Former celebrity preacher's prison sentence reduced to 12 years upon appeal
High Court Judge Shamsulbahri Ibrahim delivered this decision after considering written and oral arguments from both defense and prosecution teams. The court maintained the punishment of two strokes of the rotan.
'Since the two counts of physical sexual assault involved identical witnesses and are components of the same case, I find it appropriate for the sentences to run concurrently,' Shamsulbahri was quoted as saying.
Defense counsel Fahmi Adilah argued that both charges originated from the same case with the same victim and witnesses.
He claimed the sessions court had failed to consider Section 102 of the Subordinate Courts Act, which places a 20-year cap on total sentencing.
Fahmi contended that High Court intervention was warranted as the trial proceeded without delays under a single case number.
Meanwhile, deputy public prosecutor Tengku Najiha Zahari countered that the sessions court's original ruling was reasonable and not excessive.
She maintained there was no continuity of action in the case, and although the trial consolidated witnesses, this didn't justify concurrent sentencing.
She urged the court to prioritize public interest, noting that Azman's position as a religious figure and the victim's young age called for strict punishment.
Previously, the sessions court had sentenced 44-year-old Azman to 12 years imprisonment and one stroke of the rotan for each offense, with prison terms to be served consecutively.
Azman popularly known as PU Azman faced charges of sexually assaulting a 17-year-old boy at a homestay in Kampung Sungai Udang, Klang on February 20 and June 29, 2022.
The charges were brought under Section 14(a) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017, which provides for imprisonment up to 20 years and caning upon conviction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
High Courts acquits two men of murder charge
Lawyers Datin Freda Sabapathy (left) and Sarawana Kumar together with the accused local Jaya Kandan Madachamy,47, (second left) and Sri Lankan Rathis Thas Ganapakiyam, 42. JOHOR BARU: Two men, including a local sales assistant, have been acquitted by the High Court in a murder case dating back six years, escaping the death penalty. Jaya Kandan Madachamy, 47, and Rathis Thas Ganapakiyam, 42, walked free without having their defence called. Rathis is a Sri Lankan national.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Silent crisis of underage teens
AMIDST silence and stigma, the numbers continue to rise. Malaysia is facing a growing crisis of underage sexual activity but existing norms, policies and school systems are failing to respond with the urgency the data demands. Just two months ago, Berita Harian reported a 17% spike in such cases in Kelantan during the first quarter of 2025 compared to the same period last year, with children as young as 10 engaging in sexual acts. Worryingly, many cases involved risky behaviour – exchanging explicit content, having multiple partners and even incest. According to the 2022 National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS), 7.6% of secondary school students had engaged in sexual intercourse while 5.7% were sexually active, a slight rise from NHMS 2017 (7.3% and 5.3%, respectively). Among those sexually active, only 11.8% used condoms and 11.9% used other contraceptives, underscoring a grave risk of teenage pregnancies. The same survey found that 10.7% of respondents had more than one sexual partner, sparking concerns about sexually transmitted diseases (STD) among adolescents. In 2022, 408 gonorrhoea cases were recorded among Malaysians under 21, making up 22.4% of all cases. This trend is not merely a moral issue or a lapse in individual judgement but a result of structural failures in education, healthcare, family engagement and public discourse. Despite policy frameworks on paper, the gap between knowledge and action remains dangerously wide. While most encounters are consensual, sex involving children is illegal in Malaysia. The Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 defines a child as under 18, prohibiting all forms of sexual abuse, including physical and non-physical sexual assault, grooming, sexual communication and child pornography. As the age of consent for girls is 16 in Malaysia, any intercourse involving girls younger than that is legally considered rape, regardless of consent. Despite lower rates of premarital sex than in Western countries, the rising number of teenage pregnancies suggests a mismatch as public discourse around these issues remains heavily stigmatised. Fourteen out of every 1,000 Malaysian girls become pregnant annually, averaging 18,000 teenage pregnancies a year. If not addressed, these can carry serious health risks for mother and child. Teenage mothers are especially vulnerable to mental illness, STD, premature rupture of membranes, poor nutrition, anaemia and excessive uterine bleeding – all of which can cause maternal death. Their babies also face higher risks of low birth weight, stillbirth and stunting due to nutritional deficiencies. Most cases involve unmarried girls from poor, less-educated backgrounds, for whom raising a child is financially impossible. As a result, many resort to baby dumping. Police data shows that at least 10 babies were dumped monthly between 2018 and 2021. Of the 449 recorded cases, only 149 babies were found alive. Without safe, accessible and stigma-free reproductive options, desperate girls, often too young and too poor to raise a child, are left with tragic alternatives. Baby dumping is not a moral collapse; it is a predictable consequence of systemic silence. Although abortion and contraceptives are legal under medical supervision, many turn to unregulated channels due to social stigma, risking unsafe procedures. A study found that Malaysian adolescents who smoked, drank alcohol or used illicit drugs were more likely to engage in sex. In contrast, lower rates were observed among those with close friends, supportive peers and strong parental bonds, indicators of robust social support. Evidence also shows that caregiver control, parental awareness, curfews and dating rules are linked to delayed sexual initiation and reduced risk-taking. The benefits of comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) in preventing unplanned sex, risky behaviour and harassment are well documented. Global research shows that CSE boosts awareness and literacy, promoting safer sexual choices. Yet in Malaysia, CSE implementation remains weak. Key obstacles include the lack of a standardised curriculum, insufficient teacher training and cultural and religious sensitivities. A further concern is adolescents' poor understanding of sexuality and reproductive health (SRH), especially among rural youths. While the Education Ministry has attempted to integrate SRH into co-curricular modules and primary instruction, the fragmented delivery, lack of training and resistance from communities have rendered these efforts inconsistent and ineffective. Though SRH content has been partially integrated into school subjects, it remains non-compulsory under the national curriculum. Most delivery occurs via external programmes. In primary schools, where it is included, students receive only 13 hours of instruction per year, and HIV education is limited to two sessions annually. To tackle the troubling rise in underage sexual activity, Malaysia must adopt a holistic approach. School-based CSE: Mandate CSE as a stand-alone subject in schools while integrating it into other subjects, such as biology and social sciences. A well-designed curriculum should promote health, decision-making and awareness of bodily rights. Sweden, the first country to make sex education compulsory, teaches key concepts such as puberty, reproduction, gender roles, sexual identity, relationships, STD and contraception. Given the link between substance use, pornography exposure and risky sexual behaviour, CSE should also include media literacy and substance abuse prevention. In Malaysia, CSE must be culturally and religiously sensitive, aligning with community values. Research shows that age-appropriate sexuality education should begin earlier, ideally before puberty, to equip children with the understanding to protect themselves and report abuse. This is vital in cases of incest, which often go unreported due to confusion, fear or manipulation by perpetrators. The rise in incest cases demands stronger safeguards for child protection through early education and open dialogue. Public destigmatisation and community engagement: Step up efforts to normalise conversations around SRH through nationwide awareness campaigns. Collaborating with community leaders, educators and youths will help dismantle taboos and foster support for sexuality education. Educator training and readiness: Require in-service and pre-service training for all CSE instructors. Equip teachers with accurate, up-to-date and scientifically validated knowledge and the skills to address sensitive topics such as sexual and gender-based violence, as well as sexual abuse. Partner with civil society to create teaching materials, frameworks and training workshops. Parental involvement in SRH education: Parents play a vital role in guiding and supporting adolescents. Open communication at home can reduce stigma and promote healthier attitudes towards SRH. Continuous policy review and research: The government must regularly evaluate the effectiveness of initiatives such as the National Reproductive and Social Health Education Policy and Action Plan and the Reproductive Health and Social Education programmes. Ongoing research is vital to close enforcement gaps, refine strategies and align with global best practices. Failing to act now will not only endanger the health and future of thousands of adolescents but also entrench a generational cycle of silence, vulnerability and neglect. Dr Margarita Peredaryenko and Avyce Heng are part of the research team at Emir Research, an independent think-tank focused on strategic policy recommendations based on rigorous research.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
What is judicial mercy, and how does it apply to Ong Beng Seng's case?
Both the defence and the prosecution noted that a fine in lieu of jail would be appropriate as Ong Beng Seng has advanced multiple myeloma, which is an incurable cancer. - ST/ANN SINGAPORE: Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng pleaded guilty to one count of abetting the obstruction of justice on Aug 4. Both the defence and the prosecution noted that a fine in lieu of jail would be appropriate as he has advanced multiple myeloma, which is an incurable cancer. His lawyers urged the court to exercise judicial mercy and impose a fine with no prison time. The prosecution did not object to this, noting that even if the court did not exercise judicial mercy, there was basis for it to consider Ong's ill-health as a mitigating factor for a significant reduction of sentence. ALSO READ: Singapore-based Malaysian billionaire Ong Beng Seng pleads guilty to abetting obstruction of justice in case linked to ex-minister Iswaran What is judicial mercy? Judicial mercy is the discretionary power of Singapore's courts to give a more lenient sentence because of exceptional mitigating circumstances. It has a high threshold, and so far has been exercised in only two types of situations. The first is where the offender is suffering from terminal illness. The second is where the offender is so ill that jail time would carry a high risk of endangering his or her life. The High Court previously said that when judicial mercy is exercised, the central consideration by the court is not the culpability of the offender. Instead, the sentence will be based on humanitarian considerations. These must outweigh public interests in punishing the offender for his crime. This is distinctly different from when ill-health is considered as a mitigating factor. The High Court said judicial mercy is to be invoked only sparingly. Previous cases where it was invoked saw no imprisonment, or a nominal period of imprisonment, or the statutory minimum. Difference between judicial mercy and ill-health as mitigating factor Judicial mercy has a higher threshold than ill-health as a mitigating factor. When judicial mercy is invoked, the main consideration for sentencing becomes one of humanity. When the courts pass sentences with ill-health considered as a mitigating factor, the central consideration is still the public interest in punishing one for the offence committed. The punishment would remain proportional to the offender's culpability, but may be reduced at the discretion of the court. The courts have exercised judicial mercy in cases where the offender has not long left to live or when prison time would pose a significant risk to the offender's life. Cancer-stricken woman In 2020, the court fined a woman S$5,000 (US$3,885) instead of jailing her for a week for contempt of court. The mother of two had breached court orders relating to divorce proceedings with her former husband. She had turned her children on him and harmed his reputation. The court granted judicial mercy, noting that the woman had stage 4 breast cancer, was using a wheelchair and weighed only 30kg. Six months to live In 2018, a man who managed a coffee shop had a three-week prison sentence cut to a S$250 fine after he was diagnosed with cancer and given six months to live. Lam Kim Heng, then 68, had tried to bribe a building inspection officer with a pack of cigarettes. But three weeks after sentencing, he found out he had acute myeloid leukaemia. The High Court granted judicial mercy when it heard his appeal about three months after the diagnosis. Former Tangs chairman's kidney scandal In 2008, then Tangs chairman Tang Wee Sung was jailed for a day and fined S$17,000 for attempting to buy a kidney. He suffered from multiple medical conditions, including end-stage renal disease. Tang had to undergo dialysis six days a week, and had extremely detailed checks, injections and medication daily. The court granted him judicial mercy. Tang underwent a kidney transplant in 2009 and died in 2022. Molester with nose cancer In 2006, a convicted molester was granted judicial mercy on appeal and had his original sentence of four months' jail and three strokes of the cane replaced with a S$5,000 fine. Chng Yew Chin, then 43, had molested his maid. But he appealed and a doctor told the court he could not be cured and had little time left. The court granted him judicial mercy, saying his cancer was a far harsher sentence that would kill him in the near future. - The Straits Times/ANN
