Leo XIV says Church must fight 'lack of faith' in first mass as pope
Chicago-born Robert Francis Prevost became the 267th pope, spiritual leader of the world's 1.4 billion Catholics and successor to Argentina's Pope Francis on Thursday, after a secret vote by fellow cardinals in the Vatican's Sistine Chapel.
In today's world, Leo warned in his homily to assembled cardinals, there are places or situations where "it is not easy to preach the Gospel and bear witness to its truth, where believers are mocked, opposed, despised or at best tolerated and pitied".
"Yet, precisely for this reason, they are the places where our missionary outreach is desperately needed," said the new pope, 69, standing at the Sistine Chapel altar with Michelangelo's famed fresco of "The Last Judgment" behind him.
The former missionary deplored "settings in which the Christian faith is considered absurd, meant for the weak and unintelligent". And in an echo of his predecessor Francis, he said people were turning to "technology, money, success, power, or pleasure."
'WALK WITH ME'
"A lack of faith is often tragically accompanied by the loss of meaning in life, the neglect of mercy, appalling violations of human dignity, the crisis of the family and so many other wounds that afflict our society," said Leo in Italian, wearing a white papal robe trimmed in gold as he addressed the seated white-robed cardinals.
In an apparent message to evangelical Christians, Pope Leo also warned that Jesus cannot be "reduced to a kind of charismatic leader or superman".
"This is true not only among non-believers but also among many baptised Christians, who thus end up living, at this level, in a state of practical atheism," he said.
In an unscripted introduction to his homily in English, he also evoked a need to overcome divisions within the Church, telling his fellow cardinals: "I know I can rely on each and every one of you to walk with me".
Many around the world were still digesting the choice of the man sometimes referred to in Rome as the "Latin Yankee" for his decades-long missions in Peru.
"A pope from the United States is almost more surprising than an Argentine and Jesuit pope," such as Francis, wrote the Corriere della Sera daily. Francis was the first pope ever named from the Americas.
MISSIONARY IN PERU
The Vatican released video images of the moments after Leo's secret election Thursday, showing him praying at a chapel altar and shaking hands and receiving congratulations in a sea of scarlet-robed cardinals.
The American, a member of the Augustinian order who spent two decades in Peru and was only made a cardinal in 2023. But he had been on many Vatican watchers' lists of potential popes, although he is far from being a globally recognised figure.
Over the coming days, including during Sunday's midday Regina Coeli prayer and a meeting with journalists at the Vatican on Monday, his actions and words will be closely scrutinised.
He will meet with diplomats on May 16 and on Sunday May 18 will hold an inauguration mass at St Peter's Square, which is expected to draw world leaders and thousands of pilgrims.
Waiting outside St Peter's Friday, Argentine tourist Rocio Arguello said "there were so many people from all over the world" who were riveted by Leo's first appearance the day before, including throngs from Spanish-speaking countries.
"It was very moving when he also spoke in Spanish," said the 39-year-old woman. "When he came out and spoke both languages, it was lovely."
Back in Peru, well-wishers including the bishop of El Callao outside Lima, Luis Alberto Barrera, saluted the Augustinian's engagement in the Andean country.
"He showed his closeness and simplicity with the people," Barrera told AFP, calling the new pope a "good missionary".
In Chicago, locals celebrated his love of baseball, deep-dish pizza and his working-class South Side neighbourhood in the United States' third-largest city.
The Chicago Tribune called him "the pride and joy of every priest and nun" at his local parish, where he went to school and served as an altar boy, while a debate erupted over which of the city's rival baseball teams Leo supported: the White Sox, his brother ultimately confirmed.
BUILD BRIDGES
In his address to the crowds Thursday, Leo echoed his predecessor Francis with a call for peace and urging a "missionary Church".
"Help us, and each other, to build bridges through dialogue, through encounter, to come together as one people, always in peace," he said, as world leaders sent pledges to work with him on global issues at a time of great geopolitical uncertainty.
Leo faces a momentous task. As well as asserting his moral voice on a conflict-torn world stage, he must try to unite a divided Church and tackle burning issues such as the continuing fallout from the clerical sexual abuse scandal.
As Cardinal Prevost, the new pope defended workers and the poor and reposted articles online critical of US President Donald Trump's anti-migrant policies.
But Trump nevertheless welcomed his election, calling it a "great honor" to have a pope from the United States.
With the choice of Prevost, experts said, the cardinals had opted for continuity with the late Francis, a progressive who shook up the Church in his 12-year papacy.
"We're looking for someone following the pathway of Francis, but... I believe Pope Leo will not be a photocopy of Pope Francis," said US Cardinal Robert W. McElroy.
Italian Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi told the Corriere della Sera that Leo was "a very simple person, intensely kind. He is in the vein of Francis, but less spiky".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
18 hours ago
- IOL News
Poetic Licence: When the whip hand claims the wounds
America has discovered a new export from South Africa: not wine, not platinum, not coal, but victimhood. In the latest US human rights report, Afrikaners are cast as the persecuted minority, their fate packaged for American audiences as a morality tale of white farmers under siege. It's a story that plays neatly into the anxieties of Trump's conservative base: white Christian families displaced, driven from "their ancestral lands", "refugees" waiting to be saved. But like most exports, this one has been stripped, refined, and rebranded for foreign consumption. In this telling, land reform becomes theft, and the farmer's hand is always the one that bleeds. What goes missing is the other half of the story: the millions dispossessed of land through centuries of conquest, war, and apartheid laws. Their wounds are too messy, too dark, too political to make it into the glossy packaging of a Washington report. There is an absurdity here, the kind that only history can provide. The descendants of colonisers, beneficiaries of forced removals and racial privilege, are suddenly reimagined as the dispossessed. The narrative flips like a coin, and somehow, those who once held the whip now wear the cloak of victimhood. It is the ghost of colonial inversion: the old order rearranged to look like a new injustice. The Trump Administration has gone further, turning the myth into policy. By opening its doors to Afrikaner refugees, the US offers sanctuary to white farmers while keeping its borders shut to Haitians, Palestinians, and Mexicans fleeing real wars, famines, and state collapse. Refugee status becomes a privilege extended selectively, not a human right, but a political tool. Suffering, it seems, only counts when it comes in the right shade. This weaponisation of human rights reporting reduces the global conversation to theatre. America plays the role of saviour, while South Africa is cast as the villain; its land reform recast as persecution, its attempts at justice reframed as vengeance. In the process, the real crises, gender-based violence, township poverty, shack fires, and the daily grind of inequality slip off the stage entirely. It is easier to cry for the farmer than for the domestic worker. Easier to imagine exile than to confront the stubborn reality of shacks without toilets, schools without books, hospitals without medicine. White tears travel better across the Atlantic; black wounds are too easily ignored. Perhaps this is the most dangerous part of the narrative: it silences the majority by amplifying the myth of minority persecution. It makes the knife of dispossession vanish from the body of the nation, leaving only the hand that once gripped the blade to be bandaged and comforted. America may choose to buy this export, but South Africa cannot afford its price. Our future doesn't depend on comforting illusions, but on confronting the truth of our history, and finally, after centuries, returning the land to those from whom it was stolen.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Bishop Sipuka urges interfaith leaders to take action for the poor at G20 Forum
President of the South African Council of Churches (SACC) and Chairperson of the National Church Leaders' Consultation, Bishop Sithembele Anton Sipuka. Image: Theolin Tembo President of the South African Council of Churches (SACC) and Chairperson of the National Church Leaders' Consultation, Bishop Sithembele Anton Sipuka, delivered rousing remarks that left attendees giving him a standing ovation at the G20 Interfaith Forum. The IF20 forum, which convened religious leaders, civil society organisations, government officials, multilateral institutions, and scholars to explore collaborative solutions to pressing global challenges, concluded on Thursday. The IF20 event is intended to reflect and reinforce South Africa's G20 Presidency theme: 'Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability'. 'These four days in Cape Town have shown us that we - Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, traditional African spiritualists, and all faith traditions represented here - we have all chosen to go far, together. 'We came to Cape Town under the banner, 'ubuntu in action', focusing on vulnerable communities. Ubuntu has taught us that our humanity is interconnected - I am, because you are. This week, we have discovered something profound: Ubuntu is not just a philosophy; it is a prophecy. 'It calls us beyond mere acknowledgement of our connectedness, to active responsibility for one another's dignity,' Sipuka said. Sipuka highlighted how all the various interfaiths have all heeded the same divine call 'in different sacred languages'. 'This forum has held up a mirror to our souls, as religious leaders, and what we see is both inspiring and convincing. We have confronted uncomfortable truths about ourselves as faith leaders. Too often, we claim to serve the God of the poor, while those poor view us with suspicion. Why? Because our proximity to power has sometimes made us complicit in systems that perpetuate injustice. 'It is easy for religious leaders to be co-opted by those in power, for the benefits of that, and in exchange lose our prophetic stance, to stand and be the voice for the voiceless. This sometimes results in religious leaders living in mansions, while their congregants queue for food parcels…' Sipuka said that it was important for religious leaders to model the very leadership and action that they are seeking from those they shepherd, and to put words into action. 'As we part, my wish is that we could commit to transforming our educational approaches. Let us commit to establishing an interfaith educational partnership that teaches not literacy and numeracy but social, emotional, and spiritual intelligence - true cross-cultural religious literacy. 'May our madrasas, church schools, temple institutions, and community centres become laboratories of ubuntu, places where children learn that difference is not division, but a tapestry of diversity created by the pleasure and joy of Divine design.' Sipuka added that they haven't gathered to issue another statement or calling on officials to act as 'the poor are tired of our calls, the poor are hungry for our commitment'. 'My hope is that, as interfaith leaders, we could commit ourselves to action. My wish is that every faith community represented here could take the initiative, not waiting for perfect conditions and not waiting for external funding, but beginning where we are, with what we have, for who we serve. 'Rather than setting rigid timelines that may become empty promises, let each of us return home, and begin… what matters is not the speed of our response but the sincerity of our commitment.' Deputy Minister of Social Development Ganief Ebrahim Hendricks said that he did not doubt that the discussions at the forum would have positive effects in its wake. 'In our beloved South Africa, faith communities have and continue to play a crucial role in advancing the National Development agenda. At the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, members of our communities have witnessed extraordinary acts of courage and love. 'They demonstrated acts of solidarity and support for the most vulnerable population at the time of their greatest need, and I think the interfaith communities in South Africa, and all over the world, must be complimented for saving many, many lives because of their direct intervention,' Hendricks said. 'The aim is to harness and deepen the partnership that exists with faith communities… In truth, South Africa is still a work in progress, and it is daily challenged to keep building bridges in spite of the various obstacles. 'In conclusion, I want to thank the IF20 for throwing their weight behind South Africa in the run-up to the G20 conference in November, and I am sure what you have decided here will help us conclude a very successful G20,' Hendricks said. Vice President of G20 Interfaith Forum Association, Katherine Marshall, closed the forum by saying that they have heard a lot about ubuntu throughout the forum, but that they should heed Ambassador Ebrahim Rasool's reminder that there is a hard edge to ubuntu, 'which is that 'I am my brother's keeper''. 'I think we all leave with a powerful sense of what we can do, and what we must do together. I started out talking about something that always echoes in my mind, NATO - No Action, Talk Only.' She also thanked all of the attendees and the organisers who assisted in pulling the IF20 event together.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
SACC calls for transparency and unity ahead of National Dialogue
SACC backs the National Dialogue process but insists on accountability, inclusiveness, and moral leadership from the Eminent Persons Group to restore confidence and protect public interest. The South African Council of Churches (SACC) has expressed concern over the upcoming National Dialogue Convention, calling for greater transparency, inclusivity, and accountability in the lead-up to the event scheduled for August 15 and 16, 2025. In a statement following an emergency meeting of its national church leaders on August 11, the SACC said the gathering was held to reflect on the 'diverse views of the Christian leaders in the SACC and establish a united response to the country's temperature as relates to the National Dialogue.' The intervention from the SACC comes as momentum around the National Dialogue is threatened by a growing number of withdrawals and concerns around the process. Several prominent legacy foundations, including the Steve Biko Foundation, Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, Desmond and Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation, WDB Foundation, Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group, announced their withdrawal last Friday. ActionSA, AfriForum, the Solidarity union, and the Freedom Front Plus have also pulled out of the National Dialogue, raising further questions about the inclusivity and legitimacy of the process. The church leaders believe that postponing the National Convention 'would have been a wise route to consider,' to allow space for reflection and alignment around the core needs of the South African people. Such a delay, they said, could help to 'maximise unity through an inclusive journey from the start.' The SACC said in a media statement dated 2 July 2024: 'It is our experience that for such an effort to be successful, it does need to be protected from narrow political interests; and must be seen and experienced as being in the control of the people rather than a few who speak on behalf of others. It must be inclusive of all sectors of society to ensure its legitimacy in the eyes of the people.'
