Meghan Markle, Kate Middleton's bridesmaid dress dispute was ‘beginning of the end': expert
Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton's cry-fest over bridesmaid dresses leading up to the Duchess of Sussex's royal wedding marked the "beginning of the end" for their relationship.
British royal expert Hilary Fordwich made the claim after royal author Tom Quinn revisited the alleged clash in his book "Yes, Ma'am: The Secret Life of Servants." May 19 also marks Markle and Prince Harry's seventh wedding anniversary.
"In isolation, this incident could be construed as either minor or irrelevant, but it became a flashpoint exposing far deeper tensions between Meghan Markle and Princess Catherine," Fordwich told Fox News Digital.
"Now, with the benefit of hindsight, it can be seen as the beginning of the end of their relationship. It was not, as it seemed at the time, the end of the beginning. The dress incident was not isolated. There were already many tensions.
"This private conflict, leaked to the press, became a media firestorm, marking a significant escalation in tensions and, over time, further amplified by the media, compounded and complicated by personal, cultural and institutional differences."
After Markle said "I do" to Harry, reports surfaced that the sisters-in-law disagreed over the tailoring of Princess Charlotte's bridesmaid dress, which caused Kate to cry. However, in her 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey, Markle claimed "the reverse happened." She also claimed Kate later apologized for making her shed tears.
Quinn claimed a royal staffer gave an account of what really happened behind palace doors.
"You remember all the fuss about Meghan being accused of making Kate cry when they had a dispute about Charlotte's bridesmaid's dress?" said the staffer in an excerpt obtained by Fox News Digital.
"Well, I can tell you that all the papers and commentators got this wrong – the truth is that, as with many of these spats between sisters, brothers, or even sisters-in-law, both sides were really upset.
"The truth is that during the discussions about the bridesmaid's dress, Meghan said a few things she regretted, and Kate said a few things she later regretted, but it was all in the heat of the moment."
"Both women were crying their eyes out!" the staffer claimed. "The incident with the bridesmaid's dress became a kind of marker for all the other problems that Meghan had with Kate and with William and other members of the family."
WATCH: KATE MIDDLETON SUCCESSFULLY NAVIGATED ROYAL LIFE WHILE MEGHAN MARKLE STRUGGLED FOR THIS REASON, AUTHOR SAYS
Fox News Digital reached out to Archewell, which handles the offices of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, and Kensington Palace for comment. A spokesperson for Buckingham Palace previously told Fox News Digital,"We don't comment on such books."
The disagreement reportedly centered on how Princess Charlotte's dress fit for the wedding, resulting in the women exchanging heated words.
Fordwich pointed out that Kate had just given birth to Prince Louis and was described as "quite emotional" at the time. However, when Markle spoke out about the disagreement to Winfrey in an interview viewed by nearly 50 million people globally, it was "the last straw in the eyes of royal courtiers."
"They are extremely protective of Princess Catherine," said Fordwich. "She has always been very forgiving, but Prince William is adamant regarding there being no further contact with Meghan."
"Meghan and Princess Catherine came to blows over bridesmaid dresses," British broadcaster and photographer Helena Chard claimed to Fox News Digital.
"If this is their only personal upset, then they are doing pretty well! [But] emotions were running high in the lead-up to the wedding. From what I understand, all the bridesmaid dresses were huge, with very little time to make them good. No one would have wanted the bridesmaids, especially Princess Charlotte, to look like a laughingstock. I'm sure both ladies shared a similar perspective, that they wanted the outfits to fit well."
"Having said that, Princess Catherine has nothing in common with Meghan," said Chard. "Catherine is standing by her husband and following in the late Queen Elizabeth II's footsteps – keeping quiet and carrying on."
During her sit-down with Winfrey, Markle told the media mogul that "it was a really hard week at the wedding" and Kate was "upset about something." However, she later "owned it" and "apologized."
"She brought me flowers and a note apologizing," said Markle. "I think it's — I don't think it's fair to her to get into the details of that because she apologized, and I've forgiven her."
The former American actress said she found it "shocking" that the dispute hit the press several months after the wedding.
"I would have never wanted that to come out about her ever, even though it happened," she said.
The interview, which detailed the couple's struggles with royal life, highlighted explosive accusations. One of the claims made was that someone in the family questioned the skin color of Markle's baby before he was born. Harry later clarified that the royal in question was not the late queen or his grandfather, Prince Philip.
Following the tell-all, a statement was released by Buckingham Palace on behalf of the queen that read, "The whole family is saddened to learn the full extent of how challenging the last few years have been for Harry and Meghan. The issues raised, particularly that of race, are concerning. While some recollections may vary, they are taken very seriously and will be addressed by the family privately. Harry, Meghan and Archie will always be much-loved family members."
Harry later wrote about the spat in his 2023 memoir "Spare." In it, he claimed that his sister-in-law texted Markle four days before the wedding that, "Charlotte's dress is too big, too long, too baggy. She cried when she tried it on at home."
According to Harry's book, Markle directed Kate to see the tailor at Kensington Palace, but it was Kate who insisted "all the dresses need to be remade." After a "back and forth" between the women, Harry said he later found Meghan "on the floor, sobbing."
"I was horrified to see her so upset, but didn't think it was a catastrophe," he wrote.
Harry added that the next day, Kate visited with flowers and a card to apologize.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex stepped back as senior royals in 2020, citing the unbearable intrusions of the British press and a lack of support from the palace. They moved to California.
"I hope by now, as they are both adults and mothers too, that they can put all of this behind them," said royal expert Ian Pelham Turner about the wives. "I believe behind the scenes, they tried to do that. Meghan sent Kate a very kind message during her early days of cancer. If anyone can repair the damage… it's these two ladies."
In March of this year, Quinn claimed to Fox News Digital that the Duchess of Sussex's frequent hugging had become a problem among the royal family. The over-familiarity was considered "rude" by staff, who claimed Kate, as well as William and King Charles III, would "flinch" when Meghan moved in for an embrace.
"Tension developed between William and Harry as a result of Meghan's warm, friendly, hug-everyone approach," Quinn wrote.
"It made William uncomfortable because she hugged him virtually every time they bumped into each other; the hugging and cheek kissing fueled gossip among the staff that Meghan was flirting with William, which she was obviously not, but the tense atmosphere caused by all the touchy-feeliness (and the resultant gossip) deepened the rift between the brothers."
Quinn told Fox News Digital that while all the staff he spoke to agreed that the rumors were untrue, Kensington Palace was also a "hothouse where gossip and rumors develop."
"These rumors could become a life of their own," he said. "The senior royals have to stop them before they start. Meanwhile, Meghan was upset and felt that the royal family was… pushing her away. I think the fact that Meghan felt slightly rejected was one of the reasons why this whole project [being senior royals] didn't work."
"She was very warm," said Quinn. "Whenever she met other members of the family, she would hug them… the royals just don't do that… Meghan was astonished, for example, that Charles was so formal with his mother. It was as if she couldn't understand why the family was so cold. She came from a tradition where if you met someone close to you, you hugged them."
"Yes, Meghan got very bad press in the U.K.," Quinn continued. "She was nicknamed the 'Duchess of Difficult' by people who worked for her when she was a member of the royal family, and also by other members of the royal family."
Markle also spoke about being a hugger in her 2022 Netflix series "Harry & Meghan."
"Like I was a hugger, always been a hugger," said Meghan. "I didn't realize that that is really jarring for a lot of Brits."
"I guess I'd start to understand very quickly that the formality on the outside, carried through on the inside," she said. "There is a forward-facing way of being, and then you close the door, and you relax now. But that formality carries over on both sides, and that was surprising to me."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bruce Springsteen's European tour comes with a warning about the battle for America's soul
They know all about glory days on the Kop – the fabled terrace that is the spiritual home of fans of Liverpool – England's Premier League champions. But they're more used to legends like Kenny Dalglish or Mohamed Salah banging in goals than political cries for help. So, it was surreal to watch alongside thousands of middle-aged Brits as Bruce Springsteen bemoaned America's democracy crisis on hallowed footballing ground. 'The America that I love … a beacon of hope and liberty for 250 years, is currently in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent and treasonous' administration, Springsteen said at Anfield Stadium on Wednesday night. The Boss's latest warnings of authoritarianism on his European tour were impassioned and drew large cheers. But they did seem to go over the heads of some fans who don't live in the whirl of tension constantly rattling America's national psyche. Liverpudlians waited for decades for Springsteen to play the hometown of The Beatles, whose 'I Wanna Hold Your Hand' set his life's course when he heard it on the radio as a youngster in New Jersey. Most had a H-H-H-Hungry heart for a party. They got a hell of a show. But also, a lesson on US civics. 'Tonight, we ask all of you who believe in democracy and the best of our American experiment to rise with us, raise your voices, stand with us against authoritarianism and let freedom ring!' Springsteen said. His European odyssey is unfolding as Western democracies are being shaken again by right-wing populism. So, his determination to engage with searing commentary therefore raises several questions. What is the role of artists in what Springsteen calls 'dangerous times?' Can they make a difference, or should stars of entertainment and sports avoid politics and stick to what they know? Fox News polemicist Laura Ingraham once told basketball icon LeBron James, for instance, that he should just 'shut up and dribble.' Springsteen's gritty paeans to steel towns and down-on-their-luck cities made him a working-class balladeer. But as blue-collar voters stampede to the right, does he really speak for them now? Then there's this issue that Springsteen emphatically tried to answer in Liverpool this week: Does the rough but noble America he's been mythologizing for 50 years even exist anymore? Trump certainly wants to bring the arts to heel – given his social media threats to 'highly overrated' Springsteen, Taylor Swift and other superstars and his takeover of the Kennedy Center in Washington. Any center of liberal and free thought from pop music to Ivy League universities is vulnerable to authoritarian impulses. But it's also true that celebrities often bore with their trendy political views, especially preaching at Hollywood awards ceremonies. Springsteen, however, has been penning social commentary for decades. And what's the point of rock 'n' roll if not rebellion? Rockers usually revolt in their wild-haired youth, rather than in their mid-70s, but desperate times call for desperate measures. Oddly, given their transatlantic dialogue of recent weeks, Trump and Springsteen mine the same political terrain – globalization's economic and spiritual hollowing of industrial heartlands. 'Now Main Street's whitewashed windows, And vacant stores, Seems like there ain't nobody, Wants to come down here no more,' Springsteen sang in 1984 in 'My Hometown' long before Trump set his sights on the Oval Office. The White House sometimes hits similar notes, though neither the Boss nor Trump would welcome the comparison. 'The main street in my small town, looks a heck of a lot worse than it probably did decades ago before I was alive,' Trump's press secretary Karoline Leavitt said rather less poetically in March. Political fault lines are also shifting. In the US and Europe, the working class is rejecting the politics of hope and optimism in dark times. And the Democratic politicians that Springsteen supported – like defeated 2004 nominee John Kerry, who borrowed Springsteen's 'No Surrender' as his campaign anthem, and former President Barack Obama – failed to mend industrial blight that acted as a catalyst to Trumpism. There are warning signs in England too. The Boss's UK tours often coincided with political hinge moments. In the 1970s he found synergy with the smoky industrial cities of the North. In his 'Born in the USA' period, he sided with miners clashing with Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. A new BBC documentary revealed this week he gave $20,000 in the 1980s to a strikers' support group. Liverpool, a soulful, earthy city right out of the Springsteen oeuvre is a longtime Labour Party heartland. But in a recent by-election, Nigel Farage's populist, pro-Trump, Reform Party overturned a Labour majority of nearly 15,000 in Runcorn, a decayed industrial town, 15 miles upstream from Liverpool on the River Mersey. This stunner showed Labour's working class 'red wall' is in deep peril and could follow US states like Ohio in shifting to the right as workers reject progressives. Labour Cabinet Minister Lisa Nandy, whose Wigan constituency is nearby, warned in an interview with the New Statesman magazine this month that political tensions were reaching a breaking point in the North. 'People have watched their town centers falling apart, their life has got harder over the last decade and a half … I don't remember a time when people worked this hard and had so little to show for it,' Nandy said, painting a picture that will be familiar to many Americans. In another sign of a seismic shift in British politics last week, Reform came a close third in an unprecedented result in a parliamentary by-election in a one-time industrial heartland outside Glasgow. Scotland has so far been immune to the populist wave – but the times are changing. Still, there's not much evidence Trump or his populist cousins in the UK will meaningfully solve heartland pain. They've always been better at exploiting vulnerability than fixing it. And Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' would hurt the poor by cutting access to Medicaid and nutrition help while handing the wealthy big tax cuts. 'When conditions in a country are ripe for a demagogue, you can bet one will show up,' Springsteen told the crowd in Liverpool, introducing 'Rainmaker' a song about a conman who tells drought-afflicted farmers that 'white's black and black is white.' As the E Street Band struck up, Springsteen said: 'This is for America's dear leader.' Springsteen has his 'Land of Hope and Dreams.' But Trump has his new 'Golden Age.' He claims he can 'Make America Great Again' by attacking perceived bastions of liberal power like elite universities and the press, with mass deportations of undocumented immigrants and by challenging due process. Springsteen implicitly rejected this as un-American while in Liverpool, infusing extra meaning into the lyrics of 'Long Walk Home,' a song that predates Trump's first election win by a decade: 'Your flag flyin' over the courthouse, Means certain things are set in stone. Who we are, what we'll do and what we won't.' Sending fans into a cool summer night, the Boss pleaded with them not to give up on his country. 'The America I've sung to you about for 50 years now is real, and regardless of its many faults, is a great country with a great people and we will survive this moment,' he said. But his fight with Trump for America's soul will go on. The contrast would be driven home more sharply to Americans if he tours on US soil at this, the most overtly politicized phase of a half-century-long career. Perhaps in America's 250th birthday year in 2026?
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Analysis: Bruce Springsteen and the battle for America's soul
They know all about glory days on the Kop – the fabled terrace that is the spiritual home of fans of Liverpool – England's Premier League champions. But they're more used to legends like Kenny Dalglish or Mohamed Salah banging in goals than political cries for help. So, it was surreal to watch alongside thousands of middle-aged Brits as Bruce Springsteen bemoaned America's democracy crisis on hallowed footballing ground. 'The America that I love … a beacon of hope and liberty for 250 years, is currently in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent and treasonous' administration, Springsteen said at Anfield Stadium on Wednesday night. The Boss's latest warnings of authoritarianism on his European tour were impassioned and drew large cheers. But they did seem to go over the heads of some fans who don't live in the whirl of tension constantly rattling America's national psyche. Liverpudlians waited for decades for Springsteen to play the hometown of The Beatles, whose 'I Wanna Hold Your Hand' set his life's course when he heard it on the radio as a youngster in New Jersey. Most had a H-H-H-Hungry heart for a party. They got a hell of a show. But also, a lesson on US civics. 'Tonight, we ask all of you who believe in democracy and the best of our American experiment to rise with us, raise your voices, stand with us against authoritarianism and let freedom ring!' Springsteen said. His European odyssey is unfolding as Western democracies are being shaken again by right-wing populism. So, his determination to engage with searing commentary therefore raises several questions. What is the role of artists in what Springsteen calls 'dangerous times?' Can they make a difference, or should stars of entertainment and sports avoid politics and stick to what they know? Fox News polemicist Laura Ingraham once told basketball icon LeBron James, for instance, that he should just 'shut up and dribble.' Springsteen's gritty paeans to steel towns and down-on-their-luck cities made him a working-class balladeer. But as blue-collar voters stampede to the right, does he really speak for them now? Then there's this issue that Springsteen emphatically tried to answer in Liverpool this week: Does the rough but noble America he's been mythologizing for 50 years even exist anymore? Trump certainly wants to bring the arts to heel – given his social media threats to 'highly overrated' Springsteen, Taylor Swift and other superstars and his takeover of the Kennedy Center in Washington. Any center of liberal and free thought from pop music to Ivy League universities is vulnerable to authoritarian impulses. But it's also true that celebrities often bore with their trendy political views, especially preaching at Hollywood awards ceremonies. Springsteen, however, has been penning social commentary for decades. And what's the point of rock 'n' roll if not rebellion? Rockers usually revolt in their wild-haired youth, rather than in their mid-70s, but desperate times call for desperate measures. Oddly, given their transatlantic dialogue of recent weeks, Trump and Springsteen mine the same political terrain – globalization's economic and spiritual hollowing of industrial heartlands. 'Now Main Street's whitewashed windows, And vacant stores, Seems like there ain't nobody, Wants to come down here no more,' Springsteen sang in 1984 in 'My Hometown' long before Trump set his sights on the Oval Office. The White House sometimes hits similar notes, though neither the Boss nor Trump would welcome the comparison. 'The main street in my small town, looks a heck of a lot worse than it probably did decades ago before I was alive,' Trump's press secretary Karoline Leavitt said rather less poetically in March. Political fault lines are also shifting. In the US and Europe, the working class is rejecting the politics of hope and optimism in dark times. And the Democratic politicians that Springsteen supported – like defeated 2004 nominee John Kerry, who borrowed Springsteen's 'No Surrender' as his campaign anthem, and former President Barack Obama – failed to mend industrial blight that acted as a catalyst to Trumpism. There are warning signs in England too. The Boss's UK tours often coincided with political hinge moments. In the 1970s he found synergy with the smoky industrial cities of the North. In his 'Born in the USA' period, he sided with miners clashing with Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. A new BBC documentary revealed this week he gave $20,000 in the 1980s to a strikers' support group. Liverpool, a soulful, earthy city right out of the Springsteen oeuvre is a longtime Labour Party heartland. But in a recent by-election, Nigel Farage's populist, pro-Trump, Reform Party overturned a Labour majority of nearly 15,000 in Runcorn, a decayed industrial town, 15 miles upstream from Liverpool on the River Mersey. This stunner showed Labour's working class 'red wall' is in deep peril and could follow US states like Ohio in shifting to the right as workers reject progressives. Labour Cabinet Minister Lisa Nandy, whose Wigan constituency is nearby, warned in an interview with the New Statesman magazine this month that political tensions were reaching a breaking point in the North. 'People have watched their town centers falling apart, their life has got harder over the last decade and a half … I don't remember a time when people worked this hard and had so little to show for it,' Nandy said, painting a picture that will be familiar to many Americans. In another sign of a seismic shift in British politics last week, Reform came a close third in an unprecedented result in a parliamentary by-election in a one-time industrial heartland outside Glasgow. Scotland has so far been immune to the populist wave – but the times are changing. Still, there's not much evidence Trump or his populist cousins in the UK will meaningfully solve heartland pain. They've always been better at exploiting vulnerability than fixing it. And Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' would hurt the poor by cutting access to Medicaid and nutrition help while handing the wealthy big tax cuts. 'When conditions in a country are ripe for a demagogue, you can bet one will show up,' Springsteen told the crowd in Liverpool, introducing 'Rainmaker' a song about a conman who tells drought-afflicted farmers that 'white's black and black is white.' As the E Street Band struck up, Springsteen said: 'This is for America's dear leader.' Springsteen has his 'Land of Hope and Dreams.' But Trump has his new 'Golden Age.' He claims he can 'Make America Great Again' by attacking perceived bastions of liberal power like elite universities and the press, with mass deportations of undocumented immigrants and by challenging due process. Springsteen implicitly rejected this as un-American while in Liverpool, infusing extra meaning into the lyrics of 'Long Walk Home,' a song that predates Trump's first election win by a decade: 'Your flag flyin' over the courthouse, Means certain things are set in stone. Who we are, what we'll do and what we won't.' Sending fans into a cool summer night, the Boss pleaded with them not to give up on his country. 'The America I've sung to you about for 50 years now is real, and regardless of its many faults, is a great country with a great people and we will survive this moment,' he said. But his fight with Trump for America's soul will go on. The contrast would be driven home more sharply to Americans if he tours on US soil at this, the most overtly politicized phase of a half-century-long career. Perhaps in America's 250th birthday year in 2026?
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Analysis: Bruce Springsteen and the battle for America's soul
They know all about glory days on the Kop – the fabled terrace that is the spiritual home of fans of Liverpool – England's Premier League champions. But they're more used to legends like Kenny Dalglish or Mohamed Salah banging in goals than political cries for help. So, it was surreal to watch alongside thousands of middle-aged Brits as Bruce Springsteen bemoaned America's democracy crisis on hallowed footballing ground. 'The America that I love … a beacon of hope and liberty for 250 years, is currently in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent and treasonous' administration, Springsteen said at Anfield Stadium on Wednesday night. The Boss's latest warnings of authoritarianism on his European tour were impassioned and drew large cheers. But they did seem to go over the heads of some fans who don't live in the whirl of tension constantly rattling America's national psyche. Liverpudlians waited for decades for Springsteen to play the hometown of The Beatles, whose 'I Wanna Hold Your Hand' set his life's course when he heard it on the radio as a youngster in New Jersey. Most had a H-H-H-Hungry heart for a party. They got a hell of a show. But also, a lesson on US civics. 'Tonight, we ask all of you who believe in democracy and the best of our American experiment to rise with us, raise your voices, stand with us against authoritarianism and let freedom ring!' Springsteen said. His European odyssey is unfolding as Western democracies are being shaken again by right-wing populism. So, his determination to engage with searing commentary therefore raises several questions. What is the role of artists in what Springsteen calls 'dangerous times?' Can they make a difference, or should stars of entertainment and sports avoid politics and stick to what they know? Fox News polemicist Laura Ingraham once told basketball icon LeBron James, for instance, that he should just 'shut up and dribble.' Springsteen's gritty paeans to steel towns and down-on-their-luck cities made him a working-class balladeer. But as blue-collar voters stampede to the right, does he really speak for them now? Then there's this issue that Springsteen emphatically tried to answer in Liverpool this week: Does the rough but noble America he's been mythologizing for 50 years even exist anymore? Trump certainly wants to bring the arts to heel – given his social media threats to 'highly overrated' Springsteen, Taylor Swift and other superstars and his takeover of the Kennedy Center in Washington. Any center of liberal and free thought from pop music to Ivy League universities is vulnerable to authoritarian impulses. But it's also true that celebrities often bore with their trendy political views, especially preaching at Hollywood awards ceremonies. Springsteen, however, has been penning social commentary for decades. And what's the point of rock 'n' roll if not rebellion? Rockers usually revolt in their wild-haired youth, rather than in their mid-70s, but desperate times call for desperate measures. Oddly, given their transatlantic dialogue of recent weeks, Trump and Springsteen mine the same political terrain – globalization's economic and spiritual hollowing of industrial heartlands. 'Now Main Street's whitewashed windows, And vacant stores, Seems like there ain't nobody, Wants to come down here no more,' Springsteen sang in 1984 in 'My Hometown' long before Trump set his sights on the Oval Office. The White House sometimes hits similar notes, though neither the Boss nor Trump would welcome the comparison. 'The main street in my small town, looks a heck of a lot worse than it probably did decades ago before I was alive,' Trump's press secretary Karoline Leavitt said rather less poetically in March. Political fault lines are also shifting. In the US and Europe, the working class is rejecting the politics of hope and optimism in dark times. And the Democratic politicians that Springsteen supported – like defeated 2004 nominee John Kerry, who borrowed Springsteen's 'No Surrender' as his campaign anthem, and former President Barack Obama – failed to mend industrial blight that acted as a catalyst to Trumpism. There are warning signs in England too. The Boss's UK tours often coincided with political hinge moments. In the 1970s he found synergy with the smoky industrial cities of the North. In his 'Born in the USA' period, he sided with miners clashing with Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. A new BBC documentary revealed this week he gave $20,000 in the 1980s to a strikers' support group. Liverpool, a soulful, earthy city right out of the Springsteen oeuvre is a longtime Labour Party heartland. But in a recent by-election, Nigel Farage's populist, pro-Trump, Reform Party overturned a Labour majority of nearly 15,000 in Runcorn, a decayed industrial town, 15 miles upstream from Liverpool on the River Mersey. This stunner showed Labour's working class 'red wall' is in deep peril and could follow US states like Ohio in shifting to the right as workers reject progressives. Labour Cabinet Minister Lisa Nandy, whose Wigan constituency is nearby, warned in an interview with the New Statesman magazine this month that political tensions were reaching a breaking point in the North. 'People have watched their town centers falling apart, their life has got harder over the last decade and a half … I don't remember a time when people worked this hard and had so little to show for it,' Nandy said, painting a picture that will be familiar to many Americans. In another sign of a seismic shift in British politics last week, Reform came a close third in an unprecedented result in a parliamentary by-election in a one-time industrial heartland outside Glasgow. Scotland has so far been immune to the populist wave – but the times are changing. Still, there's not much evidence Trump or his populist cousins in the UK will meaningfully solve heartland pain. They've always been better at exploiting vulnerability than fixing it. And Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' would hurt the poor by cutting access to Medicaid and nutrition help while handing the wealthy big tax cuts. 'When conditions in a country are ripe for a demagogue, you can bet one will show up,' Springsteen told the crowd in Liverpool, introducing 'Rainmaker' a song about a conman who tells drought-afflicted farmers that 'white's black and black is white.' As the E Street Band struck up, Springsteen said: 'This is for America's dear leader.' Springsteen has his 'Land of Hope and Dreams.' But Trump has his new 'Golden Age.' He claims he can 'Make America Great Again' by attacking perceived bastions of liberal power like elite universities and the press, with mass deportations of undocumented immigrants and by challenging due process. Springsteen implicitly rejected this as un-American while in Liverpool, infusing extra meaning into the lyrics of 'Long Walk Home,' a song that predates Trump's first election win by a decade: 'Your flag flyin' over the courthouse, Means certain things are set in stone. Who we are, what we'll do and what we won't.' Sending fans into a cool summer night, the Boss pleaded with them not to give up on his country. 'The America I've sung to you about for 50 years now is real, and regardless of its many faults, is a great country with a great people and we will survive this moment,' he said. But his fight with Trump for America's soul will go on. The contrast would be driven home more sharply to Americans if he tours on US soil at this, the most overtly politicized phase of a half-century-long career. Perhaps in America's 250th birthday year in 2026?
