Australian lawyer apologises for AI-generated errors in murder case
MELBOURNE: A senior lawyer in Australia has apologised to a judge for filing submissions in a murder case that included fake quotes and nonexistent case judgments generated by artificial intelligence.
The blunder in the Supreme Court of Victoria state is another in a litany of mishaps AI has caused in justice systems around the world.
Defence lawyer Rishi Nathwani, who holds the prestigious legal title of King's Counsel, took "full responsibility' for filing incorrect information in submissions in the case of a teenager charged with murder, according to court documents seen by The Associated Press on Friday.
"We are deeply sorry and embarrassed for what occurred,' Nathwani told Justice James Elliott on Wednesday, on behalf of the defence team.
The AI-generated errors caused a 24-hour delay in resolving a case that Elliott had hoped to conclude on Wednesday (Aug 13). Elliott ruled on Thursday that Nathwani's client, who cannot be identified because he is a minor, was not guilty of murder because of mental impairment.
"At the risk of understatement, the manner in which these events have unfolded is unsatisfactory,' Elliott told lawyers on Thursday.
"The ability of the court to rely upon the accuracy of submissions made by counsel is fundamental to the due administration of justice,' Elliott added.
The fake submissions included fabricated quotes from a speech to the state legislature and nonexistent case citations purportedly from the Supreme Court.
The errors were discovered by Elliott's associates, who couldn't find the cases and requested that defence lawyers provide copies.
The lawyers admitted the citations "do not exist' and that the submission contained "fictitious quotes,' court documents say.
The lawyers explained they checked that the initial citations were accurate and wrongly assumed the others would also be correct.
The submissions were also sent to prosecutor Daniel Porceddu, who didn't check their accuracy.
The judge noted that the Supreme Court released guidelines last year for how lawyers use AI.
"It is not acceptable for artificial intelligence to be used unless the product of that use is independently and thoroughly verified,' Elliott said.
The court documents do not identify the generative artificial intelligence system used by the lawyers.
In a comparable case in the United States in 2023, a federal judge imposed US$5,000 (RM21,117) fines on two lawyers and a law firm after ChatGPT was blamed for their submission of fictitious legal research in an aviation injury claim.
Judge P. Kevin Castel said they acted in bad faith. But he credited their apologies and remedial steps taken in explaining why harsher sanctions were not necessary to ensure they or others won't again let artificial intelligence tools prompt them to produce fake legal history in their arguments.
Later that year, more fictitious court rulings invented by AI were cited in legal papers filed by lawyers for Michael Cohen, a former personal lawyer for U.S. President Donald Trump. Cohen took the blame, saying he didn't realise that the Google tool he was using for legal research was also capable of so-called AI hallucinations.
British High Court Justice Victoria Sharp warned in June that providing false material as if it were genuine could be considered contempt of court or, in the "most egregious cases,' perverting the course of justice, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. – AP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
17 hours ago
- The Sun
Brazil Supreme Court shields citizens from foreign legal decisions
SAO PAULO: Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Flavio Dino ruled on Monday that Brazilian citizens cannot automatically be subject to foreign laws or decisions within the country's territory, a move that quickly prompted blowback from the United States. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT The ruling responds to a request from Brazilian mining lobby Ibram related to Brazilian cities initiating lawsuits abroad over compensation claims for mining accidents, such as the dam collapses in Mariana in 2015 and Brumadinho in 2019. The decision could have broader impacts, too. It comes after the U.S. imposed sanctions against Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who oversees the trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro. The U.S. accused the judge of authorizing arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppressing freedom of expression. CONTEXT Bolsonaro, an ally of U.S. President Donald Trump, is on trial for allegedly plotting to overturn the 2022 election. Trump's administration imposed levies on imports from Brazil largely in response to the prosecution of Bolsonaro that he has called a 'witch hunt.' KEY QUOTE Justice Dino 'suspended the effectiveness of judicial decisions, laws, decrees, and executive orders of foreign states in our country that have not been incorporated or obtained the assent of the sovereign bodies under Brazil's Constitution and laws,' the court said in a statement. 'The decision applies to this specific case, which involves compensation claims related to the environmental accidents in Mariana and Brumadinho, Minas Gerais, but the judge's arguments apply to all similar cases,' it added. WHAT'S NEXT The ruling may prompt further legal and diplomatic discussions regarding Brazil's dispute with the U.S. over tariffs. The U.S. State Department's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs said later in the day on social media that 'no foreign court can invalidate United States sanctions — or spare anyone from the steep consequences of violating them.' It also said U.S. citizens are prohibited from transacting with Moraes, and citizens elsewhere should 'tread carefully.' - Reuters
The Star
18 hours ago
- The Star
Singer Sean Kingston sentenced to 3.5 years for RM4.2mil fraud scheme
In March, Sean Kingston, whose real name is Kisean Anderson, and his mother, Janice Turner, were each convicted by a federal jury on four counts of wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Photo: AP Months after being convicted of a high-end fraud scheme in South Florida, Grammy-winning singer Sean Kingston was sentenced on Friday to three-and-a-half years in prison and three years of supervised release. Kingston had asked if he could self-surrender at a later date due to health issues, but Florida Judge David Leibowitz ordered the 35-year-old Beautiful Girls crooner to be taken into custody and begin serving his sentence immediately. In March, Kingston, whose real name is Kisean Anderson, and his mother, Janice Turner, were each convicted by a federal jury on four counts of wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Authorities charged them with spearheading an organized scheme to defraud multiple luxury companies out of high-end goods. 'The defendants unjustly enriched themselves by falsely representing that they had executed bank wire or other monetary payment transfers … [then] retained or attempted to retain the vehicles, jewelry and other goods despite non-payment,' federal prosecutors said at the time. 'Through the execution of this scheme, the defendants obtained in excess of US$1mil in property.' Turner was arrested during a SWAT raid on her son's Florida home in May 2024. Hours later, Kingston was taken into custody in California. Late last month, Turner received a five-year prison sentence with three years of probation. After her time is served, she'll face deportation back to her native Jamaica. At Friday's hearing, before handing down his sentence, Leibowitz told Kingston he considered his mother's crimes to be more egregious. Turner had admitted to sending fake bank wires and other falsified documents, but claimed she did so to protect her son from being taken advantage of by scammers and give herself time to look into the people they did business with. She said she had always intended to pay back their debts. Kingston on Friday expressed remorse to the court for his part in the crimes. 'I apologise, I apologise, I've learned from my actions,' he said. 'All I'm asking for is to accept my apology to the court.' Assistant U.S. Attorney Marc Anton called the former chart-topper 'a thief through and through.' A restitution hearing was scheduled for October, according to NBC Miami. – New York Daily News/Tribune News Service
New Straits Times
21 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Brazil's top court: US laws hold no sway here
BRASÍLIA: Brazil's Supreme Court ruled on Monday that foreign legislation did not have jurisdiction in its country, after the United States used a law to sanction a judge on the court. Washington used the Magnitsky Act, a US law which provides for sanctions against individuals accused of human rights violations around the globe, to impose restrictions on Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is presiding over the trial of former president Jair Bolsonaro's alleged coup plot. Moraes is also the judge which banned the social network X, formerly Twitter, in Brazil last year. "Judge Flavio Dino, of the Federal Supreme Court, suspended the effectiveness of judicial decisions, laws, decrees, and executive orders of foreign nations in our country," Brazil's high court said in a statement. According to the Constitution of Brazil, foreign court decisions "can only be enforced in Brazil upon approval or in compliance with international judicial cooperation mechanisms," the court said. Dino said this same principle applied to recent decisions from UK court rulings made against the Brazilian Mining Association (Ibram) for the Mariana and Brumadinho dam disasters. Although the ruling did not explicitly mention the Magnitsky Act, a Brazilian court source told AFP that the ruling "in theory" invalidates the law in Brazil – though Washington has already contested this interpretation. "No foreign court can invalidate United States sanctions – or spare anyone from the steep consequences of violating them," the US government's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs said in a statement on X after the ruling. "Alexandre de Moraes is toxic to all legitimate businesses and individuals seeking access to the US and its markets," it continued. "US persons are prohibited from transacting with him and non-US persons must tread carefully: those providing material support to human rights abusers face sanctions risk themselves." The United States at the end of July had blocked all of Moraes' assets in the country as a result of his work on the Bolsonaro trial. The case against the former Brazilian president, an ally of US President Donald Trump, has sparked a diplomatic and trade spat between Brasilia and Washington. The verdict for the trial is expected to be announced by the court between Sept 2 and 12.--AFP
