logo
Optus faces $100 millon fine over unlawful sales to vulnerable First Nations customers

Optus faces $100 millon fine over unlawful sales to vulnerable First Nations customers

SBS Australia5 hours ago

Optus has agreed to a $100 million penalty, subject to court approval, over conduct that saw many First Nations people from remote communities sold services they did not want or need. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) said many of the affected consumers were vulnerable or experiencing disadvantage, such as living with a mental disability, or English not being a first language. Many of the consumers were First Nations Australians from regional, remote and very remote parts of Australia.
The consumer watchdog sued the telco in October last year over the practices, which affected hundreds of vulnerable customers. In one instance outlined by the ACCC, a First Nations consumer who speaks English as a second language and lives in a remote community with no Optus coverage, was sold a phone. "The customer was approached by Optus staff outside an Optus store and pressured to enter," ACCC said in a statement. "They thought staff were offering them a free phone and other free products and felt pressured by staff to accept," the statement read.
Optus has admitted that its sales staff acted unconscionably when selling products and services to more than 400 consumers at 16 different stores across Australia between August 2019 and July 2023. Optus CEO Stephen Rue said the misconduct was inexcusable and unacceptable. 'I would like to sincerely apologise to all customers affected by the misconduct in some of our stores,' Mr Rue said in a statement. 'Optus failed these customers, and the company should have acted more quickly when the misconduct was first reported. "I am leading the implementation of extensive changes across the company with active responses to the issues raised well underway," Mr Rue said.
Optus has also signed an undertaking, accepted by the ACCC, that it will compensate impacted consumers and improve its internal systems, the commencement of which is subject to the Court making relevant orders. 'The conduct, which included selling inappropriate, unwanted or unaffordable mobiles and phone plans to people who are vulnerable or experiencing disadvantage is simply unacceptable,' ACCC Deputy Chair Catriona Lowe said. 'During our investigation into this case, the ACCC heard many stories of the impact of this conduct on affected consumers.' 'Many of these consumers who were vulnerable or experiencing disadvantage also experienced significant financial harm. They accrued thousands of dollars of unexpected debt and some were pursued by debt collectors, in some instances for years,' Ms Lowe said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"Not on trial for being a liar" - defence closing continues
"Not on trial for being a liar" - defence closing continues

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

"Not on trial for being a liar" - defence closing continues

Erin Patterson's defence team has told the jury not to confuse Erin Patterson's lies with the question of whether she is guilty of murder. In the second day of Colin Mandy SC's closing address, he offered explanations for why Erin started to feel sick earlier than her lunch guests, and warned the jury not to use "hindsight reasoning" against Erin. If you've got questions about the case that you'd like Rachael and Stocky to answer in future episodes, send them through to mushroomcasedaily@ - It's the case that's captured the attention of the world. Three people died and a fourth survived an induced coma after eating beef wellington at a family lunch, hosted by Erin Patterson. Police allege the beef wellington contained poisonous mushrooms, but Erin Patterson says she's innocent. Now, the accused triple murderer is fighting the charges in a regional Victorian courthouse. Investigative reporter Rachael Brown and producer Stephen Stockwell are on the ground, bringing you all the key moments from the trial as they unravel in court. From court recaps to behind-the-scenes murder trial explainers, the Mushroom Case Daily podcast is your eyes and ears inside the courtroom. Keep up to date with new episodes of Mushroom Case Daily, now releasing every day on the ABC listen app.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has declared his stance on push to increase the GST
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has declared his stance on push to increase the GST

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has declared his stance on push to increase the GST

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has declared he won't play the 'rule in, rule out' game on future tax changes, including lifting the GST, despite making clear his personal opposition to the idea. Speaking at the National Press Club, the Treasurer outlined his ambition to develop a 'bold' reform agenda. However, he has warned that wherever the debate lands, he won't be discarding the tax reform plans for which he secured a mandate at the last election. That includes his superannuation tax changes targeting wealthy Australians with more than $3 million in retirement savings. 'We're not looking for opportunities to go back on the things that we have got a mandate for,' the Treasurer said. 'We're looking for new ideas.' Despite declaring that the 'rule in, rule out game' was corrosive to public debate about big ideas because it sparked media firestorms, Mr Chalmers was then asked about the inevitable push from the states about lifting the GST. While the International Monetary Fund has previously suggested Australia should expand consumption taxes such as the GST to help repair a blowout in the deficit, that's not an idea the Treasurer has backed. The GST has been stuck at 10 per cent for 23 years. During his speech at the press club, Mr Chalmers was asked if he had an open mind about revisiting the GST ahead of talks from senior economists and business leaders to inform the Albanese Government's future agenda. 'Historically, I've had a view about the GST,' the Treasurer replied. 'I think it's hard to adequately compensate people and I think often an increase in the GST is spent three or four times over with the — by the time people are finished with all the things they want to try and do with it. 'What I'm going to try and do, because I know the states will have a view on it, I'm going to trial not to dismiss every idea that I know that people will bring to the roundtable. 'I suspect the states will have a view about the GST. It's not a view I've been attracted to historically, but I'm going to try not to get in the process of shooting ideas between now and the round table. 'My view has not changed on all of the other times that I've been asked about it. But I think one of the ways I'm going to be inclusive and respectful. I suspect people will raise that question.' 'So you're not ruling it out?,' he was asked, prompting laughter. 'I haven't changed my view on it. And, again, it's a nice little cheeky attempt to get a rule-in-rule-out in,' he said. It sounded to me like you were ruling it out,' Nine's Andrew Probyn said. 'I'm not walking away from those views,' the Treasurer said. 'We genuinely want to hear people's ideas.' Treasurer Jim Chalmers has previously opposed raising the GST or cutting company tax rates, expressing a preference to undertake 'modest but meaningful' tax changes in 'bite-sized chunks'. Two years ago, Mr Chalmers warned that raising the GST would not fix the problem since the tax was collected by the federal government and distributed back to the states. 'From my point of view, there are distributional issues with the GST in particular. Every cent goes to the state and territory governments, so it wouldn't be an opportunity necessarily, at least not directly, to repair the Commonwealth budget,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store