National Guard deployed in Los Angeles amid protests against immigration raids
Another protest against immigration raids expected Sunday
LAPD arrested 27 on Saturday for failing to disperse from downtown protest
By Jorge Garcia and Arafat Barbakh
About a dozen National Guard members were seen in video footage on Sunday morning lining up at a federal building in downtown Los Angeles, where detainees from immigration raids on Friday were taken, sparking protests that continued on Saturday.
The complex is near Los Angeles City Hall, where another protest against the immigration raids is scheduled for Sunday afternoon. U.S. Northern Command confirmed National Guard troops had started deploying and that some were already on the ground.
'These Radical Left protests, by instigators and often paid troublemakers, will NOT BE TOLERATED,' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform early on Sunday.
California Governor Gavin Newsom has accused Trump of deploying the National Guard because he wants 'a spectacle.'
Footage showed at least a half dozen military-style vehicles and riot shields on Sunday at the federal building where the Department of Homeland Security said about '1,000 rioters' had protested on Friday. Reuters could not verify the DHS account.
On Saturday law enforcement faced off against a few hundred protesters in Paramount in southeast Los Angeles and then later on Saturday with about 100 people in downtown Los Angeles, according to Reuters witnesses. Federal law enforcement was seen firing gas canisters in Paramount and downtown Los Angeles on Saturday to try and disperse protesters.
The Los Angeles Police Department arrested 27 people on Saturday for failure to disperse from the downtown protest, police spokesperson Norma Eisenman said. She said she could not comment on whether LAPD used less lethal force. Less lethal force refers to crowd control tactics such as pepper balls.
The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department arrested three people on Saturday on suspicion of assaulting an officer. Sheriff's deputies did use 'less lethal force' in Paramount, spokesperson Deputy Brenda Serna said, but she could not specify which exact tactics were used.
'ZERO TOLERANCE'
The protests pit Democratic-run Los Angeles, where census data suggests a significant part of the population is Hispanic and foreign-born, against Trump's Republican White House, which has made an immigration crackdown a hallmark of his second term.
Trump in a presidential memorandum on Saturday said he was deploying at least 2,000 National Guard personnel following what he described as 'numerous incidents of violence and disorder' in response to the enforcement of federal immigration law, as well as 'credible threats of continued violence.'
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has also warned that the Pentagon was prepared to mobilize active-duty troops 'if violence continues' in Los Angeles, saying the Marines at nearby Camp Pendleton were 'on high alert.'
'There is plenty of room for peaceful protest, but ZERO tolerance for attacking federal agents who are doing their job. The National Guard, and Marines if need be, stand with ICE,' Hegseth said in a social media post on Sunday, referring to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Democratic Congresswoman Nanette Barragan, whose California district includes Paramount, on Sunday criticized the president's decision to deploy National Guard troops, arguing that local law enforcement has adequate resources to respond.
'We don't need the help. This is him escalating it, causing tensions to rise. It's only going to make things worse in a situation where people are already angry over immigration enforcement,' Barragan told CNN's 'State of the Union.'
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told CBS' 'Face the Nation' on Sunday that the National Guard would provide safety around buildings, to people engaged in peaceful protest and to law enforcement.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations in Los Angeles on Friday arrested at least 44 people on alleged immigration violations.
Trump has pledged to deport record numbers of people in the country illegally and lock down the U.S.-Mexico border, setting a goal for ICE to arrest at least 3,000 migrants per day.
But the sweeping immigration crackdown has also included people legally residing in the country, some with permanent residence, and has led to legal challenges.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Africa Needs Genuine Friends and Solidarity, Not Big Brother Mentality
Trump 2.0 has gone measures up, selectively and divisively putting African countries under the Orwellian gaze in ways that project, 'Big Brother mentality." Image: Brendan Smialowski/AFP The most challenging emotion for any African international relations observer and ordinary person today is processing the current US administration's stance against South Africa, in particular, and Africa in general. The legacy of the US in Africa may be problematic and mostly detrimental to the African population. But Trump 1.0 and 2.0 have demonstrated shocking derisive contempt for the continent and its people. Depending on which side of the debate one is on, the US could be the world's number one superpower or a rapidly declining one. The rise of a multipolar world and global pluralism, which recognises the emergence of other civilisations and nations, and their right to chart their foreign policies as long as they align and recognise the United Nations Charter, must be recognised. Gideon Chitanga, PhD, is an international relations and political analyst. Image: Supplied Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Although the African continent bled its most important asset, its human resources, through the slave trade, and was later subjected to close to a century of colonialism, its contribution to human civilisation through intellectual production and culture, abundant natural resources and trade, and the struggle for independence, self determination and national sovereignty should never be taken for granted. There is no doubt about the realisation and direction the continent needs to take, despite many national challenges. Africa is part of a fast-changing world order in which genuine friendships, partnerships and solidarity informed by empathetic historical understanding of its contradictions and choices could steer a robust path towards development. The rise of China, the second-largest economy in the world, and a nucleus around which the multipolar world is emerging into a reality, attests to changing times attuned to genuine multilateralism. Africa-China cooperation, and growing ties among countries of the global south are producing irrefutable evidence of progressive socio-economic transformation in infrastructure, energy, agriculture, and industrial partnerships, which are unfortunately rattling other powers, instead of supporting such initiatives. Increasingly, Africa and other countries in the global south are demanding an equal voice, responsible exercise of power and an equal share of economic prosperity in the interest of Africans and the whole human race. Despite resonant calls for commitment to multilateralism, a more participatory and equitable world order based on solidarity, international cooperation and mutually beneficial relations, respect for the national sovereignty and self-determination of other nations, the Trump Administration is rewriting history to the age of power is mighty, characterised by 'big brother mentality.' Trump 2.0 has gone measures up, selectively and divisively putting African countries under the Orwellian gaze in ways that project, 'Big Brother mentality." There is no denying the power of partnerships, including bilateral relations with the US, but Africa needs genuine friendship and solidarity that is informed by, and shares common concerns with, the structural legacy of poverty and inequality induced by close to a century of colonial hegemony. To the extent that some of the African leaders have failed their nations, and indeed Africa, friends of the continent and its people should work positively with Africans, who have a better, deeper understanding of their conditions to improve national institutions, governance, and equip the young generation of leaders with proper skills to lead during increasingly complex fluid global context. Furthermore, they must closely collaborate with African countries, and together with much of the global south, to advocate for more equitable international relations, fostering mutually beneficial win-win relations among all nations. While African countries and much of the global south are focused on improving socio-economic transformation at home, and multilateral relations that uplift many of us, Washington has chosen to go isolationist, seeking to 'Make America Great Again' (MAGA). Since the Trump Administration assumed power, it has imposed economic tariffs, including on some of the weakest economies in Africa, unilaterally cut aid, walked away from multilateral commitments such as the Paris Agreement on climate change, and recently from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). UNESCO is a specialised agency of the United Nations whose core mission is to build peace and security through international collaboration in education, science, culture, and communication. A statement attributed to Audrey Azoulay, the Director-General of UNESCO, says that the US withdrawal was anticipated, of course reflecting the general recognition that Washington is rolling back or out of major multilateral institutions. Azoulay profoundly noted that the decision to withdraw from UNESCO contradicts the fundamental principles of multilateralism. While withdrawing from multilateral institutions may be a legitimate choice of the current US Administration and American voters, it is its external behaviour that is not only concerning, but also boggles the mind. Let's take the example of South Africa, a major continental economic and political hub, which now finds itself as a major target of the US republican government. South Africa is a relatively stable multiracial democracy facing severe economic challenges, which, among many factors, largely accounts for its sluggish economic growth at an average of 1% in the past decade. A combination of growing violent crime, partly attributable to growing unemployment and a huge influx of economic and political migrants, has created major challenges for South Africa's Government of National Unity, under the African National Congress (ANC) and the Democratic Alliance (DA), a party dominated by the minority white population. US-South Africa relations are in jeopardy, but not because Pretoria has violated any of its domestic or international obligations. South Africa has consistently sought to exercise its foreign policy under its constitution and historical norms, in some cases to the consternation of US foreign policy, which tends to be oblivious of the human rights of its targets and the interests of the Global South. South Africa assumed its continental and global prominence after probably experiencing the harshest apartheid policy suffered by any nation. Secondly, like many post-colonial African states, the exercise of its national sovereignty and self-determination was realised out of a painful liberation struggle by its oppressed population. Yet, recently, the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee voted 34-16 to send the ''U.S.-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act'' to the full House of Representatives. The bill seeks a review of U.S.-South Africa relations over objections to the latter's foreign policy, and imposition of sanctions on South African government and business officials. The US is also snubbing the G20 under South Africa's Presidency, threatening the imposition of high tariffs, expelling Pretoria from AGOA, which, for all purposes, seems to have been overtaken by tariffs. The Trump Administration has also threatened to impose 100% tariffs on members of the BRICS, and to punish South Africa for its close relations with China, as well as its human rights advocacy on the Israeli war on Gaza. Sanctions will complicate South Africa's future economic prospects. Perhaps this US administration has ushered in a critical juncture for African countries to stand together in unity. The global south must reinforce national and international solidarity, intensify calls for robust multilateralism based on the United Nations Charter.
Eyewitness News
10 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Malema takes a swipe at African heads of State
JOHANNESBURG - Economic Freedom Front (EFF) leader Julius Malema has taken aim at African heads of state, accusing them of presenting themselves for a humiliation ritual in the United States Oval Office. Malema delivered this message at the party's 3rd central command team meeting in Bela Bela. He is calling on his party to force Africa to cut ties with imperialist powers. Malema caught the ire of US President Donald Trump when South Africa visited the Oval Office in May—where Trump showed visuals of the firebrand chanting "shoot the boer"—as she sought to substantiate a false claim that whites were under siege in the country. Five African heads of state have recently been hosted by the US president. With President Cyril Ramaphosa being one of them, Malema has accused him of going to the Oval for the sole purpose of discussing the EFF. He says Ramaphosa failed to even defend the "shoot the boer" chant—which is rooted in the president's own political party—the African National Congress (ANC). The EFF leader—in his observations—also notes the lack of improvement in relations between South Africa and the US. During his address, Malema also took a swipe at the US president, describing him as the most unstable imperialist—with ties to sex traffickers. He has further labelled Trump's tariff war as irrational and illiterate—lacking the understanding of the concept of a trade deficit. Malema has called on the global forces on the left to unite against the US.
IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
World economies reel from Donald Trump's tariffs punch
US trading partners now face tariff rates of between 10% and 41%. Image: Andrej Ivanov / AFP Global markets reeled on Friday after President Donald Trump's tariffs barrage against nearly all US trading partners as governments looked down the barrel of a seven-day deadline before higher duties take effect. Stock markets in Hong Kong, London, and New York slumped as they digested the turmoil, while weak US employment data added to worries. Trump announced late on Thursday that dozens of economies, including the European Union, will face new tariff rates of between 10 and 41 percent. However, implementation will be on August 7 rather than Friday as previously announced, the White House said. This gives governments a window to rush to strike deals with Washington setting more favorable conditions. South Africa has been hit with a 30% tariff. However, President Cyril Ramaphosa said on Friday that talks between South African and US officials are continuing and that his government had submitted a Framework Deal that aims to enhance mutually beneficial trade and investment relations. The government is also finalising a package to support companies that are vulnerable to the reciprocal tariffs, US neighbour Canada, one of the biggest US trade partners, was hit with 35 percent levies, up from 25 percent, effective Friday - but with wide-ranging, current exemptions remaining in place. The tariffs are a demonstration of raw economic power that Trump sees putting US exporters in a stronger position, while encouraging domestic manufacturing by keeping out foreign imports. But the muscular approach has raised fears of inflation and other economic fallout in the world's biggest economy. Trump's actions come as debate rages over how best to steer the US economy, with the Federal Reserve this week deciding to keep interest rates unchanged, despite massive political pressure from the White House to cut. Data on Friday showed US job growth missing expectations for July, while unemployment ticked up to 4.2 percent from 4.1 percent. On Wall Street, the S&P 500 dropped 1.6 percent, while the Nasdaq tumbled 2.2 percent. Political goals Trump raised duties on around 70 economies, from a current 10 percent level imposed in April when he unleashed "reciprocal" tariffs, citing unfair trade practices. The new, steeper levels listed in an executive order vary by trading partner. Any goods "transshipped" through other jurisdictions to avoid US duties would be hit with an additional 40 percent tariff, the order said. But Trump's duties also have a distinctly political flavor, with the president using separate tariffs to pressure Brazil to drop the trial of his far-right ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro. He also warned of trade consequences for Canada, which faces a different set of duties, after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ In targeting Canada, the White House cited its failure to "cooperate in curbing the ongoing flood of fentanyl and other illicit drugs" - although Canada is not a major source of illegal narcotics. By contrast, Trump gave more time to Mexico, delaying for 90 days a threat to increase its tariffs from 25 percent to 30 percent. But exemptions remain for a wide range of Canadian and Mexican goods entering the United States under an existing North American trade pact. Carney said his government was "disappointed" with the latest rates hike but noted that with exclusions, the US average tariff on Canadian goods remains one of the lowest among US trading partners. 'Tears up' rule book With questions hanging over the effectiveness of bilateral trade deals struck - including with the EU and Japan - the outcome of Trump's overall plan remains uncertain. "No doubt about it - the executive order and related agreements concluded over the past few months tears up the trade rule book that has governed international trade since World War II," said Wendy Cutler, senior vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute. On Friday, Trump said he would consider distributing a tariff "dividend" to Americans. Notably excluded from Friday's drama was China, which is in the midst of negotiations with the United States. Washington and Beijing at one point brought tit-for-tat tariffs to triple-digit levels, but have agreed to temporarily lower these duties and are working to extend their truce. Those who managed to strike deals with Washington to avert steeper threatened levies included Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea, and the European Union. Among other tariff levels adjusted in Trump's latest order, Switzerland now faces a higher 39 percent duty. AFP
