America's Test Kitchen's Worst Secrets Exposed
We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.
The year 1992 was pretty big. The Cold War was officially declared over, Bill Clinton was elected as President of the United States, Queen Elizabeth II celebrated her Ruby Jubilee, the first text message was sent, and America's Test Kitchen took its first steps. The latter, of course, is one of the U.S.'s favorite cooking companies.
America's Test Kitchen's journey first began with the launch of the Cook's Illustrated magazine, but over the course of more than three decades, it has expanded significantly. It has filmed hundreds of TV shows, released multiple cookbooks, launched a food truck, and published countless recipes, all of which are devoted to helping people cook delicious food for themselves and their loved ones at home. America's Test Kitchen fills a need in American society; research suggests that nearly two thirds of U.S. adults either love or like to cook.
But while America's Test Kitchen has achieved an enormous amount, the last few years have not always been smooth sailing for the company. Far from it, in fact. For one, America's Test Kitchen has endured a long and drawn-out feud with one of its former founders. It has also been faced with more than one lawsuit relating to its handling of consumer data, and it has been accused of underpaying employees. And that's not all. There have been issues with a lack of diversity and layoffs, too. Keep reading to find out some more of the worst (and worst-kept) secrets in America's Test Kitchen history.
Read more: Ina Garten's Favorite Kitchen Tools (Including The One She's Kept For Nearly 60 Years)
In 2015, to the dismay of many fans, one of America's Test Kitchen's founders and most familiar faces, Christopher Kimball, left Cook's Illustrated and America's Test Kitchen for good. At the time, Boston Common Press, the publisher that owns both of the brands, claimed that the situation surrounding his departure from America's Test Kitchen was amicable. However, the lawsuit that followed suggested otherwise.
In 2016, after Kimball decided to start his own cooking-focused brand called Milk Street, America's Test Kitchen sued its former host for "ripping off" its concept. The company's allegations included that Kimball had stolen trade secrets and customer lists from America's Test Kitchen in order to start his own business. The lawsuit also claimed that Kimball "secretly solicited" employees from America's Test Kitchen to work with him. It alleged that around 15 former and current employees moved to Milk Street.
It took until 2019 for the lawsuit to be settled, when Kimball agreed that he would return his shares in America's Test Kitchen back to the company. Both Kimball and America's Test Kitchen agreed to bury the hatchet and move forward amicably (truly, this time).
At the time of writing, Milk Street is still in operation. The brand, which is still run by Kimball, has its own magazine, a podcast, a cookbook, and YouTube channel. Similar to America's Test Kitchen, it also has an extensive recipe database containing hundreds of globally-inspired recipes.
The situation with Kimball isn't the only lawsuit America's Test Kitchen has faced. In 2024, it settled a lawsuit that alleged it had disclosed consumer's personal information to Facebook without consent. According to the legal action, America's Test Kitchen violated the Video Privacy Protection Act when it provided information to Meta Pixel about consumers who watched one of its videos in 2020.
Meta Pixel used to be known as Facebook Pixel, and it's a tool that was originally designed to help businesses with advertising and marketing. It essentially provides companies with information about their consumers behave, which can be used to improve and target marketing campaigns. For example, it can provide information on newsletter subscriptions, page views, or on-site purchases. It can also tell companies how long consumers have spent looking at their websites and how long they scrolled for.
But Meta Pixel has got many companies into hot water. Also in 2024, Cerebral, a telehealth company, was forced to pay $7 million due to a pixel data leak. Again in 2024, the UK political organization Reform UK was investigated for using Meta Pixel to collect private data from consumers. In the same year, Swedish bank Avanza was fined SEK 15 million by the Swedish data protection authority for its use of Meta Pixel data. To settle its case, America's Test Kitchen paid $300,000 to class counsel on top of around $7,000 in legal costs.
In February 2023, America's Test Kitchen was acquired by Marquee Brands, a leading U.S. holding company that also owns the brands of Martha Stewart, Sur La Table, and Emeril Lagasse, among many others.Kent Savagian, a shareholder in America's Test Kitchen and Vice Chairman in the Global Investment Banking Group, said in a statement at the time that Marquee Brands was "the right partner" to lead the "iconic brand and its production of award-winning content." However, while the initial tone was positive after the acquisition, this soon changed for many people when in March, America's Test Kitchen laid off 23 of its employees.
According to a statement posted to Instagram by ATK United, the America's Test Kitchen union, the layoffs were announced despite the fact that workers were "assured that nothing would change" after Marquee Brands took control. The layoffs included 14 union members and nine non-union members. The union promised to advocate for severance packages and continued healthcare benefits for the members who had been let go from America's Test Kitchen, but clarified that it could not guarantee these benefits would extend to non-union members. It stated that ATK United's members would "wear black in recognition of the lost jobs."
America's Test Kitchen wasn't alone. Several companies laid off employees in 2023. Prominent examples include McDonald's, which restructured in 2023, as well as Alphabet (which owns Google), Microsoft, and Amazon. Around nearly 50,000 jobs were lost in total from the latter three companies combined.
In 2022, after ATK United was formed, the union sent a letter to America's Test Kitchen's senior leadership team on behalf of its members. In the letter, it outlined the struggles of many of America's Test Kitchen's workers. ATK United then posted the letter publicly on X, formerly known as Twitter.
Among allegations of understaffing, a lack of diversity, inconsistent hiring processes, and inadequate subsidization for commuting costs, one of ATK United's biggest accusations was low pay. In the letter that was sent on behalf of its members, it stated that "It's no one's dream to live paycheck to paycheck." It also called the salaries at America's Test Kitchen "egregiously low" and claimed that several employees had to take second jobs in order to supplement their income. It added that some employees had to lean on family members or partners for financial support. The aim of the letter was to negotiate a new contract with America's Test Kitchen that would include improvements across the company and increase the salary of its employees.
ATK United has called out America's Test Kitchen poor treatment of employees on a number of occasions. Its website includes a "testimonials" section, where former staff list their grievances and negative experiences with the company. Allegations include that staff were given "unrealistic deadlines," that they were "gaslit and devalued," and that they weren't paid " enough to afford to live in Boston," where the company is headquartered.
America's Test Kitchen might have been accused of underpaying its staff, but when it comes to the recipes, reports show the company pays thousands of dollars to perfect them. In fact, according to Dan Souza — the Chief Content Officer at America's Test Kitchen at the time of writing, the former editor in chief of Cook's Illustrated, and one of the America's Test Kitchen TV show's regular cast members — each of the recipes produced by the company costs around $11,000. In 2016, Souza told Vox that this all comes down to the methodical and thorough process that comes with testing recipes.
Each dish on America's Test Kitchen is researched extensively before it is put through its paces in the kitchen. After that, it is given to home cooks for further testing. They then provide feedback before the recipe is posted live. According to Souza, sometimes, it can take cooks 100 different attempts to get a recipe right. In a separate interview with Publisher's Weekly in 2016, the former CEO David Nussbaum said that recipes were tested up to 50 times.
All of this work pays off. According to America's Test Kitchen, some of its most popular recipes of the last few decades include carrot layer cake, shrimp scampi, ragu alla Bolognese, summer berry pie, and cauliflower soup. America's Test Kitchen's intense and scientific testing process ultimately allows the company to describe its recipes as failproof.
America's Test Kitchen makes no secret of the methodical, scientific process that goes into perfecting its recipes. As we've established, a very long testing process takes place before it publishes any of its recipes. Part of this process involves making sure that they are as easy as possible for amateur cooks at home to follow.
Many people appreciate America's Test Kitchen's level of effort. Its shows, for example, have been running for 25 years and currently have around 2 million weekly viewers. The company has also published several best-selling cookbooks, including "The Complete Beans and Grains Cookbook" and "The Complete Cooking for Two Cookbook." To celebrate its success, the company has published multiple anniversary cookbooks, too. In 2019, for example, there was America's Test Kitchen released a new book showing off 20 years of obsessive cooking, and in 2024, its 25th anniversary cookbook hit the shelves.
However, not everyone enjoys America's Test Kitchen's approach to cooking. For example, one article published by Salon in 2014 called Cook's Illustrated "the very wonkiest of kitchen authorities" and added that it "takes all of the soul out of cooking." Another post on the blog Amateur Gourmet, published in 2017, accused Cook's Illustrated and America's Test Kitchen of "preying" on the "insecurity" of home cooks. It stated that its declaration that its recipes are the "best" takes the creativity out of cooking for many people.
One key part of America's Test Kitchen used to be ATK Kids, which, as the name suggests, was primarily targeted at teaching young children and teens how to cook, as well as showcasing tasty kid-friendly recipes and tips. The content included a YouTube channel, for example, which posted videos like "How to Make Cheeseburger Sliders" and "DIY Fruit Snacks." The company also published cookbooks aimed at children, including "The Complete Cookbook for Teen Chefs" and "The Complete DIY Cookbook for Young Chefs."
However, in 2023, after it was acquired by Marquee Brands, America's Test Kitchen decided to shut its kids division. This ultimately resulted in the aforementioned layoffs. Most of the employees who were let go were in charge of making content for children. The YouTube channel, which had just under 6,000 subscribers, is still live with all of the previous videos available to stream, but it is no longer being updated with new content. The same goes for the ATK Kids Instagram account, which had amassed nearly 60,000 followers. All of America's Test Kitchen's kid-friendly cookbooks are also still available for consumers to buy.
The main America's Test Kitchen website also hosts a section dedicated to kid- and family-friendly recipes, including Cinnamon-Sugar Monkey Bread and Kids Banana Bread. The shutdown of the division came just one year after America's Test Kitchen partnered with GoNoodle, a children's media platform, to launch a new cooking channel.
In 2020, the world was dealing with a lot. In the midst of the worsening COVID-19 pandemic, there were many lockdowns (which led to plenty of Zoom meetings, quarantine cooking attempts, and panic buying groceries). But alongside all of this, the murder of George Floyd at the hands of a police officer sparked protests against racial inequality all over the world. At this time, a number of individuals and companies were called out for a lack of diversity, and America's Test Kitchen was among them.
Like many brands, Cook's Illustrated posted an acknowledgement on Facebook that it needed to do more to improve its representation of people of color. In the post, it also pledged to introduce "mandatory diversity and inclusion training," as well as increase the representation of people of color in the company by 50% over the course of 18 months. The company also promised to donate money to several organizations dedicated to tackling racial inequality, including the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, FoodLab Detroit, and the Black Farmer Fund.
However, in 2022, as mentioned earlier in this list, ATK United again cited a lack of diversity across America's Test Kitchen in its letter to leadership. The union asked America's Test Kitchen to not only focus on hiring a more diverse workforce and leadership team, but to also focus on retaining them, too.
America's Test Kitchen has faced more than one lawsuit linked to consumer data. In 2019, one consumer proposed class action against America's Test Kitchen and alleged that the company had provided consumer data to data aggregators, which are companies that collect and compile data for businesses and researchers.
The proposed claim also stated that the data — which was allegedly obtained through the consumer's subscription to the Cook's Illustrated magazine — had been sold to list brokers, appenders, and cooperatives. Alongside the data aggregators, these external parties then sold the information to companies, charities, and political organizations that sent junk mail to the consumer's house.
On top of this, the lawsuit also claimed that America's Test Kitchen's treatment of consumer data was putting vulnerable people at risk. This is because elderly people or people with learning disabilities, for example, are more likely to fall foul to telemarketers, who often buy data from major companies.
Fraudulent telemarketers — who can steal data from agencies and brokers — are the worst for targeting seniors. This is because elderly people are less likely to recognize scammers on account of factors like cognitive decline, which makes them more likely to become confused or fall for manipulation tactics. The class action complaint against America's Test Kitchen claims that "an entire black market exists" for the exchange of data of vulnerable Americans. America's Test Kitchen denied the allegations that it made extra money by selling consumer data.
Former employees have accused management of creating a poor working environment at America's Test Kitchen on multiple occasions. For example, one former employee, called Afton Cyrus, told Boston news platform GBH in 2022 that workers often had to work for up to 13 hours a day. This was "without additional compensation."
Another former employee, Andrew Janjigian, who used to work as a senior editor for Cook's Illustrated, said in a statement published on the ATK United website that many workers were consistently underappreciated. He noted that those who were not shown on TV had to "fight for recognition." Janjigian added that he believed the management at America's Test Kitchen was "not interested" in "nurturing or promoting" his talents.
Janjigian's sentiments were echoed by another former editor, who has remained anonymous, but claimed in a testimonial that the infrastructure at America's Test Kitchen was "creatively stifling." Another anonymous editor said that the behavior of upper management had "ruined the shining light that ATK could be."
However, America's Test Kitchen claims that it treats its employees well. In a statement to GBH, the company's spokesperson Brian Franklin said that it was "proud" of its "high employee retention" and noted that America's Test Kitchen's workers have opportunities "to advance in positions of responsibility and compensation."
For more food and drink goodness, join The Takeout's newsletter. Get taste tests, food & drink news, deals from your favorite chains, recipes, cooking tips, and more!
Read the original article on The Takeout.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
13 minutes ago
- USA Today
The 'true' origin story of 'The Ritual' is even more hair-raising: 'Begone Satan!'
The 'true' origin story of 'The Ritual' is even more hair-raising: 'Begone Satan!' Show Caption Hide Caption 'The Ritual': Al Pacino, Dan Stevens take on exorcism horror Al Pacino and Dan Stevens star in "The Ritual," a horror film based on the account of a 1928 American exorcism. "The Ritual" exorcism horror drama (now in theaters), starring Al Pacino as the real-life German-American Capuchin friar Theophilus Riesinger and Dan Stevens as Father Joseph Steiger, proudly claims to be "based on true events." The star duo delivers hair-raising moments as they recreate the 1928 exorcism of Emma Schmidt (Abigail Cowen). But on a horror level, it pales in comparison to the more sensational source material. Writer-director David Midell has made it clear "The Ritual" is inspired by the 1935 "Begone Satan!" book by Father Carl Vogl, a German priest and author. Vogl's exclamation point-filled "true account" of the proceedings in Earling, Iowa, is still available online and makes for great, campy reading. How 'Begone Satan!' emerged as the source of 'The Ritual' in Time magazine Steiger's job was to host (other churches declined) and to take notes during the harrowing (and reportedly successful) exorcism. The Steiger notes are the purported source of "Begone Satan!" which made front-page news in religious publications like Denver's Catholic Register years later. Time magazine brought the story to mainstream readers with a Riesinger-heavy 1936 account of the "diabolical possession." The Time article demonstrates some skepticism by reminding readers "that no Catholic is obliged to believe in any particular account of a case of diabolical possession outside of those recounted in Scripture." At the end of this long, twisted, and sometimes dubious road, "The Ritual" earns the right to make the carefully worded claim in its closing: "The 1928 exorcism of Emma Schmidt represents the most thoroughly documented and well-known exorcism in American history." The devil will apparently mess with your car In an early "Ritual" scene, Steiger apologizes for failing to pick up Riesinger at the train station, attributing the oversight to the devil's mischief. With 19 exorcisms to his name, he knows that the devil will mess with cars. In "Begone Satan!" Steiger can't explain why his "tip-top" car takes two hours to get to the station. Riesinger points out that the traveling mishap is the devil "doing his utmost to foil our plans." Later, Steiger is nearly killed after inexplicably losing control of his still-new car on a familiar road and crashing it to "smithereens." The book's car-totaling "devil's trick" doesn't make "The Ritual," which is a shame, given the rich real-life irony: Stevens' "Downton Abbey" character, Matthew Crawley, was killed in a Season 3 car crash that allowed him to pursue a film career. In "Begone Satan!" Steiger's congregation pitches in to buy a new car for the pastor, which frankly could have been an alternate film ending (with a Ford sponsorship). Riesinger had met Schmidt's demons before In "The Ritual," Riesinger makes it clear that the case is personal because he had previously exorcised Schmidt. "Begone Satan!" says Riesinger "freed her from this possession" in 1912, but Schmidt "became possessed again" in her 40s. Schmidt is said to be possessed by four entities that announce themselves as Beelzebub, betraying disciple Judas, Schmidt's abusive father Jacob and Mina (Jacob's lover and Schmidt's aunt). The devil didn't mess with the 'Ritual' nuns Three nuns are injured while dealing directly with the possessed Schmidt in "The Ritual," and Sister Rose ("Twilight" star Ashley Greene) has her hair pulled out of her scalp. In "Begone Satan!" the devil never attacked the nuns, saving his blows for the bigwigs — Pastor Steiger or Mother Superior (played by "Everybody Loves Raymond" star Patricia Heaton). In "The Ritual," the demons within Schmidt taunt Steiger with knowledge of his brother's recent death by suicide. There's no suggestion of these low blows in "Begone Satan!" But in the book, Steiger gives some memorable verbal shots in that never made the movie, like "detestable hellhound" and "vile serpent." Satan also calls Riesinger "dumbbell" when the overtired priest doesn't get his prayers right. That didn't make the movie, either. 'Begone Satan!' has the possessed woman flying over bed like 'The Ritual' The possessed Schmidt throws up black bile often in "The Ritual," but not as much as in the book. 'It was not unusual for her to vomit 20 to 30 times a day," the book says, including bedside descriptions of wretched output "resembling vomited macaroni." The movie scene featuring Schmidt flying over the bed is detailed in "Begone Satan!" "The possessed woman broke from the grip of her protectors and stood erect before them," the book says. "Only her heels were touching the bed." How 'Begone Satan!' ends the story Unlike the movie, the Iowa exorcism reportedly took place in three stages, in August, September and December 1928. The book's climax differs from "The Ritual" ending, which has Schmidt running through the church catacombs, and Steiger stepping up with an exorcist hero moment, shouting down the demon with the Bible in hand. In the book, levitating Schmidt returns to the bed, and "Satan was forced to leave his victim at last to return to Hell." Schmidt utters, "My Jesus mercy! Praised be Jesus!" showing she's clear. The woman "reportedly lived out the rest of her life peacefully," the movie says in the closing credits. "Begone Satan!" backs up that happy ending, adding "there were still possessions, but of a milder nature."
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Energy Transfer the All-American Dividend Stock for You? Consider This High-Yielder Instead.
Energy Transfer has a lofty 7.4% yield backed by an inherently domestic business. The midstream giant has made some decisions that should leave conservative investors with trust issues. Enterprise Products Partners' 6.9% yield will likely be a better fit for most investors. 10 stocks we like better than Energy Transfer › Dividend investors are always trying to maximize yield, but that requires extra consideration on the risk front. A high yield that isn't backed by a reliable company could leave you in the lurch and, likely, at the worst possible time. This is why investors looking at Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET) and its lofty 7.5% distribution yield will probably be better off taking a little less yield and choosing Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD) instead. Here's why. Energy Transfer and Enterprise are two of the largest midstream companies in North America. They both hail from the United States and generate most of their business from the country. The truth is, owning energy infrastructure assets like pipelines essentially forces these two businesses to be American at heart. After all, you can't move oil around the United States on a pipeline that gets built in Europe. That pipeline has to get built on U.S. soil. The midstream is actually the most boring segment of the overall energy sector. That's because businesses like Energy Transfer and Enterprise charge fees for the use of their assets. Although the oil, natural gas, and other products that flow through the system may have volatile prices, midstream companies don't really care about the price of what they move. They just care about the volume of product they move. The higher the volume, the higher the toll-like revenues they generate. Given the importance of energy to the global economy, demand for oil and natural gas tends to remain fairly robust even when commodity prices are weak. Even recessions don't materially diminish demand, since the world would, literally, stop in its tracks without oil and natural gas. From this perspective, Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners are on equal footing. Here's the thing: Energy Transfer doesn't have the same history of treating its investors well as Enterprise does. That difference is why conservative income investors should be happy to trade down to Enterprise's 6.9% yield. The first big issue happened in 2016, during a time when oil prices were weak. At that point, Energy Transfer agreed to buy peer Williams. It got cold feet, warning that completing the deal would require taking on too much debt and could also force a dividend cut. It was the right decision to scuttle the deal. The problem was the way in which it achieved that end. The company sold convertible securities, with a huge portion going to the then-CEO. It appears that the convertible securities would have protected the CEO from the effect of a dividend cut, had a dividend cut been needed. In the end, Energy Transfer got out of the Williams deal, but that convertible decision should leave a bad taste in investors' mouths. Then, in 2020, when the energy industry was hit hard by demand declines around the coronavirus pandemic, Energy Transfer cut its distribution. Again, the decision was probably the right one for the business, which used the freed-up cash to strengthen its balance sheet. But income investors took it on the chin, and that's the key takeaway here. During the last two big energy industry downturns, when income investors were likely hoping for consistency, they had to worry about, and actually experience, income declines if they owned Energy Transfer. Enterprise Products Partners didn't cut its distribution in 2016 or in 2020. It didn't put out any warnings that such an event was possible. It just operated its reliable cash flow generating business. Along the way, it delivered distribution increases. At this point, the U.S. midstream giant has increased its distribution for 26 consecutive years. While trust might be a troubling issue with Energy Transfer, it isn't with Enterprise Products Partners. The long streak of putting unitholders first is a core reason to like Enterprise Products Partners, but it isn't the only reason. Other good reasons to like this midstream giant are its investment grade rated balance sheet, and the 1.7x over that its distributable cash flow covered its distribution in 2024. These are both signs of management's commitment, since they mean there's a lot of leeway before a distribution cut would be in the cards at Enterprise Products Partners. Put it all together, and most investors will probably be better off with all-American Enterprise over all-American Energy Transfer. Before you buy stock in Energy Transfer, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Energy Transfer wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Energy Transfer the All-American Dividend Stock for You? Consider This High-Yielder Instead. was originally published by The Motley Fool


Hamilton Spectator
16 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
US Open ‘25: DeChambeau's sand save an all-time memory at golf's most punishing major
It only feels right that the reigning titleholder at the golf championship that, at least in theory, anyone can win is the player who leans into the role of the sport's most relatable everyman, Bryson DeChambeau. And it only feels right that at the U.S. Open — a tournament built to humble and punish the best in the game as much as celebrate them — DeChambeau earned his title by hitting a shot that virtually no man can hit. A plaque now sits outside the bunker on the 18th hole at Pinehurst No. 2, enshrining the spot where DeChambeau placed his name in the history books with what he called 'the shot of my life' — a 55-yard blast from the sand to 4 feet with the trophy hanging in the balance on Sunday at last year's Open. Defense of the title begins Thursday at Oakmont, getting ready to host its record 10th U.S. Open and a course with a longtime reputation for being as difficult as they come. All of which seems to suit the 31-year-old pro golfer/social media star just fine. His first U.S. Open title came in 2020 at Winged Foot, the course best known for producing the 1974 'Massacre at Winged Foot' along with Phil Mickelson's meltdown in the trees and trash cans more than 30 years later. Then, last year, that bunker at Pinehurst. What would golf's everyman say to his millions of YouTube followers who someday might encounter their own version of the 50-yard bunker shot, widely recognized as one of the most difficult in the game, even under normal circumstances? 'The best piece of advice I give them is, just practice in weird, unique situations for maybe an hour a week, 20 minutes, whatever,' DeChambeau said. 'But try to be different and don't just hit the same stock shot every time.' A history-making shot in a tournament that does not produce them All the major championships have their own personalities. The Masters produces roars through the pines during back-nine charges on Sunday. The British Open is a brittle links-style test where players have to think differently about getting from Point A to Point B. America's golf championship has a reputation for forcing the best players to suffer like the rest of us. As a result, the list of 'greatest shots of all time' at the U.S. Open is a short one: — Ben Hogan's 1-iron on the 72nd hole that helped force a playoff at Merion in 1950. — Arnold Palmer's lash with driver to the first green at Cherry Hills in 1960. — Jack Nicklaus' 1-iron that hit the flagstick on No. 17 at Pebble Beach in 1972. — Tom Watson's chip from the rough on the same hole 10 years later to beat Nicklaus. — Tiger Woods' 12-foot putt at Torrey Pines in 2008 to force a playoff he eventually won over Rocco Mediate. And now, there is DeChambeau's bunker shot. 'When he took this big swing, the amount of confidence that you have to have to hit it that close to the golf ball and not accidentally catch too much ball and send it on top of the clubhouse, it's a very fine line,' said NBC golf analyst Smylie Kaufman, whose biggest brush with pressure came when he played in the final group Sunday at the 2016 Masters. 'They work every single day, every week at these facets of the game in hopes they will have an opportunity to try it,' said Notah Begay, also of NBC. 'I think one of the most overlooked things about professional golf is all the calculation that happens on the fly in evaluating certain shots, which way the grass is lying, where the ball's going to land, and on top of all the normal things.' A tournament for everyone could come down to Bryson, Rory, Scottie Maybe the biggest irony is what the U.S. Open officially sells itself as, versus what always ends up happening. More than 10,000 players signed up to qualify for the U.S. Open which is, officially, open to any professional, or amateur with a handicap of 0.4 or lower. There will be good stories to tell among those who went through qualifying to make the 156-man field : a 17-year-old high schooler from Georgia, a dentist in Indiana who used to caddie at Oakmont. The cold facts: The last man to run the gauntlet of local and sectional qualifying to win the title was Orville Moody in 1969. (Lucas Glover went through sectional qualifying only when he won in 2009.) By the time the sun starts going down on Sunday, the tournament almost certainly will come down to a handful of players who virtually all golf fans have heard of. Though Scottie Scheffler is playing the best right now and Rory McIlroy recently won the Masters to complete the career Grand Slam, it's plausible to think that DeChambeau captures the attention of more of those fans than anyone. He recently surpassed 2 million subscribers on his YouTube channel. He is making golf feel like everyman's sport, posting videos in which he makes a hole-in-one with a wedge shot over his house, plays with off-the-rack clubs to see how they stack up and tries to beat a scratch golfer while playing left-handed. All of it sounds nutty, but it all goes back to that piece of advice he offered when asked how to replicate the improbable under impossible circumstances — i.e., a 50-yard bunker shot with the U.S. Open on the line. 'Once you get a stock shot down and you're comfortable with it, go have some fun,' DeChambeau said. 'Do a chipping contest with your amateur friends and throw it in the bunker from 50 yards, or throw it in a bush and see if you can get out. Stuff to that extent has suited my game very well.' ___ AP Sports Writer Ben Nuckols contributed to this report. ___ AP golf: