
Singapore cabinet sworn in as PM Lawrence Wong vows to steer country through new world order
Singapore's Prime Minister Lawrence Wong pledged to chart a course through a world order he described as turbulent and uncertain, while promising a more consultative style of governance as his new cabinet was sworn in on Friday night.
Addressing 600 guests who gathered at the Istana lawn for the ceremony, Wong said that amid a turbulent world, 'Singaporeans voted for a strong and stable government while re-electing opposition MPs in the constituencies they held'.
He described the result of the May 3 election as a 'clear mandate', with his People's Action Party (PAP) returning to power with a 'strengthened majority' from the last election.
'This outcome reflects the collective desire of Singaporeans in these uncertain times – you understood what was at stake, our vulnerability and our future. You chose leaders you could trust, a government you could rely on and a steady course for our nation's next phase of development,' he said.
This will serve as a 'clear advantage' for the country when conducting foreign policy,' he added.
Earlier this week, Wong announced his new cabinet line-up, with key changes including former education minister Chan Chun Sing filling the defence spot, and two newly elected faces, former senior civil servant Jeffrey Siow and ex-chief of army David Neo, becoming acting ministers for transport and culture, respectively.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
New South Korea leader faces tightrope act between US alliance, stronger China ties
Hours after Lee Jae-myung was sworn in as the president of South Korea early on Wednesday, Chinese President Xi Jinping extended a congratulatory message, emphasising that China placed 'great importance' on strengthening ties with its neighbour amid an increasingly uncertain global landscape. Advertisement During his campaign, Lee pledged to repair strained ties with China and North Korea and underscored China's role as a vital trading partner. Analysts predicted more stable China-South Korea relations to come, saying Lee's foreign policy would be marked by 'pragmatism', flexibility and economic urgency – a departure from former president Yoon Suk-yeol, who steered the country to align more with the United States. However, diplomatic observers also cautioned that any improvement might be constrained by South Korea's delicate position within two 'triangles': the China-South Korea-Japan dynamic and the South Korea-Japan-US alliance. They said his ambition to maintain a balanced approach between Beijing and Washington would still be tested. Advertisement Da Zhigang, researcher at the Institute of Northeast Asian Studies at the Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Social Sciences, said Lee was likely to seek a more 'balanced and flexible' approach to China that pursued South Korean domestic interests, compared with Yoon's more ideological and nationalistic approach.


South China Morning Post
7 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
South Korea's new leader faces tightrope act between US alliance and stronger China ties
Hours after Lee Jae-myung was sworn in as the president of South Korea early on Wednesday, Chinese President Xi Jinping extended a congratulatory message, emphasising that China placed 'great importance' on strengthening ties with its neighbour amid an increasingly uncertain global landscape. During his campaign, Lee pledged to repair strained ties with China and North Korea and underscored China's role as a vital trading partner. Analysts predicted more stable China-South Korea relations to come, saying Lee's foreign policy would be marked by 'pragmatism', flexibility and economic urgency – a departure from former president Yoon Suk-yeol, who steered the country to align more with the United States. However, diplomatic observers also cautioned that any improvement might be constrained by South Korea's delicate position within two 'triangles': the China-South Korea-Japan dynamic and the South Korea-Japan-US alliance. They said his ambition to maintain a balanced approach between Beijing and Washington would still be tested. Da Zhigang, researcher at the Institute of Northeast Asian Studies at the Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Social Sciences, said Lee was likely to seek a more 'balanced and flexible' approach to China that pursued South Korean domestic interests, compared with Yoon's more ideological and nationalistic approach. Yoon joined initiatives such as the Chip 4 Alliance – a coalition of the US, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan aimed at reducing dependence on mainland China for semiconductor supply chains.


South China Morning Post
9 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
‘Strategic clarity' over Taiwan is just so much American bombast
People often make a situation worse because they are unhappy with the status quo. The United States is doing exactly that over Taiwan. In doing so, it is, as PLA Major General Hu Gangfeng said, destabilising the whole region. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth made headline news at the Shangri-La Dialogue for regional security in Singapore last week by warning of 'devastating consequences' if China tried to 'conquer' Taiwan. He said America stood shoulder to shoulder with its allies and partners in the region, and that no one should doubt its commitment. Really? But as a caveat, he said countries in Southeast Asia needed to boost defence spending, possibly to 5 per cent of GDP. That immediately invited ridicule from some conference participants. Mohd Faiz Abdullah, chairman of the Institute of Strategic and International Studies in Malaysia and a senior adviser to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, called it 'mind-boggling' and 'nonsensical' to expect countries in the region to drum up 5 per cent of their GDP in military acquisitions, presumably from US arms manufacturers. It would make more sense, he suggested, for Washington to dispense with its highly destructive tariffs and deepen economic engagement with the region instead. Indeed! In one breath, Hegseth said the US would support them against Chinese aggression while asking them to ramp up military spending and contribute to the fight. But Asean is not Nato. Most of its member states are not even American military allies. The Philippines is an exception. Asean wants to engage with China, not fight it, especially over Taiwan. The island is not to East Asia what Ukraine is to the European Union or Nato. It's not even their fight.