government to award the contract for a future replacement for the ageing MV Lord of the Isles directly to Ferguson Marine. The SMI has warned UK ministers that traditional shipbuilding and marine engineering, particularly on the Clyde and Rosyth will remain "vulnerable to international competition" which they say is dominated by state-owned and state-supported shipyards with "readier access to finance and cyclical demand unless underpinned by strategic sovereign procurement". Sovereign procurement is a strategic approach where purchases are made with the explicit goal of benefiting the nation or local economy and often involves prioritising domestic businesses, including small and medium enterprises (SMEs), and supporting local industries and jobs. It pointed out that the sector was once the global leader centred around the Clyde, but had declined rapidly from the 1960s onwards due to global overcapacity, the size of vessels required in the market outgrowing UK yards, the cost of competition from East Asia and also a "lack of state support, and underinvestment in innovation and productivity". HMS Glasgow is manoeuvered onto a barge at the BAE Govan shipyard in Glasgow (Image: PA) It said: "Transition was not effectively managed, leading to a collapse in employment, decimation of skills, and widespread economic deprivation in riverside communities. Defence contracts have revitalised the sector but at a different scale to pre- and post-war years." And it added in an analysis: "Without sustained investment in shipyard modernisation and green vessel innovation, the sector risks further erosion." It said that the North Sea oil and gas industry was entering a "structural decline" due to decarbonisation, maturing fields and shifts by investors away from fossil fuels and that it was crucial that UK wind farms bought British. It said the transition would have a "profound impact on Aberdeen and surrounding areas, affecting supply chains, services and skilled employment. They said: "While the energy sector is pivoting towards renewables, a managed transition plan is essential to retain industrial capacity and employment. It is essential for ports like Aberdeen to win renewables work with UK windfarms, if the UK wants to maintain its sovereign capabilities in these crucial sectors." But they warned that the "key risk" was not in transitioning, but in "failing to equip Scottish communities and firms with the tools, skills and investment to navigate it successfully. A place-sensistive, sector-specific response is needed". It said that while the ambition of Invest 2035 was to drive growth, productivity and innovation across the UK, the strategy "does not fully reflect Scotland's unique industrial profile or the specific challenges facing its coastal and energy-transitioning communities". It said that while the strategy references a shift to Net Zero, it "lacks specific mechanisms for supporting regions heavily exposed to oil and gas decline, such as north-east Scotland". The SMI added: "Despite Scotland's significant shipbuilding, port, and marine technology capabilities, the maritime sector is underrepresented in Invest 2035's eight growth-driving sectors. This risks overlooking critical opportunities for coastal regeneration, sovereign manufacturing, and decarbonisation leadership. "Scotland is well placed to contribute to the UK's global competitiveness in maritime defence, offshore renewables, and digital ocean infrastructure. Invest 2035 should embed export-oriented growth strategies for these subsectors and provide a framework for long-term sovereign procurement that supports Scotland's shipyards and marine engineering firms. Nicola Sturgeon at Ferguson Marine (Image: PA) "In summary, Invest 2035 requires greater regional tailoring, stronger maritime inclusion, and deeper integration with Scotland's economic strategies to realise its full potential north of the border." Analysis from the Robert Gordon University last month warned that the oil and gas industry could lose up to 400 jobs every two weeks for the next five years unless action is taken. It says that the UK risks losing tens of thousands of offshore energy jobs by 2030 unless urgent and coordinated action is taken immediately. It is estimated that 43% of the UK's oil and gas jobs are in Scotland. Demands have been made for an independent public inquiry as it was claimed hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers money has been 'lost' by a 'scandalous' ministerial failure to properly consider a Clyde shipbuilding revolution. Ministers have given the nod to contracts to build 13 ferries in the past decade, pushing a billion pounds with only one so far delivered and the responsibility for only two given to Scottish firms. The cut price catamaran ferry revolution which promised to create and secure hundreds of Scots jobs and save state-controlled Scots shipyard firm Ferguson Marine while helping solve the nation's ferry crisis involved the creation of a fleet of 50 catamarans. It was part of an £800 million scheme - a fraction of the cost of those currently being built. The proposal works out at £16m per catamaran while the cost of the Scottish Government's 13 is at around £70m to date. It was envisaged that the major catamaran project would be based at nationalised Ferguson Marine, Inchgreen dry dock in Inverclyde and Govan dry dock. A UK Government spokesman said: "Our commitment to shipbuilding was made clear when we secured a deal to save thousands of jobs at Harland and Wolff, including in Scotland, ensuring future investment in the industry." 'Our Modern Industrial Strategy will go even further to ensure a bright future for Scottish shipbuilding with lower energy costs, major infrastructure investment and strengthened skills and innovation as part of our Plan for Change.' Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said the Scottish Government agreed that Scotland must receive a fair share of spending, including on naval shipbuilding, "at which we have proven expertise". She added: 'The shipbuilding sector plays a vital role in supporting jobs and driving economic growth across Scotland. We are committed to promoting manufacturing and innovation and continue to engage with businesses in the sector as part of that commitment.'
