Top Asian News 5:46 a.m. GMT
The U.S. has lifted bounties on three senior Taliban figures, including the interior minister who also heads a powerful network blamed for bloody attacks against Afghanistan's former Western-backed government, officials in Kabul said Sunday. Sirajuddin Haqqani, who acknowledged planning a January 2008 attack on the Serena Hotel in Kabul, which killed six people, including U.S. citizen Thor David Hesla, no longer appears on the State Department's Rewards for Justice website. The FBI website on Sunday still featured a wanted poster for him. Interior Ministry spokesman Abdul Mateen Qani said the U.S. government had revoked the bounties placed on Haqqani, Abdul Aziz Haqqani, and Yahya Haqqani.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
3 hours ago
NATO defense chiefs wrap talks on Ukraine security, but the path forward is unclear
Top U.S. and European defense officials spent much of this week privately discussing possible military options in Ukraine that would bolster the Eastern European country's protections against Russia. But the alliance's top military officials appeared to emerge without a concrete plan -- at least not one they were willing to discuss publicly. Gen. Dan Caine, President Donald Trump's top military adviser and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, invited several of his European counterparts to dinner at his home at Fort Myer in Virginia on Tuesday evening. The discussion continued Wednesday online with a briefing by Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, the top U.S. commander in Europe, who also serves as head of NATO forces, officials said. The talks were aimed at providing military options that Trump and other political leaders in the NATO alliance could use to guarantee Ukraine's security as part of a peace deal between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Zelenskyy has aggressively sought security guarantees from the alliance to ensure Russia would not attack again. United Kingdom officials have said previously that Great Britain and France are prepared to lead a multinational force in Ukraine, but it was not clear how many troops would be involved, from which countries, or what exactly the troops would do. On Tuesday, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer hailed the possibility of NATO-backed security guarantees as a 'breakthrough,' noting that the U.S. was now working 'at pace' with 30 or so other countries, which he called a 'coalition of the willing,' to help Ukraine. 'These guarantees will ensure that if there is a peace, if there is a deal, then we hold to it and there isn't further conflict,' Starmer said in a video post on X. Likewise, Gen. Keith Kellogg, Trump's special envoy to Russia and Ukraine, said the security guarantees will ultimately help achieve any ceasefire in the three-year war. "If you bring in good security guarantees, this allows Zelenskyy some options as well to work with Putin so he can settle this conflict, and I think w'ere on a path to do that," Kellogg told Fox Business on Tuesday. But along with any commitment of troops, details on these possible security guarantees remained elusive Wednesday, as several officials said the discussions were still in the early stages and would need to become part of a broader political discussion going forward. Ivo Daalder, a former U.S. ambassador to NATO, told ABC News Live on Wednesday it was unlikely that NATO would cobble together a security agreement that would be acceptable to both Ukraine and the Europeans and to Russia. 'What you may get is a ceasefire, perhaps even an armistice, a more formal ceasefire that would require NATO security or European security guarantees to Ukraine to ensure that Russia does not restart the war,' Daalder continued. NATO officials struck an optimistic tone Wednesday following meetings with their counterparts, while avoiding discussing specifics. 'NATO has faced important times before,' said Col. Martin L. O'Donnell, a spokesperson for Grynkewich and the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe, in a statement following the meetings. 'And these have only made our Alliance Stronger,' he added. Adm. Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chair of the NATO military committee, said members confirmed their support for Ukraine during the meeting Wednesday. The 'priority continues to be a just, credible and durable peace,' he wrote. For his part, Trump has said only that he won't send ground troops and suggested the U.S. could help with air assets. 'President Trump has been clear that the U.S. will not be sending boots on the ground, but may be willing to help in other ways,' a White House official told reporters on Wednesday.
Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
NATO defense chiefs hold ‘candid discussion' on security guarantees for Ukraine
Assurances that it won't be invaded again in the future are one of the keys for getting Ukraine to sign up for a peace deal with Russia. It wants Western help for its military, including weapons and training, to shore up its defenses, and Western officials are scrambling to figure out what commitments they might offer. Russia's top diplomat said Wednesday that the country would insist on being a part of any future security guarantees for Ukraine, a condition that European and Ukrainian officials widely see as absurd. Advertisement It was the clearest sign yet that enormous gaps remain in the negotiations over a possible end to Russia's invasion. And it added to the uncertainty over how a European effort to rally a 'coalition of the willing' to protect a postwar Ukraine, possibly with Western soldiers stationed inside the country, would fit into President Trump's plans for a peace deal with President Vladimir Putin of Russia. Advertisement 'Seriously discussing issues of ensuring security without the Russian Federation is a utopia, a road to nowhere,' Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told reporters in Moscow after a meeting with his Jordanian counterpart. US General Alexus Grynkewich, NATO's supreme allied commander Europe, took part in the virtual talks, Dragone said. US General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was also due to participate, a US defense official said. Caine also met with European military chiefs Tuesday evening in Washington to assess the best military options for political leaders, according to the defense official, who wasn't authorized to comment publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. Trump met last Friday with Putin in Alaska and on Monday hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and prominent European leaders at the White House. Neither meeting delivered concrete progress. Trump is trying to steer Putin and Zelensky toward a settlement more than three years after Russia invaded its neighbor, but there are major obstacles. They include Ukraine's demands for Western-backed military assurances to ensure Russia won't mount another invasion in the coming years. 'We need strong security guarantees to ensure a truly secure and lasting peace,' Zelensky said in a Telegram post Wednesday after Russian missile and drone strikes hit six regions of Ukraine overnight. Kyiv's European allies are looking to set up a force that could backstop any peace agreement, and a coalition of 30 countries, including European nations, Japan, and Australia, has signed up to support the initiative. Military chiefs are figuring out how that security force might work. The role that the US might play is unclear. Trump on Tuesday ruled out sending US troops to help defend Ukraine against Russia. Advertisement Russia has repeatedly said that it would not accept NATO troops in Ukraine. Attacks on civilian areas in Sumy and Odesa overnight into Wednesday injured 15 people, including a family with three small children, Ukrainian authorities said. Russian strikes also targeted ports and fuel and energy infrastructure, officials said. Zelensky said the strikes 'only confirm the need for pressure on Moscow, the need to introduce new sanctions and tariffs until diplomacy works to its full potential.' Switzerland could host a Putin-Zelensky summit Trump said Monday he has Lavrov, in his Moscow press conference, said Russia is prepared to continue negotiations with Ukraine in any format. He said Putin proposed to Trump raising the level of representation in delegations that recently took part in largely fruitless direct talks in Istanbul. He added that 'a separate block [of talks] should be devoted to examining the political aspects of the settlement, along with the military and humanitarian ones.' Ukraine and Western leaders have accused Putin of dragging out peace negotiations in the hope of capturing more land before any settlement. French President Emmanuel Macron has said the summit could happen in Europe and proposed the Swiss city of Geneva. Switzerland has expressed its willingness to act as host. Putin's ability to travel abroad Advertisement Switzerland intends to ask the ICC to exempt it from sanctions in order to allow Putin in for a summit, according to a senior official in The Hague with direct knowledge of the request. The official was not authorized to speak about the proceedings and spoke on condition of anonymity.
Washington Post
4 hours ago
- Washington Post
State Dept. fires official after internal debates over Israel
The State Department fired its top press officer for Israeli-Palestinian affairs following multiple disputes over how to characterize key Trump administration policies, including a controversial plan to relocate hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip that critics consider ethnic cleansing, according to U.S. officials and documents reviewed by The Washington Post. Monday's firing of c occurred days after an internal debate about releasing a statement to the news media that said, 'We do not support forced displacement of Palestinians in Gaza.' Ghoreishi drafted the line, which resembled previous remarks made by President Donald Trump and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, who said in February the United States would not pursue an 'eviction plan' for Gaza. State Department leadership vetoed the move, instructing officials to 'cut the line marked in red and clear,' according to a memo dated last week. U.S. officials said Ghoreishi's firing has sent a chilling message to State Department employees that communication straying from ardent pro-Israel messaging — even if it's in line with long-standing U.S. policy — will not be tolerated. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters. The State Department did not offer a rationale for Ghoreishi's firing but suggested he had strayed from the White House's agenda. 'We do not comment on leaked emails or allegations,' said State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott. 'Federal employees should never put their personal political ideologies ahead of the duly elected president's agenda.' Ghoreishi told The Post he was not given an explanation for his firing, which the State Department was not required to provide due to his status as a contractor. He said the incident raised troubling questions about the department's position on the potential expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza. 'Despite a strong reputation and close working relationship with many of my colleagues, I was unable to survive these disputes,' he said, noting the language he recommended for the media statement had been previously cleared by the State Department since Trump took office on Jan. 20. Another dispute inside the State Department occurred earlier this month following Israel's targeted killing of Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif and several other journalists in Gaza City. Israel claimed al-Sharif was a Hamas member, a charge denied by Al Jazeera. Israel has not made similar claims about the cameraman and other journalists killed along side al-Sharif. As officials contemplated how the State Department should address the incident, Ghoreishi recommended including a line that said 'We mourn the loss of journalists and express condolences to their families.' State Department leadership objected in an email sent Aug. 10. 'No response is needed,' said the email. 'We can't be sending out condolences if we are unsure of this individual's actions.' A key opponent of Ghoreishi within the department was David Milstein, a senior adviser to Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel. Milstein is known for confronting staff throughout the department in defense of the Israeli government, said officials familiar with the matter. Critics of Milstein within the State Department contend he appears overly eager to please Israeli officials and frequently involves himself in matters that are beyond the scope of his responsibilities. 'Milstein is an adviser to an ambassador,' one official said. 'That's it, yet he has his hands in everything.' Milstein did not respond to a request for comment. Milstein and other State Department officials clashed in July when Milstein sought to release a statement under Secretary of State Marco Rubio's name that condemned Ireland for considering legislation that would ban trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, said officials. The effort alarmed U.S. diplomats in Europe, who viewed the appropriate next step to be consulting with Irish officials in private before publicly condemning the country's actions. Ultimately, U.S. diplomats overseeing Europe and the Middle East prevailed over Milstein and prevented the statement's release. More recently, Milstein and Ghoreishi disagreed over Milstein's push for the State Department to refer to the West Bank as 'Judea and Samaria,' the biblical name for the region that is widely used within Israel. The territory is internationally recognized as the West Bank and Palestinians object to the use of Judea and Samaria as legitimizing Israeli settlements and potential annexation — a concern also shared by advocates of a two-state solution. A Milstein memo reviewed by The Post was drafted in response to questions from the Associated Press about House Speaker Mike Johnson's visit to the territory. The memo praised Johnson (R-Louisiana) for 'making history as the highest-ranking U.S. official and first speaker of the House to ever go to Judea and Samaria.' Ghoreishi managed to cut that line before it was shared with the news media and inserted previously approved State Department language that used West Bank while referring other questions about Johnson's trip to his 'office for further information,' the line said. The question about displacement from Gaza is particularly relevant given reports that Israeli officials are in talks with South Sudan about relocating thousands of Palestinians to the war-torn African nation. Critics say the plan, if implemented, would amount to ethnic cleansing and a war crime. Israeli officials say the plan would amount to 'voluntary migration,' a characterization challenged by those noting the besieged enclave's chronic lack of food and water, and sustained Israeli military campaign. Ghoreishi's supporters in the department rebutted spokesman Pigott's suggestion that he worked against Trump's agenda. One State Department official said Ghoreishi always cleared his recommendations internally and had a 'proven track record of being able to channel President Trump and Rubio in the public talking points' and noted that, 'He's the guy who wrote the Secretary's tweet 'Make Gaza Beautiful Again.'' Ghoreishi said he was not motivated by anti-Trump animus and had been inspired by Trump's May speech about the Middle East, which he said some senior State Department officials continued to resist. 'Trump called out neocons and western interventionists for failing the Middle East, and claimed he wanted to help pave a new path for the region,' he said. 'The hawks on the seventh floor of the State Department do not match that vision.' The department's seventh floor houses Rubio's office and those of other top officials. Other U.S. officials have noted that Trump's language on Israel has ranged from critical to extremely supportive, and contradictory remarks about establishing a 'Riviera of the Middle East' in Gaza have allowed competing ideological camps to stake a claim for the Trump mantle. On Wednesday, Ghoreishi came under attack from Laura Loomer, a far-right activist and unofficial adviser to Trump with a track record of leveling unsubstantiated claims. In a post on social media, she called Ghoreishi a 'Pro-Iranian Regime Jihadi Muslim Tied To NIAC,' a reference to the National Iranian American Council, a group that supported the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Ghoreishi said he was an intern there in the fall of 2013.
