
Former celebrity preacher's prison sentence reduced to 12 years upon appeal
PETALING JAYA: The Shah Alam High Court has reduced former celebrity preacher Azman Syah Alias's jail term from 24 to 12 years after ruling that his sentences should be served concurrently rather than consecutively, Kosmo reports.
High Court Judge Shamsulbahri Ibrahim delivered this decision after considering written and oral arguments from both defense and prosecution teams. The court maintained the punishment of two strokes of the rotan.
'Since the two counts of physical sexual assault involved identical witnesses and are components of the same case, I find it appropriate for the sentences to run concurrently,' Shamsulbahri was quoted as saying.
Defense counsel Fahmi Adilah argued that both charges originated from the same case with the same victim and witnesses.
He claimed the sessions court had failed to consider Section 102 of the Subordinate Courts Act, which places a 20-year cap on total sentencing.
Fahmi contended that High Court intervention was warranted as the trial proceeded without delays under a single case number.
Meanwhile, deputy public prosecutor Tengku Najiha Zahari countered that the sessions court's original ruling was reasonable and not excessive.
She maintained there was no continuity of action in the case, and although the trial consolidated witnesses, this didn't justify concurrent sentencing.
She urged the court to prioritize public interest, noting that Azman's position as a religious figure and the victim's young age called for strict punishment.
Previously, the sessions court had sentenced 44-year-old Azman to 12 years imprisonment and one stroke of the rotan for each offense, with prison terms to be served consecutively.
Azman popularly known as PU Azman faced charges of sexually assaulting a 17-year-old boy at a homestay in Kampung Sungai Udang, Klang on February 20 and June 29, 2022.
The charges were brought under Section 14(a) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017, which provides for imprisonment up to 20 years and caning upon conviction.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Express
11 hours ago
- Daily Express
Cops tracking down eight to help in police probes
Published on: Saturday, June 07, 2025 Published on: Sat, Jun 07, 2025 By: Winnie Kasmir Text Size: Mohammad Azwan among those being sought by police. SANDAKAN: Police are currently tracking down several individuals identified to assist in investigations related to a number of criminal cases in the district. Acting Sandakan District Police Chief, Supt Ramasamy a/l Kuppan, said members of the public who know or have any information about the individuals involved are urged to contact the Sandakan District Control Centre at 089-212222 or go to the nearest police station to provide information. Advertisement Among those being sought is Yee Kok Wai (MyKad: 621219-12-5433) for an offence under Section 376 of the Penal Code for rape; Mohammad Azwan Mukram (MyKad: 960814-12-6277) under Section 14(d) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017; and Hisyam Tarang (MyKad: 820304-12-6061) under Section 354 of the Penal Code for using criminal force with intent to outrage modesty. Police are also searching for Mohd Nazrie Mohd Sha (MyKad: 770914-12-5581) for voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323 of the Penal Code, and Firdawis Daud (MyKad: 860401-12-5489) under Section 46(N) of the Prisons Act 1995. Also wanted is a 31-year-old Indonesian woman, Safawati Taming (Passport No: C3822626), for theft under Section 380 of the Penal Code. In addition, Mohd Dussin Ahmad (MyKad: 900828-12-5529) is wanted under Section 15(4) of the Road Transport Act 1959, and Mohd Nursyahfiq Homir Sari (MyKad: 990815-12-5193) under Section 380 of the Penal Code for theft. Advertisement Ramasamy reiterated the police's commitment to combating criminal activities that threaten public safety and order. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia


New Straits Times
a day ago
- New Straits Times
Prisoner escapes gallows, gets seven years for killing cellmate
TAIPING: An oil palm plantation worker escaped the death penalty after the High Court here today sentenced him to seven years' jail on an amended charge of manslaughter involving the death of a detainee at Taiping Prison six years ago. Judge Noor Ruwena Md Nurdin handed down the sentence on Mohd Nizam Shah Shahruddin, 40, after he pleaded guilty to the amended charge under Section 304(b) of the Penal Code for culpable homicide not amounting to murder. He was previously charged under Section 302 for murder. The prison term was ordered to begin from the date of his arrest on Aug 29, 2019. Nizam was suspected of causing the death of Chua Teng Wooi, 41, at the Taiping Prison remand cell at about 9.30pm on the same day. Noor Ruwena said the decision was reached after considering the facts of the case, submissions by both the prosecution and defence, as well as the statements of the accused and witnesses. The court accepted that Nizam had raised reasonable doubt regarding any intent to kill, stating he was angered by the victim's behaviour and intended only to "teach him a lesson." According to the judge, testimony revealed that Chua had been beaten by multiple detainees in the remand cell due to his habit of defecating indiscriminately, believed to be caused by diarrhoea. The court also noted uncertainties over whether the accused and others were responsible for the lung injuries that caused the victim's death, citing testimony suggesting the injuries may have resulted from a fall in the prison toilet due to poor lighting. "The accused's statement that he had awakened other inmates to help the deceased after the fall, and had carried the deceased, was not disputed. The affidavit stating that other detainees had also assaulted the victim was similarly unchallenged," said Noor Ruwena. Deputy public prosecutor Sally Chay Mei Ling led the prosecution, while counsel Rajit Singh Tara Singh represented the accused.


The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Lawyers face sanctions for citing fake cases with AI, warns UK judge
FILE PHOTO: A message reading "AI artificial intelligence," a keyboard and robot hands are seen in this illustration created on January 27, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo LONDON (Reuters) -Lawyers who use artificial intelligence to cite non-existent cases can be held in contempt of court or even face criminal charges, London's High Court warned on Friday, in the latest example of generative AI leading lawyers astray. A senior judge lambasted lawyers in two cases who apparently used AI tools when preparing written arguments, which referred to fake case law, and called on regulators and industry leaders to ensure lawyers know their ethical obligations. "There are serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system if artificial intelligence is misused," Judge Victoria Sharp said in a written ruling. "In those circumstances, practical and effective measures must now be taken by those within the legal profession with individual leadership responsibilities ... and by those with the responsibility for regulating the provision of legal services." The ruling comes after lawyers around the world have been forced to explain themselves for relying on false authorities, since ChatGPT and other generative AI tools became widely available more than two years ago. Sharp warned in her ruling that lawyers who refer to non-existent cases will be in breach of their duty to not mislead the court, which could also amount to contempt of court. She added that "in the most egregious cases, deliberately placing false material before the court with the intention of interfering with the administration of justice amounts to the common law criminal offence of perverting the course of justice". Sharp noted that legal regulators and the judiciary had issued guidance about the use of AI by lawyers, but said that "guidance on its own is insufficient to address the misuse of artificial intelligence". (Reporting by Sam Tobin; Editing by Sachin Ravikumar)