'Engineered exclusions': RJD moves SC against EC's electoral roll revision in poll-bound Bihar
In his writ petition, Jha contended that the process is 'not only hasty and ill-timed, but has the effect of disenfranchising crores of voters, thereby robbing them of their constitutional right to vote.'
Jha's petition claimed that the decision, taken without consultation with political parties, 'is being used to justify aggressive and opaque revisions of electoral rolls that disproportionately target Muslim, Dalit and poor migrant communities. As such, they are not random patterns but are engineered exclusions.'
Jha, a Rajya Sabha member from the RJD, told the court that the short deadlines render the entire process unreasonable and unworkable.
The petition challenges the process as a violation of the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Lal Babu Hussein v. Electoral Registration Officer, (1995) 3 SCC 100, which held that deletions from electoral rolls must follow a fair and reasonable procedure.
'The impugned order (ECI's) is discriminatory, unreasonable and manifestly arbitrary and violates Articles 14, 21, 325, and 326. The impugned order dated 24-06-2025 is a tool of institutionalised disenfranchisement,' the petitioner stated.
Questioning the rationale of initiating such an exercise in a state with a high number of migrant workers and illiterate citizens affected by poverty, Jha argued that conducting the process just months before the assembly elections is both illegal and arbitrary.
'The 11 documents which are specified by the ECI to establish citizenship are not the kind of documents which poor and illiterate persons might possess,' Jha said, urging the court to quash the ECI's SIR order.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
32 minutes ago
- The Print
‘Arbitrary, to be replicated in Bengal.' What pleas by ADR, Mahua challenging EC's Bihar exercise say
While Moitra argued this was a violation of the right(s) to equality, freedom of speech and expression and life, Yadav also termed the decision 'manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of electoral laws'. The origins of this case lie in a June 24 decision of the ECI, which directed the state election commission to conduct a special intensive revision of the electoral polls in Bihar. New Delhi: Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mahua Moitra and Bharat Jodo Abhiyan national convener Yogendra Yadav, among others, have moved the Supreme Court against the Election Commission of India's (ECI) decision to conduct a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, saying that a similar second revision of the voters list can be replicated in the state of West Bengal, in a similar fashion. 'It is submitted that it is for the very first time in the country that such an exercise is being conducted by the ECI, where electors whose names are already there in electoral rolls and who have already voted multiple times in are being asked to prove their eligibility,' Moitra's petition contended. Apart from this, similar petitions have been filed by non-profit organisations Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL). Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) MP Manoj Jha has also filed a similar petition before the top court. ADR's petition, which has been filed through advocate Prashant Bhushan, also mentions alleged lack of due process and an 'unreasonably short timeline' for the revision exercise to take place, while adding that it could result in the removal of lakhs of genuine voters from electoral rolls leading to their disenfranchisement. 'ECI has issued unreasonable and impractical timeline to conduct SIR in Bihar with close proximity to state elections which are due in November 2025. There are lakhs of citizens who do not possess the documents as required under the SIR order, there are many who may be able to procure the documents but the short timeline mentioned in the directive may preclude them from being able to supply the same within the time period,' it argued. Also Read: 'Worst attack' on Constitution, says Oppn after meeting EC over voter verification drive in Bihar Mahua Moitra's petition In her petition, Moitra also argued that the ECI's move violated provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and Articles 325 and 326 of the Constitution which state that no one can be ineligible for inclusion in a special electoral roll on grounds of religion, race, caste or sex, and mandate universal adult franchise for all. By way of her petition filed through advocate Neha Rathi, Moitra said she has information that the '(SIR) exercise is stated to be replicated in West Bengal from August 2025 for which instructions have already been given'. Saying that such a revision of electoral rolls is a direct threat to democratic rights, Moitra's petition argued that the electoral body was acting at the behest of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), and was attempting to disenfranchise millions of voters, especially migrants and the economically disadvantaged. If not set aside, the order can lead to large-scale disenfranchisement of eligible voters in the country and undermining of democracy and free and fair elections in the country, Moitra said while adding that the ECI must be restrained from issuing similar orders in other states too. Yogendra Yadav's petition By way of his PIL, Yadav challenged the ECI's special exercise in Bihar, saying it violated Section 22 of the RP Act, and Rule 21-A of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, since both laws require procedural safeguards before deletion of names. Section 22 of the 1950 Act, outlines the process for correcting, transposing, or deleting entries in electoral rolls. It states that the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) is allowed to make changes to electoral rolls, either on an application or on their own motion, after an inquiry. However, such changes can be made only if an entry is erroneous, or there is a change of residence within the constituency, or requires deletion in case of someone's death. On the other hand, Rule 21-A talks about the process of including names which have inadvertently or erroneously been omitted due to some The ECI order ECI's June 26 order directing that an SIR be conducted requires the inclusion or retention of a voter's name in the electoral roll upon producing citizenship documents, like citizenship proof from either or both parents. If a voter cannot furnish this, they run the risk of exclusion. Moitra said this violates Article 326, which grants universal adult franchise to all persons, and introduces extraneous requirements which are not originally envisaged under the RP Act, 1950. The order arbitrarily excludes commonly accepted identity documents such as Aadhaar and ration cards from the list of accepted documents, which puts a 'huge burden' on the voters who are at a risk of getting disenfranchised, the petition said. It also pointed to current field reports from the state of Bihar that confirm that lakhs of residents across rural and marginalised areas in Bihar are at an imminent risk of disenfranchisement due to these stringent and unreasonable requirements. (Edited by Amrtansh Arora) Also Read: ECI's voter verification drive in Bihar is tailor-made to keep Dalits, Muslims, EBCs out
The Print
33 minutes ago
- The Print
LJP (RV) chief and Union Minister Chirag Paswan to contest upcoming Bihar polls
Earlier today, Paswan had carried out the 'Nav-Sankalp Mahasabha' from Chhapra to Nav Bihar, starting at the Rajendra Stadium in Chhapra. He said, 'Today, from this sacred land of Saran, I am declaring before all of you that yes, I will contest the election. I will contest the election for the people of Bihar, for my brothers, for my mothers, for my sisters, and we will create a system in Bihar, we will build a Bihar that will truly take the state forward on the path of development.' While hitting out at the Congress and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) over comprising the development of the state, he added, 'In the coming days, regarding the inheritance tax, the way Congress, RJD, and all their allies think about taxing the property that belongs to you generation after generation. The people who talk about development in Bihar today are the same opposition leaders who had ruined Bihar in the 90.' However, the Union Minister, while reacting over the murder of businessman Gopal Khema, expressed worry over the 'rising crime' and the 'collapse of law and order' in the state, and urged for putting pressure on the state government to bring the perpetrators to justice. 'It is a matter of worry the way crime has risen and law and order has collapsed in Bihar. If such an incident has happened in a posh locality of Patna, then we can only imagine what is happening in villages. It is worrying to see such incidents occur under a government that was known for good governance; then the opposition will have a chance to speak up. Strict action needs to be taken to set a precedent so that such a thing is not repeated,' Paswan told mediapersons here. On July 4, businessman Gopal Khemka was allegedly shot dead near his residence in the south area of the Gandhi Maidan in Patna. Following the incident, Bihar Police has formed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate the murder case. The murder has evoked sharp political reactions from the opposition parties and put the spotlight back on the law and order situation in the state. LJP (Ram Vilas) is part of the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA), with Janata Dal (United) and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). LJP is expected to keep on allying with the NDA for the upcoming Bihar polls, however Paswan has not yet confirmed his stance on it. (ANI) This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. Also Read: What Ram Vilas Paswan did to Lalu in 2005 must haunt Nitish in 2025 as Chirag enters poll fray
The Hindu
33 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Will move SC seeking uniform rules for overage vehicles, says Delhi CM
Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said on Sunday that the BJP government will approach the Supreme Court seeking uniform rules for overage or 'end of life' vehicles in the national capital that are in line with the regulations followed across the country. Lieutenant-Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena has also written to Ms. Gupta, urging her government to file a review petition in the apex court. He said it is 'irrational' that a 10-year-old diesel vehicle is deemed to have reached the end of its life in Delhi while remaining 'roadworthy' in other parts of the country. A 2018 Supreme Court judgment had banned diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years in Delhi as part of efforts to reduce vehicular pollution. 'We will tell the Supreme Court about the pollution control measures taken by the government. Parameters applicable in the rest of the country should apply to Delhi too. We don't want Delhiites to face any inconvenience,' Ms. Gupta told reporters. In his letter, the L-G acknowledged that air pollution is a shared responsibility and must be tackled with urgency and foresight. He called for a more 'balanced and technologically advanced framework' to address vehicle emissions. 'The policy execution must also reflect principles of legality, fairness, and socio-economic sensitivity,' it stated. 'Put ban on hold' Last week, Environment Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa wrote to the Commission for Air Quality Management in NCR and Adjoining Areas (CAQM), requesting that it put on hold its directive to deny fuel to ELVs at petrol pumps. He also objected to the impounding of such vehicles identified through automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras. The CAQM is yet to respond. On April 23, the CAQM had directed that all ELVs identified through ANPR or similar systems at fuel stations would be denied fuel from July 1 in Delhi, from November 1 in Gurugram, Faridabad, Ghaziabad, Gautam Buddha Nagar, and Sonipat, and from April 1, 2026, in the rest of the National Capital Region (NCR). The Delhi government initially supported the CAQM's directive, and from July 1, the Transport Department and the Delhi police began impounding ELVs at fuel stations. However, within days, Mr. Sirsa wrote again to the CAQM, urging the panel to pause the enforcement of the ban.
